Central Valley Habitat Exchange A Voluntary Program Creating New Financial Returns for Landowners RCD Conference November 13, 2014 Photo: Jacob Katz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roundtable on Sustainable Forests. Forests cover about 750 million acres -- more than a quarter of the entire United States -- and sustainable management.
Advertisements

DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
Towards More Sustainable and Market-based Payment for Ecosystem Services A Pilot Project in Lijiang, China Lu Zhi.
The new LIFE Programme INFO Day Brussels 12/5/2014 Antongiulio Marin Policy officer – DG CLIMA.
Ecological and Recreational Flows Workgroup Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps Urban Water Institute August 14, 2014 San Diego,
Corporate Biodiversity Finance Financing no net loss & positive impacts Dr Francis Vorhies Earthmind Panel 1B: Resource Mobilisation CBD Cop12 Business.
ECOSYSTEM MARKETS What exactly are we talking about in the Yakima River basin!?
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Bay Bank The Chesapeake’s Ecosystem Service Marketplace.
Restoration and Enhancement Delivery on Private Lands Lessard Outdoor Heritage Council Monday, January 26, 2009 Kevin Lines Board of Water and Soil Resources.
The LIFE Integrated Projects
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
Putting Nature on the Map Through Landscape Level Mitigation Greenprints to RAMP: A Multiple Benefit Approach Liz O’Donoghue The Nature Conservancy California.
MEANS TO AN END: the OECD Approach for Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Systems Getting really strategic Paulo Magina Head of the Public.
1 Evaluating and Trading Ecological Services A Lone Star Coastal Exchange Adam Davis Partner April 29, 2013.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Pheasant Summit Action Plan 23 June 2015 Kevin Lines – Pheasant Action Plan Coordinator Greg Hoch – Prairie Habitat Team Supervisor.
Indian Valley Meadow Restoration acre meadow located atop the Sierra Crest in Alpine County, CA. Headwaters of the Mokelumne River. Source for agricultural,
One Land – Many Stories: Prospectus of Investment Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities December
Working to improve availability of plant materials for partner organizations Shannon Hatch DEVELOPMENT OF NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS FOR RIPARIAN RESTORATION.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
National Reserve System and non-marine aquatic ecosystems Presented by: Tim Bond Science Coordinator National Reserve System Section.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps: Agriculture Conservation, Productivity, and Transfers Workgroup Urban Water Institute Conference.
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Northern California Conservation Planning Partners Eleventh Annual Habitat Conservation Planning From Tahoe to the Bay Workshop John Kopchik East Contra.
Two Years Old: Walking and Talking - Poised to Run? Urban Water Institute: August 25, 2011.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
Initiative to Integrate an Eco-Logical Approach to Infrastructure Development Air Quality Advisory Committee July 24, 2008.
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
Management of Commonwealth environmental water in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia David Papps, Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder Environmental.
August 2013 Coastal Incentive Grant Program Cycle 17 Highlights Planning for Cycle 18 Coastal Advisory Council Annual Meeting July 31, 2014 Georgia Department.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Mohamed Bakarr Senior Environmental Specialist GEF Familiarization Seminar Washington, DC January 17 – 19, 2012 GEF Strategies, Activities and Accomplishment:
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Counting on the Environment An Ecosystem Credit Accounting System Nicole Robinson-Maness The Willamette Partnership.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
Rainfed Strategic Research Portfolio of CGIAR Research Program Water, Land and Ecosystems Our vision: farmers and pastoralists thrive in highly productive.
Yolo HCP/NCCP Presentation to the Solano County Water Agency Water Policy Committee Petrea Marchand JPA Executive Director May 11, 2015.
Observations and Ideas for Payment for Ecosystem Services in Central Asia.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Mark Xu NRCS 67th Annual SWCS International Conference.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Science Translation, Conservation Adoption and Delivery: Revised process for needs and projects related to science translation and adoption Steve Fuller.
National Association of Conservation Districts Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL February 2, 2010 The Next Generation of The Next Generation of Conservation.
Central Valley Habitat Exchange A Voluntary Program Creating New Financial Returns for Landowners Introduction & Overview July 1, 2014.
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
The Oregon Watershed Council Model, USA
The Central Valley Habitat Exchange
Farm/Ranch Conservation Issues: NRCS Initiatives
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
Klamath Tracking and Accounting Program
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
Strategic Priorities and Actions:
Investing in Source Water Protection
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
The – new – LIFE program (Integrated Projects)
Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES)
the role of the PCG IN increasing access to finance to small farmers
Can insert photo or graphic in this space
National Waterways Conference
Presentation transcript:

Central Valley Habitat Exchange A Voluntary Program Creating New Financial Returns for Landowners RCD Conference November 13, 2014 Photo: Jacob Katz

EDF’s Vision Reverse habitat loss Incentivize outcomes/create profit Increase amount and effectiveness of restoration Better EROI

Habitat Exchanges in Development LEGEND Compliance Pre-Compliance Voluntary 3. Upper Green River Conservation Exchange 4. Colorado Habitat Exchange 2. Central Valley Habitat Exchange 5. Lesser Prairie Chicken Habitat Exchange 1. Mokelumne Environmental Benefits Program 6. NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program 7. Nevada Conservation Credit System

Problem: Net loss of habitat annually (despite $20 billion in spending) Problem: Net loss of habitat each year despite mitigation, public & private investment Net loss Habitat lost to development Mitigated through banking Mitigated through non- banking actions Farm Bill & regional programs ,000 Private non- mitigation Functional-Acres Numeric values are rough estimates for illustration only Public land mgt Fddfdfdfdfdfdfdf dfdfdfdfdfdfdf

Vision: Performance based investment Vision: Performance based investment for mitigation, public & private investment Net Gain Habitat lost to development Mitigated through banking Mitigated through non- banking actions Farm Bill & regional programs ,000 Private philanthropy 10,000,00 0 Functional- Acres Numeric values are rough estimates for illustration only Improvement Over Status Quo Status Quo Net Loss Public land mgt Fddfdfdfdfdfdfdf dfdfdfdfdfdfdf

6 Need: Significant Conservation & Mitigation Demand Projected in CA ~1.4 million acres over next 20 yrs. Coachella Valley Multispecies HCP

Exchange Goal Framework for effective habitat conservation in the Central Valley that:  Actively engages farmers and ranchers, on a voluntary basis,  Contributes to fulfillment of state conservation goals and mitigation obligations  Improves ecosystem function. Photo: Matthew Grimm

Public and private sectors engage in accountable and transparent investments in sustainable resource management. Landowners compensated for sustainable management and restoration that results in measurable improvements. Healthier streams, resilient floodplains and riparian corridors - resulting in jobs, cost savings, and other societal benefits. 8 CVHE V ISION Photo: Matthew Grimm

9

Exchange Program Area

Potential Needs (concerning HCP/NCCP implementation)  Publicizing habitat mitigation and conservation needs of the HCP/NCCPs to potential willing sellers to secure sufficient habitat supply at an appropriate time.  Ability to consistently prioritize habitat projects and available funding.  Comprehensive understanding of mitigation and conservation activities across the Central Valley.

Exchange Value Tool in the toolbox to help meet goals and objectives of current and future HCP/NCCPs:  Expanding market for conservation delivery to HCPs (i.e., the Exchange as a conservation broker).  Systematic and consistent metrics to help evaluate cost benefits for HCPs.  Third party tracking to coordinate mitigation and conservation activities across the Central Valley.

$$ Exchange Administrator Oversight Committee Science Committee State & Federal Regulators External Administrative Entities Habitat Impacts Sellers Buyers Habitat Verifiers MOU Registry Exchange Structure Proposed relationship with HCP/ NCCPs MOU

$$ Exchange Administrator Oversight Committee Science Committee State & Federal Regulators External Administrative Entities Habitat Impacts Sellers Buyers Habitat Verifiers MOU Registry Exchange Structure Proposed relationship with HCP/ NCCPs Other Sellers Other Buyers MOU

Consistent Metrics Multi-Benefit Habitat Quantification Tool Water Quality Waterbird Habitat Salmon Habitat Frequency, duration of inundation Landform & structure Riparian songbird Habitat Landscape Attributes & Processes Habitat Benefits

Exchange Administrator Sellers Conservation Delivery The Exchange Administrator HCP/NCCP Administrator Buyers/ Developers OR Quantifying Swainson’s Hawk Habitat

Habitat Attribute Categories Landscape Priority Habitat Quality (percent of potential) Acres Habitat Credits Nesting Habitat Foraging Habitat

Attribute Category: Foraging Habitat Attributes Vegetative Cover Hedgerows Management Practices

Attribute Category: Nesting Habitat Attributes Tree Presence and Quality Recruitment Capacity Proximity to Disturbance Documented On-site Nesting Gary O. Grimm

Attribute Category: Landscape Priority Attributes Proximity between Foraging and Nesting Habitats Predicted Habitat Suitability Index (NADC)

Attribute Weights Foraging Habitat ___ Vegetative Cover ___ Hedgerows ___ Management Practices Nesting Habitat ___ Tree presence and density ___ On-site nesting ___ Proximity to disturbance Landscape Priority ___ Proximity of nesting to foraging ___ Proximity to off-site nesting ___ Predicted habitat suitability ___ + ___ + __ = SCORE

Summary: Central Valley Habitat Exchange Quantification Tool for Swainson’s Hawk Transparent and Accessible Demonstrates restoration outcomes Tuned for private lands Adaptable resource

Timeline: One year (Mar 2014 to Mar 2015) Target species: Swainson’s Hawk Project site: Yolo County Major goal: Demonstration of concept Exchange Pilot Project

Photo: Matthew Grimm Timeline: One year (Mar 2014 to Mar 2015) Target species: Swainson’s Hawk Project site: Yolo County Major goal: Demonstration of concept Exchange Pilot Project

Tracking, Reporting & Coordination The Exchange Registry & Annual Reports

Benefits for Landowners Makes it profitable to increase the environmental benefits their land can provide, even as they maintain or increase their productivity Involves them directly in process and outcomes More easily links them to investors 26

Conservation Benefits Links impacts more directly to scientifically quantified/verified outcomes Focuses on outcomes, not just practices Larger projects possible - aggregation Integrates landscape conservation Results in net conservation benefits Expands investment in conservation 27

Questions? Ann Hayden, Environmental Defense Fund Photo: Jacob Katz