1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
Advertisements

Existing & Future Earthquake Information Systems Ken Hudnut USGS, Pasadena LA Financial Services Sector Regional Recovery Coalition Meeting 17 November.
SEISMIC HAZARD Presentation is based on: Allen, R., Earthquake hazard mitigation: New direction and opportunities, in "Treatise on Geophysics”, Bilham,
Seismic and Tsunami Threats to Southern California Nancy King, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Pasadena Field Office Northridge earthquake 1994 Northridge.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
National Focus, Local Touch COLLABORATION IS THE KEY Ellis M. Stanley, Sr., CEM General Manager, Emergency Preparedness Department City of Los Angeles.
Earthquake Early Warning Research and Development in California, USA Hauksson E., Boese M., Heaton T., Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of.
IMW Strategic Planning August 14, “Options for Political Activism to Get Increased Funding” John G. Anderson Director, Nevada Seismological Laboratory.
SEISMIC RISK REDUCTION Stela PETRESCU MDPWH PMU General Director Ministry of Development, Public Works and Housing ICAR FORUM, Bucharest, 1-2 October 2007.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Tsunami Activities 5 Year Review Craig Weaver David Oppenheimer May 16, 2007.
Brief Overview, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
August 14, 2006 Seismic Monitoring in the Utah Region — Status and Needs Walter Arabasz.
Earthquake Predictibility, Forcasting and Early Warning Bill Menke October 18, 2005.
Monitoring Structural Response to Earthquakes using Wireless Sensor Networks Judith Mitrani June 18, 2002.
California Integrated Seismic Network Strategy for Success Woody Savage David Oppenheimer ANSS-IMW Strategic Planning Meeting August 14, 2006 Salt Lake.
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Southern California Seismic Network (USGS/SCSN) Prepared by Gary Cone.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration High-definition Images Reveal Changes on Many Scales NASA radar reveals local surprises......and troubling.
Sri Lanka Earthquake & Tsunami Warning Training Program Session I.1 Introduction to Earthquake Science: A Historical Perspective April 3, 2006 CETRAC,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
Fault Slip Sensors and DamageMap: GPS in Rapid Earthquake Response Systems Ken Hudnut USGS, Pasadena.
California Tsunami Program: An Overview James D. Goltz Ph.D. Earthquake and Tsunami Program Manager California Office of Emergency Services National Tsunami.
CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE EXERCISE OCTOBER 21, 2010 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
Section 10.3 pg. 222 Earthquake Hazards.
CISN Earthquake Early Warning UC BerkeleyCaltechSCEC/USC U.S. Geological Survey Real-time testing of algorithms statewide Richard Allen, UC Berkeley.
Emergency Management Information System - EMIS
Use of ShakeMap in Emergency Management Loren Turner Caltrans, Division of Research & Innovation.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL Committee on the Economic Benefits of Improved Seismic Monitoring Committee on Seismology and Geodynamics Board on Earth Sciences.
CISN Outreach: Transferring Real-Time Information Products to Users A Report to the CISN Steering and Advisory Committees Jim Goltz Earthquake and Tsunami.
The following figures show three modeled measures of network capability 1) Minimum magnitude threshold 2) Network detection time 3) Earthquake Location.
Earthquakes Most destructive forces on Earth. But it is buildings and other human structures that cause injury and death, not the earthquake itself 1988.
CISN: C alifornia I ntegrated S eismic N etwork The Program Management Group (PMG): Tony Shakal – CGS David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park Peggy Hellweg.
Pacific Island Countries GIS/RS User Conference Suva, Fiji November 2010 Tools for Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation Abigail Baca.
Meeting the ANSS Performance Standards & Future CISN Infrastructure CISN-PMG Egill Hauksson, Caltech Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees.
Shaking Out in Minnesota! Robert de Groot Director for Education, Experiential Learning, and Career Advancement Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC)
Renato U. Solidum, Jr. DOST-PHIVOLCS My EARTHly Experience as a Leader.
Michael Hodges, Chris Kohlenberger, Nolan Mattox, and Christian Vanderwall Seismic Hazard Map Plugin Improvement of ShakeMap Plugin Custom Color Maps Team.
Erol Kalkan, PhD, PE U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Instrumentation of Veteran Administration Medical Centers.
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
1 Suppose that local fire and rescue crews had to prioritize which of the "Strong Shaking Case Studies" areas to search first for earthquake survivors.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
CISN: C alifornia I ntegrated S eismic N etwork The Program Management Group (PMG): Doug Given – USGS Pasadena Egill Hauksson - Caltech Peggy Hellweg &
Brief history, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
Overview of CISN Operations and Products David Oppenheimer USGS Menlo Park, CA.
Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization
U.S. National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program 5-Year Review David Green, NOAA Tsunami Program Manager National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
SEISMIC HAZARD. Seismic risk versus seismic hazard Seismic Hazard is the probability of occurrence of a specified level of ground shaking in a specified.
Some Thoughts on IMW And Opportunity We represent a big area of the ANSS national program Bob Smith Univ. of Utah.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Flash Flood Forecasting as an Element of Multi-Hazard Warning Systems Wolfgang E. Grabs Chief, Water Resources Division WMO.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
Caltech CE Seminar - Jan. 25, 2007 The November 13, 2008 ShakeOut Exercise (GG’08) Threat to Roadway Lifelines: M w 7.8 on the Southern San Andreas Fault.
George Crawford, Washington Emergency Management Division June 25,2007 UW Educational Outreach – Tsunami Science & Preparedness Program (Su 07) Sponsored.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
1 Case Study: Pacific Gas & Electric Company San Francisco Lifelines Council Edwards Salas Senior Vice President, Engineering and Operations, PG&E February,
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
Dr. David Wald United States Geological Survey, Golden, Colorado & Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado Dr. David Wald
Earthquake early warning summit April 4-5, 2011, UC Berkeley Delivering earthquake warnings to the U.S. west coast.
California Tsunami Program: An Overview James D. Goltz Ph.D. Earthquake and Tsunami Program Manager California Office of Emergency Services National Tsunami.
Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Natural Hazards Science in the Coming Decade Facing Tomorrow’s Challenges USGS Natural Hazards Science in the Coming.
Earthquakes USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquake Basics
USGS Tsunami Activities 5 Year Review
California Earthquake Early Warning System (CEEWS)
TOWARDS A NEW NORTHRIDGE AFTER THE JANUARY 17, 1994 EARTHQUAKE
June 7-10, 2016 Emergency Operations and Coordination Centers (EOC/ECCs) at all levels of government and the private sector will activate to conduct a.
Earthquake and Tsunami Program Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for the Natural Hazards Caucus February 3, 2006 Dr. William Leith ANSS Coordinator Earthquake Hazards Program

2 Earthquake Losses: Earthquakes pose the highest, single-event financial risk of any natural hazard. Northridge, California, M 6.8 event of 1994 caused an estimated $40 billion in losses. Kobe, Japan, M 6.8 event of 1995 caused over $100 billion in direct losses, estimated over $300 billion total losses FEMA estimates annual earthquake losses now $5.6 billion

3 What can an advanced earthquake monitoring system do? Provide rapid notification of earthquake occurrences and effects to speed emergency response and recovery. Promote mitigation through application of earthquake hazard assessments and data in building codes, structure design, and civic planning. Provide data for basic and applied research on earthquake effects and to improve hazard assessments. Improve public education and awareness. All of these activities rely on improved monitoring data…

4 The Advanced National Seismic System An integrated national monitoring system A focus on the areas of highest risk –26 urban areas slated for dense instrumentation A commitment to rapid delivery of earthquake information to critcal users and the public A strategy to gather critically needed data on earthquake effects on structures A system built through close partnerships with States and local jurisdictions 6000 strong motion sensors in 26 at-risk areas 50% of these instruments in buildings and structures 1000 new or upgraded regional stations 50 new national backbone stations

5 The Building Blocks of the ANSS National Earthquake Information Center –NEIC, Golden, Colorado National Seismic Network –(“ANSS Backbone”) 15 Regional Seismic Networks –and data centers at Fairbanks, Seattle, Menlo Park CA, Pasadena CA, Reno. Salt Lake, Memphis, Weston MA National Strong Motion Network

ANSS Costs: Capitalization $172M, Operations $43M/yr Annual Funds: $8M $4M ANSS Funding

7 ANSS Accomplishments Over 600 new earthquake sensors installed; National and Regional Network Upgrades begun. ShakeMap capability implemented in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Salt Lake and Anchorage Real-time products and integrated communications, data analysis, and reporting under development Management and technical plans completed; National and regional structures in place and working.

8 ANSS Products: ShakeMap rapid mapping of strong ground shaking grew out of the Northridge earthquake experience Newhall: Intensity IX Collapse of Overpass Northridge: Intensity IX Parking Garage Collapse Granada Hills: IX Gas/Water Line Rupture Provides a rapid indication of probable areas of earthquake damage

9 In partnership with:

10 ANSS Backbone: Estimated Detection Capability Mw Simulated future detection capabilities with 22 planned ANSS backbone stations added

11 M. Çelebi Structural Array in Atwood Building, Anchorage Instrumentation monitors for drift, translation, torsion, and rocking

12 ANSS Performance Goals Through the modernization, expansion, and integration of earthquake monitoring and notification nationwide the completed ANSS will: Provide an accurate assessment of the severity and distribution of strong ground shaking in high-risk urban areas at risk within 10 minutes Acquire the seismic data necessary to improve earthquake hazards assessments and improved earthquake resistant construction and performance based design. Provide a few tens of seconds warning of imminent strong ground shaking in urban areas.

13 Modern networks can give detailed picture of seismic shaking in urban areas and possibly give tens seconds warning of imminent ground shaking

14 Timeline budget dependent Continued Expansion of the System Expect completion of system development phase in 2007 Expected 2007 funding will cover only O&M of the existing system and small expansion in the number of instrumented structures Over 20 urban areas remain to be instrumented for ShakeMap, and the 4 of 5 instrumented cities need additional sensors Event reporting will be at minimum perfor- mance standards in most areas of the country Early warning requires considerable new investment

15