AWB0202071 Impact of Adding Bolts to Inner Leg Data extracted from HM Fan’s ANSYS Model of Composite Modular, TF and PF Coils Impact of Added Bolts assessed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Advertisements

Summary of Twisted Racetrack / Clamp Analysis K. D. Freudenberg.
Deviations from fiducial locations are unacceptable in areas despite high accuracy at alignment points.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Home Work #3 Due Date: 11 Mar, 2010 (Turn in your assignment at the mail box of S581 outside the ME general office) The solutions must be written on single-side.
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
THE WASHINGTON MONUMENT (1884) The purpose of this study is to show how this structure supports its own weight and wind load, by calculating its efficiency.
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads Friction Tests Collar Shear Tests NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03 Michael Kalish.
Target Update – Mico Meeting Monday 21 st April 2008 General Expect to obtain new coils for stators anytime New Shafts at RAL for metrology. Will be back.
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads
Bolted joint failure modes
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Further optimization of the solenoid design A.Efremov, E.Koshurnikov, Yu.Lobanov, A.Makarov, A.Vodopianov GSI, Darmstadt,
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
NSTX CSU Preliminary Assessment of PFCs Art Brooks December 8,
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review OVERVIEW C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
KDEMO Structural Analysis P. Titus June ! KDEMO coil axisymmetric analysis pfcb 21 1, 1.52,0.70,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS1 2, 1.52,2.10,.9,1.3,8,10 !CS2.
ARIES AT Project Meeting - Princeton, NJ 18 Sept 00 1 ARIES-AT Toroidal Field (TF) and Poloidal Field (PF) Coils Tom Brown, Fred Dahlgren, Phil Heitzenroeder.
NSTXU-CALC TF Flex Joint and TF Bundle Stub
1 WBS 1 Design Analysis Status NCSX Analysis Meeting Dec 3, 2003.
Pre-Lehman Review Briefing Reiersen December 18, 2006.
Screws, Fasteners, and the Design of Nonpermanent Joints
Modular Coil Assembly Bolted Joint PDR 2/22/07. Objectives The review objectives include... Define the location of additional inboard bolts Finalize the.
Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus October Aluminum Block Analyses.
Problem-1: A rigid coupling has a bore diameter of 50 mm. Four machined bolts on a bolt circle of 125 mm diameter and fitted in reamed holes. If the bolts.
BOLT IN FRICTION (left) The bolt preload provides a resistance to lateral movements of the flanges, by combining with friction. The max lateral force R.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
Summary of first round of testing of shim concept for modular coil assembly
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
NCSX Modular Coil Joint Load/Stress Calculation By Leonard Myatt Myatt Consulting, Inc.
May 19-20, 2004NCSX FDRLeonard Myatt 1 Linear Structural Analysis of the NCSX Modular Coil & Shell Leonard Myatt NCSX Final Design Review May 19-20, 2004.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus January 27, 2010 Umbrella Leg Sliding Blocks TF OOP Support to the Vessel Seismic (Static.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Cooldown and Modular Coil EM Loads Part 2 – Results of Clamp Assembly, Wing Bags, Poloidal.
Results of Linear Stress Analyses for Modular Coils and Coil structure For 2T High Beta Currents at 0 Seconds and Initial Coil Shrinkage of in/in.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Purpose and Goals of the NCSX Conference Call on Modular Coil Analyses February 25, 2004 ??
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Peer Review NSTX TF Hub Assembly Friction Coating C Neumeyer 10/27/04 Requirements Testing Calculation Update Implementation.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus April 14, 2010 PF4/5 Terminal Stress Existing PF4/5 Support Weld Algorythm Moment Influence.
Interpretation of MC Interface Analysis Results Wayne Reiersen April 11, 2007.
Shear Test Assembly update
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
Twisted Racetrack Analysis Update
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review SUMMARY C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
Update: TF Outer Ring and Clevis Design TF Outer Ring – Implemented recommendations from P. Rogoff. Modified Bolted Joint. Modified weldment to reduce.
BoltJoin ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011. NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts.
AWB Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
NCSX Friction Coating Peer Review March 16, 2007 NCSX.
The Design: Totally bolted, electrically isolated 6 top and 6 bottom inboard flange holes, with tapped holes in one flange and a thru holes in mating flange.
AWB NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review April 10, 2003 Art Brooks.
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Conductor FDR 5/17/05 1 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Conductor.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Cost and Schedule Rebaseline April 25, 2005 NCSX Project Re-baseline Review April 25, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
SEPT 20, 2006 T. Brown, M. Cole, P. Fogarty, P. Goranson, K. Freudenberg, D. Williamson NCSX STAGE 2 COIL TO COIL ASSY.
Pins in Holes Shear Panels Rev 0 Stress Analysis By Leonard Myatt & ORNL Myatt Consulting, Inc.
MC inner leg bolts.ppt1 MC Inner Leg Bolts ProE model: stb_added_mc_holes.asm 1/31/07.
NCSX Modular Coil Joint Load/Stress Calculation By Leonard Myatt Myatt Consulting, Inc.
PEER Review of Coil Tolerances and Trim Coil Requirements plus Magnetic Material in Test Cell April 19, 2004 Art Brooks.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review OVERVIEW C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
WS2B-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. April 30, 2009 Inventory # Workshop 2B Assembly Contact Workbench-Mechanical.
Presentation transcript:

AWB Impact of Adding Bolts to Inner Leg Data extracted from HM Fan’s ANSYS Model of Composite Modular, TF and PF Coils Impact of Added Bolts assessed by Post Processing, not direct Modeling

AWB A B A C B C 0 of 7 bolts added at A – A joint 3 of 7 bolts added at B – A joint 3 of 3 bolts added at B – C joint A Per Tom Brown’s Study 3/17/06

bolts to inner leg3 A B C 0 of 7 bolts added at A – A joint 3 of 7 bolts added at B – A joint 3 of 3 bolts added at B – C joint A No problem with the 3 bolts as shown. These 3 bolts are in the clear, located on one side of the CL. If you need one for positioning, put one here. Per Tom Brown’s Study Updated 1/31/07

AWB Friction Enhancement Helps in Regions in Compression (Blue) Note: Above does not include effect of preload from added bolts CC2BC2AB2AAABBCCC

AWB All Results for 2T High Beta Scenario

AWB Shear Loads Components at IL of MCWF Flanges Max Shear Top/Bot is 590 KN (133 Klbs)

AWB Compression Over Inboard Region

AWB Adding Bolts to Inner Leg Reduces Required Coefficient of Friction to 0.45 Based on Bolt Preload of lb at 80K Need to Update for Minimum Expected Preload

AWB Again, All Results for 2T High Beta Scenario

AWB

AWB Maximum Coefficient of Friction Required Outboard is under 0.25 Based on Bolt Preload of lb at 80K

AWB Conclusions – Based on Bolt Averages over Regions – No Peaking Assumed If the coefficient of friction in the inboard region can be verifiably enhanced (ie with diamond grit) to 0.6 we should be OK and maintain the 0.15 margin the NCSX Design Requirements dictate. –At mu = 0.50, margin drops to 0.05 (ie 90% of Limit) If we can provide a coefficient of friction of 0.4 in the outboard region, we should again be OK and again maintain the 0.15 margin the NCSX Design Requirements dictate. If we can only provide a coefficient of friction of 0.3 in the outboard region, our margin is less but still positive, with the bolt shear capability providing some additional margin of safety (our belts and suspenders). –How do we fold this into criteria? Need to Understand Peaking due to gaps in bolting pattern

AWB Shim Identifications cc2t cc2b cct cc2int ccb ccint bc2tl bc2tru bc2trl bc2bru bc2int bc2brl bc2bl bcint bctl bctru bctrl bcbrl bcbl aaint aatl aabl aatr aabr ab2int ab2tl ab2tru ab2trl ab2br ab2bl abint abtl abtr abbru abbrl abbl -60 deg +60 deg 0 deg cc2inb bc2inb ab2inbaainb ccinb bcinb abinb