5/16/2015 1 © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Advertisements

Shifting FromShifting To Learning at schoolLearning anytime/anywhere Teaching as a private event Teaching as a public collaborative practice Learning.
Common Core State Standards Wolcott Elementary School West Hartford Public Schools.
Technology Integration and the Common Core Linda Jones, Coordinator/Instructor, The Eighth Floor Technology and Learning Center.
ELA STRANDS.
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
The Common Core State Standards A Districtwide Dialogue for the Los Angeles Unified School District.
History & Vision.  The new standards are rigorous, research- based, and designed to prepare every student for success in college and the workforce. 
Gary W. Phillips Vice President and Chief Scientist American Institutes for Research August 3, 2015.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: The Key Shifts.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Math and Science Teacher’s Workshop September 21, 2011 Luke Dowell - Presenter.
California unemployment: 1,371,2218.3% (July 2014) California Employment Development Department.
Illinois Learning Standards The Illinois State Board of Education adopted new Math and ELA standards for K-12 education aligned to college and career readiness.
 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Review Focus and Coherence A Closer look at Rigor.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
September, Network for New Science/Math Teachers September 24, 2010 Meeting 1, Year 2 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute.
November 7 th What are Common Core State Standards? Aligned with college and work expectations Focused and coherent Include rigorous content and.
Overview of the Common Core ELA Learning Standards Dennis Atkinson Christine Cutler IES E2BOCES
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Common Core State Standards in Connecticut ELMS PTA Presentation October 16, 2012 Dr. Judy DeLeeuw, Principal Jason Bitgood, Assistant Principal Jennifer.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Common Core Update – Opening March 11, Common Core Standards  What are the Common Core Standards?  How do the Common Core Standards compare to.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Launching the Common Core State Standards. Partnership for 21Century Learning presents: Above and Beyond MM387HNQk.
OVERVIEW OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS): Focus on English, Language Arts & Literacy Presented by Jane Cook to the East Hartford High School.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
“EQAO has an accountability mandate to provide data that inform classroom teaching practices and contributes to improved student achievement in Ontario’s.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
West Virginia’s Adoption of the Common Core State Standards for High School Mathematics Lou Maynus, NBCT Mathematics Coordinator Office of Instruction,
Greely High School is committed to high academic expectations for each student. We value teaching and learning in a safe and supportive environment.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
2012 Parent Engagement Summit. Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Overview Dr Kwaku Adu-Gyamfi Stefanie Smith. 2  Work with your group  Who did you work with?  What did you learn about them?  Their knowledge of.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
I NTERNATIONAL B ENCHMARKING S TUDY — C ONTENT A LIGNMENT Mary J. Pitoniak, Nancy Glazer, Luis Saldivia Educational Testing Service June 22, 2015 National.
Using the Standards for Mastery Learning September 7, 2010 Math & ELA.
Cindy W. Bennett, PhD Director of Curriculum & Instruction NCDPI.
December 20 th 2011 Melissa H. Silberman Deputy Executive Director Office of Post Secondary Readiness.
Common Core: Just the Basics Deanna E. Mayers Director of Curriculum Blendedschools.net.
WELCOME TO GREENSBURG SALEM’S “KICK-OFF” TO THE COMMON CORE Greensburg Salem School District August 2012.
NAEP READING FOR 2009 Michael L. Kamil Stanford University.
11 PIRLS The Trinidad and Tobago Experience Regional Policy Dialogue on Education 2-3 December 2008 Harrilal Seecharan Ministry of Education Trinidad.
Using Survey of the Enacted Curriculum (SEC) Data to Compare Using Survey of the Enacted Curriculum (SEC) Data to Compare State Standards to Common Core.
An Introduction. How NCCSS come about? What do we do now that we have it? What today is NOT about Venting Discussing what’s “wrong” with our kids.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Best Practices in Implementing the 2010 ELA Standards
Common Core State Standards
Benchmarking International Standards
國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭 英語閱讀與會考命題趨勢 國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭
國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭 PISA 與英語閱讀素養 國立臺灣師範大學英語系陳秋蘭
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Benchmarking International Standards
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) &
Common Core State Standards Initiative
Skills frameworks New Approaches to Statistical Capacity Development
Why Common Core? Common Core GPS Resources
Common Core State Standards Initiative
Why Common Core? Common Core GPS Resources
Presentation transcript:

5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Benchmarking Definitions “A process of comparing the quality of a specific process or method to another that is widely considered to be an industry standard or best practice.” “Benchmarking is the practice of being humble enough to admit that someone else has a better process and wise enough to learn how to match or even surpass them.” American Productivity and Quality Center from Benchmarking for Success: Ensuring U.S. Students Receive a World-Class Education a report by the NGA, CCSSO and Achieve 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Gain insight to improve educational systems  Access global knowledge and best practices  Necessary to compete in our global economy  Compare educational performance over time 5/16/ Goals of International Comparisons © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Standards  Accountability  Educator workforce  Assessment International Comparison: Areas of Educational Benchmarking 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Focus: Deeper  Rigor: Complex and challenging  Coherence: Orderly progression  Fluency: Proficient and automatic 5/16/ Characteristics of Standards in the best-performing nations © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Mathematics Benchmarking International Standards 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Focus for Math Assessments 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

International Assessments: Mathematics Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Assessments: Focus on determining if students can use what they have learned in the situations they are likely to encounter in their daily life Have students analyze, reason, and communicate effectively as they pose, formulate, solve and interpret mathematical problems in a variety of situations Test how students apply skills to real-world problems 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

PISA Sample Problem 5/16/ What is the approximate distance from the starting line to the beginning of the longest straight section of the track? 2.What is the lowest speed recorded during the second lap? 3.What can you say about the speed of the car between the 2.6 km and 2.8 km marks? © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

International Assessments: Mathematics Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Assessments: Place emphasis on questions and tasks that offer better insight into students’ analytical, problem solving and inquiry skills and capabilities Test both content and cognitive domains Content: Number, Geometry, Algebra, Data and Chance, etc. Cognitive: Knowing, Applying, Reasoning 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 John and Cathy were told to divide a number by 100. By mistake John multiplied the number by 100 and obtained an answer of 450. Cathy correctly divided the number by 100. What was her answer?  If n is a negative integer, which of these is the largest number? a) 3 + n b) 3 × n c) 3 − n d) 3 ÷ n TIMSS Sample Problem 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 A model to compare US standards with three high-performing countries: Hong Kong, Singapore and Korea.  Focus on learning progressions  Transform the Asian standards into an organization of mathematics content  Create a set of composite standards by topic and grade. Informing Grades 1-6 Mathematics Standards Development: What Can be Learned from High-performing Hong Kong, Korea and Singapore. American Institutes for Research /16/ International Benchmarking: Composite Standards for Mathematics © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Identify the core mathematics topics taught within each strand across countries  Identify each country’s grade-by-grade sequence of mathematical competencies for each core topic  Create composite standards for each core topic by drawing from the learning progressions in the standards in each of the three countries 5/16/ Composite Standard Development © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Benchmarking International Standards 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Focus on Reading Literacy Assessments 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Introduction: Reading Literacy Major international assessments: The Progress in Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

The Progress in Reading Literacy Study: PIRLS 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

5/16/  Measure trends in reading literacy achievement.  Improve the teaching of reading and the acquisition of reading skills around the world.  Assess reading achievement for students in their fourth year of school. © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

PIRLS defines reading literacy as the ability to understand and use those written language forms required by society and/or valued by the individual. Young readers can construct meaning from a variety of texts. They read to learn, to participate in communities of readers in school and everyday life, and for enjoyment. 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 The PIRLS assessment focuses on the two overarching purposes for reading : Reading for literary experience (50%) Reading to acquire and use information (50%) 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Focus on and retrieve explicitly stated information (20%)  Make straightforward inferences (30%)  Interpret and integrate ideas and information and textual elements (30%)  Examine and evaluate content, language, and textual elements (20%) PIRLS: Comprehension Processes 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Programme for International Student Assessment: PISA 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Measure how well students are prepared to meet the challenges they may encounter in future life.  Tested Age-15 PISA: Purpose 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

Reading literacy is understanding, using, reflecting on and engaging with written texts, in order to achieve one’s goals, to develop one’s knowledge and potential, and to participate in society. PISA: Reading Literacy Definition 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Access and retrieve  Integrate and interpret  Reflect and evaluate PISA Skills 5/16/ © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association

 Benchmarking for Success: Ensuring U.S. Students Receive a World-Class Education. National Governors Association, Council of Chief State School Officers, and Achieve, Inc., 2008 (  Comparative Indicators of Education in the United States and Other G-8 Counties: 2009 (  IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in Primary School in 40 Countries (  Overview of IEA’s PIRLS Assessment PIRLS2011_Framework.pdf) PIRLS2011_Framework.pdf  PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science (  Informing Grades 1 – 6 Mathematics Standards Development: What Can Be Learned From High-Performing Hong Kong, Korea, and Singapore? (  The Second Derivative: International Benchmarks in Mathematics for U.S. States and School Districts (  U. S. Performance Across International Assessments of Student Achievement: Special Supplement to The Condition of Education 2009 National Center for Education Statistics (  Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. US Department of Education, 2008 ( ) 5/16/ References © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association