Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011 -- Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/2012 5 Year Crashes Carver.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speed Limits 25 Speed Limits 35 Speed Limits 50 Speed Limits 55 Speed Limits 65.
Advertisements

All Roads Transportation Safety Roadway Departure Crash (Formerly Jurisdictionally Blind Safety)
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
Maryland Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Education Program Maryland Highway Safety Office City of Rockville Toole Design Group, LLC Rockville, MD April 11,
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
Project Development – High Priority Segments 1/24/2011 Rumble StripE Lane Width? Rumble Strip 2 ft. shoulder paving* (up to 6 miles/year**) + rumble stripE.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.
City of Evansville and Vanderburgh County Intersection Crash Analysis.
1 High risk intersections - making sense of safe systems in practice Tim Hughes – National safety engineer.
Pedal Cyclist Accidents in Leeds Dave Sherborne Road Casualty Manager Leeds City Council July 2007.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
Project Development – High Priority Segments -- ATP 2 10/29/2012 Road Surface? Paved Gravel Segment received Stars for Lane Departure Crash Density & Critical.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
By Tanya Bankston.  Current Version of the manual was prepared by Neel-Schaffer in 2002  The Traffic Signal Manual is currently being updated by DOTD.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
MICHIGAN’s INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING HIGHWAY FATALITIES.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
Peachtree Road Transformation Project: Operations and Safety Analysis P.I Fulton County August 25, 2015 Buckhead CID 1.
ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Traffic Signs Part Two. What do these 2 signs tell you?
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
Do Now Questions 1. When parking downhill on a street with a curb, the vehicles wheels should be? 2. The most common type of parking on city streets and.
Test Site Spirio Rd Left Turn #1 Scored Right Turn #1 Scored Right Turn #2 Scored Right Turn #3 at Stop Light, Scored.
1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
us 30 and SR 603 – Ashland county September 7, PUBLIC meeting
S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan S.R. 44 Corridor Management Plan
District 6 – Safety Applications
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Crash Analysis
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
CTDOT Traffic Safety Engineering
What factors lead to older drivers’ crashes?
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
Current and Upcoming Features
State Road 72 Safety Improvements
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Please listen closely because there is a quiz at the end
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Design Standards.
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver 4, Year Crashes Carver 4, State System 2,555 – 53% 43 – 43% State System 2,555 – 53% 43 – 43% CSAH/CR 1,448 – 30% 47 – 46% CSAH/CR 1,448 – 30% 47 – 46% Rural 693– 48% 32 – 68% Rural 693– 48% 32 – 68% Urban 755 – 52% 15– 32% Urban 755 – 52% 15– 32% All Way Stop 22 – 5% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 22 – 5% 0 – 0% Run off Road 235 – 70% 20 – 83% Run off Road 235 – 70% 20 – 83% On Curve 133 – 39% 12 – 60% On Curve 133 – 39% 12 – 60% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 52 (33%), 2 (40%) Left Turn – 13 (8%), 2 (40%) “Other” – 84 (53%), 1 (20%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (6%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 52 (33%), 2 (40%) Left Turn – 13 (8%), 2 (40%) “Other” – 84 (53%), 1 (20%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (6%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 159 – 36% 5 – 83% Thru-Stop 159 – 36% 5 – 83% Rear End – 61 (38%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 35 (22%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 26 (16%), 0 (0%) Head On/SS Opp – 18 (11%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 61 (38%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 35 (22%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 26 (16%), 0 (0%) Head On/SS Opp – 18 (11%), 0 (0%) Signalized 161 – 37% 0 – 0% Signalized 161 – 37% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 181 –32% 5 – 17% Inters-Related 181 –32% 5 – 17% City, Twnshp, Other 852 – 17% 11 – 11% City, Twnshp, Other 852 – 17% 11 – 11% Inters-Related 441 – 59% 6 – 50% Inters-Related 441 – 59% 6 – 50% Not Inters-Related 227 – 23% 5 – 42% Not Inters-Related 227 – 23% 5 – 42% Run Off Road – 78 (34%), 4 (80%) Head On/SS Opp – 26 (11%), 1 (20%) Rear End – 57 (25%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 78 (34%), 4 (80%) Head On/SS Opp – 26 (11%), 1 (20%) Rear End – 57 (25%), 0 (0%) Animal 137 – 20% 2 – 6% Animal 137 – 20% 2 – 6% Not Inters-Related 338 – 61% 24 – 80% Not Inters-Related 338 – 61% 24 – 80% Head On, SS Opp 23 – 7% 2 – 8% Head On, SS Opp 23 – 7% 2 – 8% On Curve 8 – 35% 1 – 4% On Curve 8 – 35% 1 – 4% Unknown/Other 74 – 10% 1 – 8% Unknown/Other 74 – 10% 1 – 8% Unknown/Other 37 – 7% 1 – 3% Unknown/Other 37 – 7% 1 – 3% Other/Unknown 99 – 22% 1 – 17% Other/Unknown 99 – 22% 1 – 17% Right Angle – 28 (25%), 2 (100%) Run Off Road – 14 (13%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 28 (25%), 2 (100%) Run Off Road – 14 (13%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 111 – 61% 2 – 40% Thru-Stop 111 – 61% 2 – 40% Right Angle – 3 (5%), 2 (67%) Head On – 4 (7%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 3 (5%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 3 (5%), 2 (67%) Head On – 4 (7%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 3 (5%), 0 (0%) Other/Unknown 60 – 33% 3 – 60% Other/Unknown 60 – 33% 3 – 60% Not Animal 556 – 80% 30 – 94% Not Animal 556 – 80% 30 – 94% All Way Stop 2 – 1% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 2 – 1% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 4% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 4% 0 – 0% Ped/Bike 13 – 2% 3 – 20% Ped/Bike 13 – 2% 3 – 20% Non Ped/Bike 742 – 98% 12 – 80% Non Ped/Bike 742 – 98% 12 – 80% Ped 6 – 46% 2 – 67% Ped 6 – 46% 2 – 67% Bike 7 – 54% 1 – 33% Bike 7 – 54% 1 – 33% Int 5 – 38% 2 – 67% Int 5 – 38% 2 – 67% Signal 1 – 8% 1 – 33% Signal 1 – 8% 1 – 33% Int 4 – 31% 0 – 0% Int 4 – 31% 0 – 0% Signal 0 – 0% Signal 0 – 0%

Carver County Roadways/TH Crash Data Comparison Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). Rural CSAH/CR Rural CSAH/CR Run off Road 235 – 70% 20 – 83% Run off Road 235 – 70% 20 – 83% On Curve 133 – 39% 12 – 50% On Curve 133 – 39% 12 – 50% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Inters-Related 181 –32% 5 – 17% Inters-Related 181 –32% 5 – 17% Animal 137 – 20% 2 – 6% Animal 137 – 20% 2 – 6% Not Inters-Related 338 – 61% 24 – 80% Not Inters-Related 338 – 61% 24 – 80% Head On, SS Opp 23 – 7% 2 – 8% Head On, SS Opp 23 – 7% 2 – 8% On Curve 8 – 35% 1 – 4% On Curve 8 – 35% 1 – 4% Unknown/Other 37 – 7% 1 – 3% Unknown/Other 37 – 7% 1 – 3% Right Angle – 28 (25%), 2 (100%) Run Off Road – 14 (13%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 28 (25%), 2 (100%) Run Off Road – 14 (13%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 111 – 61% 2 – 40% Thru-Stop 111 – 61% 2 – 40% Right Angle – 3 (5%), 2 (67%) Head On – 4 (7%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 3 (5%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 3 (5%), 2 (67%) Head On – 4 (7%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 3 (5%), 0 (0%) Other/Unknown 60 – 33% 3 – 60% Other/Unknown 60 – 33% 3 – 60% Not Animal 556 – 80% 30 – 94% Not Animal 556 – 80% 30 – 94% All Way Stop 2 – 1% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 2 – 1% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 4% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 4% 0 – 0% Rural MNTH 2-Lane Rural MNTH 2-Lane Run off Road 122 – 56% 3 – 33% Run off Road 122 – 56% 3 – 33% On Curve 18 – 8% 1 – 11% On Curve 18 – 8% 1 – 11% Inters-Related 145 –40% 8 – 47% Inters-Related 145 –40% 8 – 47% Animal 92 – 20% 0 – 0% Animal 92 – 20% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 216 – 60% 9 – 53% Not Inters-Related 216 – 60% 9 – 53% Head On, SS Opp 30 – 14% 5 – 56% Head On, SS Opp 30 – 14% 5 – 56% On Curve 6 – 3% 2 – 22% On Curve 6 – 3% 2 – 22% Unknown/Other 2 – 1% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 2 – 1% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 34 (44%), 2 (33%) Run Off Road – 11 (14%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 34 (44%), 2 (33%) Run Off Road – 11 (14%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 78 – 54% 6 – 75% Thru-Stop 78 – 54% 6 – 75% Left Turn – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Head On – 2 (4%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (2%), 0 (0%) Left Turn – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Head On – 2 (4%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (2%), 0 (0%) Other/Unknown 50 – 34% 2 – 25% Other/Unknown 50 – 34% 2 – 25% Not Animal 363 – 80% 17 – 100% Not Animal 363 – 80% 17 – 100% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 14 – 10% 0 – 0% Signalized 14 – 10% 0 – 0%

Animal, ACCTYPE=08,09 Rear End, DIAG=01 Left Turn, DIAG=03 Right Angle, DIAG=05 Run off Road, DIAG=04, 07 (Road departure) Head On, SS Opp, DIAG=08, 09 (Lane departure) Curve-Related, ROAD CHAR=05-08 State, SYS=01, 02, 03 CSAH/CR, SYS=04, 07 City, Twnshp, Other, SYS=NOT 01-03, 04 or 07 Urban, City coded Rural, City not coded (0000) Intersection-Related, JUNC=2-7, Not Intersection-Related, JUNC=1, 8-11 Other/Unknown, JUNC=90, 98, 99, 00 Signalized, TCD=01 All-Way Stop, TCD=02, 03 Thru-Stop/Yield, TCD=04, 05 Other/Unknown, TCD=>06 and 00 Code Guide 4/11/2012