1 Evolution & Economics No. 5 Forest fire p = 0.53 p = 0.58.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mixed Strategies.
Advertisements

Pondering more Problems. Enriching the Alice-Bob story Go to AGo to B Go to A Alice Go to B Go to A Go to B Go shoot pool Alice.
Game Theory Assignment For all of these games, P1 chooses between the columns, and P2 chooses between the rows.
Stackelberg -leader/follower game 2 firms choose quantities sequentially (1) chooses its output; then (2) chooses it output; then the market clears This.
Evolution and Repeated Games D. Fudenberg (Harvard) E. Maskin (IAS, Princeton)
1 Evolution & Economics No Evolutionary Stability in Repeated Games Played by Finite Automata K. Binmore & L. Samuelson J.E.T Automata.
Chapter Twenty-Eight Game Theory. u Game theory models strategic behavior by agents who understand that their actions affect the actions of other agents.
Congestion Games with Player- Specific Payoff Functions Igal Milchtaich, Department of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1993 Presentation.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 2.5.Repeated Games Lecture
For any player i, a strategy weakly dominates another strategy if (With at least one S -i that gives a strict inequality) strictly dominates if where.
MIT and James Orlin © Game Theory 2-person 0-sum (or constant sum) game theory 2-person game theory (e.g., prisoner’s dilemma)
EC3224 Autumn Lecture #04 Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium
Lectures 7&8 Revisit Elections Now range is left-wing or right-wing politics. Candidate-Voter model Assume even distribution of voters. Voters will vote.
Learning in games Vincent Conitzer
What is a game?. Game: a contest between players with rules to determine a winner. Strategy: a long term plan of action designed to achieve a particular.
Economics 202: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory 1.HW #6 on website. Due Tuesday. 2.Second test covers up through today’s material, and will be “pseudo-cumulative”
Maynard Smith Revisited: Spatial Mobility and Limited Resources Shaping Population Dynamics and Evolutionary Stable Strategies Pedro Ribeiro de Andrade.
The Evolution of Conventions H. Peyton Young Presented by Na Li and Cory Pender.
Eponine Lupo.  Game Theory is a mathematical theory that deals with models of conflict and cooperation.  It is a precise and logical description of.
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
1 Economics & Evolution Number 2. 2 Reading List.
January 20 Lecture Econ 171. The game of matching pennies has A)two pure strategy Nash equilibria B)One pure strategy Nash equilibrium C)One mixed strategy.
Communication Networks A Second Course Jean Walrand Department of EECS University of California at Berkeley.
Evolutionary Game Theory
0 Network Effects in Coordination Games Satellite symposium “Dynamics of Networks and Behavior” Vincent Buskens Jeroen Weesie ICS / Utrecht University.
Chapter Twenty-Eight Game Theory. u Game theory models strategic behavior by agents who understand that their actions affect the actions of other agents.
1 Computing Nash Equilibrium Presenter: Yishay Mansour.
Why How We Learn Matters Russell Golman Scott E Page.
Outline  In-Class Experiment on a Coordination Game  Test of Equilibrium Selection I :Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil (1990)  Test of Equilibrium Selection.
XYZ 6/18/2015 MIT Brain and Cognitive Sciences Convergence Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Agents Srinivas Turaga th March, 2004.
Evolutionary Games The solution concepts that we have discussed in some detail include strategically dominant solutions equilibrium solutions Pareto optimal.
6.1 Consider a simultaneous game in which player A chooses one of two actions (Up or Down), and B chooses one of two actions (Left or Right). The game.
Chapter 6 Extensive Games, perfect info
Learning in Games Scott E Page Russell Golman & Jenna Bednar University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
Nash Equilibrium - definition A mixed-strategy profile σ * is a Nash equilibrium (NE) if for every player i we have u i (σ * i, σ * -i ) ≥ u i (s i, σ.
Evolutionary Games The solution concepts that we have discussed in some detail include strategically dominant solutions equilibrium solutions Pareto optimal.
Game Theoretic Analysis of Oligopoly lr L R 0000 L R 1 22 The Lane Selection Game Rational Play is indicated by the black arrows.
1 Economics & Evolution. 2 Cournot Game 2 players Each chooses quantity q i ≥ 0 Player i’s payoff is: q i (1- q i –q j ) Inverse demand (price) No cost.
1. problem set 6 from Osborne’s Introd. To G.T. p.210 Ex p.234 Ex p.337 Ex. 26,27 from Binmore’s Fun and Games.
CPS Learning in games Vincent Conitzer
Social Choice Session 7 Carmen Pasca and John Hey.
Learning in Multiagent systems
1 Economics & Evolution Number 3. 2 The replicator dynamics (in general)
Microeconomics 2 John Hey. Game theory (and a bit of bargaining theory) A homage to John Nash. Born Still alive (as far as Google knows). Spent.
\ B A \ Draw a graph to show the expected pay-off for A. What is the value of the game. How often should A choose strategy 1? If A adopts a mixed.
7.2 Means and Variances of Random Variables.  Calculate the mean and standard deviation of random variables  Understand the law of large numbers.
Equilibrium transitions in stochastic evolutionary games Dresden, ECCS’07 Jacek Miękisz Institute of Applied Mathematics University of Warsaw.
Mixed Strategies and Repeated Games
1 What is Game Theory About? r Analysis of situations where conflict of interests is present r Goal is to prescribe how conflicts can be resolved 2 2 r.
Vincent Conitzer CPS Learning in games Vincent Conitzer
1 The Volunteer’s Dilemma (Mixed Strategies). 2 The Volunteer Dilemma Game Simultaneously and independently, players have to decide if they wish to volunteer.
Pondering more Problems. Enriching the Alice-Bob story Go to AGo to B Go to A Alice Go to B Go to A Go to B Go shoot pool Alice.
Replicator Dynamics. Nash makes sense (arguably) if… -Uber-rational -Calculating.
Extensive Form (Dynamic) Games With Perfect Information (Theory)
Lec 23 Chapter 28 Game Theory.
1 Nash Demand Game Nash Program (non cooperative games) Demand Game S Topics 3.
Entry Deterrence Players Two firms, entrant and incumbent Order of play Entrant decides to enter or stay out. If entrant enters, incumbent decides to fight.
By: Donté Howell Game Theory in Sports. What is Game Theory? It is a tool used to analyze strategic behavior and trying to maximize his/her payoff of.
Working Some Problems.
Game theory basics A Game describes situations of strategic interaction, where the payoff for one agent depends on its own actions as well as on the actions.
Chapter 28 Game Theory.
Microeconomics Course E
Game Theory Fall Mike Shor Topic 3.
Economics & Evolution Number 2.
Economics & Evolution.
Vincent Conitzer Learning in games Vincent Conitzer
EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IENG314 OPERATIONS RESEARCH II SAMIR SAMEER ABUYOUSSEF
Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009
Lecture Game Theory.
Vincent Conitzer CPS Learning in games Vincent Conitzer
Presentation transcript:

1 Evolution & Economics No. 5 Forest fire p = 0.53 p = 0.58

2 Best Response Dynamics A finite population playing a (symmetric) game G. Each individual is randomly matched and plays a pure strategy of G. At each point in (discrete) time each individual (or alternatively each with probability) chooses the best response to the mixed strategy played by the population.

3 AB A3, 30, x Bx, 0x, x Payoff Dominant Equilibrium AB A3, 30, x Bx, 0x, x 3 > x > 0 Nash Equilibria Risk Dominant Equilibrium

4 Payoff Dominant Equilibrium Risk Dominant Equilibrium AB A3, 30, x Bx, 0x, x A Population of n individuals playing either A or B. A B All playing A All playing B 0 1 k/n k playing B

5 Payoff Dominant Equilibrium Risk Dominant Equilibrium AB A3, 30, x Bx, 0x, x AB A3, 30, 2 B2, 02, α α A B

6 Payoff Dominant Equilibrium Risk Dominant Equilibrium AB A3, 30, x Bx, 0x, x AB A3, 30, 2 B2, 02, A B In the Best Response Dynamics: The Basin of Attraction of the Risk Dominant Equilibrium is larger than that of the Pareto Dominant Equilibrium

7 A B

8 A B A deterministic dynamics can be described as a transition function

9 The replicator Dynamics (in which all learn – revise their strategy) is: If each individual has probability λ of learning: A B

10 If each individual has probability of learning: If each individual has probability λ of learning: A B A state of the population becomes a distribution of states

11 The prob. of learning may be dropped. A B If each individual (when learning) has a small probability ε of learning the ‘wrong’ strategy: B (B) B (A) Each state has a positive probability of becoming any other state.

12

13

14 A B AB A3, 30, 2 B2, 02, 2 ε -small, mistakes are rare The process converges to B (A) and will stay there a long time. In the long-run mistakes occur (with prob. 1 ) and the process will be swept away from B.

15 A B If more individuals made mistakes, the process moves to the basin of attraction of A, from there to A, and will remain there a long time. If few individuals make mistakes, the process will remain in the basin of attraction of B, and will return to B.

16 A B What proportion of the time is spent in A ?? The process remains a long time in A and in B. To leave the basin of attraction of B, a t least 2/3 of the population has to err. This happens with prob.: To leave the basin of attraction of A, at least 1/3 of the population has to err. This happens with prob. :

17 A B It is a rare move from B to the basin of attraction of A. The reverse is much more frequent !!!

18 A B In the very long run the process will spend infinitely more time in B than in A. In the very long run the process will spend 0 time in A.

19 The Best Response Dynamics – with vanishing noise, chooses the Risk Dominant Equilibrium. The equilibrium with a larger Basin of attraction. AB A3, 30, 2 B2, 02, 2 AB A3, 30, 2 B2, 02, 2

20 Kandori, Michihiro & Mailath, George J & Rob, Rafael, "Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages H Peyton, "The Evolution of Conventions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages M.I. Freidlin and A.D. Wentzell, Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems, Springer New York, 1984 Based on: