Serra Mesa Planning Group. What and Why of Redistricting Drawing of district boundaries for elected office Happens every 10 years at all levels of government.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sully District Fairfax County Prepared by Ralph Hubbard Sully Supervisor Representative Fairfax County Redistricting Committee 3/23/2011.
Advertisements

October 2003 San Diego Fires. HWY 15 N & Miramar Way.
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission The Redistricting Process.
Local Government.
Where does the sludge go? grams per person per day Sludge handling/disposal accounts for 25-50% of the cost –Sludge treatment:- Convert organics.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
WHAT DOES THE PROPOSED SERRA MESA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT Mean For You?
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Round II Hearings.
Introduction to ReDISTRICTing Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO Presents: Rani Woods Manager, Redistricting Strategy & Outreach
Lassen County 2011 Supervisorial Reapportionment Public Hearing Lassen County Courthouse – Photo courtesy of Couso Technology & Design.
PLANNING IN A COLLEGE TOWN Implementing Smart Growth in College Park, Maryland.
HWY 15 N & Miramar Way. The fire moves south down Oak Canyon toward the 52 freeway.
Geography Project Sheung Wan. History  Northern waterfront of Hong Kong Island.  Steeped in Hong Kong's early colonial history.  The place which.
The SMART CHOICES PROGRAM and TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT Presentation to ETS Annual Community Conference March 11, 2006.
Local Government 4With respect to local government, states are like unitary nations--they allow counties, cities, towns, etc. to exist and set the terms.
Reprecincting and Redistricting December 2011 Michelle Brzycki Lori Clark Leslie Barnes Dale Simmons
Unit 5 – Local Governments
DETERMINING WHERE IS AFFORDABLE SENIOR HOUSING MOST NEEDED WITHIN CALIFORNIA? Affordable Senior Housing By: Luis A. Topete PP M224A Winter 2011 Image Source:
 Organization of state government (branches)  Taxation  Voter requirements  Legal amount of money the state can spend and borrow  Referendum, recall.
City of Pasadena Introduction to 2011 Redistricting 10/5/2011 Page 1.
Redistricting I: Theoretical Criteria. Definitions Reapportionment.
Which city would you rather live in, bike in, work in, and vacation too? Which city would you rather drive through? Which is more important to you?
College of the Mainland Redistricting Hearings April 30 and May 15, 2012 Gene Locke, Attorney Andrews Kurth LLP Leslie Johnston, Demographer Johnston &
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
CITY OF SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY PLANNERS COMMITTEE and 42 COMMUNITY PLANNING GROUPS #CPGsWork Building Civic Engagement, working together WE can make a difference.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 16: Local Government and Citizenship Study Presentation ©2005 Clairmont Press.
Title Slide. Preliminary Conceptual Development Workshop Integrate sustainable design into new buildings and reduce carbon footprint Create more flexible.
Overview of Southern Ocean County Presented by David J. McKeon, Assistant Planning Director Ocean County Department of Planning Tuesday, January 11, 2005.
Unit 8: Local Government Chapter 16: TB pgs Unit 8 Cover Page: NB pg. 106 Table of Contents: NB pg. 107 ©2005 Clairmont Press.
County and City Government in Georgia
City of Palm Coast City Council Districts City Council Public Hearing June 14, 2011.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 24: Local Government and Citizenship ©2005 Clairmont Press.
TOD Technical Assistance Panel June 21, rd STREET, San Pablo CA.
Downtown Lawrence Inc. Four-Year Downtown Beautification Plan Downtown Lawrence Inc. Four-Year Downtown Beautification Plan
Retail Locations Location is the prime consideration in a customer’s store choice.
2011 Election Administrators Conference A Redistricting Guide for County Election Official s.
Redistricting After the 2010 Census Jill Wilson and Clint Pinyan July 18, 2011 Board of Education Redistricting Committee.
County and City Government in Georgia
East San Fernando Valley Redistricting Coalition Community of Interest Statement May 26, 2011 Non-Partisan Grassroots Organization Including Neighborhood.
APPORTIONMENT, REDISTRICTING & GERRYMANDERING. “REAPPORTIONMENT” “…the process by which seats in the U.S. House of Reps are redistributed throughout the.
LEE COUNTY NAACP REDISTRICTING PLAN Opportunities for improving representation of students and parents on the expanded Lee County School Board A presentation.
Krystal Zwinggi Project Manager John McClintock GIS Analyst Lance English Webmaster Michael Stanley GIS Analyst.
San Diego Trolley. Current Current/future expansion Propose extension.
Warm-Up What do you already know about Congress and representation? What questions do you have about Congress and representation?
Lec 27: Ch3.(T&LD): Traffic Analysis – Directional distribution of site traffic Notice the difference in the trip distribution process between urban transportation.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Latino Rights and Power in Whittier Whittier Voters Coalition Summer 2015.
A PRESENTATION BY THE DISTRICT 1 COMMUITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK TO BATTLE CREEK REC.
Union Park District Council Ayd Mill Road Task Force St. Paul Capital Improvement Budget Proposal
Local Government County and City. Georgia Performance Standard SS8CG5 The student will analyze the role of local governments in the state of Georgia.
WHAT IS REDISTRICTING? It’s the process of drawing electoral district lines. For congressional, state assembly, state senate or city council districts.
CBD Characteristics You will need to be able to describe and where appropriate explain the main characteristics of the CBD. Where possible always try and.
Planning & Community Development Department 3202 East Foothill Boulevard (Mixed Use Project – Space Bank) City Council May 16, 2016 Predevelopment Plan.
Proposal for Amending Existing County Commission Districts.
General Districting Considerations Legal Requirements Geography Neighborhoods Physical Layout School Districts and Other Areas Political Participation.
City of Oceanside Melrose Drive Extension Public Scoping Meeting March 13, p.m.
County Government ESSENTIAL QUESTION:
City of Vista 2017 Districting Draft Maps
Serra mesa community plan amendment roadway connection project
General Plan Adoption Follow-up
Concepts: Governance Distribution of Power
Human Characteristics of United States Unit 2 Lesson 3
SANDAG Inaccuracies November 2017 Proprietary & Confidential.
Administrator of Elections Director of Regional Planning Commission
Process and Anticipated Schedule
The Gerrymander How to Divide and Conquer your Enemy
Local Government.
Slide Deck: Local Governments
Local Government.
HISD Redistricting Hearings May 26, June 1, June 7 and June 9, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Serra Mesa Planning Group

What and Why of Redistricting Drawing of district boundaries for elected office Happens every 10 years at all levels of government Account for population changes “One person, one vote” Ensure equal access to political representation New ninth Council District, Proposition D (2010) – Strong Mayor Form of Governance First new district since 1960s

City Charter Section 5.1 Requirements Nine districts to be created Composed of whole U.S. Census units Each has one-ninth of City’s population Goal is 144,624 people per district Goal is zero deviation from this number, but standard is as little deviation as possible Lines not drawn for the purpose of advantaging or protecting incumbents

Requirements, Cont. Districts Must: Be geographically compact Be composed of contiguous territory Preserve ‘identifiable communities of interest’ Have reasonable access between population centers Be bounded by natural boundaries, street lines and/or by City boundary lines

District 6 Today and Tomorrow Currently Serra Mesa is in District 6, which includes: ClairemontLinda Vista Kearny MesaMission Valley According to the 2010 US Census, the combined population of District 6 totals 161,348, far beyond the Redistricting Commission objective.

Planning Areas: Serra Mesa Kearny Mesa Serra Mesa and Kearny Mesa should be considered as one due to natural boundaries, compact geography, shared and unique resource of Montgomery Field Airport, shared library, shared retail areas, and shared history; originally made up one Community Plan.

New District 6, Proposal One Remove Mission Valley, keep Serra Mesa, Kearny Mesa, Linda Vista and Clairemont Mission Valley has very different/much larger businesses, geography and significant approved and planned population/business growth Preserves communities with strong common factors: All mesa communities with finger canyon geography Common freeway access Defined by natural boundaries of I-5, SR-52, I-15, and northern rim of Mission Valley or Friars Road (Linda Vista) Geographically contiguous and compact Population total of 146,650 deviates from the goal by 1.4%, a much larger deviation than Proposal Two.

Why Mission Valley should be included with Navajo and College Area: Shared traffic impacts of current residential, retail, and commercial developments, such as shopping centers, Qualcomm Stadium, SDSU, Hotel Circle Shared future traffic impacts from new developments: Civita (Quarry Falls), RiverWalk, Mission Valley Center expansion, Hazard Center Towers, CenterPointe, Archstone apartments, Shawnee, Superior Mine San Diego Trolley connects it to Old Town, Grantville, Navajo and College Area I-8 connects it to Mission Bay, Old Town, Grantville, Navajo, Del Cerro and College Area Friars Road and other east/west connector streets connect it to Mission Bay, Old Town, Grantville and Navajo San Diego River and proposed San Diego River Park bisect it and connect it to Mission Bay, Old Town, Grantville and Navajo Geography of valley (vs. mesa tops) common to Grantville and Mission Gorge Share seasonal flooding issues around the San Diego River

New District 6, Proposal 2 Remove Mission Valley and Linda Vista, retain Serra Mesa, Kearny Mesa and Clairemont, and add Tierrasanta Geographically contiguous and compact Common north/south and east/west transit routes, roads; common shopping centers and geographic features Linda Vista’s southern boundary is the north side of Friars Road, so it includes many parcels in the geographic area of Mission Valley, a strong factor to include them with Mission Valley: Fashion Walk and entire north side of Friars Road, from Ulric St. to Morena Blvd. New population total would be 145,379, a variation from goal of only 0.52%. Supported by Tierrasanta Community Council

Linda Vista Community Planning Area

Proposal 2, continued Why Tierrasanta should join with Kearny Mesa, Serra Mesa, and Clairemont: No street connection to District 7 whatsoever, and none planned Street connection to KM and SM via Clairemont Mesa Blvd, Tierrasanta Blvd/Balboa Ave, and Aero Drive, and shared bus routes, bike routes Shared SDFD mutual aid coverage (Station 39 covers Station 28 and vice-versa) Shared SDPD Police station (Eastern Division) Shared library (when TS is closed, SM is open) Shared Montgomery Field Airport issues (use, noise, and AAC participation) Shared borders of I-15 (KM/SM) and SR-52 (KM/CM) Natural eastern divide of Mission Trails Reg. Park and San Diego River Shared retail commerce centers (2 Wal-Mart's, Sears, Vons, PetCo, etc.) Common geography: mesa top, finger canyons Similar demographics

New District 6, Proposal 3 Remove Linda Vista and Clairemont Mesa, retain Serra Mesa and Kearny Mesa, and join with Tierrasanta and Navajo Serra Mesa, Kearny Mesa and Tierrasanta have less of affinity with Navajo than with Mission Valley Deviation is -1.24%, a relatively large deviation.

Navajo Community Plan Area

Community Plan Area Existing District 6Proposal 1Proposal 2Proposal 3Proposal 4 MV 14,698 CM 82,479 LV 32,649 KM 2,633 SM 28,889 TS 31,378 Navajo 47,281 Totals = 161, , , , ,528 Target: 144,624 Difference = 16,724 2, ,79412,904 Deviation =11.56%1.40%0.52%-1.24%8.92%

Approved and Proposed Developments for Mission Valley and Grantville/Navajo Calls for Joining Them Mission Valley – 10,000+ new residents Civita (Quarry Falls): 4,780 units, ~9,560 residents Hazard Center Redevelopment: 473 units, ~946 residents Riverwalk, planned: 1,329 units, ~2,558 residents Mission Valley Center Expansion, planned: 250 condos and 500,000 sq ft of retail, a 50% increase Grantville – 2,000 + new residents Archstone: 444 units, ~888 residents CenterPointe: 588 units, ~1,176 residents Shawnee, planned: 1,023 units, ~2,046 residents

APAC Proposal This proposal creates a Districts 5 that is far from geographically compact, and a District 9 that splits Kearny Mesa and MCAS Miramar, so is not supported by Serra Mesa. The Kearny Mesa Split is based completely on business ownership, and not residential ownership.

Rancho Penasquitos/North County Inland Proposal Includes new 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 8 Districts that we can support. Districts 6 and 9 not geographically contiguous and/or compact, and Serra Mesa has very little affinity or connection to Mira Mesa, so we cannot not support them.

La Jolla Community Planning Group Proposal for new District 1, supported by Serra Mesa