SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM, GROWTH AND STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WENDY ST. MICHELL ASSESSMENT DIRECTOR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCSC AA-AAS Ben Morrison Alternate Assessment Coordinator Special Education Programs
Advertisements

CAC NOVEMBER 13, 2014 Common Core State Standards and Universal Design for Learning.
1 Test Accommodations for Students with Disabilities in Virginia’s Accountability Assessment System Virginia Department of Education Division of Assessment.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
0 Accessibility Features and Accommodations Ensuring Access for All Students.
Smarter Balanced Accessibility and Accommodations Policies and Guidelines Chief Instructional Officers Update March 12, 2013.
CCSS-M IN MICHIGAN. Michigan K-12 Standards CCSS-M with Michigan “Welcome”
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
June 2014 NCSC Commitment to Student Communicative Competence.
Challenging All Students to Meet High Expectations: Supporting Schools in Raising the Bar for Students with Disabilities Office of Special Education Programs.
KRISTEN BURTON ERIN FAASUAMALIE Future of Alternate Achievement Standards and Assessment in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Accommodations SBAC Assessment Beth Schiltz Fall 2014.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Michigan K−12 Statewide Assessments Division of Accountability Services (DAS) Office of Special Education (OSE) MDE Office of Special Education and ISD.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
A LTERNATE P ROFICIENCY A SSESSMENT AND D YNAMIC L EARNING M APS.
PARCC: Accessibility Features & Accommodations
Assessment Accommodations Andrew R Hinkle. Is There Anything I Need to Know About Testing Accommodations for Online Assessments?
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
NCSC Project Description
Accommodations Charter Schools Roundtable October 26, 2011.
Assessment Update Testing Students with Disabilities District Test Coordinator Meeting Douglas Alexander Anne Mruz Suzanne Swaffield June 11,
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on Key Transition and Smarter Balanced Assessment Development.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES January OSPI agency priorities and organization chart.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
Emily Day.  The state of North Carolina requires that all students be assessed at the end of the school year (middle and high school) or at the end of.
Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.
Dynamic Learning Maps Update Linda Howley, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Joanne Winkelman, Office of Special Education.
Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
Star Rating Part 2 Growth, Graduation Rates and College and Career Readiness.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
Alternate Assessments Ben Morrison Alternate Assessment Coordinator Special Education Programs
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.
PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual Training for Parents Presented on November 20, 2014 Presented by the: Office of Special Education.
State Assessments: Updates and New Info Peg Moran Hussien Tim Peterson November 2015.
Accessibility and Accommodations Alabama Student Assessment Program Nannette Pence Education Specialist Student Assessment Alabama State Department of.
Accessibility and Accommodations Alabama Student Assessment Program Nannette Pence Education Specialist Student Assessment Alabama State Department of.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
29 States $176,000,000 for development Includes formative, interim & summative Governed and controlled by states Co-chairs, Judy Park, Utah; Tony Alpert,
Preparing All Students for College and Career Readiness CCSS and Smarter Balanced Assessments 101.
Common Core Standards. Development of the Common Core Standards California has joined a national movement to adopt common standards and assessments for.
Special Ed. New Direction - Kathy Airhart and Joey Hassel  focus on embedded PD model combining sped and general PD  shifting towards performance based.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Hope Allen – Director of Assessment. 2 Grade(s)Required TestsSubjects KindergartenQualls ScreenerN/A 1 st and 2 nd GradeIOWA AssessmentMath and ELA 3.
Testing Students with Disabilities. Resources Appendix C of Test Administration Manuals – SCPASS Science and Social Studies – End-of-Course English 1.
Assessments for the Common Core State Standards focus on Students with Disabilities 1.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
Common Core Standards - Implementation Timeline SCHOOL YEAR The school year will require full implementation of Arizona’s Common Core.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Language Arts Assessment Update
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
Summative: Formative resources: Interim Assessments:
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards
New Assessments and Accommodations
Presentation transcript:

SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM, GROWTH AND STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WENDY ST. MICHELL ASSESSMENT DIRECTOR

SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM 1. Current ISAT 2. Future ISAT Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium b. Timeline a Pilot Testing b Field Testing c Full Implementation d Ongoing research and Evaluation

Smarter Balanced - Accessibility and Accommodations Category A: Options are open to all students. These options do not impact the construct nor item content. System options system might include masking of test items or visual magnification. Local options might include scratch paper or extended time. Category B: Options are available to students with a documented need. These options may effect item content but do not impact the construct being measured. System options might include read-aloud tools or language translation for mathematics content. Local options might include scribes or administering the test individually in a separate location. Category C: Option is essential for a specific access need and open to those with defined need. These tools may effect item content but do not impact the construct being measured. System tools might include refreshable braille display or audio descriptions of graphics. Local tools might include special equipment such as noise buffers, special lighting, or adaptive/special furniture. Category D: This category includes specialized supports for students who would not be able to access the assessment without them. Category D contains supports that violate the construct. System options might include a read-aloud on a reading test for visually impaired students who are not braille readers. Local options might be a scribe that translates responses into written English that are provided in ASL or verbally in another language. Focus on Access Needs Personal Needs Profiles (PNP) Being developed now

DEMO – Nimble Tools SMARTER BALANCED – A GLANCE INTO WHAT IS OUT THERE NOW…

Waiver: Idaho’s Accountability Measures 1.ISAT 2.Growth to Achievement 3.Growth to Achievement Subgroups 4.Graduations Rates 5.Participation How to Read the Student Growth Report 1.Student Growth Percentile (SGP) provides a norm-referenced measure of academic growth by comparing the student’s scale score to that of the student’s “academic peers.” all Idaho students being tested in the same grade- level subject and having a similar ISAT scale score in that subject prior to the current year. 2. Adequate Growth Percentile (AGP) provides a criterion-referenced measure of academic growth by predicting how much growth is necessary to keep or achieve proficiency in three years or by 10 th grade, whichever comes first. IDAHO GROWTH MODEL

IDAHO GROWTH MODEL AND STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 1. We do not include ISAT-Alt students in the growth model. -Size of population -Scale 2. WAIVER: If a subgroup is smaller than 25 then they will not be included in growth measures, rather all subgroups will be rolled into one.

NCSC is a project led by five centers and 19 states to build an alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS) for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. NATIONAL CENTER AND STATE COLLABORATIVE (NCSC)

 NCSC will not only develop an end of year test, but will work to develop curriculum, instruction, and professional development support for teachers of students with significant cognitive disabilities.  An opportunity to ensure that students with the most significant cognitive disabilities benefit from the national movement toward Common Core State Standards designed to prepare all students for success in college and careers. NATIONAL CENTER AND STATE COLLABORATIVE (NCSC)

WENDY ST. MICHELL Questions? /