The Subdivision of Land Part 3. 2 Conforming the Plat Map The plat map must conform to the Official MapThe plat map must conform to the Official Map So,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

Two views of federalism develop: states rights position: favors state and local governments Nationalist position: favors national action in dealing with.
The Scheme in Operation GOVAN MBEKI LAND USE SCHEME, 2010.
The Role of Custom Thornton v. Hay, 462 P.2d 671 (Or. 1969).  Appeal from decree enjoining building of fences.  Court rejected prescription because it.
Virginia Land Use Law 101 Transition Area/ Interfacility Traffic Area Committee May 2, 2013.
& The Questions It Raises Over Taxation On Indian Reservations By: Jennifer C. Klein, Deputy County Counsel Sonoma County Counsel’s Office May 30, 2013.
Local Automated Enforcement of Red Light Violations Presented by Tom Drage County Attorney.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Ten Things to Know About Corridor Protection and Land Development Regulations Richard Ducker School of Government UNC – Chapel Hill October 20, 2004 NCSITE.
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ROUTE 29.
Responsive People. Real Partners. ACCESS MANAGEMENT:MAIN STREET OR THE HIGHWAY? Presented by: Dan Cohen/Tim Preece.
State of Florida Department of Transportation SR 7 (US 441) Value Engineering Study September 24-28, 2001 Segment III - From North of Hollywood Blvd to.
St. Pete Beach The TRUTH about. Hometown Democracy’s Amendment 4 Does not equal ≠ St. Pete Beach.
When to Purchase Access Rights versus When to Exercise our Police Power in Lieu of Purchasing. Mike Roach WisDOT Access Management Engineer May 15, 2013.
FISCAL STUDIES: LEGAL BASIS John R. Molitor Attorney.
LIGHTING UP THE FACTS Distinguishing MYTHS from FACTS in Innovation Way.
Property II Professor Donald J. Kochan Spring 2009 Class March 2009.
8/29/20151 Docket Z (Easter Mountain, LLC) A Request to Rezone 556 Acres From RU-4 to SR-2 Cochise County Board of Supervisors October 25, 2011.
2008 Legislative Summary Utah APA Luncheon West Valley City March 10, 2008.
Gated Communities Worksession Board of County Commissioners October 30, 2007.
Constitutional Law Part 8: First Amendment: Freedom of Expression Lecture 3: Places Available for Speech.
PUBLIC RESTRICTIONS ON OWNERSHIP. FOUR BASIC POWERS OF GOVERNMENT OVER REAL PROPERTY TAXATION ESCHEAT EMINENT DOMAIN POLICE POWER.
Community Development Department GRAHAM SWAMP AREA FUTURE LAND USE & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2623 & 2624.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 5, 2010.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
La Center, Washington: Balancing Pipelines and Populations 1.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Lucas vs. South Carolina Coastal Council By Alisha Renfro Geology 558.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Request to Downzone from R-36 To RU-2 Zoning District Applicant: Marshall Miles of GM Propane Docket Z Request for a Rezoning Board of Supervisors.
Public Hearings June 30, Case: CDR Project: Village F Master PD / LUP Applicant: Eric Warren, Poulos & Bennett District: 1 Acreage:1,
Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency April 24, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency.
Lessons Learned Disclaimer: Opinions expressed are those of the speaker and not the opinions of the WA State Attorney General’s Office or the Attorney.
Transportation Corridor Preservation and The Official Map Act.
An ordinance amending the County’s zoning and land use regulations to increase pipeline safety Adopted July 27, 2010.
Local Zoning Policy Effects on Transportation Planning – and vice versa April, 2005.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
County Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA To the Future Land Use Map 2020.
Community Development Department Rezone Application #1783 Parcel ID No RPOF-0031.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
Town of Bethlehem DG Bethlehem Solar, LLC Zoning Board of Appeals Wednesday, October 1, 2014 David Albrecht, P.E., PV Engineers, D.P.C. Virginia Cook,
INVERSE CONDEMNATION S. Steven Vitale, MAI valbridge.com.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Community Development Department Settlement and Development Agreement Seagate Communities, Inc and the City of Palm Coast.
Local Development (San Diego)  Development Services is responsible for managing the majority of the construction and development project review services.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
POM & I-84/US 730 IAMPs Morrow County Planning Commission Hearing December 20, 2011.
N Current Adopted Post-LCP Certification and Appeal Jurisdiction Map Exhibit 1.
Washoe County Board of Adjustment June 1, 2017
Town Hall Meeting: Proposed Extension of Sunset Drive
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Stealing Your Property or Paying You for Obeying the Law
Brevard County v Jack Snyder 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993)
Don’t bother me now Sailor, we’re making good time!
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Land Use Assumptions Public Hearing - 5/31/18
Land Use Exactions, Takings and Impact Fees
1133 Westchester Avenue, Suite N-202
Prepared by Lewis Longman & Walker, P.A. November 15, 2017
Item #: 3.1 Public Hearing – Vacating Lot 15 of Cherapple Farms, Plat C, and Lot 17 of Cherapple Farms, Plat E, and approving the final plat of Cherapple.
(CONTINUED FROM APRIL 14, 2009)
Board of County Commissioners
Real Estate Principles, 11th Edition
Presentation transcript:

The Subdivision of Land Part 3

2 Conforming the Plat Map The plat map must conform to the Official MapThe plat map must conform to the Official Map So, where the Official Map shows roads or canals, the plat map must also show roads or canals,So, where the Official Map shows roads or canals, the plat map must also show roads or canals, with nothing encroaching on them with nothing encroaching on them

3

4

5 This plat map shows the development going to the rights of way for the abutting significant featuresThis plat map shows the development going to the rights of way for the abutting significant features –US 41 – the Tamiami Trail –Krome Avenue –The C-4 Canal Note that there is no encroachment.Note that there is no encroachment.

6 Here is a reservation

7 Palm Beach County v. Wright, 641 So.2d 50 (Fla 1994) A “reservation”A “reservation” –Sort of like reserving a table at a restaurant. –Palm Beach County reserved certain properties for future roadways and nobody could use that property for anything that would impede that future use. Hey, we’re gonna build a road there!Hey, we’re gonna build a road there! Existing Road – Southern Blvd Reserved for future expansion of Southern Blvd

8

9 This is the right of way that was reserved

10

11 Well, wouldn’t a “reservation” be a taking because the owner couldn’t use the land?Well, wouldn’t a “reservation” be a taking because the owner couldn’t use the land? That’s what Joint Ventures was about.That’s what Joint Ventures was about. –“Maps of reservation” were invalid because of a violation of due process – No hearingsNo hearings No opportunity to present evidenceNo opportunity to present evidence Etc.Etc.

12 Joint Ventures v Dept of Transportation, 641 So.2d 50 (Fla. 1994) The Florida Department of Transportation planned for the expansion of state roads in Hillsborough County.The Florida Department of Transportation planned for the expansion of state roads in Hillsborough County. These plans included rights of way acquisitionsThese plans included rights of way acquisitions The DOT then filed “rights of way reservations” meaning, among other things, that property owners could not encroach on these rights of way (reservations).The DOT then filed “rights of way reservations” meaning, among other things, that property owners could not encroach on these rights of way (reservations).

13 At issue in Joint Ventures was a prohibition on “development” – read as plat or site plan approval – if that plat or plan encroached on a reserved right of way.At issue in Joint Ventures was a prohibition on “development” – read as plat or site plan approval – if that plat or plan encroached on a reserved right of way. From the property owner’s perspective, this is a denial of use – all use – and therefore a regulatory taking or inverse condemnation.From the property owner’s perspective, this is a denial of use – all use – and therefore a regulatory taking or inverse condemnation. In Joint Ventures the Supreme Court found that practice illegal.In Joint Ventures the Supreme Court found that practice illegal.

14 Would not Palm Beach County’s “thoroughfare plan” be the same thing?Would not Palm Beach County’s “thoroughfare plan” be the same thing? –Any plat or site plan had to confirm to the thoroughfare plan and –Could not encroach on a “thoroughfare.”

15 What is a “thoroughfare map?” (6)(b)... A Comprehensive Plan must have a traffic circulation element consisting of (6)(b)... A Comprehensive Plan must have a traffic circulation element consisting of the types, locations, and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares....the types, locations, and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares.... Transportation corridors... may be designated in the traffic circulation element....Transportation corridors... may be designated in the traffic circulation element.... If the transportation corridors are designated,If the transportation corridors are designated, the local government may adopt a transportation corridor management ordinance. the local government may adopt a transportation corridor management ordinance. [which is what Palm Beach County did] [which is what Palm Beach County did]

16 Palm Beach County’s Thoroughfare Map

17 The claim in Joint Ventures and Wright is that net effect of a “reservation” or a “thoroughfare map” was to prohibit development of land designated for future roadway improvements.The claim in Joint Ventures and Wright is that net effect of a “reservation” or a “thoroughfare map” was to prohibit development of land designated for future roadway improvements. Such prohibition would thus be a per se taking.Such prohibition would thus be a per se taking. –i.e., the private property would be taken with the filing of either, so it was just a matter of filing a claim in order to be compensated.

18 Opinion... By GrimesBy Grimes “[W]e hold that the adoption of a thoroughfare map is the proper subject of the county’s police power which substantially advances a legitimate state interest.“[W]e hold that the adoption of a thoroughfare map is the proper subject of the county’s police power which substantially advances a legitimate state interest. In fact, the county’s ability to plan for future growth would be seriously impeded without the thoroughfare map.”In fact, the county’s ability to plan for future growth would be seriously impeded without the thoroughfare map.”

19 Does this mean that Wight’s property was not taken?... that Wight’s property was not taken? No!No! –Wight’s facial attack failed. –The simple act of including a thoroughfare map in a comprehensive plan did not constitute a taking of private properties located within the designated corridors. –Wright would have to apply for development,apply for development, be denied, andbe denied, and then attack the regulations as applied.then attack the regulations as applied.

20 But what if Wright was approved with a condition of non-encroachment?But what if Wright was approved with a condition of non-encroachment? Could this be a denial of a beneficial use?Could this be a denial of a beneficial use? –Denominator Issue

21