4/9/13 CAS plan is due 4/23/13 or earlier; talk to Ms. Gant if you have questions. Quarter 4 TOK Reminders: – Work is due in class on due date – You need.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THINKING. Critical Thinking
Advertisements

Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 5 Ways of knowing – Reason.
Deductive Validity Truth preserving: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
Critical Thinking: Chapter 10
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
For Monday, read Chapter 4, Sections 1 and 2. Nongraded homework: Problems on pages Graded HW #4 is due on Friday, Feb. 11, at the beginning of.
1 Topic Mathematical Proofs. 2 Topic Mathematical Proofs California Standards: 24.2 Students identify the hypothesis and conclusion in logical.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
REASON, FAITH, LANGUAGE & MEMORY in 8 slides. DEDUCTIVE REASONING & its limitations Deductive reasoning moves from the general to the specific. All dogs.
Knowledge Claims By now, after many years of full-time education and life- experience, you can, perhaps, claim to know many things. You should be able.
Age of the Sage Advertising, Inc. “I cannot teach anybody anything; I can only make him think.” Socrates.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
ToK ESSAY The instructions tell you to: Remember to centre your essay on knowledge issues and,where appropriate, refer to other parts of your IB programme.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should.
Ethics of Intercultural Writing McCool Chapter 5.
REASONING Deductive reasoning - syllogisms. Syllogisms are examples of gaining knowledge by reasoning. Can you discuss in your groups the benefits of.
Reason: as a Way of Knowing Richard van de Lagemaat, Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma (Cambridge: CUP, 2005)
The Science of Good Reasons
AP English Language and Composition
 Reason A Way of Knowing.  Logic is the beginning of wisdom, Valeris, not the end. - Spock.
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Logic in Everyday Life.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Ways of Knowing: Reason Reason. Cogito ergo sum Reasoning Deductive Inductive.
Reasoning as a Way of knowing
Epistemology – Study of Knowledge
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Reasoning To understand and analyse how basic philosophical arguments work. Understand basic philosophical terms. Use the terms to identify key features.
The construction of a formal argument
ToK - Reason 1. Reason (noun) a basis or cause, as for some belief, action, fact, event, etc 2. Reason (verb) - to think or argue in a logical manner;
Deductive and induction reasoning
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. FOUNDATIONS.
Deductive reasoning. The curious incident An expensive racehorse has been stolen. A policeman asks Holmes if any aspect of the crime strikes him as significent.
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
Knowledge Claims By now, after many years of full-time education and life- experience, you can, perhaps, claim to know many things. You should be able.
REASONING as a Way of Knowing. REASONING Our capacity to think beyond our immediate experiences We use reasoning to build our knowledge and to evaluate.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Reasoning as a Way of knowing
SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE Or OBSTACLE TO IT?
ARGUMENTATION AND LOGIC
What is it? How does it work? Why does it matter?
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Let’s play.
If A happens, then B happens then A must cause B
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Fallacies Implicit or explicit arguments that: Ignore logic and reason
The Ontological Argument
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Reasoning about Reasoning
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
1 A The Cosmological Argument Kalam Argument
The Ontological Argument
Inductive and Deductive Logic
From Informal Fallacies to Formal Logic
Logical Fallacies.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

4/9/13 CAS plan is due 4/23/13 or earlier; talk to Ms. Gant if you have questions. Quarter 4 TOK Reminders: – Work is due in class on due date – You need to be taking notes from the text – You may not print out the powerpoints I give and use as notes on the quizzes. – Participation will be a weekly grade in this class this quarter. – If you need something printed, please arrive early to get it done. If you send me something via , I will print it when you get here, so build time in for this.

And finally… You asked IB teachers not to grade every little thing and to give you more time for big assignments— there is reciprocity in that request that falls on you: Teachers grade every little thing because they fear you won’t do it unless there are points attached; in other words, you won’t do something if you won’t be turning it in. Teachers have to be able to trust that you’ll do something even if you’re not graded traditionally on it. When given 2-3 weeks for bigger assignments, quality needs to reflect that.

Reason and Logic I think, therefore I am. -Rene Descartes

A few more vocab words A priori Post priori Antecedent Consequent Explicit Implicit Axiom erroneous Microcosm Anomaly Aberration Incontrovertible Dogma Doctrine Verites de fait Verites de raison

My dear, Watson… The curious incident of the dog in the nighttime…. The guard dog will bark at strangers. The guard dog did not bark. The murderer was not a stranger. “It’s elementary!”

Tied to other WAYs of knowing: Remember that we develop reason and logic based on a system of rewards that appeals to sensory/emotion/language. Think of a baby learning what things are called…what rewards does he get when he is correct?

Logic is the art of reason. Three kinds of Reasoning: Deductive Inductive Creative/informal Rationalism: argues that reason is the most important source of knowledge; rationalists are suspicious of knowledge based in perception or emotion.

Logical assumptions: premises, drawing conclusions independent of external factors like culture, class, etc. Reason helps us develop consistent beliefs about the world. However, is it always appropriate? Does it leave room for faith/belief?

Reason is said not to be the way to get closest to truth but rather the best way to preserve the truth.

Bad reasoning… Fallacies: invalid forms and patterns of reasoning (more on this later). Rationalization: manufacturing reasons to justify invalid arguments, positions, or prejudices. Causes of bad reasoning: ignorance, laziness, pride, prejudice…can you think of others?

Implications Implication: logical relation between two ideas. Most basic: If A, then B. A implies that B will occur. If idea A is true, idea B cannot be false.

Laws of thought Five Laws of Thought: 1. Law of Identity: If A, then A. If this is a pencil, then it is a pencil.

Law #2 Law of non-contradiction: Nothing can be A and not A. This pencil cannot also not be a pencil.

Law #3 Law of Excluded Middle Everything is either A or not A. Everything is either a pencil or not a pencil.

Law #4 All proof must end somewhere, and is dependent on developed systems of classification. The word for this object is ‘pencil’. Therefore it is a pencil.

Law #5 The Law of Infinite Regress A.Infinite regress arises when we ask what are the justifications for the reasons themselves. B.If the reasons count as knowledge, they must themselves be justified with reasons for the reasons, and so on, ad infinitum. This is a pencil. Why? Because it writes on paper with lead. But why does that define it as a pencil? Because all of these other objects that also write with lead on paper are called pencils. Why?

“Reliable” generalizations Generally reliable…generalizations…will have the following: Number of confirmed experiences are greater than 1. Variety of circumstances with same results. Exceptions and counter examples have been examined. Coherence—even more evidence required for surprising claims or results. Subject area reliability (For more, see pg. 123 of text)

Truth and validity Truth and validity are NOT the same thing. Often, premises are based on generalizations. TESTS: – Are the premises true? – Are the arguments valid? AN argument that follows a valid process may not be true.

Reason= – When the first two premises are true, the conclusion will be true. – When one of the two premises is false, the conclusion is false. – If the conclusion of an argument is not true, then either the argument is invalid or at least one premise is false.

Example of a syllogism that is ALWAYS valid: – All As are Bs, Some As are Cs. Therefore, some Bs are Cs. – Can you draw this in a Venn diagram? For more, see pg of text.