Major risk factors for PRRS in Colombian farms Dr. Derald Holtkamp Cartagena, July 16, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on PED Research Lisa Becton, DVM, MS, DACVPM Dir. Swine Health Information & Research National Pork Board.
Advertisements

PRRSV control and eradication in Spanish farms Enric Marco marco i collell; S.L.
Merton V. Smith, Ph.D., J.D. Director International Programs Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration Governance of Veterinary.
Sow Longevity – Its Improvement and Economic Importance Ken Stalder Department of Animal Science Iowa State University.
Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine Diagnostic sampling strategies and classification of breeding herds for PRRS virus Pilot training.
PED Producer Update Paul Sundberg DVM, PhD, Dipl ACVPM VP Science and Technology National Pork Board.
Comprehensive Discussion of PEDv 2014 Swine Education In-Service Conference October 2, 2014 Dr. Harry Snelson AASV.
Update on PEDV Lisa Becton, DVM, MS National Pork Board.
Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) Status & Research Update
Update on PED Research Lisa Becton, DVM, MS, DACVPM Dir. Swine Health Information & Research National Pork Board.
Update on PED Research Lisa Becton, DVM, MS, DACVPM Dir. Swine Health Information & Research National Pork Board.
Scenario 3 Classical Swine Fever (CSF) Risk Communicator Training for Foreign Animal & Zoonotic Disease Defense.
Antibody Response During a PRRS Outbreak can be Predicted Using High-Density SNP Genotypes Nick V.L. Serão 1 *, R.A. Kemp 2, B.E. Mote 3, J.C.S. Harding.
Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine Principles of diagnostic sampling – the “ bead game” Pilot training school in PRRS diagnostics, 2012.
Sow Herd Monitoring Tools in PRRSv Control Programs PRRS Diagnostic and Control Workshop Thessaloniki, Greece. August, 2012 Jose Angulo DVM Boehringer.
Lesson 1 Good Production Practice #1 Establish and implement an efficient and effective herd health management plan.
Regulatory | education | partnership Overcoming North American Trade Hurdles Barry Carpenter.
PED Building on the Lessons Learned Liz Wagstrom, DVM, MS, DACVPM Chief Veterinarian.
Economic Impact of Disease Dr. Derald Holtkamp Cartagena, July 16, 2014.
GOOD PRACTICES FOR BIOSECURITY IN THE PIG SECTOR WB/OIE/FAO guidelines.
1. 2 The Public Health Agency of Canada Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: An Overview Dr. Paul Gully Deputy Chief Public Health Officer Ottawa, 19 January.
SDPI Competitive Grant Program Planning Meeting 1 IHS Diabetes Competitive Grant Program: Overview and Update Kelly Acton, MD, MPH, FACP Director, IHS.
Lesson 3 Good Production Practice #3 Use Antibiotics Responsibly.
MEJORA COMPROBADA DE SALUD POST – DESTETE Y CONVERSION ALIMENTICIA MEDIANTE NUEVOS MANEJOS PRACTICOS Luc Willekens Cartagena, July
Dr. John W. Mabry Iowa Pork Industry Center Iowa State University
Secure Pork Supply Plan Pilot Project A Continuity of Business Plan for the Pork Industry in the Face of a Foreign Animal Disease Pam Zaabel, DVM Center.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 Proposed BSE Comprehensive Rule: A New Approach to BSE Rulemaking Dr. Christopher Robinson Assistant Director, NCIE BSE Comprehensive.
PEDv Pork Management Conference June 19, 2014 Carthage Veterinary Service, Ltd.
Farm Visit Biosecurity CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
REG set up: first steps… Alison Chisholm 7.40 am – 7:45 am.
Swine Enteric Coronavirus Diseases
Epidemiology Tools and Methods Session 2, Part 1.
Application of MJ PRRS Vaccine for PRRS Control and Elimination AASV 2010, Omaha, NE Neil DeBuse, DVM.
Impacts of Porcine Epidemic Virus in the U.S. Swine Herd Dr. Liz Wagstrom, DVM, MS National Pork Producers Council.
Protecting American Agriculture 1 The Wild Bird Population: An Early Warning System for Avian Influenza Dr. Ron DeHaven Administrator USDA Animal and Plant.
“The University of Georgia College of Veterinary Medicine, founded in 1946, is dedicated to training future veterinarians, providing services to animal.
Swine Diseases Part III of III Julie Zimmerman Advanced Swine Production Spring 2008.
EUROPEAN LIVESTOCK AND MEAT TRADEING UNION UECBV PIGLETS CASTRATION.
A. Kittawornrat 1, J. Prickett 1, C. Wang 1,2, C. Olsen 1, C. Irwin 1, Y. Panyasing 1, A. Ballagi 3, A. Rice 3, R. Main 1, C. Rademacher 4, M. Hoogland.
Tanja Opriessnig The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine Iowa State University, USA.
Impact of the environment on pig respiratory disease transmission Impact of the environment on pig respiratory disease transmission Research update on.
Brian Sullivan, CSHB Executive Committee February 12, 2014 Brian Sullivan, CSHB Executive Committee February 12, 2014 Genome Canada Webinar: PED.
Faster, better, cheaper (PRRSV) surveillance using oral fluid-based sampling Jeff Zimmerman DVM PhD Iowa State University Ames, Iowa.
To Fight EID, Think Global, Act Local Our response to Emerging Diseases is considered on a global basis, but implementation is regional – The risk and.
Sanna Nikunen DVM The Association for Animal Disease Prevention, Finland
Managing Disease Risk. HSEMD, IDALS, CFSPH Animal Disease Emergency Local Response Preparedness, 2008 Overview Importance of animal agriculture Biological.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for The Western Pacific Regional Activities Report and Preparation for the Upcoming Influenza Seasons THE 3rd.
Evaluation of a local PRRSv elimination program in Brittany (France) Catherine Belloc UMR INRA-Oniris 1300 BioEpAR Nicolas Masset, Vincent Auvigne, Nathalie.
Certification Update Dinah Peebles 1. PQA Plus Trainers: 64 Advisors: 1, ,849.
What do you need to know? Are you at risk? How do you protect yourself? SWINE FLU Partnership for Environmental Education and Rural Health peer.tamu.edu.
Why Compensation?. What’s the Goal of Veterinary Services?
Report on Animal Care Annual General Meeting April 9, 2014 Mark Fynn Animal Care Specialist.
Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) A threat to swine production & swine shows! Stan Smith, OSU Extension, Fairfield County Dr. Andrew Bowman, Department.
1 Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) Meeting Detection of Porcine circovirus (PCV) and PCV DNA Sequences in U.S. Licensed.
The epidemiology of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Eric Bush USDA:APHIS:VS FDA:CVM Swine Mycoplasma Pneumonia Workshop Kansas City, MO March 6, 2002.
BSE: World update FDA TSE Advisory Committee Gaithersburg, MD September 18, 2006 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS, Veterinary.
Quarantine and Movement Control Movement Control, Permitting, and Personnel Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control.
High Path Avian Influenza (HPAI) Emergency Poultry Disease Planning (EPDP) Meeting October 1, 2015.
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development
Biosecurity for the Livestock Enterprise. Biosecurity – Disease Prevention Management practices to protect health of livestock herd –Prevent introduction.
Regulatory Perspective on Trends in Veterinary Biologics Byron Rippke, DVM Nancy Clough, DVM, PhD Director, Center for Veterinary Biologics U.S. Department.
Industry: trends, concerns hopes and ideas VICH5 Conference Carel du Marchie Sarvaas, Executive Director October 2015.
A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO CONTROL OF PIG DISEASES Pig farm clinics training in Matuga Kampala Uganda, JOSEPH M KUNGU National Livestock Resources.
Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV). Acknowledgement United States Department of Agriculture Funding Proposal Title: A Human Behavioral Approach to.
National Pork Producers Council 7/8/ On-Farm Food Safety Certification Trichinae Herd Certification Dr. Dave Pyburn National Trichinae Coordinator.
1 Recent Global Development of Two Major Porcine Diseases - African Swine Fever and Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea - Dr Tomoko ISHIBASHI Deputy Regional Representative.
Swine Health Information Center
Using the pig trade networks and the geographical distance among farms to model the spatio-temporal dynamics of porcine reproductive & respiratory syndrome.
Structure and Terminology
Agency Overview and Budget
Presentation transcript:

Major risk factors for PRRS in Colombian farms Dr. Derald Holtkamp Cartagena, July 16, 2014

Outline Importance of biosecurity and need for tools to assess risk Production Animal Disease Risk Assessment Program (PADRAP) Assessment of risks in Colombian sow farms

In the U.S. PRRSV had been the primary disease that motivated producers to improve biosecurity “wake up call” Introduction of porcine circovirius type 2 (PCV2) and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has been a real “wake up call” Biosecurity! Biosecurity! Biosecurity! Photo: Courtesy of Dr. Matt Ackerman

PEDV spread rapidly between and within regions of the U.S. Biosecurity as currently practiced in the U.S. was NOT effective at slowing the spread of the virus Source: Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease Testing Summary Report, USDA Animal Plant & Health Inspection Service, May 15, 2014.

And now porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) Source: Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease Testing Summary Report, USDA Animal Plant & Health Inspection Service, May 15, 2014.

~50% of sow herds infected with PEDV Source: Swine Health Monitoring Report, University of Minnesota, College of Veterinary Medicine. March 7, ~50%

But… PRRSV was relatively quiet this year Source: PRRS incidence study update, University of Minnestota, March 19, 2014

The slow down in PRRS dates back to July 2013 July 2013 Source: PRRS incidence study update, University of Minnestota, March 19, 2014

Biosecurity is the primary tool to slow herd-to-herd transmission and prevent outbreaks Biosecurity! Biosecurity! Biosecurity!

But – making continuous improvements in biosecurity is hard Disease risk is complicated (and frequently overwhelming) Requires effort and costs money – must be tailored to circumstances of farm Can’t do everything – have to start somewhere

Giving producers published lists of biosecurity recommendations or “page- after-page” of protocols doesn’t work! Need tools to assess risks and implement biosecurity that is tailored for farms or production systems

Outline Importance of Biosecurity and need for tools to assess risk Production Animal Disease Risk Assessment Program (PADRAP) Assessment of risks in Colombian sow farms

Production Animal Disease Risk Assessment Program (PADRAP) is a program through which a set of disease risk assessment surveys are delivered PADRAP is owned by The American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) and is used by veterinarians who are members

Surveys can be delivered through PADRAP

“Risk Quadrant” report Enables benchmarking of disease risks Examples of reports

Enables benchmarking of disease risks Examples of reports “Individual Risk Factor” report

PADRAP is provided as a benefit to members of AASV No fees for using PADRAP Must be an AASV member to access it – International (Associate) members are eligible to use the program

History of Development Fall-2002: Fall-2002: Design and development of the PRRS Risk Assessment for the Breeding Herd was done at Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc. (BIVI) March 2005: March 2005: BIVI offered to gift the tool to the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) March 2006: March 2006: AASV, with support from National Pork Board (NPB) and USDA accepted the gift September 2006: Production Animal Disease Risk Assessment Program (PADRAP) September 2006: Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Supply Veterinary Medicine entered into an agreement with AASV to establish the Production Animal Disease Risk Assessment Program (PADRAP)

History of Development November 2007: November 2007: Launch of web version – “PADRAP-Online” February 2008: February 2008: PADRAP Advisory Committee created March 2009: March 2009: Growing Pig Assessment introduced December 2011: December 2011: Boehringer Ingelheim, Harrisvaccines, NPPC and Newport Laboratories become sponsors of PADRAP

Collaborative effort – American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) – Iowa State University (ISU) providing program coordination and web hosting Director: Derald Holtkamp Associate Director: Chris Mowrer – Financial support National Pork Board (NPB) Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc. (BIVI) Harrisvaccines National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) Newport Laboratories

Training sessions conducted 363: Number of veterinarians that have been trained – 67 – 67 training sessions (33 online; 34 face-to-face) have been conducted in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Serbia and online – Used primarily by veterinarians and researchers in the U.S, Mexico and Canada – Veterinarians from Australia, Bermuda, Chile, Colombia, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Philippines, Serbia, South Korea and UK have also been trained Veterinarians are provided a username and password for the web version that is activated upon completion of training

Database of PRRS Risk Assessment for the Breeding Herd (version 2) continues to grow – 3,678: Number of assessments completed (as of February 2014) – 1,878: Number of breeding herd sites assessed (as of February 2014) PRRS Risk Assessment for the Breeding Herd

PRRS Risk Assessment for the Growing Pig Herd Database of PRRS Risk Assessment for the Growing Pig Herd (version 1) – 1,120: Number of assessments completed (as of February 2014) – 982: Number of growing pig sites assessed (as of February 2014)

Ways veterinarians have applied the PRRS Risk Assessment for the Breeding Herd Evaluate current biosecurity protocols and/or to develop new biosecurity protocols Demonstrate improvement in biosecurity over time to help justify expenditure of resources on biosecurity An aid in the decision to initiate a project to eliminate PRRSV from a breeding herd site Regional PRRS Elimination / control projects utilizing PADRAP

Steps to get access to and use PADRAP Become member of AASV Attend an AASV training session (username and password provided at end of training) Set up “production system(s)” and “site(s)” in PADRAP Create and complete risk assessment surveys View risk benchmarking reports

Outline Importance of Biosecurity and need for tools to assess risk Production Animal Disease Risk Assessment Program (PADRAP) Assessment of risks in Colombian sow farms

PRRS Control and Monitoring Program in Colombia Coordinated by the Technical Area of the Colombian Association of Pork Producers (Asociación Colombiana de Porcicultores) – Jose Fernando Naranjo – Diego Rodriguez – Mayra Aguirre – Natalia Toro A PADRAP training session was conducted in Colombia – Lilly Urizar with Centre de développement du porc du Québec (CDPQ)

72 sow herds in Colombia were assessed between July of 2013 and June of 2014

Average risk scores for Colombian farms assessed vs. average of all sites in the database (Benchmarked Against) “Biosecurity” terminology External Risks => Bioexclusion External Risks => Bioexclusion – keeping pathogens out of a population Internal Risks => Biomanagement Internal Risks => Biomanagement – managing pathogens already in a population to minimize the negative consequences Dr. Butch Baker, National Hog Farmer, 10/15/2009

Average risk scores for Colombian farms assessed vs. average of all sites in the database (Benchmarked Against) “Big bar bad --- little bar good” Opportunity is to improve bioexclusion

Smaller and mid-size sow herds tended to have more frequent outbreaks

Farrow-to-finish farms had more frequent outbreaks

Most of the sow herds that were assessed were PRRSV “naïve” or “negative” Holtkamp et. al Terminology for classifying swine herds by PRRS virus status. J. Swine Health Prod. 19:

Closed herds (produce their own gilts) and farms with more sources of replacement gilts had more frequent outbreaks

Sow herds that obtained gilts from herds that were positive unstable or unknown status had more frequent outbreaks

Sow herds that enter gilts without routinely testing for PRRSV by PCR or ELISA had more frequent outbreaks

Just over ½ of the sow herds assessed are bringing semen in from outside the farm

Sow herds that received semen from boar studs with unknown PRRSV status had more frequent outbreaks

Sow herds that did not know when the most recent outbreak had occurred at the boar stud(s) had more frequent outbreaks

Of the assessed sow farms that are bringing in semen from outside the farm, very few are testing boars for PRRSV by PCR

When sow herds did not wash vehicles that hauled pigs between every load they had more frequent outbreaks

When sow herds did not allow vehicles that hauled genetic replacements to dry after washing they had more frequent outbreaks

Nearly all of the sow farms assessed disposed of dead animals on-site

Sow farms that only required a boot wash / disinfection or with unrestricted entry had more frequent outbreaks

Sow farms with high employee turnover had more frequent outbreaks

Sow farms located in areas with more swine farms had more frequent outbreaks

Sow farms located on flat land or gentle rolling hills had more frequent outbreaks

Acknowledgements American Association of Swine Veterinarians National Pork Board PADRAP Sponsors –Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. –Harrisvaccines –NPPC –Newport Laboratories Asociación Colombiana de Porcicultores – Jose Fernando Naranjo – Diego Rodriguez – All the veterinarians and producers that completed the PADRAP questionnaires