LW 2103 Law of Tort Fact Issue Rules Application Conclusion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United States Law Laws can govern how people act in certain environments. But how are laws made?
Advertisements

Torts.
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Torts True or False Torts Defined Torts Completion.
Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test.
{ Chapter 10 TORTS: Negligence and Strict Liability.
The Law of Torts Chapter 4. The Corner Cafe Characters: Jamila ………………….Ms. Walton Thai …………………….Jacoy Daniel …………………. Peggy ………………….Kerisha.
I’ll sue!! TORT LAW Introduction TortTort is the French word for a “wrong.” Tort law protects a variety of injuries and provides remedies for them.
TORTS INTENTIONAL AND NEGLIGENT. INTENTIONAL TORTS Intentional torts share the requirement that the defendant desires the result or knows to substantial.
Chapter 3 Tort Law.
Chapter Fourteen Negligence and Intentional Torts This multimedia presentation and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. © 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 5 Negligence Chapter.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 6 School Personnel and School District Liability This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.
TORT LAW INTENTIONAL TORTS What is a tort? A tort is a breach of a duty imposed by law which results in injury to another. The law imposes a general.
 What is a tort? A civil wrong An injured party can bring a civil lawsuit to seek compensation for a wrong done to the party or the party’s property.
Crimes and Meanings Pages General Considerations Every crime is made up of elements. 1. Act and intent – person intended to commit a crime. 2.
Bullying Facts and Fiction. Bullying defined Any willful attempt or threat to inflict on another person when accompanied by an apparent present ability.
2 Crimes & Torts Crimes Intentional Torts
Tort Law – Unintentional torts
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. © 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 5 Intentional Torts.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
Tort Law 2: Intentional Torts Mr. Garfinkel 3/3/14.
12 NYCRR PART PUBLIC EMPLOYER WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION PROGRAMS.
Intentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Section 3.1 Definition of a Tort. Section 3.1 Definition of a Tort.
Business Law Jeopardy True or False?MultipleChoiceTortsVocabularyBonus.
Civil Law Security Services. Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.
Chapter 6.  A tort is a wrong  There are three categories of torts  Intentional torts  Unintentional torts (negligence)  Strict liability 6-2Copyright.
TORTS INTENTIONAL AND NEGLIGENT. The Elements of an Intentional Tort 1. An intentional tort. 2. An injury. 3. Tort was the proximate cause of injury.
Torts in a Health care setting. What is a Tort? A tort is an infringement of a person’s rights that constitutes grounds for a lawsuit. This may be in.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 School Personnel.
Tutorial Business Law Law of Tort. Question 1 The driver of a car driving at a fast speed hits a pedestrian who had just stepped down from the footpath.
By Kelly Marken CIVIL LAW & LAWSUITS. WHEN YOU TURN 18 YOU CAN SUE AND BE SUED IN A CIVIL COURT.
LS 500 Unit Nine Town Hall Saturday, February 11, 2012 John Gray Welcome! Are there any questions about the material.
TORT LAW INTENTIONAL TORTS Criminal Law v Tort Law Recap A crime is wrong against all of society that gives rise to sanctions usually imprisonment. A.
LAW OF TORTS QUESTION ONE (a)State the difference between intentional and unintentional tort. Illustrate your answer with examples. (b)Explain briefly.
Torts Civil Wrongs Tort When someone commits a wrong in civil law.
TRESPASS Monday 1 August categories of Trespass  Trespass to the person  Trespass to land  Trespass to goods (things)
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 4.  Crime- harm not only specific individuals but also the general welfare  Tort- private wrong committed by one person against another  Intentional.
 Do Now: Battery Scenario Reactions: Review your partners analysis of your scenario. Describe your reaction to his/her response? Do you agree with his/her.
Defences for Negligence. The best defence is Negligence did not exist, or the defendant didn’t owe the plaintiff a duty of care. The best defence is Negligence.
SUMMARY OF LAST CLASS DOCTRINE OF EXTENDED CONSEQUENCES TYPES OF FAULT (INCLUDING WILLFUL, WANTON, RECKLESS) CHILD AND PARENT LIABILITY THE INSANITY RULE.
The Law of Torts Chapter 4. Intentional Torts Crime: –Harm to specific individuals and also to the general welfare Tort: –Private wrong committed by one.
Relevance of intention in the law of Torts
Legal Concerns Sports Medicine I. Legal Concerns Liability- the state of being legally responsible for the harm one causes another person. Liability-
Battery. Battery – Actus Reus Ireland; Burstow – AR = Application of unlawful physical force to another.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
Intentional Torts Chapter 19. Types of Damages Compensatory Damages- money awarded to compensate for monetary loss and pain and suffering Nominal Damages-
Civil Law An overview of Tort Law – the largest branch of civil law Highlight the differences between tort law and criminal law How torts developed historically.
Civil Liability Issues and Negligence Unit 4. Objectives Define the intentional torts of battery, assault, false imprisonment, intentional infliction.
Battery Actus Reus - Ireland – AR = Application of unlawful physical force to another.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Chapter 6 School Personnel and School District Liability
Principles of criminal liability
Section 4.2.
The Law of Torts I’m going to sue you!.
Intentional Interference with the Person
Trespass to the person and defences
Introduction to Torts: Civil Law
Trespass to Person By Waseem I. khan Assistant Professor Shri Shivaji Law College, Parbhani, Maharashtra contact:
Torts – Introduction Torts deals with the relationships between people and the liability of one person for failing to live up to society’s standards for.
Warm Up: 1/27/15 GOOD MORNING!
Class Name, Instructor Name
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Tutorial Question 4 Chris Lau Franco Lee Ka Yan Lai
Criminal Law 2.2 Crimes Against the Person
Criminal Law 2.3 Crimes Against the Person
Presentation transcript:

LW 2103 Law of Tort Fact Issue Rules Application Conclusion

Fact Hugo quarreled with the couple, Tim and Claudia over the renting of Hugo’s flat Hugo threw a pair of scissors at Tim Tim dodged But they hit Claudia

Issue Can Tim bring a legal action to Hugo, even though he was not hit? Can Claudia bring a legal action to Hugo? If yes, in what legal reasons?

Rules Both assault and battery –An act must be direct and intentional –Proof of damage is not required

Rules Definition of “Assault” –any direct and intentional act or conduct of the defendant which puts a reasonable man in apprehension of an imminent physical contact with his body

Rules “Assault” –The defendant actually attempts to strike the plaintiff but fails –The defendant does not make any actual attempt but apparently prepares for an assault –Only threatening words are uttered but both parties are not in presence of each other

Rules Case – Assault Turberville v Savage (1669) 1 Mod Rep 3 I de s et ux v W de s (1348), Year Books Liber Assisarum s 99, p 60

Rules Case – Turberville v Savage It was held that the words negatived what would otherwise have been an assault The defendant himself made it clear that he would not attack the plaintiff

Rules Case -- I de s et ux v W de s Typical assault case It was held that where the defendant struck at the plaintiff with a hatchet but missed her, it was assault.

Rules Definition of “Battery” –any direct and intentional application of force by the defendant to the person of the plaintiff –to protect a person against all unpermitted contacts irrespective of whether there is any physical harm or insult

Rules Battery requires some positive act, as opposed to a mere omission, resulting in actual physical contact with the plaintiff’s body

Rules Case – Battery Collins v Wilcock [1984] 3 All ER 374 Wilson v Pringle [1986] 2 All ER 440 Pursell v Horn (1838) 8 Ad & E1 602

Rules Case – Collins v Wilcock The fundamental principle that every person’s body is inviolate…. This is a question of physical contact which is generally acceptable in the ordinary conduct of everyday life.

Rules Case – Wilson v Pringle …. Hostility was not to be construed as malice or ill-will and would be a question of fact in each case. The act of touching in itself might display hostility….

Rules Case -- Pursell v Horn The application of force need not be flesh to flesh but may be effected through other means, such as striking the plaintiff with a knife or other objects.

Application Prima facie –Hugo has committed assault to Tim, and –Committed battery to Claudia

Application In Tim’s situation –The defendant, Hugo, actually attempts to strike the plaintiff but fails –Similar to the case of I de s et ux v W de s (1348), the defendant was liable to assault even though the attack missed

Application The case of Turberville v Savage may not be applied –What the defendant did was actually hit Tim, not through threatening words

Application In Claudia’s situation Hugo did use direct and intentional application of force by the defendant to the person of the plaintiff

Conclusion From prima facie evidence –Tim can sue Hugo on the ground of assault –Claudia can sue Hugo on the ground of battery