Relationship between Frontal Stiffness and Occupant Compartment Intrusion in Frontal Crash Tests James Saunders NHTSA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sport Utility Vehicles And Auto Insurance Costs 1998 Ford Expedition Session MIS-33.
Advertisements

Discrete Choice Models of the Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles Thomas Adler & Mark Fowler, Resource Systems Group, Inc. Aniss Bahreinian, California.
Performance as Test Procedures of the PDB and ODB Tests for the Light and Heavy Cars 5th Meeting of the Informal Group on Frontal Impact 1 May 25, 2009.
MOCT / KOTSA(KATRI) New Car Assessment Program in Korea July
BPS - 5th Ed. Chapter 241 One-Way Analysis of Variance: Comparing Several Means.
CHAPTER 25: One-Way Analysis of Variance: Comparing Several Means ESSENTIAL STATISTICS Second Edition David S. Moore, William I. Notz, and Michael A. Fligner.
Defining acute aortic syndrome following trauma: are abbreviated injury scale (AIS) codes a useful surrogate descriptor? Field ML, Bashir M, Sastry P,
Three Point Seat Belts on Coaches - The First Decade in Australia Michael Griffiths Road Safety Solutions Sydney Michael Paine Renae Moore.
Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Effects on Florida Freeways and Multilane Highways using an Advanced Vehicle Performance Modeling Approach by Seckin Ozkul Analysis.
ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION FOR BODY SUBASSEMBLIES AND MODEL VARIANTS.
Introduction: SEI Background and Rollover Injuries Safety Engineering International (SEI) – Designers of HALO™: Mr. Friedman and Mr. Grzebieta have been.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRASH SEVERITY AND INCOMPATIBILITY IN FRONTAL CRASHES A CIREN CENTER THE WILLIAM LEHMAN INJURY RESEARCH CENTER Jeffrey S. Augenstein,
DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS
Do Now for 5/21/13 Take out E83 #6 and get ready to hand in Study for quiz HW: Anything not completed in class. E84 will be checked tomorrow.
Race, Hispanic Origin, and Socioeconomic Status: Motor Vehicle Occupant Death Rates and Risk Factors Among Adults Elisa R. Braver, Ph.D.
The National Crash Analysis Center The George Washington University Un-Constrained Models Comparison For Elastic Roof – Production Roof – Strong Pillars.
Module 36: Correlation Pitfalls Effect Size and Correlations Larger sample sizes require a smaller correlation coefficient to reach statistical significance.
Advanced Air Bag System (AABS). Nissan advanced systems Dual-stage inflation Seat belt sensors Occupant classification system.
A comparison of two cars I would like to own: a 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee and a 2011 Chevy Cruze. Presented By: Marli Glasgow PROJECT 15- CAR PURCHASE.
The effects of interstate speed limits on driving speeds: Some new evidence Fred Mannering.
Statistics Are Fun! Analysis of Variance
2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP
Vehicle Occupant Presence and Position Sensing System United States Patent Number: Inventor: Peter Norton of Farmington, MI.
The Influence of Weight Average model weight of light-duty gas vehicles and trucks Freight-ton miles per heavy-duty diesel truck.
Analysis of Real-World Data Static Stability Factor and the Risk of Rollover April 11, 2001.
Meeting the Safety Challenge Jeffrey W. Runge, M.D. Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Automotive News World Congress January.
Challenge: Are some types of cars more dangerous than other types?
Results H1 was supported. Paired samples t-tests revealed statistically significant (p
Forty-second session of GRSP December REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments Proposal submitted by France Informal.
Chapter 5 Controlling your vehicle
1 Feasibility of Reducing Death and Injuries in Small Overlap/Oblique Crashes NHTSA and Honda R&D Meeting 11/16/2009.
The Sports Utility Vehicle Anthony Connor. A little about myself.
1 Model Selection Response: Highway MPG Explanatory: 13 explanatory variables Indicator variables for types of car – Sports Car, SUV, Wagon, Minivan There.
Lesson 2. ANOVA Analysis of Variance One Way ANOVA One variable is measured for many different treatments (population)_ Null Hypothesis: all population.
Sport Utility Vehicles And Auto Insurance Costs 2001 Lincoln Navigator Session PL-30.
RESULTS Latin NCAP GRSP – December, 2011 Geneva Phase II Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, 6–9 December 2011, agenda item 14)
SUVs and Automobile Insurance Costs SUV Drivers Have Different Underlying Liability Loss Costs Michael C. Dubin, FCAS, MAAA, MCA 1999 CAS Seminar on Ratemaking.
How does NHTSA perform the frontal crash rating and how are vehicles rated? Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour (mph), which.
Stop Speeding Before It Stops You!. FACES4 Families Against Chronic Excessive Speed 4 Every fatality on our roadways due to aggressive speed has a face.
The Standard International Energy Product Classification (SIEC) and its relationship with the Central Product Classification (CPC)
Netherlands’ presentation for Informal Group on Frontal Impact of GRSP 6 Oct UNECE Reg.94 - Past, Present & Future Presentation by the expert from.
JP Research Summary: JASIC Flex Injury Estimate GTR09 PH2 Informal Working Group 17 Sept GTR
Discussion of Impaired Riding: Past Research and Implications for the Future Scott McKnight Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation SMSA, Thursday,
Strategic Growth Programme (SGP) Centre for Environment and Development for the Arab Region & Europe (CEDARE)
Using State Data to Assess the Influence of Child Safety Campaigns Challenges Faced When Analyzing State Data Marc Starnes National Center for Statistics.
Car Occupant Injuries Caused By Loading From Luggage 35th GRSP, May , 2004 Slide Nr. 1 Eberhard Faerber, BASt, Germany CCIS(UK) & GIDAS(D) Accident.
Structural Unemployment in Croatia How Important is the Occupational Mismatch? Background  In order to completely utilize the stock of human capital in.
SAFETY & VEHICLE DESIGN Copyright © 2016 STC, UK.
The U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)
24th annual EALE Conference, Bonn – Germany, September 20-22, 2012
Michael L. Nance, MD, Michael J. Kallan, MS and John H. Holmes, PhD.
FIMCAR Global Strategy
Vehicle Crash Testing Adam Hedges.
New Vehicle Construction
Basic Practice of Statistics - 5th Edition
Naming Hurricanes_Atlantic Basin
Using State Data to Assess Vehicle Performance
HALO™ Rollover Occupant Protection System Development to Application
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking
HALO™ Rollover Occupant Protection System Development to Application
AUTOMOBILE PARTS.
Inferences on Two Samples Summary
Harmonization of Crash Regulations in Korea
 Trends in incidence rates of reported work related injuries and illnesses in jobs with and without exposure, for two exposure categories (hours/week and.
A.M. CLARKE-CORNWELL1, P.A. COOK1 and M.H.GRANAT1
Sampling.
Work progress regarding Self-Protection
How does NHTSA perform the frontal crash rating and how are vehicles rated? Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour (mph), which.
Real World Side Impacts Involving Rear Pediatric Occupants
Expected life-saving effect of introducing the GTR Head Protection Regulation in Japan (only GR INF PS161: applies to Bonnet/Wing) Ministry of Land, Infrastructure.
Presentation transcript:

Relationship between Frontal Stiffness and Occupant Compartment Intrusion in Frontal Crash Tests James Saunders NHTSA

Outline Background Methodology Vehicle classification Results Future research Conclusions

US Rating Systems NCAP IIHS NCAP IIHS

Background  Nolan and Lund (2001) –Improved performance in IIHS Offset did not affect vehicle stiffness  Verma et al. (2003) –Fixed barriers lead to higher front forces  Saunders et al. (2005) –V-to-V tests had higher partner injuries for redesigned vehicles with improved IIHS offset

Methodology Matched NCAP and IIHS vehicles –Model years 1995 to 2006 Calculated stiffness from frontal NCAP tests –Kw400, KwFinal and KwTotal from barrier force and vehicle accelerometers Maximum toepan intrusion from IIHS Examine relationship between test results –Aggregate by vehicle type and weight ranges

Stiffness Calculations

Vehicle Classifications

Results No overall relationship between Kw400 and toepan intrusion –Pickups were only category with a significant trend Trends were different for compact and full size KwTotal had similar results KwFinal had no relationship to toepan intrusion

Kw400 for Passenger Cars

Kw400 for Sport Utility Vehicles

Kw400 for Different Weight PUs

Statistical Hypothesis Testing Pickups had a different relationship between Kw400 and toepan intrusion

Discussion Eight vehicle categories were used to compare stiffness and compartment intrusion –Only pickups had any trend Different relationship for SUVs and pickups –Many pickups and SUVs are built on the same platform –Vehicle selection and limited sample size may have affected results Mix of body integral and body on frame vehicles

Future Research Examine whether R94 Barrier provides a good measure for heavy pickup and SUV intrusion –Designed for smaller vehicles –Bottoms out during offset tests Compare offset performance using progressive deformable barrier

Dodge Stratus Barrier Deformations R94 PDB

Ford F-250 Barrier Deformations R94PDB

Conclusions Only pickups showed relationship between Kw400 and toepan intrusion Heavy and compact pickups had different rate of change of stiffness per occupant compartment intrusion –Statistically significant