Darren T. Nielsen, M.Ad., CISA, CPP, PCI, PSP, CBRA, CBRM Senior Compliance Auditor, Cyber Security Salt Lake City, UT Office CIP-006 V3 to CIP-006 V5 Transition Overview 5/14/2014 V5 Outreach Salt Lake City, UT

2 Lessons Learned updates to slide deck Revision History of Road Show CIP-006Change HistoryDate R1Added R1.105/8/2014NERC SDT addition per FERC Order

3 24 years Physical Security Experience o Marine Corps Veteran (PRP) o Retired Law Enforcement Officer o 7 years Critical Infrastructure Protection Program o ASIS Utilities Security Council – Chairman o ASIS Physical Security Council o Education: M.Ad. (Leadership Emphasis) w/Distinction - Northern Arizona University o BA- Police Science- Ottawa University (Summa Cum Laude) Speaker Intro: Darren T. Nielsen, CISA, CPP, PCI, PSP,

4 Provide a basic overview of the changes Share WECC audit approach Provide examples of Best Practices Answer questions to assist your compliance efforts Purpose of V5 transition Presentation

5 Physical Security Program o Must define the operational or procedural controls to restrict physical access o Removed current “6 wall” wording to instead require a Physical Border- PSP o For High Impact, added the need to utilize two or more different and complementary physical access controls to restrict physical access o Testing changed to a 24-month cycle ocument_for_CIP_V5_Clean_( ).pdf Summary of CIP Changes

6 A new Purpose….and some new language To manage physical access to “BES Cyber Systems” by specifying a physical security plan in support of protecting BES Cyber Systems against compromise that could lead to misoperation or instability in the BES. CIP Physical Security of BES Cyber Systems

7 High Impact BES Cyber Systems – Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems– Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems without External Routable Connectivity – Medium Impact BES Cyber Systems with External Routable Connectivity – o This also excludes Cyber Assets in the BES Cyber System that cannot be directly accessed through External Routable Connectivity. New language to assist going forward

8 Physical Access Control Systems (PACS) – Applies to each Physical Access Control System associated with a referenced high impact BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber System. New language (Continued)

9 Locally mounted hardware or devices at the Physical Security Perimeter – Applies to the locally mounted hardware or devices (e.g. such as motion sensors, electronic lock control mechanisms, and badge readers) at a Physical Security Perimeter associated with a referenced high impact BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber System with External Routable Connectivity, and that does not contain or store access control information or independently perform access authentication. These hardware and devices are excluded in the definition of Physical Access Control Systems. New language (Continued)

10 Protected Cyber Assets (PCA) – Applies to each Protected Cyber Asset associated with a referenced high impact BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber System. Electronic Access Control or Monitoring Systems (EACMS) – Applies to each Electronic Access Control or Monitoring System associated with a referenced high impact BES Cyber System or medium impact BES Cyber System. Examples may include, but are not limited to, firewalls, authentication servers, and log monitoring and alerting systems. You're now bilingual CIP personnel (end of new language)

11 A substantive change to your Plan.. now becomes a program. No Annual Approval. CIP —R1 A new look- Requirements and Measures

12 Methods to control, log and monitor access remain the same as CIP R4, R5, and R6 CIP —R1.2 A new look- Requirements and Measures

13 o Aligns to old V3 for CCA’s and protecting PACS assets. CIP —R1.2 A new look- Requirements and Measures

14 Major Change- Physical Access control to High Impact BES Cyber Systems assets CIP —R1.3 A new look- Requirements and Measures For physically layered protection, a locked gate in combination with a locked control- building could be acceptable, provided no single authenticator (e.g., key or card key) would provide access through both.

15 Two forms of access control means access needs to require two of the following: 1.Something you know (PIN, password, etc.) 2.Something you are (biometrics, security guard identity verification, etc.) 3.Something you have (Hard key, token, card key, etc.) CIP —R1.3 – Audit Approach

16 Methods of physical access control include: Card Key: A means of electronic access where the access rights of the card holder are predefined in a computer database. Access rights may differ from one perimeter to another. Special Locks: These include, but are not limited to, locks with “restricted key” systems, magnetic locks that can be operated remotely, and “man ‐ trap” systems. Security Personnel: Personnel responsible for controlling physical access who may reside on ‐ site or at a monitoring station. Other Authentication Devices: Biometric, keypad, token, or other equivalent devices that control physical access into the Physical Security Perimeter. CIP —R1.3 – Audit Approach

17  This is the old CIP R5 Monitoring Requirement CIP —R1.4 A new look- Requirements and Measures

18 More of the old R5 for High Impact and Medium with ERC within 15 minutes CIP —R1.5 A new look- Requirements and Measures

19 Specific to PACS associated with….this is the old CIP-006 R2.1 with a twist. PACS must now be monitored in addition to the Physical Security Perimeter. CIP —R1.6 A new look- Requirements and Measures

20 CIP —R1.7 A new look- Requirements and Measures NOTE: within 15 minutes for “detected” UA access to a PACS. Added notification emphasis to contact identified in CSIRP.

21 Logs requirement (old CIP R6) CIP —R1.8 A new look- Requirements and Measures

22 Log retention stays the same (Old V3- R7) CIP —R1.9 A new look- Requirements and Measures

23 CIP —R1.10 (in work SDT)

24 Visitor Control Program Old (V3 R1.6) Added CIP Exceptional Circumstances CIP —R2 A new look- Requirements and Measures

25 Major change: log visitor only once per day. (Initial entry and exit)- Point of Contact req. maintain logs for 90 days (R2.3) CIP —R2.2 & 2.3 A new look- Requirements and Measures

26 Testing & Maintenance (CIP R8) changed from 3 year to 2 year cycle CIP —R3 A new look- Requirements and Measures

27 Key Control Program o Who has them? o How do you log the use of a hard key? o Is an alarm triggered when the door is opened? o Do they have a PRA? o Training Physical Access Controls

28 Visitor/escort forgets to log out. Are you in a Possible Violation situation? o Can you retrieve data via Cameras? o Other Logs? o Ask and update to ensure completeness of logs. Logging

29 PSWG- Get plugged in! CIIMS/PSWG/default.aspxhttp:// CIIMS/PSWG/default.aspx Phone call away-  We want to help. Always willing to provide our “audit approach” At Your Service

Darren T. Nielsen, M.Ad, CISA, CPP, PCI, PSP, CBRA, CBRM Senior Compliance Auditor, Cyber Security Western Electricity Coordinating Council 155 North 400 West, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT (801) Questions?