GeoCenter LP SeisUP ® Marine Processing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Seismic Method Lecture 5 SLIDE 1
Advertisements

Tutorial 3 Refractor assignment, Analysis, Modeling and Statics
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Reflection Seismic Processing
Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
GeoCenter, Inc. SeisUP ® GeoCenter, Inc. Training ~ 2003 University of Texas / Dallas Husky Oil / Western Canada Basin University of Texas / Dallas Husky.
5. AVO-AVA Introduction Weak-contrast, short spread approximation for reflection coefficient Information content Classification Tuning effect Examples.
Amplitude correction Important methods:
Processing: zero-offset gathers
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Stacking  Statics  Residual statics in combination with the velocity analysis  Muting  Approximated zero offset section.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
The ray parameter and the travel-time curves P flat and P radial are the slopes of the travel time curves T-versus-X and T-versus- , respectively. While.
GEOCENTER LP LAND PROCESSING. Step 2 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 3 Step 1 SeisUP ® “AGLEN” Dataset Land Processing.
New Trends in AVO Brian Russell and Dan Hampson
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Squelch Tests for Streamer Noise Attenuation Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey
Introduction to Seismology
Radon Transforms in Tau-P space and Multiple Removal
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2015 Matching Filter to match Transition Zone Airgun Source Wavelet.
Data QC and filtering Bryce HutchinsonSumit Verma Objective: Consider the frequency range of different seismic features Look for low frequency and high.
T 2 = T X 2 /V 2. It is a hyperbola with apex at X = 0 and T 0 = 2H/V. – –V and H are the layer velocity and thickness. T 2 -X 2 plot is a straight.
Reflection seismograms
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Transition Zone Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Testing the Match between Vibroseis and Dynamite Data Reflection.
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
© 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Huffman: PSYCHOLOGY IN ACTION, 6E PSYCHOLOGY IN ACTION Sixth Edition by Karen Huffman Digital Art Slide Set Chapter 6 Learning.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Source Designature Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67 Jan. 25, 2014.
© 2007 Richard L. Knowdell. All rights reserved
ADVANCED MARINE TUTORIAL
Dmitri Lokshtanov Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Bergen.
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
© 2007 Richard L. Knowdell. All rights reserved
SEISMIC DATA ANALYSIS AND FIELD QC SYSTEM
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
High Resolution AVO NMO
PSYCHOLOGY IN ACTION Sixth Edition by Karen Huffman
Modeling of free-surface multiples
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
From Raw Data to an Image
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
This document is a supplement to the article ‘Large near-surface block rotations at normal faults of the Iceland rift: evolution of tectonic caves and.
Presentation transcript:

GeoCenter LP SeisUP ® Marine Processing

SeisUP ® University of Texas / Dallas Offshore Oregon Processed By: GeoCenter for Training Session utilizing SeisUP ®

Table of Contents SeisUP ® Slides Subject 4 Processing Flow 5-6 7 Raw Record Display 8-9 Near Trace Displays 10-11 Brute Velocity Analysis 12 QC Stack 13 Gain Analysis 14-15 A/C & Decon QC 16-17 Decon Velocity Analysis 18 Decon Stack 19 Radon QC 20-21 Radon Velocity Analysis Slides Subject 22-23 Radon Stacks 24-25 Radon DMO Velocity Analysis 26 DMO Stack 27 KTMIG Stack 28 DMO Angle Gather QC 29-31 AVO Cross Plots 32-33 Angle Stacks 34-36 Aperture Model QC 37 SMIG Stack 38 Closing SeisUP ®

Processing Flow Additional QC Radon Test Apperture Modeling Test Reformat to GCI format Geometry Near trace extraction Spherical divergence correction Surface consistent gain correction Spike edit Deconvolution Velocity analysis Stack Radon Dip moveout correction KTMIG AVO Processing Angle Stack QC Angle Stacks (15 & 30 degrees) AVO Crossplots AVO (intercept & gradient) Stack Additional QC Radon Test Apperture Modeling Test SeisUP ®

University of Texas / Dallas Page 5 / 38 University of Texas / Dallas Offshore Oregon Processing Flow (1) Processing Flow (1) SeisUP ®

University of Texas / Dallas Processing Flow (2) University of Texas / Dallas Offshore Oregon Processing Flow (2) SeisUP ® Page 6 / 38

Raw Record Display Raw Record Display SeisUP ® Page 7 / 38

Near Trace (all shots) SeisUP ® Near offset display All Shots Page 8 / 38

Near Trace (every 3rd Shot) Near offset display Edit: every 3 rd shot SeisUP ® Page 9 / 38

Brute Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Page 10 / 38

Brute Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Page 11 / 38

Alternate Trace Display (zoomed zone of interest) SPER + NMO + STACK + AGC Alternate Trace Display (zoomed zone of interest) Brute Stack SeisUP ® Page 12 / 38

Surface Consistent Amplitude Analysis SGN1 +SGN2 Gain Analysis Before After SeisUP ® Page 13 / 38

Auto Correlation Analysis SeisUP ® Page 14 / 38

Spiking Deconvolution Auto Correlation Analysis Decon A/C Analysis Spiking Deconvolution Operator= 160 msec Auto Correlation Analysis SeisUP ® Page 15 / 38

Decon Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Page 16 / 38

Decon Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Page 17 / 38

Decon Stack SeisUP ® SPER +SGN3 + DECON + NMO + STACK + AGC Alternate Trace Display (zoomed zone of interest) SeisUP ® Page 18 / 38

Radon QC Before After Removed Radon QC SeisUP ® Page 19 / 38

Radon Velocity Analysis Decon + Radon Velocity Analysis Radon Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Page 20 / 38

Radon Velocity Analysis Decon + Radon Velocity Analysis Radon Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Page 21 / 38

Radon Stack SeisUP ® SPER +SGN3 + DECON + RADON (TP)+NMO + STACK + AGC Alternate Trace Display (zoomed zone of interest) SeisUP ® Page 22 / 38

Radon Stack SeisUP ® SPER +SGN3 + DECON + RADON + NMO + STACK + AGC Alternate Trace Display (zoomed zone of interest) SeisUP ® Page 23 / 38

DMO Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Decon + Radon + DMO Velocity Analysis Page 24 / 38

DMO Velocity Analysis SeisUP ® Decon + Radon + DMO Velocity Analysis Page 25 / 38

Decon + Radon + DMO + Filter+ AGC DMO Stack SeisUP ® Page 26 / 38

Decon + Radon + DMO +KTMIG + Filter+ AGC KTMIG Stack SeisUP ® Page 27 / 38

DMO Angle Gather QC (0-50/10 = 5 degrees) SeisUP ® Page 28 / 38

AVO Cross – P-wave Intercept and Gradient AVO Cross Stack SeisUP ® Page 29 / 38

AVO Cross Plot SeisUP ® Page 30 / 38

AVO Cross Plot SeisUP ® Page 31 / 38

Angle Stack (0-15 degree) SeisUP ® Angle Stack 0-15 degrees Page 32 / 38

Angle Stack (0-30 degree) SeisUP ® Angle Stack 15 - 30 degrees Page 33 / 38

Aperture Model QC SeisUP ® Aperture Model QC (one sided) Design desired aperture = Number of traces x TR. Interval x 2 (for full aperture) SeisUP ® Page 34 / 38

Designed Aperture Model QC Aperture Model QC (one sided) Designed Aperture Model QC Aperture designed by controlling distance and time varying dip. SeisUP ® Page 35 /38

Designed Aperture Model QC Aperture Model QC (one sided) Designed Aperture Model QC Aperture designed by time varying dip only. SeisUP ® Page 36 / 38

Decon + Radon + DMO + SMIG + Filter+ AGC SeisUP ® Page 37 / 38

GeoCenter has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information herein. However, appropriate information sources should be consulted, especially for new or unfamiliar processing procedures. It is the responsibility of the processing geophysicist to evaluate and conclude his/her own opinion to the context of the material presented. It is forbidden to reproduce or to transmit in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical , including photocopying any portion of this presentation without written permission from the University of Texas/Dallas and GeoCenter. GeoCenter LP 4805 WestWay Park Blvd. Houston, TX 77041 281.443.8150 SeisUP ®