VARICI RECIDIVE DAL 6% ALL`80% ? REZIDIVVARICOSIS von 6% bis 80% ? RECURRENT VARICOSE VEINS FROM 6% TO 80% ? Ebner H*, JA Ebner** * SVGTCHIR, ** CHIRURGIA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting: United Kingdom (Leeds) Target Population/Sample: Non-randomized sample of 95 patients (104 limbs) attending the venous clinic at the General Infirmary.
Advertisements

Technique to Heal Venous Ulcers: Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source (TIRS) 2012 Ronald Bush, MD, FACS Midwest Vein & Laser Center Dayton, Ohio.
PREVALENCE OF DEEP VENOUS REFLUX AS PRIMARY AETIOLOGY IN CASE OF LOWER LIMB VARICOSE VEINS ABSTRACT ID NO 99.
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round 19th October 2013
Venous Insufficiency: Nuts and Bolts
The Perplexing Perforator: SEPS, PAPS, nothing
Debate: Never Perform Thermal and Chemical Ablation in the Same Setting Ron Bush, MD, FACS Midwest Vein & Laser Center Dayton, OH.
Arthroscopic dorsal wrist ganglion excision – The treatment of choice? Kęstutis Bliznikas, Vytautas Mikelevičius.
Management of Leg Ulcers
Does competence of the terminal and/or pre-terminal valve influence the modalities of foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of trunk varices ? By Claudine.
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round
Endovenous Laser Therapy for Lower Limb Varicose Veins: intermediate outcomes of 800 limbs. Khalid AL-Ghamdi, MD Vascular Fellow, King Saud University.
Varicose Veins Core Surgical Trainees Vascular Teaching Day Kent and Canterbury Hospital 1st December 2009 Hasantha Thambawita SpR Vascular Surgery.
Lower Extremity Venous Disease: Peripheral Venous Insufficiency
Venous Reflux Disease and Current Treatment Modalities VN20-03-B 10/04.
Lowest traumatism Binocular loupes  3.5 Without electric scalpel Surgicalprinciples Horizontal incision Skin - Aponevrosis.
Understanding CEAP Classification for Venous Insufficiency
A Comparison of Treatment Options - The Efficacy of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy in the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous.
Endovenous Laser Treatment: Is it right for you?.
Your Company Name Procedure Education DAVID DIMARCO MD.
Ultrasound Diagnosis of Lower Extremity Venous Insufficiency S. Lakhanpal MD President & CEO Center for Vein Restoration.
New Treatment Options for Varicose Veins Minimally Invasive Techniques to Remove Varicose Veins Dr. Shannon D. Thomas FRACS Vascular, Endovascular and.
RECIST Overview.
Residents’ Journal Club Giao Q. Phan, M.D. September 4, 2014.
A GLOBAL APPROACH OF WORLD EMIDEMIOLOGY IN CHRONIC VENOUS DISORDERS Dr M. Cazaubon et Pr FA. Allaert.
Schul MW, Schloerke B, Gomes GM REFLUXING ANTERIOR ACCESSORY SAPHENOUS VEIN (AASV) DEMONSTRATES GREATER CLINICAL SEVERITY WHEN COMPARED TO THE REFLUXING.
Important questions As good or better ? Cost effective ? Overall, safer? Is it safe as a cancer operation? Can all surgeons do it? Compare to open surgery.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Efficacy of Omeprazole for the Treatment of Symptomatic.
Duplex Ultrasound Investigation of the Veins of the Lower Limbs after Treatment for Varicose Veins – UIP Consensus Document M. De Maeseneer, O. Pichot,
VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY P. Altes Mas, MD, FEBVS
Peripheral Venous Reflux - When is Surgical Intervention Necessary?
Endo-venous laser ablation of small saphenous vein
DIAGNOSIS & ENDOASCULAR MANAGEMENT OF PELVIC CONGESTION SYNDROME
Assistant Lecturer of Vascular Surgery, Zagazig University
The angiosome concept; open and endovascular treatment of CLI
Rome 2016, UIP chapter meeting Endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation. Comparison with stripping and foam sclerotherapy George Geroulakos Professor.
(RESULTS OF PROSPECTIVE NONCOMPARATIVE STUDY)
Implementation of a new two-ring radial-fiber combined with
A.A.Elmghrbee, K.Bilal, P.Whitear, A.E.P.Cameron, Abu Own,
Pelvic Veins a Source For Lower Extremity Varicose Veins
Treatment of iliac vein obstruction
SITE 2013 Barcelona, May 8th to 11th, 2013
New England Society of Interventional Radiology Case Presentation
Treatment of iliac vein obstruction
Prevalence of small varicosities Among Patients With or Without Telangiectasias On The Lower Limbs Estimated By Augmented Reality Examination Kasuo Miyake,
Introduction Methods Results Conclusions
Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation
Klippel Trenaunay Syndrome Case presentation
Treatment of Primary Varicose Veins by Endovenous Obliteration with the VNUS Closure System: Results of a Prospective Multicentre Study  Ph. Nicolini,
Outcome of Endovenous Laser Therapy for Saphenous Reflux and Varicose Veins: Medium-Term Results Assessed by Ultrasound Surveillance  K.A. Myers, D. Jolley 
Evaluation of the Superficial Venous System and When to Treat
Microfoam ablation of the long saphenous vein
Failure of microvenous valves in small superficial veins is a key to the skin changes of venous insufficiency  Jordan R. Vincent, Gregory Thomas Jones,
Steven T Deak, MD, PhD, FACS Deak Vein NJ Clinic Somerset, NJ
  Retrograde Injection Technique for Endovenous Chemical Ablation of Varicose Veins, A Case Study     Steven T Deak, MD, PhD, FACS Hungarian Medical Association.
Ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins
Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency  Robert F. Merchant,
Retrograde Microfoam Ablation of Superficial Venous Insufficiency:
Does air plethysmography correlate with duplex scanning in patients with chronic venous insufficiency?  Paul S. van Bemmelen, MD, PhD, Mark A. Mattos,
Midterm results of the surgical treatment of varices by phlebectomy with conservation of a refluxing saphenous vein  Paul Pittaluga, MD, Sylvain Chastanet,
Retrospective evaluation of the need of a redo surgery at the groin for the surgical treatment of varicose vein  Paul Pittaluga, MD, Sylvain Chastanet,
Patient characteristics and physician-determined variables affecting saphenofemoral reflux recurrence after ligation and stripping of the great saphenous.
Clinical Case Nicos Labropoulos
Clinical case Symptomatic GSV varicosities with normal saphenous vein.
The appropriate length of great saphenous vein stripping should be based on the extent of reflux and not on the intent to avoid saphenous nerve injury 
Clinical Case Symptomatic CVD without varicose veins
Clinical case of a swollen limb Emphasis on diagnosis
Varicose Veins and IVC Filter Registries
Subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery as treatment for lateral perforating vein incompetence and venous ulceration  P.A.R de Rijcke, MD, W.C.J.
Presentation transcript:

VARICI RECIDIVE DAL 6% ALL`80% ? REZIDIVVARICOSIS von 6% bis 80% ? RECURRENT VARICOSE VEINS FROM 6% TO 80% ? Ebner H*, JA Ebner** * SVGTCHIR, ** CHIRURGIA VASCOLARE E TORACICA Ospedale Centrale Bolzano

authoryearrecurrence rateTime F-up Jones L %prolonged Perrin MR %5 – 20y Blomgren L %not mentioned Kostas T %not mentioned Egan B %x – 10y Noppeney T %not mentioned Parès JO %not mentioned Gad M %5y Recurrence Rates in the Literature Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ?

Recurrence Rates in the Literature Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? Jones L 1996

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? authoryearpercentageF-up Leu HJ ,5 % 6,5 % 3y 3y Jeanneret C et al ,4 % 6y 6y Fischer R et al ,0 % 34y The Incidence depends on Time of F-up

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Diagnostic Methods Diagn. Method% Recurrence Questionnaire36% Clinical Examination47% Duplex60% Fischer R et al. Phlebologie 2000;29:17-22 Fischer R: 125 legs after 34 years

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Diagnostic Methods Author / / Diagn. Method Years F-up Sympto- matic Clinical examination Duplex Specifi- cations Indication for intervention Jones L 19962y11%43%52% Fischer R y36%47%60%22% Recek C 20004y16%68,5%81,5%GSV stem8,6% Blomgren L 20048y68%86%57%57% groin27% Parès J 20105y?50%65%22,2%

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Choosen Parameters: 1) Clinical Examination Hobbs Classification 2: „cure“ :absence of Varicose Veins „improvement“: Varicose Veins < 5mm „failure“: Varicose Veins > 5mm, main trunks or incompetent Perforators Hobbs JT, Arch Surg 1974; 109: , cited by Parès Ann Surg 2010 Hobbs Classification 1: Hobbs JT, Arch Surg 1974 „cure“ :no varices or symptoms „improvement“: minor residual varices ± symptoms „failure“: no improvment or worsening of varices or symptoms compared to preoperative findings

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Choosen Parameters: 1) Clinical Examination Hobbs JT, Lancet 1978; 27:1149, cited by Carandina Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007 Hobbs Classification 3: Class A: no visible and palpable varicose veins Class B: a few visible and palpable v.veins < 5mm Class C: remaining or newly formed VV > 5 mm Class D: incompetent main trunks and perforator

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Choosen Parameters: 2) Duplex 1 Edinburgh Classification Blomgren L 2004 Reflux on duplex with escape point and change of Compartment Carandina 2007 Fischer`s Classification Fischer R 2000 No precise indications Jones L 1996, Bountouroglou D 06, Faubel 2010, Obliterated, Competent or Reflux Kalodiki E

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Choosen Parameters: 2) Duplex 2 Vvein diameter ≥ 3mm Hartmann 2006, Jones 1996, Faubel 2010, van Rij 2004, 4mm Blomgren 2004, ≥ 5mm Carandina 2007, Frings 1999, Parès 2010, Zamboni 2010 Reflux > 0,5 sec Bountouroglou D 2006, Disselhoff 2011, Escribano 2003, + 7 > 1,0 sec Carradice 2011, no value Fischer 2000, Carandina 2007, Faubel 2010, Parès 2010 Clinical Significance Perrin „Consensus“ 2000,

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Performed Treatment Therapy % Recurrence Years of F-up authors No SFJ ligature82%3 Zamboni, SFJ alone43%,36%2,10 Jones,Belcaro, SFJ + stripping AK20%,47%,25%,8%1,5,2,2 Carradice,Faubel,Jones,Mooij, SFJ + stripping BK35%5, Kalodiki, SFJ + strip + perfor.60%,48%,34,5 Fischer,Parès, CHIVA87%,31%,18,5%3, Escribano,Parès,Carandina ASVAL/ESECnot found Not found Sclerotherapy ± Foam35%,65%,39%2,6,5 Shadid,Hobbs,Kalodiki Endovasc. Laser4%,38%,25%,44%1,5,2,10 Carradice,Disselhoff,Mooij,Belcaro Endovasc. Termal49%,5 Disselhoff,

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Definition Recurrent Varices = Varici Recidive Residual Varices What is „Recurrence“ in Surgery meaning? Return of the same pathology operated on earlier What is „Recurrence“ in Flebology meaning? Presence of varicose veins in a lower limb previously operated on for varices …… and varicose veins still present after the operation? Residual Varices …… and varicose veins in other sides but the operated one? Recurrent TRUE Perrin M, consensus document 2000

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on Criterion some authors Only clinical Hobbs, Royle, Parès, Rass Clinical and Duplex Faubel and 12 authors more Clinical or Duplex Carandina, Carradice, Blomgren Duplex Fischer, Hofer, Kostas Duplex and Questionaire Bountouroglou, Darwood, Disselhoff Duplex and amb.ven.press. Belcaro 1, Belcaro 2 Duplex and Symptomatic Shadid Assessment for recurrences

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? Indication for Reintervention ? Author / / Diagn. Method Years F-up Sympto- matic Clinical examination Duplex Specifi- cations Indication for intervention Jones L 19962y11%43%52%-- Fischer R y36%47%60%22% Recek C 20004y16%68,5%81,5%GSV stem8,6% Blomgren L 20048y68%86%57%57% groin27% Parès J 20105y?50%65%22,2%

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? The Incidence depends on % of Patients Lost Y F-up % patients lost in F-up 0, , 0, 15, , 10, 10, 39, 9, X, 0, 4, 16, 29, 37, 46, , 60, X, X, 11, 17, X, 87

Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? SUMMARY Recurrence rates depend on Time of Follow up Diagnostic Methods Choosen Parameters Performed Treatment Type of Recurrence Assessment for Recurrences Percentage of Patients controlled

CONCLUSIONS Recurrent varicose veins from 6% to 80% ? Dealing with a bare recurrence rate of varicose veins from 6% to 80% is not correct, neither for papers nor for lectures Every recurrence rate has to be supplemented by clear data concerning at least the mentioned variables