1 Business System Analysis & Decision Making - Lecture 5 Zhangxi Lin ISQS 5340 July 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economics of Information (ECON3016)
Advertisements

© 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Decision Analysis. © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 3 – 2 Decision Trees decision tree Any problem that can be presented in a decision.
Mixed Strategies.
Game Theory Lecture 4 Game Theory Lecture 4.
ECON 100 Tutorial: Week 9 office: LUMS C85.
Decisions with conflict
© 2009 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Game theory The study of multiperson decisions Four types of games Static games.
Decision Making Under Risk Continued: Bayes’Theorem and Posterior Probabilities MGS Chapter 8 Slides 8c.
C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to Describe and identify oligopoly and explain how.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
MIT and James Orlin © Game Theory 2-person 0-sum (or constant sum) game theory 2-person game theory (e.g., prisoner’s dilemma)
EC3224 Autumn Lecture #04 Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium
Risk Attitude Dr. Yan Liu
Taking Turns in the Dark (Subgame perfection with imperfect information) Econ 171.
Chapter 11 Game Theory and the Tools of Strategic Business Analysis.
Game Theory.
Economics 202: Intermediate Microeconomic Theory 1.HW #6 on website. Due Thursday. 2.No new reading for Thursday, should be done with Ch 8, up to page.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part I: Strategic Games
GAME THEORY.
Chapter 6 © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western Game Theory.
Game Theory Analysis Sidney Gautrau. John von Neumann is looked at as the father of modern game theory. Many other theorists, such as John Nash and John.
Ecs289m Spring, 2008 Non-cooperative Games S. Felix Wu Computer Science Department University of California, Davis
Adverse Selection Asymmetric information is feature of many markets
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
1 1 Lesson overview BA 592 Lesson I.10 Sequential and Simultaneous Move Theory Chapter 6 Combining Simultaneous and Sequential Moves Lesson I.10 Sequential.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part II: Mixed and Correlated Strategies Bernhard Nebel.
Finance 30210: Managerial Economics The Basics of Game Theory.
Decision Analysis April 11, Game Theory Frame Work Players ◦ Decision maker: optimizing agent ◦ Opponent  Nature: offers uncertain outcome  Competition:
Game theory The study of multiperson decisions Four types of games
THE PROBLEM OF MULTIPLE EQUILIBRIA NE is not enough by itself and must be supplemented by some other consideration that selects the one equilibrium with.
1 Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: /
Game Theory Here we study a method for thinking about oligopoly situations. As we consider some terminology, we will see the simultaneous move, one shot.
An introduction to game theory Today: The fundamentals of game theory, including Nash equilibrium.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 16-1 Chapter 16 Decision Making Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
1 Section 2d Game theory Game theory is a way of thinking about situations where there is interaction between individuals or institutions. The parties.
Static Games of Complete Information: Subgame Perfection
Game Applications Chapter 29. Nash Equilibrium In any Nash equilibrium (NE) each player chooses a “best” response to the choices made by all of the other.
Two-Stage Games APEC 8205: Applied Game Theory Fall 2007.
© 2009 Institute of Information Management National Chiao Tung University Lecture Notes II-2 Dynamic Games of Complete Information Extensive Form Representation.
Today: Some classic games in game theory
Reading Osborne, Chapters 5, 6, 7.1., 7.2, 7.7 Learning outcomes
Chapter 9 Games with Imperfect Information Bayesian Games.
Decision Analysis (cont)
Games with Imperfect Information Bayesian Games. Complete versus Incomplete Information So far we have assumed that players hold the correct belief about.
Dynamic Games & The Extensive Form
THE “CLASSIC” 2 x 2 SIMULTANEOUS CHOICE GAMES Topic #4.
Chapters 29 and 30 Game Theory and Applications. Game Theory 0 Game theory applied to economics by John Von Neuman and Oskar Morgenstern 0 Game theory.
Chapter 5 Game Theory and the Tools of Strategic Business Analysis.
1 Business System Analysis & Decision Making - Lecture 10 Zhangxi Lin ISQS 5340 July 2006.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 16-1 Chapter 16 Decision Making Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Extensive Games with Imperfect Information
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 5e © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 17-1 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition Chapter.
Quantitative Decision Techniques 13/04/2009 Decision Trees and Utility Theory.
P2 P1 Confess No (-1,-1) Confess (-5,0)No (0,-5)(-3,-3) TABLE 1 Battle of Sexes and Prisoner’s Dilemma Prisoner’s Dilemma Husband Wife Basket- ball Opera.
Decision theory under uncertainty
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews Courses: / / Lecture 12.
Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Static Games of complete information: Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibrium in pure and mixed strategies.
Chapters 29 and 30 Game Theory and Applications. Game Theory 0 Game theory applied to economics by John Von Neuman and Oskar Morgenstern 0 Game theory.
Game Theory (Microeconomic Theory (IV)) Instructor: Yongqin Wang School of Economics, Fudan University December, 2004.
Topics to be Discussed Gaming and Strategic Decisions
1 Systems Analysis Methods Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow SMU EMIS 5300/7300 NTU SY-521-N NTU SY-521-N SMU EMIS 5300/7300 Utility Theory Applications.
Advanced Subjects in GT Outline of the tutorials Static Games of Complete Information Introduction to games Normal-form (strategic-form) representation.
Chapter 12 Game Theory Presented by Nahakpam PhD Student 1Game Theory.
Q 2.1 Nash Equilibrium Ben
LECTURE 2 MIXED STRATEGY GAME
Game Theory Chapter 12.
Chapter 17 Decision Making
Game Theory: The Nash Equilibrium
Presentation transcript:

1 Business System Analysis & Decision Making - Lecture 5 Zhangxi Lin ISQS 5340 July 2006

2 Outline of Modeling Preferences Probability Basics – Conditional probability Risk Attitude and Expected Utility Game Model with Complete Information

3 Conditional Probability P(A|B) = P(A and B) / P(B) Example, there are 40 female students in a class of of them are from some foreign countries. 20 male students are also foreign students. Even A: student from a foreign country Even B: a female student If randomly picking up one of students to give a talk in the class. The probability the student is a female: P(B) = 0.4 The probability the student is from a foreign country: P(A) = ( ) / 100 = 0.3 The student is female and from a foreign country: P(A and B) = 10 / 100 = 0.1 If randomly choosing a female student to present in the class, the probability she is a foreign student: P(A|B) = 10 / 40 = 0.25, or P(A|B) = P (A and B) / P (B) = 0.1 / 0.4 = 0.25

4 Venn Diagrams Female Foreign student Female foreign student

5 Questions What is the probability of female students who are not foreign students regarding the whole class? What is the probability of male students who are foreign students regarding the whole class? What is the probability of male students who are not foreign students regarding the whole class?

6 Confusion Matrix Model M 1 PREDICTED CLASS ACTUAL CLASS BadGood Bad50 Good

7 Utility Functions Many of the examples and problems that we have considered so far have been analyzed in terms of expected monetary value (EMV). EMV, however, does not capture risk attitudes. For example, consider the Texaco-Pennzoil example. If Pennzoil were afraid of the prospect that Pennzoil could end up with nothing at the end of the court case, the company might be willing to take the $2 billion that Texaco offered. When discussing risk attitudes, we need to think of a utility function.

8 Utility Function Curve x: Payoff U(x): Utility x1x3x2 U(x) = f(x) Utility function

9 Utility Function Concave utility functions U(x) = log(x) U(x) = 1 – e x/R U(x) = +x 0.5

10 Risk Premium Payoff Utility lottery 10 P= P= Concave utility function Convex utility function Positive premium Negative premium

11 Risk Attitudes Risk averse – positive risk premium Risk seeking – negative risk premium Risk neutral –risk premium = 0, i.e. EMV can be used as the utility function

12 Quiz 1 Question Suppose you are looking for an apartment. There are two choices: 2br, $700/month, built 2004, cross street to the university 2br, $400/month, built 1988, about 5 miles from the university Draw a table as follow and input weights for each criterion to conduct your decision making. You can set any scalar for the different criteria and use the weight value between or in percentage.

13 Factor Rating (Scale: 1-10) CriteriaWeightApartment AApartment B Rent price 1410 Year built 183 Close to the University 1105 Total 2218

14 Decision Tree for Apartment Decision Apartment B Apartment A You Price w2 w1 Distance Year built w3 w2 w1 w3 Price Distance Year built

15 “Pennzoil vs. Texaco” Revisit Counteroffer $5 billion $Billion Texaco Counteroffer $4 billion (0.33) Texaco refuse (0.50) Texaco accepts $5 billion (0.17) Accepts $2 billion Accept $4 billion Court decision (0.2) (0.5) (0.3) (0.2) (0.5) (0.3) Making decisions Weighting payoffs

16 Utility Function Assessment Take into account of utility function: U(x) = x 0.5 Calculations: U(10.3) = = 3.21 U(5) = = 2.24 U(0) = 0 Total = 3.21 * * = 1.76 U(4) = 2

17 “Pennzoil vs. Texaco” Revisit Counteroffer $5 billion $Billion Texaco Counteroffer $4 billion (0.33) Texaco refuse (0.50) Texaco accepts $5 billion (0.17) Accepts $4 billion Accept $4 billion Court decision (0.2) (0.5) (0.3) (0.2) (0.5) (0.3) U = 2 U = 1.76 U=1.92 U = 2.24 U=1.41 Utility function: U(x) = x 0.5 U = 1.76

18 “Pennzoil vs. Texaco” Revisit Counteroffer $5 billion $Billion Texaco Counteroffer $4 billion (0.33) Texaco refuse (0.50) Texaco accepts $5 billion (0.17) Accepts $4 billion Accept $4 billion Court decision (0.2) (0.5) (0.3) (0.2) (0.5) (0.3) U = 1.39 U = 1.27 U=1.36 U = 1.61 U=1.39 Utility function: U(x) = ln(x) U = 1.39 U = 2.33 U = 1.61 U = 0 U = 1.27 U = 2.33 U = 1.61 U = 0

19 Exercise 2.1 Draw the decision tree of “Pennzoil vs. Texaco” Recalculate the problem by assuming U(x) = log(x). Put the outcomes in the tree and check the final decision Try to draw the utility function curve to explain the final outcome.

20 Exercise 2.2 Let U(x)=+x 0.5, calculate Question 4 in Chapter 3. Explain the outcome with the story told in Chapter 3. This is the assignment of homework 2 in addition to the one online

21 Prisoner’s Dilemma Problem In this game, each player has two strategies available: confess and not confess.1) If prisoner 1 chooses not confess and another confesses, the prisoner 1 will be sentenced to stay in jail for 9 month and prisoner 2 will be released. 2) If both confess, they will stay in jail for 6 months. 3) If both do not confess, they will only stay in the jail for one month. -1, -1-9, 0 -6, -60, -9 Not Confess Not Confess confess Prisoner 1 Prisoner 2 Nash Equilibrium (-6, -6) is a Nash equilibrium for the two prisoners

22 The Concepts in a Game Model Information set: Complete or incomplete Strategies: (Confess, not confess) Payoff: How much the players will be benefited/punished with regard to different outcomes of the game. Nash equilibrium: A set of strategies composed of the ones adopted by each player is called Nash equilibrium if, for any player, his responding strategy is the best one to others. Implying that any deviation of a player from the strategy of Nash equilibrium will cause the player worse off.

23 Not confess Confess Prisoner 1 Not confess Confess -6, -6 Confess Not confess Game tree – Extended Form of the Game Prisoner 2 0, -9 -9, 0 -1, -1

24 The Battle of the Sex Problem Pat and Bob must choose to attend either the opera or a prize fight. Both players would rather spend the evening together than apart, but Pat would rather they be together at the prize fight while Bob would rather they be together at the opera. 2, 10, 0 1, 20, 0 Opera Fight Opera Fight Bob Pat Nash Equilibrium There are two Nash equilibria

25 Matching Pennies Assume Pat and Bob decide to play a game to determine whether they will go to the opera or the prize fight. They are flipping two pennies. If both are heads up or tails up Bob win. If the outcomes are different, Pat win. -1, 11, -1 -1, 11, -1 Heads Tails Heads Tails Bob Pat There is no Nash equilibrium in this game

26 Two-stage dynamic game of complete but imperfect information: Bank runs Two investors have each deposited D with a bank. The bank has invested these deposits in a long-term project. If the bank is forced to liquidate its investment before the project matures, a total of 2r can be recovered, where D > r > D / 2. If the bank allows the investment to reach maturity, the project will pay out a total of 2R, where R > D. There are two dates at which the investors can make withdrawals from the bank: date 1 is before the bank’s investment matures; date 2 is after. If both investors make withdrawals at date 1 then each receives r. If only one investor makes a withdrawal at date 1 then that investor receives D, the other receives 2r – D If neither investor makes withdrawal decisions at date 1 then the project matures and the investors make withdrawals at date 2. They will receive R. If only one investor makes a withdrawal at date 2 then he receives 2R – D, and the other receives D. If neither makes a withdrawal at date 2 then the bank returns R to them.

27 Subgame perfect equilibrium r, rD, 2r - D 2r - D, DNext stage Withdraw don’t Withdraw don’t Date 1 R, R2R - D, D D, 2R - DR, R Withdraw don’t Withdraw don’t Date 2 r, rD, 2r - D 2r - D, DR, R Withdraw don’t Withdraw don’t = R > D > r > D / 2 Two pure strategy subgame perfect equilibrium: (r, r) and (R, R)

28 Discussion There are two pure strategy subgame perfect equilibria in this game It is different from classical Prisoner’s Dilemma game. The latter only has one unique equilibrium that is inefficient, while here the model has one extra equilibrium that is efficient.