Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) Enhancing American competitiveness by enabling discovery and innovation through the use of computational thinking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
Advertisements

Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
NSF Webinar Partnerships for Innovation Programs (Solicitation: NSF ) Karlene A. Hoo, Ph.D. Sara B. Nerlove, Ph.D. Program Directors Industrial Innovation.
NSF Regional Grants Conference St. Louis, MO
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.
Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) Objective: Enhance American competitiveness by enabling innovation through the use of computational thinking.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Leading to excellence Comprehensive Equity at Ohio State: What have we learned? Joan M. Herbers Principal Investigator ceos.osu.edu 1.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Computer & Information Science and Engineering Directorate (CISE) National Science Foundation (NSF) CPATH CISE Pathways to Revitalized Undergraduate Computing.
Other Funding Opportunities (Some pointers) C. S. George Lee Program Director Robust Intelligence Cluster Human-Robot Interaction IIS Curriculum Development.
NSF Research Support Relevant to Games4Learning John C Cherniavsky National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Sept 29-30, 2005 Cambridge, MA 1 Grand Challenges Workshop for Computer Systems Software Brett D. Fleisch Program Director National Science Foundation.
Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) Objective: Enhance American competitiveness by enabling innovation through the use of computational thinking.
Modeling Complex Interactions of Overlapping River and Road Networks in a Changing Landscape Programmatic overview Hypothesis Preliminary findings.
NSF CAREER Program & CAREER Proposals Claudia Rankins Program Director, Directorate of Education and Human Resources NSF CAREER Program.
May 28, 2009Great Plains Network, Kansas City, MO1 Cyber Advancing Research … Research Advancing Cyber Scott F. Midkiff  :  :
1 Cyberinfrastructure Opportunities for Antarctic Research Dan Lubin Cyberinfrastructure Program Manager NSF Office of Polar Programs 1.Overview.
Fred H. Cate Vice President for Research September 18, 2015 Grand Challenges.
NSF for CASIC Researchers Jacqueline Meszaros, Ph.D. Decision, Risk and Management Sciences Innovation and Organizational Sciences
Biomedical Science and Engineering Funding Opportunities at NSF Semahat Demir Program Director Biomedical Engineering Program National Science Foundation.
Program Overview (NSF ) Jessie DeAro, Ph.D. AGEP Program Officer National Science Foundation Questions:
Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Amber L. Story Deputy Division Director Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
S L I D E 0 An Introduction to National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants Development Office 23 Bacon Hall, Morris Conference Center Staff Members:Kathy.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
LSC/Virgo Meeting HannoverOctober 22, The View from NSF Tom Carruthers LIGO Program Officer +1 (703) Tom Carruthers LIGO.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Susanne Hambrusch Department of Computer Science Department Head Increase diversity of faculty, students, and staff Division Director in CISE at NSF The.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
GEO-AGEP webinar, August 2, 2012 Jessie DeAro, Ph.D. AGEP Program Officer National Science Foundation Questions:
Materials Innovation Platforms (MIP): A New NSF Mid-scale Instrumentation and User Program to Accelerate The Discovery of New Materials MRSEC Director’s.
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
Chapter 27 The Engineering Design Process. Learning Objectives Describe the various factors that are changing the design process Discuss the steps in.
Submit your questions by to NSF-NCS 2016 Proposers’ Webinar 1.
Presented by the College of Arts & Sciences with the Office of Contracts and Grants University of San Francisco April 2012.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
ITR COV AC Briefing Dr. Lesia Crumption Young ITR COV Member ENG AdCom Member May 11-12, 2005.
2015/2016 PSIEE Seed Grant Information Session October 21, 2015.
March 12, SIGCSE Report FOCE Summit Panel 1 Getting to a Future of Computing Education Summit Joseph Urban Texas Tech University.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
1 Cyber-Enabled Discovery and Innovation Michael Foster May 11, 2007.
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
Collaboration between University- National Lab-Industry It is in the national interest to foster and support a vibrant and dynamic research infrastructure.
Pre-Submission Proposal Preparation Proposal Processing & Review.
Carpe Diem Phase II Making the Case. Jot down 3 questions that you have related to Phase II (the one’s that you carried into the room today)
Images: Images are extremely important to publicize the results of NSF investments. In general, graphs, spectra, and reaction diagrams are not compelling.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Nancy Lutz, Program Director Economics NSF Day Conference SUNY Albany, October 2011.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Program February 25, 2016.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
National Science Foundation Opportunities
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
The Curry School of Education October 3, 2018
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Information Session October 13, 2016
Programmatic overview Hypothesis Preliminary findings
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Cyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) Enhancing American competitiveness by enabling discovery and innovation through the use of computational thinking

2 CDI is Unique Within NSF Five-year initiative All directorates, programmatic offices involved To create bold, revolutionary, radical, paradigm-changing, transformative science and engineering research outcomes Multidisciplinary activities that significantly advance more than one field of science and engineering Through innovations in, or innovative use of, computational thinking (concepts, methods, models, algorithms, tools)

3 The Funding Potential for CDI Could be Significant All NSF directorates are participating in this activity (subject to budget approval) Request FY 2008 FY 2009FY 2010FY2011FY 2012 $52M 50% pooled $100M$150M$200M$250M

4 CDI Philosophy “Business as usual” need not apply  “Projects that make straightforward use of existing computational concepts, methods, models, algorithms and tools to significantly advance only one discipline should be submitted to an appropriate program in that field instead of to CDI.” No place for incremental research Untraditional approaches and collaborations welcome

5 NSF Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts New language on Transformative Research: to what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?

6 CDI Review Criteria The proposal should define a bold multidisciplinary research agenda that, through computational thinking, promises paradigm-shifting outcomes in more than one field of science and engineering. The proposal should provide a clear and compelling rationale that describes how innovations in and/or innovative use of computational thinking will lead to the desired project outcomes. The proposal should draw on productive intellectual partnerships that capitalize upon knowledge and expertise synergies in multiple fields or sub-fields in science or engineering and/or in multiple types of organizations.

7 CDI Review Criteria Potential for extraordinary outcomes, such as,  Revolutionizing entire disciplines,  Creating entirely new fields, or  Disrupting accepted theories and perspectives as a result of taking a fresh, multi-disciplinary approach. Special emphasis will be placed on proposals that promise to enhance competitiveness, innovation, or safety and security in the United States.

8 Three CDI Themes From Data to Knowledge: enhancing human cognition and generating new knowledge from a wealth of heterogeneous digital data; Understanding Complexity in Natural, Built, and Social Systems: deriving fundamental insights on systems comprising multiple interacting elements; Virtual Organizations: enhancing discovery and innovation by bringing people and resources together across institutional, geographical, and cultural boundaries.

9 From Data to Knowledge Improving our ability to gather, organize, analyze, model, and visualize large, multi- scale, heterogeneous data Data aggregation and annotation Modeling and algorithm development Statistical analysis and stochastic simulation Approaches to visualization and pattern recognition informed by knowledge of human cognition and perception Data confidentiality, privacy, regulatory issues

10 Understanding Complexity in Natural, Built, and Social Systems Identifying general principles and laws that characterize complexity and capture the essence of complex systems is one of the major challenges of 21st century science. Attaining the breakthroughs to overcome these challenges requires transformative ideas in the following areas: Simulation and computational experiments Mathematical and statistical modeling and analysis, including agent-based modeling and neural networks Nonlinear couplings across multiple scales

11 Virtual Organizations (VOs) Creating systematic knowledge about the interwined social and technical issues of effective VOs. Advances in VOs bring together domain needs with computational thinking, including algorithm development, systems operations, organizational studies, social computing, and interactive design. CDI encourages: Multidisciplinary and potentially international research and education teams advancing the design, development, and assessment of VOs Exploring VOs as a primary vehicle for broadening participation in not just research but also education, with the potential to reach students at all levels and the public at large.

12 Broadening Participation Diversity of sciences and engineering, academic departments Junior researchers, students, and underrepresented minorities (especially in STEM) Intellectual partnerships involving investigators from academe, industry, and/or other types of organizations, including international entities (NB: Generally speaking, for-profit entities and international partners must support their participation in CDI from other funding sources)

13 Types of Projects CDI defines research modalities Project size not measured by $$ Projects classified by magnitude of effort Three types are defined: Types I, II, and III Type III, center-scale efforts, will not be supported in the first year of CDI

14 Type I Projects Research and education efforts roughly comparable to that of up to two investigators with summer support, two graduate students, and their research needs (e.g., materials, supplies, travel), for a duration of three years For example, focused aims that tackle discrete, high-risk problems that, once resolved, may enable transformative breakthroughs in multiple fields of science or engineering through computational thinking

15 Type II projects Several intellectual leaders, larger teams Significant education component Likely to be distributed collaborative projects with more extensive project coordination needs Greater effort than in Type I, and, for example, roughly comparable to that of up to three investigators with summer support, three graduate students, one or two other senior personnel (post-doctoral researchers, staff), and their research needs (e.g., materials, supplies, travel), for a duration of four years For example, multiple major aims that tackle complementary facets of complex solutions for advancing multiple fields of science and engineering through computational thinking.

16 Type III Projects Collaborative research, potentially distributed across several institutions May involve center-type activities, demanding substantial coordination efforts Greater effort than in Type II in terms of scope and in the order of magnitude of expected outcomes Type III projects will not be supported in FY08, but will be supported in future years, subject to the availability of funds

17 An SBE Hypothetical Example As hypotheses in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences have become more sophisticated, so have basic data needs. Merging biomedical data with survey and administrative data is a relatively untested area, but it is becoming more crucial for understanding hypotheses emerging from behavioral economics and other fields. Understanding human/environmental interactions requires the merging of data across multiple scales, such as remote sensing data, surveys of households, and ecological data. The creation and use of these sophisticated data sets raises many issues. For example, more and more of our data are geocoded. This raises serious questions regarding data confidentiality. How do researchers maintain the usability of data while protecting confidentiality when the identifying variables also are variables in the analysis? Research in this area lends itself to potential advances in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences, computer science, and the mathematical sciences. CDI Theme: From Data to Knowledge.

18 Key Dates: Letters of Intent (required) due: Nov 30, 2007 Preliminary Proposals due: Jan 8, 2008 Full proposals due: April 29, 2008  Full proposals by invitation only! Awards: no later than October 2008

19 More Information on CDI CDI Solicitation:  ds_key=nsf ds_key=nsf07603 CDI Overview, References, FAQ, Calendar of Events:  Contact members of CDIIT  Contact the CDIIT Co-chairs: Sirin Tekinay (CISE), Tom Russell (MPS), Eduardo Misawa (ENG)  SBE Reps: Terry Langendoen and Cheryl Eavey ; (703)