CIGRE 7-10 September 2009, Moscow

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilizing IED Capability to Reduce Wiring Terrence Smith, GE Digital Energy Multilin Richard Hunt, GE Digital Energy Multilin Jakov Vico, GE Digital Energy.
Advertisements

Testing Numerical Transformer Differential Relays
FAULT TYPE SELECTION Jeff Roberts April 6 and 9, 2005.
New Energy Horizons Opportunities and Challenges Fault Current Contributions from Wind Plants Dean Miller PacifiCorp July 25,
Submitted by: Name:Rajendra Kumar Choudhury Branch:Electrical Engg.
Distributed Intelligence Provides Self-Healing for the Grid
MIFII DIGITAL FEEDER PROTECTION A Cost Effective Protection Solution for Overcurrent Protection at Any Voltage Level GE Multilin
GENERATOR PROTECTION.
Research & production enterprise «EKRA», Ltd,
1 Distributed Generation and Power Quality. 2 Relaying considerations DG infeed may reduce the reach of overcurrent relays –DG feeds fault, so utility.
W650 Wind Generator Protection System
Generator Management Relay
© 2010 Eaton Corporation. All rights reserved. Neutral Switching of Grounded Sources Dave Loucks, PE.
Universal Relay Family
Name: Osamu TSUBOI Country: Japan Registration No.: Group: B5 Pref. Subject: 1 Question: 7 1 Question 7 Non-harmonic-restraint schemes applied in Japan.
Power System Analysis/ Power System 1 EEE 4113/ EEE 3131
Generator Protection. Amount of Protection Rated power of the generator Ratio of its capacity to the total capacity of the system Configuration of the.
Unit Transformer Unit transformer are step up transformer which is connected to generating house & step up voltage from 15kV voltage to 132 voltage level.
1 PCA2 On-load Protection Condition Analyser. 2 PCA2 online testing concept Concept introduction: PCA2 is a new system test approach intended to save.
MIG II DIGITAL FEEDER PROTECTION
High-Impedance Fault Detection with the F60 Universal Relay
International Scientific & Technical Conference
A N OPTIMAL RELIABILITY ALLOCATION METHOD FOR DIGITAL SUBSTATION SYSTEMS Y UZHOU H U, P EICHAO Z HANG, Y ONGCHUN S U, Y U Z OU Adviser: Frank, Yeong-Sung.
New approach in functionality and testing for HV Capacitor Bank Protection Jorge Cardenas † (J.C.), Sean Cox ♣ (S.C), Petru van Wyk ♣ (P.W.), Boitumelo.
Zoran Gajić ABB AB Vasteras, Sweden
Adaptive Protection of Distribution Feeders Alexander Apostolov, Benton Vandiver.
Synchrophasor: Implementation,Testing & Operational Experience
SFT 2841 IN CONNECTED MODE Prepare setting files.
Electrical Distribution Training
1 © ABB AB, Application of Unit Protection Schemes for Auto-Transformers Zoran Gajić ABB AB Vasteras, Sweden Authors: Z. Gajić, ABB Sweden.
SWER New Zealand & Australian Experience
New proposed BU circuit and control logic design University of Washington.
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY DG CONFERENCE UPDATE ON THE CURRENT STATUS OF DG INTERCONNECTION PROTECTION WHAT IEEE 1547 DOESN’T TELL YOU ABOUT INTERCONNECTION PROTECTION.
Universal Relay Family B30 Presentation Q&As. Power Management The Universal Relay Contents... Application Algorithm Biased Characteristic Dynamic Bus.
©2009 Mladen Kezunovic. Improving Relay Performance By Off-line and On-line Evaluation Mladen Kezunovic Jinfeng Ren, Chengzong Pang Texas A&M University,
Slide 1 Line Current Differential Application on Short Lines Presentation to SSCET October 26 th, 2012.
Protection of Microgrids Using Differential Relays
Lecture 22 Unbalanced Faults and Power System Protection Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J Protection of distributed generation connected networks with coordination of overcurrent relays.
Protection & Switchgear
Transformer Protection Over-current protection in the form of fuses may be the only protection provided to a small 100 kVA, 11 kV/440 V distribution transformer.
Lecture 22 Unbalanced Faults and Power System Protection Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 22: System Protection, Transient Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
Announcements Read Chapters 10 and 11
1 Distributed Generation and Power Quality-Continued.
Submitted to: Submitted by:
O. MÄKINEN FI Session 3 Block 3 Barcelona May What is an intermittent earth fault (IE/F)? Insulation Conductor Screen Insulation break-down.
Submitted to: Submitted by:
ABOC/ATC days Electrical Network: Selectivity and Protection Plan José Carlos GASCON TS–EL Group 22 January 2007.
Name Of The College & Dept
1 Industrial Systems BUS2000 Busbar Differential Protection System Differential overcurrent system with percentage restraint protection.
CIGRE Study Committee B5 Colloquium September 2005, Calgary, Canada PS1 - Question 7 What would be the future practice for selecting harmonic restraint.
Sub-Synchronous Frequency Detection Using SEL OGIC ® Control Equations SSF Relay ERCOT Workshop NPRR562 Subsynchronous Resonance Larry Gross.
ECE 498HZ: Power Distribution System Analysis
Protection of Power Systems
Protection of Power Systems
STUDY OF ELEMENTS OF A 220/132/33KV SUBSTATION
Design a protection System of 220/33kV Grid Station United Arab Emirates University College of Engineering Saif Mohammed AL Aryani Ahmed Soruor.
Announcements Design Project has firm due date of Dec 4
Quality and Security Assessment of Protection Systems
IG BASED WINDFARMS USING STATCOM
2011+ NEC Article Arc Energy Reduction. Where the highest continuous current trip setting for which the actual overcurrent device installed.
PSCAD models.
Advanced Fuse-Saving Techniques
CIGRE SC B5 COLLOQUIUM CALGARY
Chapter 7 System Protection
Protection Philosophy
A Tutorial on the Application and Setting of Collector Feeder Overcurrent Relays at Wind Electric Power Plants By: Stephanie Mercer.
POWER SYSTEM COMMISSIONING AND MAINTENANCE PRACTICE
Exercise 9 Power systems.
Presentation transcript:

CIGRE 7-10 September 2009, Moscow Digital Energy Multilin Problems and Solutions of Line Differential Application in Cable Transformer Protection Jorge Cardenas. GE Digital Energy Mahesh Kumar. GE Digital Energy Jesus Romero. RasGas CIGRE 7-10 September 2009, Moscow

Application problem in differential Cable+Transformer Transformer Inrush phenomena affects the operation of the differential protection in the same way as in case of a Power Transformer. In the classical approach, an inhibition or blocking action based on the harmonic (usually 2nd harmonic) content on the differential algorithm, is normally used. Because differential protection is practically disabled during some time after the energization, a complementary protection is needed to disconnect the circuit if a fault is produced during that time Another problem is the Inrush phenomena after the voltage recovery during external three-phase or phase-to-phase faults..

On-line diagram and Line Differential Protection scheme

Initial Protection Scheme As Current Differential Relays installed in the plant have not specific functions to prevent Transformer Inrush phenomena, initially a logic based on setting group change was implemented to avoid a non-desirable trip when the Line is energized (there are no CB´s on the 33 kV receiving end of the individual Power Transformers) and interposing CT’s are used at LV side to correct the vectors similar to conventional transformer differential protection. At time zero, the relays work with a high pickup differential settings (typically 2.0 p.u.) and with a time delay (800 ms) after the CB close, the pickup is changed to a lower value (typically 0.3 p.u.).

Initial Logic to prevent false trip during energization Relays (UR from GE) installed allows on-line logic change of the differential pickup level. Setting Group is changed in less than 2.5 ms. This is the maximum additional delay expected to trip on internal faults.

Problems with the Initial Protection Scheme Definition was correct, but incomplete. Logic only contemplates Energization, but no Inrush after voltage recovery. Pickup setting were too low for Energization, particularly on 6.6 kV. Side No complementary protection was active to prevent faults during the energization, only TOC as backup.

Critical Irest vs Idiff in 6.6 kV with Actual Setting

Changes Recommended 1.   Switch on to fault and distance protections implemented in Setting Group 2 to provide backup to current differential protection during transformer energizing or when operation is blocked due to loss in communications. This new setting effectively covered all 3 phase and phase to phase faults up to 120% of the line. Ground TOCs in 33KV and 6.6KV provide the protection for phase to ground fault as per existing settings. The current differential pickup is adjusted to avoid unwanted trip due to inrush currents.   2.   Setting Group 3 is introduced in the scheme to provide the correct setting for inrush current produce during voltage recovery after the isolation of an external fault. The new setting used distance protection to cover 3 phase and phase to phase internal faults. Ground TOCs in 33KV and 6.6KV cover phase to ground faults as the actual coverage is done with Setting Group 1.  3.  Distance protection is implemented in Setting Group 1 to cover all faults up to transformer HV windings, this also provided backup to current differential protection when the operation is blocked due to loss of communications. The Merging Unit (Brick) is designed to be located as close to the source of signals and controls as possible. As such, the brick is designed for outdoor mounting and is completely connectorized for quick replacement. Copper cables for interfacing with Currents, Voltages, Digital Inputs, Transducer Inputs, and control outputs are available. The system is designed for complete redundancy such that 2 MUs – containing the exact same data – can be connected into the same relay. The relay always compares the sources of the data and, depending on the security setting, upon detection of an error either shuts downs the entire system or automatically switches to the back MU as its source of data.

Changes Recommended (cont.) 4.  With the existing or proposed current differential settings in Group 1, it was found out that for loads in 33KV of more than 200A approximately, differential protection does not operate on phase to ground faults. This is due to the increased in the restraint current magnitudes with increased load currents. Enabling of distance Gnd Z2 proved to address this problem plus the existing 33KV directional Ground TOC.   It has also been noted that only trip on current differential is programmed for circuit breaker inter trip. A new inter trip logic based also in the other protection functions (Distance, SOFT and Ground TOC) has been tested and it is recommended for implementation. The Solutions Proposed were validated initially with test on RTDS ans later with tests in Field.

Validation of the model for Inrush tests a) Phase A b) Phase B c) Phase C

Breaker Trip time estimation from a Real Event

New Setting Group Proposed for Inrush recovery after external faults Modifications in Group 2 were as follows:   Relay at 33 kV: Change the slope 2 to 70% and the Breakpoint to 2 Relays at 6.6 kV: Raise the pickup to 4.0, slope 2 to 70% and Breakpoint to 2 A Merging Unit needs to provide data to multiple relays/meters. This is typically accomplished through the installation of an Ethernet switch on the output of the Merging Unit. In this architecture, the switch is combined with the Merging Unit so no external switch is required. As such, the fiber cable from the field into the control house contains 4 fibers – the outputs of the internal switching – as well as a pair of copper wires in order to provide power for the MU. Note that the IEEE 802.3 Bi-Direction Ethernet standard is used for Ethernet so that a only a single fiber connection is required for full-duplex communication. Fiber cables from the field are terminated in a Patch Panel (lower left pictures). The Patch Panel provides the junction box that enable connection from a source of data in the field to a consumer (relay) in the control house. Connection between the producer (MU) and the consumer (relay) is realized through a single fiber jumper between the fiber cables. Critical Irest vs Idiff in 6.6 kV modified Setting of Group 2

New Setting Group Proposed for Inrush recovery after external faults It was decided an intermediate setting, higher than the maximum peak estimated according to table 1 (3,2 p.u.). Settings on relays at 33 kV and 6.6 kV were as follows:  

Logic Implemented to complement the Line Differential Algorithm

Energization tests in the worst close angle condition after the new logic implementation

Inrush voltage recovery tests after the new logic implementation Inrush after voltage recovery. Operation considering load condition, that is trip on external fault caused by an instantaneous protective relay. 3PH fault on 1

Cable and Transformers Fault tests PH_PH fault on pos 5. PH-PH in Pos 7. 3PH in pos 7. External 3PH fault on 6.

Cable and Transformers Fault tests The data input card is designed with 8 fiber optic inputs that feed into another internal Ethernet switch. The inputs are organized as 4 from system A and 4 from system B. As mentioned earlier, in a redundant implementation, the receiving card (Process Card) compares all received packets and flags errors and failures. The switch serves two functions: first – to collect all the data from all devices and second (as will be seen in the Synchronization slide) provides for simultaneous output of GOOSE messages to all connected devices. Direct trip by Ground TOC and Distance during internal PH_G fault on 4.

Conclusions Proposed solution makes the energization of transformers without any nuisance trips and proved several time for last 2 years. As these feeders were crucial in LNG production of Rasgas, this solution helped them to save time and money with an improved reliability. The solution implemented has been be extended to any other similar substations w/o additional hardware, nor modifications on it. The numeric technology in the multifunction relays give us many tools to implement new solutions to problems that in the past were only possible to solve using another techniques as the second harmonic restrain to prevent a false trip during transformer energization. We have demonstrated that other possible schemes are also possible maintaining a similar level of reliability and security as the traditional ones. The use of the RTDS has allowed as a very good approach with the problems encountered in field, helping in test new solution for Differential Application on schemes composed by cables + transformers.