Aline Jaimes Kreinovich, Vladik PhD. CYBER-ShARE Meeting Nov ‘08

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
21M062007D The Shaw Group Inc. ® An Analytical Screening Technique to Estimate the Effect of Cooling Ponds on Meteorological Measurements – A Case Study.
Advertisements

Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
The electric flux may not be uniform throughout a particular region of space. We can determine the total electric flux by examining a portion of the electric.
The Fundamentals Of Modeling A Gaussian Coil-Gun Orbital Launcher
1 Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, POBox 64, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland (e  mail:
An Unbalanced Force FAFA FfFf FgFg FNFN. What is an unbalanced force? According to Newton’s Second Law of Motion: –an unbalanced force is one that causes.
Session 2, Unit 3 Atmospheric Thermodynamics
Reading: Text, (p40-42, p49-60) Foken 2006 Key questions:
Skyler Goldman, Meteorology, DMES RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ROUGHNESS LENGTH, STATIC STABILITY, AND DRAG COEFFICIENT IN A DUNE ENVIRONMENT.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Atmospheric boundary layers and turbulence II Wind loading and structural response Lecture 7 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Large-eddy simulation of flow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons under different thermal stratifications W. C. Cheng and Chun-Ho Liu * Department.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Surface Exchange Processes SOEE3410 : Lecture 3 Ian Brooks.
page 0 Prepared by Associate Prof. Dr. Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Chemical Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Marine Boundary Layers Shear Stress Velocity Profiles in the Boundary Layer Laminar Flow/Turbulent Flow “Law of the Wall” Rough and smooth boundary conditions.
0.1m 10 m 1 km Roughness Layer Surface Layer Planetary Boundary Layer Troposphere Stratosphere height The Atmospheric (or Planetary) Boundary Layer is.
MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Chapter 9: FLOWS IN PIPE
D A C B z = 20m z=4m Homework Problem A cylindrical vessel of height H = 20 m is filled with water of density to a height of 4m. What is the pressure at:
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Eddy Covariance John Knowles University of Colorado Department of Geography INSTAAR.
Comparison of Eddy Covariance Results By Wendy Couch, Rob Aves and Larissa Reames.
Ang Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Turbulence Zong-Liang Yang Department of Geological Sciences.
Training course: boundary layer II Similarity theory: Outline Goals, Buckingham Pi Theorem and examples Surface layer (Monin Obukhov) similarity Asymptotic.
Derivation of the Gaussian plume model Distribution of pollutant concentration c in the flow field (velocity vector u ≡ u x, u y, u z ) in PBL can be generally.
Calculation of wildfire Plume Rise Bo Yan School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Planetary boundary Layer near the sea surface.
The Air-Sea Momentum Exchange R.W. Stewart; 1973 Dahai Jeong - AMP.
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER THE SENSITIVITY OF A 3D STREET CANYON CFD MODEL TO UNCERTAINTIES IN INPUT PARAMETERS James Benson*, Nick Dixon, Tilo.
Session 4, Unit 7 Plume Rise
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Cases 1 through 10 above all depend on the specification of a value for the eddy diffusivity, K j. In general, K j changes with position, time, wind velocity,
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Evaporation What is evaporation? How is evaporation measured? How is evaporation estimated? Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 3.5 and 3.6 With assistance.
Xin Xi. 1946: Obukhov Length, as a universal length scale for exchange processes in surface layer. 1954: Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory, as a starting.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Faculty of Engineering Sciences Department of Basic Science 5/26/20161W3.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law. Let’s return to the field lines and consider the flux through a surface. The number of lines per unit area is proportional to.
Momentum Equations in a Fluid (PD) Pressure difference (Co) Coriolis Force (Fr) Friction Total Force acting on a body = mass times its acceleration (W)
50 Years of the Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory Thomas Foken University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Chapter 10 Rotational Motion.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
AOSC 634 Air Sampling and Analysis Vertical Flux Eddy Correlation (Eddy Covariance) And Vertical Gradient Copyright Brock et al. 1984; Dickerson
Chapter 7 Energy of a System.
Bulk Parameterizations for Wind Stress and Heat Fluxes (Chou 1993; Chou et al. 2003) Outlines: Eddy correlation (covariance) method Eddy correlation (covariance)
Lecture 20 Ground Water (3) Ground water movement
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Consequence Analysis 2.2.
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Scales of Motion, Reynolds averaging September 22.

BOUNDARY LAYERS Zone of flow immediately in vicinity of boundary Motion of fluid is retarded by frictional resistance Boundary layer extends away from.
Chapter 12-2 The Effect of Turbulence on Momentum Transfer
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Ekman Layer. Scaling of the horizontal components  (accuracy, 1% ~ 1‰) Rossby Number Vertical Ekman Number R o and E v are.
Modeling of heat and mass transfer during gas adsorption by aerosol particles in air pollution plumes T. Elperin1, A. Fominykh1, I. Katra2, and B. Krasovitov1.
Development of the two-equation second-order turbulence-convection model (dry version): analytical formulation, single-column numerical results, and.
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
Lecture 20 Ground Water (3) Ground water movement
Similarity theory 1. Buckingham Pi Theorem and examples
Different kinds of energy
FSOI adapted for used with 4D-EnVar
September 9 to 13, 2013; Reading, United Kingdom
PURPOSE OF AIR QUALITY MODELING Policy Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Aline Jaimes Kreinovich, Vladik PhD. CYBER-ShARE Meeting Nov ‘08 Footprint Model Aline Jaimes Kreinovich, Vladik PhD. CYBER-ShARE Meeting Nov ‘08

OUTLINE Background Footprint definition Model description Conclusions CYBER-ShARE meeting

Air flow in Ecosystem Air flow can be imagined as a horizontal flow of numerous rotting eddies Each eddy has 3D components, including a vertical wind component The diagram looks chaotic but components can be measured from the tower CYBER-ShARE meeting

Eddies at one point covariance is a measure of how much two variables change together The essence of the method is that vertical flux can be presented as covariance between measurements of vertical velocity, the up and down movements, and concentration of the entity of interest. CYBER-ShARE meeting

Where is the flux coming from? Footprint models and tower flux measurements is a first cut evaluation of the impact of biodiversity on net ecosystem CO2 exchange. Issues related to footprint, spatial distribution of vegetation and net ecosystem exchange: Representativeness of the integrated tower record Appropriateness of conventional gap filling that does not consider the effects of wind direction on algorithm development. CYBER-ShARE meeting

Until now estimates of annual NEE and its error have not considered the impact of wind direction, footprint and upwind vegetation. This effect can be a major source of bias error. (Kim at al. 2006) One question that needs to be address is whether the temporal sum of net ecosystem CO2 exchange is equal to the net flux if the wind came from the same wind direction and was processed by the same patch. To address this question we need to assess NEE for various wind direction sectors. Because wind direction is not uniform, gap filling algorithms must be applied. CYBER-ShARE meeting

Definition Footprint. The contribution, per unit surface flux, of each unit element of the upwind surface area to a measured vertical flux. The measured flux is the integral of the contributions from all upwind surface elements. The flux footprint is the relative weight given each elemental surface flux. The Plan view shows isopleths of the footprint function for a wind blowing from right to left, and the profile view shows the crosswind integrated flux footprint. The footprint has its maximum directly upwind of the measurement location, decreases slowly upwind of the maximum, and decreases very rapidly downwind of the maximum. . Figure 1. Plan and profile sketches of the flux footprint function f for a tower-based flux measurement. (Horst and Weil, 1994) CYBER-ShARE meeting

Objective. Estimate flux footprint φ(x,y,z) Flux portion at (0,0,z) caused by a unit point source at (x,y,0) In our case z=zm =6m Figure 1. (a) The crosswind integrated footprint f(x,zm). (b) Isopleths of the footprint. The solid lines depict the neutral case, the dashed and the dotted lines the stable and the instable case, respectively. CYBER-ShARE meeting

Parameters describing the model m – Describes how horizontal wind velocity depends on height z: n – Describes how eddy diffusivity depends on the z: How to empirically find m: So, - Vertical profile of the Reynolds-averaged wind velocity - Constant in power-law profile of the wind velocity - Vertical Profile of eddy diffusivity - Von Karman constant =0.4 CYBER-ShARE meeting

Simplest case (Schuepp et. al. 1990) Mathematical description: n=1 , m=0 Wind velocity u(z)=U does not depend on height Diffusivity K(z)=kz linearly increases with height CYBER-ShARE meeting

Auxiliary parameters Shape factor r=2+m-n Meaning: crosswind integrated concentration c decreases with height z Schuepp case: r=1 Useful constant Schuepp case µ=1 Eq. 12 c- crosswind integrated concentration. r – shape factor µ - (1+m)/r – constant CYBER-ShARE meeting

Analytical formula for velocity ū(x) of the plume: ū(x)= Eq. 18 Where Г(z) is the gamma function: Is an extension of factorial n!=1·2·…·n to real numbers: Г(n) = (n-1)! Schuepp case: ū(x)=U Gamma function is an extension of the factorial function to real and complex numbers. ū(x) – Effective plume velocity Г (x)– Gamma function U – Constant of power of law profile wind velocity CYBER-ShARE meeting

Analytical Model Crosswind distribution function Dy (x,y) described horizontal distribution Crosswind integrated flux footprint f(x,z) described vertical distribution Ø(x,y,z) – flux footprint or vertical flux per unit point source. CYBER-ShARE meeting

Crosswind distribution Function: Gaussian Model where dispersion is: Since , ū(x)~ Schuepp case: ū(x)~x Typically : σv - Constant crosswind fluctuation σ(x) - Crosswind dispersion ū(x)- Effective plume velocity zm – Measurement height CYBER-ShARE meeting

Maximum of a Footprint f(x,z)= Flux Length scale: Crosswind integrated flux footprint or vertical flux per unit point source f(x,z)= Maximum is attained at: Maximum footprint value is: Eq. 22 ζ(z) – Flux length scale Г – Gamma function µ - Vertical profile of the Reynolds-averaged wind velocity CYBER-ShARE meeting

Final Formula σ(x) – Crosswind dispersion r – shape factor µ - Vertical profile of the Reynolds-averaged wind velocity ζ (z) – Flux length scale CYBER-ShARE meeting

Towards a more accurate description In analytical model, we assumed power law (Eq. 11) A more accurate model: where: u* is friction velocity zo Is roughness length L is Obukhov length where: Kinetic energy , is equal to the potential energy gz The Monin-Obukhov Length is the height above ground, where mechanically produced (by vertical shear) turbulence is in balance with the dissipative effect of negative buoyancy, thus where Richardson number equals to 1: where u * is the frictional velocity, is the mean potential virtual temperature, is the perturbation scalar velocity' and θ * is a potential temperature scale (k). a process that involves heat transfer (addition or loss of heat to the surroundings) is generally called diabatic. u(z) - Vertical profile of the Reynolds-averaged wind velocity U – Constant in power-law profile of the wind velocity Ψm(z/L) – Diabatic integration of the wind profile CYBER-ShARE meeting

Conclusions Kormann & Meixner’s model is a simple approach to estimate footprint models. Footprint models will allow estimation of net fluxes when wind direction is not uniform. Therefore, improving development of gap filling algorithms for JER Station. CYBER-ShARE meeting

Questions / Comments / Suggestions Thank you Questions / Comments / Suggestions CYBER-ShARE meeting