An Evaluation of the Nation's First Juvenile Mental Health Court for Delinquent Youth With Chronic Mental Health Needs An Evaluation of the Nation's First.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Juvenile Drug Court Dependency Drug Court Family Drug Court Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Juvenile Treatment Court.
Advertisements

Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 5: Law Enforcement and Juvenile.
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Site Dev Highlighted article or topic – Transport Findings Update and Summary _____________________________________ Website: Pre Sonja Schoenwald, Ph.D.
Criminal Violence: Patterns, Causes and Prevention Riedel and Welsh, Ch. 8 “Family Violence”
Trajectories of criminal behavior among adolescent substance users during treatment and thirty-month follow-up Ya-Fen Chan, Ph.D., Rod Funk, B.S., & Michael.
2011 Alachua County Juvenile Offense Data Presented by: Office of the State Attorney William P. Cervone Gretchen Casey, Project Payback
”Forensic psychiatric evaluations concerning mentally ill, non-psychotic offenders* in 2003 and 2008 at 4 regional centers in Denmark – development, differences.
Childhood Violence Exposure and the Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice Initiative Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research.
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
The Extent, Nature, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence Beth Chaney Texas A&M University.
1 Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Part 2 Presented by Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Project Director: Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
Transforming Juvenile Justice: Integrating Systems, Practice, and Policy Daniel J. Flannery, PhD Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence Kent.
1 Behavioral Health/Juvenile Justice (BH/JJ) Evaluation Report ( ) Presented by Jeff Kretschmar, Ph.D. Project Director: Institute for the Study.
Increasing Alternative Sentencing in the Juvenile Justice System Through a Partnership Between Public Defenders and Social Workers National Organization.
Strengthening Communities-Youth (SCY) Presented by Dr. David Hussey Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence at Kent State University.
The Analysis and Synthesis of Research Studies on Children and Youths entering the Justice System in Thailand. Researcher : Asst. Professor Dr. Sunee Kanyajit,
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Youth Empowerment Services (YES) A Medicaid Waiver Program for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbances Clinical Eligibility Determination Texas Department.
Youth and Co-Occurring Disorders. Disorders First Diagnosed in Infancy, Childhood or Adolescence Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity.
Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment New York County Alternatives to Incarceration Program Bradley Jacobs Deputy Director, Behavioral Health Programs.
WRAPAROUND MILWAUKEE “Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world: indeed, it’s the only thing that ever does.” Margaret.
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.
A Strategic Approach to Violence Reduction: An Overview for Project SAFE Cabarrus Jim Frabutt, Ph.D. Center for Youth, Family, and Community Partnerships.
MPER-CAMHPS School Mental Health Leadership Academy Session II January 15, 2008.
ST. LOUIS FAMILY COURT Judge Jimmie M. Edwards July 21, 2011.
LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS FOR NEWBORNS WITH DRUG EXPOSURE AND THEIR FAMILIES Harolyn M.E. Belcher, M.D., M.H.S. Associate Professor of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins.
Chapter 11 Subset of Overview by Mental Health Disorders GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
A Hard Sell for a Soft Option? YJB Convention November 2007 Foster Care NCH: Wessex Community Projects
Improving The Odds for Kids: Tracking The Success Of An Early Delinquency Intervention Program Jeffry A. Will, The Florida Center, University of North.
Self-esteem: The overall way we evaluate ourselves. Self-esteem: The overall way we evaluate ourselves. Emotional development is characterized by Emotional.
Juvenile Justice. juvenile Persons under the age of 17.
CHAPTER 3: Safety-Related Clinical Issues and Treatment Treating Those with Mental Disorders: A Comprehensive Approach to Case Conceptualization and Treatment.
North Carolina Juvenile Justice Process. What are the causes of Juvenile Offenses? Abuse & neglect by caregivers Abuse & neglect by caregivers Poverty.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile System. CHILD SAVERS Child Savers: Wealthy, civic minded citizens who were concerned with the welfare of disadvantaged children.
Wraparound in Washington State: Coordinating Care and Why it Matters Skagit Results: Dawn Scott and Terrance Ellison Pilot Site Results: Ericka Wiggins.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Dr. Abednego Musau. School violence is widely held to have become a serious problem in recent decades in many countries. It includes violence between.
Chapter 15 Subset of Overview by Program GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from
Facts to Consider: Presentation to the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Howard N. Snyder National Center for Juvenile.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Chapter 6 Subset of Overview by Gender GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available from
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Chapter 13 Subset of Overview by Crime and Violence GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
Lundy Bancroft. KEY CONCEPTS There are multiple sources of psychological injury to children from exposure to men who batter. Professional responses need.
Intervention outcomes for male DV offenders Preliminary Data Gilbert MacVaugh and Alan Rosenbaum (Unpublished)
Chapter 9 Subset of Overview by Risk of Homelessness GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
Chapter 17 Subset of Overview by Type of Treatment GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. November Available.
Association for Women in Psychology Conference “A Model of Integrated Treatment for Women with Co-Occurring Disorders who are at High Risk for HIV” Presented.
Law Visuals Criminal Law Civil Law Felony (1) Drug abuse violations (2) Driving while Intoxicated (3) Property crime (includes burglary, larceny,
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,
Joleen Joiner CJ420 Lisa Hancock September 5, 2010.
Medication Adherence and Substance Abuse Predict 18-Month Recidivism among Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Clients Elizabeth N. Burris 1, Evan M.
Office of Juvenile Justice The Office of Juvenile Justice protects the public by providing safe and effective individualized services to youth, who will.
P AUL A. C URTIS, E XECUTIVE D IRECTOR Everychild Foundation – February 23, 2016.
Gender Specific Associations Between Parental Risk Factors and Trauma-Related Psychological Symptoms Among Adolescents Jamara A. Tuttle, MSW 1,2,Terry.
TRAUMA AND THE BHJJ INITIATIVE Jeff Kretschmar Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education Case Western Reserve University Jeff Spears.
Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice
Domestic Violence and Stalking
Eighth Judicial District Court Mental Health Court Program
BCPD Statistics Crimes Against Persons Property Crimes
Patterns National Survey of Violence Against Women (NSVAW)
Criminal Violence Riedel and Welsh, Ch. 8 “Family Violence”
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Presentation transcript:

An Evaluation of the Nation's First Juvenile Mental Health Court for Delinquent Youth With Chronic Mental Health Needs An Evaluation of the Nation's First Juvenile Mental Health Court for Delinquent Youth With Chronic Mental Health Needs Monic P. Behnken, J.D., Ph.D. Iowa State University David E. Arredondo, M.D. Applied Neuroscience Wendy L. Packman, J.D., Ph.D. Pacific Graduate School of Psychology

Authors’ Note: This presentation contains material from a forthcoming publication. Full Citation: Behnken, M. P., Arredondo, D. E., & Packman, W. L. (in press). Reduction in recidivism in a juvenile mental health court: A pre- and post-treatment outcome study. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, Summer Wiley- Blackwell Publishing.

What is a Juvenile Mental Health Court? Specialty court model (Goldkamp & Irons-Guynn, 2000) Specialty court model (Goldkamp & Irons-Guynn, 2000) Specific offender population Specific offender population (Poythress, Petrila, McGaha & Boothroyd, 2002) Emphasis on psychiatric treatment Emphasis on psychiatric treatment (Wolff & Pogorzelski, 2005) Voluntary participation (Arredondo et al., 2001) Voluntary participation (Arredondo et al., 2001) Therapeutic Jurisprudence principles Therapeutic Jurisprudence principles (Wexler & Winick, 1991)

Santa Clara JMHC - CITA Focuses on interdisciplinary cooperation Focuses on interdisciplinary cooperation Promotes a child-centered, multidisciplinary, and family focused approach to treatment Promotes a child-centered, multidisciplinary, and family focused approach to treatment Provides integrated and coordinated services Provides integrated and coordinated services Culturally sensitive community resources Culturally sensitive community resources Caregivers involved in treatment Caregivers involved in treatment Protects the rights of the child and the community Protects the rights of the child and the community

Simplified Traditional Court Structure Judge District Attorney Mental Health Probation Detention Defense Counsel Juvenile Family

CITA Structure Juvenile Judge Probation Mental Health District Attorney Defense Counsel FamilySchool Advocates

Study Design Demographic characteristics Demographic characteristics Descriptive Statistics Descriptive Statistics Recidivism rates for graduates Recidivism rates for graduates McNemar Tests and Paired T-Tests McNemar Tests and Paired T-Tests Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test

N = 133 Overall Demographics

Demographics 15 years old (11-18) 15 years old (11-18) Race Race 34% Caucasian 33% Hispanic 13% Biracial 9% African American 6% Asian 5% Other Sex Sex 67% male 33% female 58% female single parent home 58% female single parent home 9 th grade 90% with school behavior problems 87% abuse substances 31% gang involvement M Diagnoses = 4 (1-12) M Medication = 2 (1-11) M Offenses = 4 (1-17) 52% exposed to domestic violence

Diagnoses ADHD 60.15% Sub. Abuse/Dep % Bipolar DO 41.36% Major Dep. DO 34.59% Oppos./Defiant DO 30.08% Adjustment DO 25.56% Mood DO NOS 19.55% Depressive DO NOS 15.54% PTSD15.04% Learning Disorders 15.04% AXIS II features 14.29% Parent/Child Prob13.53% Dysthymic DO 12.03% Conduct DO 12.03% MR/Borderline IQ 9.77% Psychotic DO 8.27% Anxiety DO NOS 6.77% Inter./Explosive DO 6.02% Enuresis/Encopresis5.26% Disruptive Beh. DO 4.51% Reactive/Attach. DO3.76% OCD3.76% Amph Abuse/Dep3.01% Gen. Anxiety DO 3.01%

Medications Wellbutrin 24.06% Depakote 22.56% Ritalin 18.80% Risperdal 17.29% Prozac 15.04% Concerta 14.29% Zoloft 14.29% Seroquel 12.78% Lithium 10.53% Strattera 9.77% Klonapin 9.02% Zyprexa 9.02% Adderall 8.27% Paxil 8.27% Trazedone 8.27% Abilify 7.52% Geodon 7.52% Celexa 6.02% Effexor 6.02% Topomax 5.26%

Risk Factors Risk Factors For Violence And Psychiatric Disturbance Prior Psychiatric Hospitalization 67 (50.38%) Exposure to Domestic Violence 65 (51.88%) Family History of Mental Illness 58 (43.61%) Physical Abuse Victim 54 (40.60%) Prior Suicide Attempt 46 (34.59%) Gang Affiliation 42 (31.58%) Run Away History 40 (30.08%) Self-Mutilation History 39 (29.32%) Sexual Abuse Victim 36 (27.07%) Perpetrates Violence Against Family 34 (25.56%) Partner Violence 17 (12.78%) Family History of Gang Affiliation 7 (5.26%)

Most Common Offenses Assault/Battery 56.39% Violation of Probation 44.36% Theft 27.07% Bench Warrant 21.05% Escape from Detention 16.54% Burglary 15.04% Terrorist Threats 13.53% Vandalism 13.53% Dirty Drug Test 12.78% Poss. Dangerous Weapon 12.78% Theft of a Vehicle 12.03% Drug Possession 10.53% Robbery 6.77% Public Dist./Intox. 5.26% Curfew Violation4.51% Sell/Rec Stolen Prop. 4.51% Threatened Officials4.51% Arson 3.76% Runaway 3.76% Car Jacking 2.26%

Main CITA Steps Arrest Arrest Mental Health Screen Mental Health Screen Mental Health Assessment Mental Health Assessment Multi-disciplinary Team Multi-disciplinary Team CITA CITA Court Ordered Probation Court Ordered Probation Mental Health Treatment Mental Health Treatment

Interventions Psychoeducation Psychoeducation Domestic Violence/Teen Batterers Domestic Violence/Teen Batterers Anger Management Anger Management Parenting Parenting Job Training Job Training Independent Living Skills Independent Living Skills Problem Solving Problem Solving Victim Awareness Victim Awareness Substance Abuse Substance Abuse

Interventions Medical Medical Neurological Evaluation Neurological Evaluation Psychiatric Evaluation Psychiatric Evaluation Medication Evaluation Medication Evaluation Medical/Dental Evaluation Medical/Dental Evaluation School School Individualized Education Program Individualized Education Program Regular School Attendance Regular School Attendance

Interventions Court Ordered Sanctions Court Ordered Sanctions Drug Testing Drug Testing Restraining Order Restraining Order Restitution Restitution Community Service Community Service Electronic Monitoring Electronic Monitoring Home Detention Home Detention

Interventions Psychological Psychological Individual Individual Group Group Therapeutic Behavior Services Therapeutic Behavior Services Family Family Intensive Home Services Intensive Home Services Wraparound services Wraparound services Settings Community Outpatient Group Home Residential Juvenile Hall Ranch

N = 64 Graduates’ Recidivism

Overall Offense History Number of Offenses Before CITA Admission Mean2.98 SD2.05 Lower Limit/Upper Limit0/11 Number of Offenses After CITA Admission Mean1.14 SD1.41 Lower Limit/Upper Limit0/6 Difference in Number of Offenses Before and After CITA Admission Mean1.84*** SD2.26 ***Significant T-Test p value <.001 ***Significant McNemar Test p value <.001

Offense Pre-Admission Offenses Post-Admission Offenses McNemar’s Test p Values Violent Offenses Assault/Battery34 (53.13%)7 (10.94%)<.001*** Att. Kidnapping1 (1.56%)00.317* Burglary8 (12.50%)3 (4.69%)0.096* Carjacking1 (1.56%)00.317* Hit & Run01 (1.56%)0.317 a Indecent Exposure2 (3.13%)00.157* Obstr/Resist Arrest1 (1.56%) Pos. Dng. Weapon9 (14.06%)1 (1.56%)0.011*** Reckless Driving1 (1.56%)00.317* Robbery01 (1.56%)0.317 a Stalking1 (1.56%)00.317* Threat. Officers01 (1.56%)0.317 a Terrorist Threats7 (10.94%)1 (1.56%)0.034*** *** Significant Change at p <.05 * Change trends in the positive direction a Post admission increases

Offense Pre-Admission Offenses Post-Admission Offenses McNemar’s Test p Values Property Crimes Arson2 (3.13%)00.157* Forgery1 (1.56%)00.317* Sell/Rec Stol Prop 3 (4.69%)1 (1.56%)0.317* Theft18 (28.13%)5 (7.81%)0.002*** Theft (Vehicle)4 (6.25%)1 (1.56%)0.180* Vandalism11 (17.19%)1 (1.56%)0.002*** *** Significant Change at p <.05 * Change trends in the positive direction a Post admission increases

Offense Pre-Admission Offenses Post-Admission Offenses McNemar’s p Values Miscellaneous Offenses Bench Warrant6 (9.38%)4 (6.25%)0.527* Curfew Viol.03 (4.69%)0.083 a DUI2 (3.13%)00.157* Drug Poss.2 (3.13%)5 (7.81%)0.257 a Escape/Detention8 (12.50%)5 (7.81%)0.405* Dirty Drug Test6 (9.38%)5 (7.81%)0.739* Pub. Dist./Intox.3 (4.69%)2 (3.13%)0.564* Runaway01 (1.56%)0.317 a Viol. of Prob.18 (28.13%) *** Significant Change at p <.05 * Change trends in the positive direction a Post admission increases

Interval Differences Number of Days Between First Documented Offense and CITA Admission Mean (18.4 months) SD Lower Limit/Upper Limit298/500 Number of Days Between CITA Admission and CITA Graduation Mean (23.26 months) SD Lower Limit/Upper Limit512/751 Interval Difference in Time Before and After CITA Admission Mean (4.87 months)* SD Lower Limit/Upper Limit-331/-94 * Marginally significant Wilcoxon Signed-Rank p value =.072

Summary Risk factors for offending Risk factors for offending Mental illness Mental illness Family/Environment Family/Environment Prior arrest Prior arrest 99% recidivism while on traditional probation 99% recidivism while on traditional probation

Summary Reduced Recidivism Reduced Recidivism Assault & Battery Assault & Battery Violent Threats Violent Threats Possession of a Dangerous Weapon Possession of a Dangerous Weapon Theft Theft Vandalism Vandalism Results trended toward reductions in other offenses Results trended toward reductions in other offenses

Researcher Comments Multidisciplined but not integrated Multidisciplined but not integrated Different documentation standards Different documentation standards Not all files available Not all files available No recidivism data past age 18 No recidivism data past age 18

Researcher Comments CITA participation appears linked to decreased recidivism CITA participation appears linked to decreased recidivism Violent offenses reduced Violent offenses reduced Effective multi-disciplinary cooperation is possible Effective multi-disciplinary cooperation is possible Cost effective alternative Cost effective alternative Humane treatment of mentally ill Humane treatment of mentally ill