GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KARTDATA TIL NYTTE FOR SAMFUNNET POSITIONING DATA – FOR SOCIETY’S BENEFIT DETERMINATION OF THE GRAVITY FIELD OVER NORWEGIAN TERRITORIES.
Advertisements

Comparison of full-repeat and sub-cycle solutions in gravity recovery simulations of a GRACE-like mission Siavash Iran Pour, Nico Sneeuw, Matthias Weigelt,
A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
ILRS Workshop, 2008, A 33 Year Time History of the J2 Changes from SLR Minkang Cheng and Byron D. Tapley Center for Space Research.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado ASEN 5070 OD Accuracy Assessment OD Overlap Example Effects of eliminating parameters.
An estimate of post-seismic gravity change caused by the 1960 Chile earthquake and comparison with GRACE gravity fields Y. Tanaka 1, 2, V. Klemann 2, K.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 03 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Basic Governing Differential Equations
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Digital Camera and Computer Vision Laboratory Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
The Aristotle University of Thessaloniki - Department of Geodesy and Surveying A. Dermanis: The rank deficiency in estimation theory and the definition.
Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Long wavelength gravity field determination from GOCE using the acceleration approach M. Weigelt 1, O. Baur 2, T. Reubelt 1, N. Sneeuw 1, M. Roth 1 (1)
Assessment of SLR observation performance using LAGEOS data Gang ZHAO, You ZHAO, Mingguo Sun, Huanhuan YU Changchun Observatory, NAOC, CAS, China 16 th.
COMBINED MODELING OF THE EARTH’S GRAVITY FIELD FROM GOCE AND GRACE SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS Robert Tenzer 1, Pavel Ditmar 2, Xianglin Liu 2, Philip Moore.
CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January
Satellite geodesy: Kepler orbits, Kaula Ch. 2+3.I1.2a Basic equation: Acceleration Connects potential, V, and geometry. (We disregard disturbing forces.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 7: Linearization and the State.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © This research is based on the estimation of the spherical harmonic geopotential.
CISE-301: Numerical Methods Topic 1: Introduction to Numerical Methods and Taylor Series Lectures 1-4: KFUPM.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Figure and Gravity Figure of a planet (Earth) Geoid Gravity field
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications Prepared by: Dr. Ivica Kostanic Lecture 2: Orbital Mechanics (Section 2.1) Spring 2014.
Generalization of Farrell's loading theory for applications to mass flux measurement using geodetic techniques J. Y. Guo (1,2), C.K. Shum (1) (1) Laboratory.
CISE-301: Numerical Methods Topic 1: Introduction to Numerical Methods and Taylor Series Lectures 1-4: KFUPM CISE301_Topic1.
Physics 311 Classical Mechanics Welcome! Syllabus. Discussion of Classical Mechanics. Topics to be Covered. The Role of Classical Mechanics in Physics.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
Hydrological mass changes inferred from high-low satellite- to-satellite tracking data Tonie van Dam, Matthias Weigelt Mohammad J. Tourian Nico Sneeuw.
Advanced mechanics Physics 302. Instructor: Dr. Alexey Belyanin Office: MIST 426 Office Phone: (979)
Free Association well, Cheap Association. 1 Potpourri.
Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar Radar reflections image variations in Dielectric constant  r ( = relative permittivity )  3-40 for most Earth materials;
GOCE Workshop at ESA LP Symposium, Bergen, 29./30.June, 2010 Precise Science Orbits for the GOCE Satellite – Aiming at the cm-level H. Bock 1, A. Jäggi.
1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.
Curve-Fitting Regression
Water storage variations from time-variable gravity data Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION ASEN 5070 LECTURE 11 9/16,18/09.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION The Minimum Variance Estimate ASEN 5070 LECTURE.
Gravity Summary For a point source or for a homogeneous sphere the solution is easy to compute and are given by the Newton’s law. Gravity Force for the.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
1 Honors Physics 1 Summary and Review - Fall 2013 Quantitative and experimental tools Mathematical tools Newton’s Laws and Applications –Linear motion.
Proportionality between the velocity V and radius r
RIGTC, Geodetic Observatory Pecný The institute's mission is basic and applied research in geodesy and cadastre Designated institute of Czech Metrology.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 6 Point Positioning –By now you should understand: F How receiver knows GPS satellite coordinates F How receiver produces pseudoranges.
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Introduction E. Schrama.
1 Satellite geodesy (ge-2112) Processing of observations E. Schrama.
A proposal for a consistent model of air pressure loading as part of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) Conventions Plag, H.-P. (1),
ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 2: Basics of Orbit Propagation.
OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.
Newton’s Universal Law of Gravity Every object attracts every other object with a force that is directly proportional to the masses of the objects and.
4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)
Celestial Mechanics I Introduction Kepler’s Laws.
Soichiro Isoyama Collaborators : Norichika Sago, Ryuichi Fujita, and Takahiro Tanaka The gravitational wave from an EMRI binary Influence of the beyond.
Last Time: Introduction to Gravity Governed by LaPlace’s equation: with solution of the form: If we have a spherical body with mass M and constant (or.
Celestial Mechanics IV Central orbits Force from shape, shape from force General relativity correction.
How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
SC4MGV – ESA Contract No /13/NL/MV 5th International GOCE User Workshop November 2014, Paris, France ESA SC4MGV Search strategy for.
We will be looking for a solution to the system of linear differential equations with constant coefficients.
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Class Notes 9: Power Series (1/3)
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Describing Motion: Kinematics in One Dimension
CISE-301: Numerical Methods Topic 1: Introduction to Numerical Methods and Taylor Series Lectures 1-4: KFUPM CISE301_Topic1.
Presentation transcript:

GRACE GRAVITY FIELD SOLUTIONS USING THE DIFFERENTIAL GRAVIMETRY APPROACH M. Weigelt, W. Keller

Geophysical implications of the gravity field Geodesy Continental Hydrology Oceano- graphy Glacio- logy Atmosphere Tides Earth core Solid Earth Geoid 2

Geophysical implications of the gravity field 3 ESA

Observation system 4 GRACE = Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Initial orbit height: ~ 485 km Inclination: ~ 89° Key technologies: –GPS receiver –Accelerometer –K-Band Ranging System Observed quantity: –range –range rate CSR, UTexas

Gravity field modelling 5 with gravitational constant times mass of the Earth radius of the Earth spherical coordinates of the calculation point Legendre function degree, order (unknown) spherical harmonic coefficients

Spectral representations 6 Spherical harmonic spectrum Degree RMS

Outline GRACE geometry Solution strategies –Variational equations –Differential gravimetry approach What about the Next-Generation-GRACE? 7

Geometry of the GRACE system

9 B A Differentiation Integration Rummel et al. 1978

Solution Strategies

Solution strategies 11 Variational equationsIn-situ observations Classical (Reigber 1989, Tapley 2004) Celestial mechanics approach (Beutler et al. 2010, Jäggi 2007) Short-arc method (Mayer-Gürr 2006) … Energy Integral (Han 2003, Ramillien et al. 2010) Differential gravimetry (Liu 2010) LoS Gradiometry (Keller and Sharifi 2005) … Numerical integration Analytical integration

Equation of motion 12 Basic equation: Newton’s equation of motion where are all gravitational and non-gravitational disturbing forces In the general case: ordinary second order non-linear differential equation Double integration yields:

Linearization 13 For the solution, linearization using a Taylor expansion is necessary: Types of partial derivatives: initial position initial velocity residual gravity field coefficients additional parameter Homogeneous solution Inhomogeneous solution …

Homogeneous solution 14 Homogeneous solution needs the partial derivatives: Derivation by integration of the variational equation Double integration !

Inhomogeneous solution (one variant) 15 Solution of the inhomogeneous part by the method of the variation of the constant (Beutler 2006): with being the columns of the matrix of the variational equation of the homogeneous solution at each epoch. Estimation of by solving the equation system at each epoch:

Application to GRACE 16 In case of GRACE, the observables are range and range rate: Chain rule needs to be applied:

Limitations additional parameters –compensate errors in the initial conditions –counteract accumulation of errors outlier detection difficult limited application to local areas high computational effort difficult estimation of corrections to the initial conditions in case of GRACE (twice the number of unknowns, relative observation) 17

In-situ observations: Differential gravimetry approach

Instantaneous relative reference frame 19 PositionVelocity

In-situ observation 20 Range observables: Multiplication with unit vectors: GRACE

Relative motion between two epochs 21 absolute motion neglected! Epoch 1 Epoch 2 K-Band GPS

Limitation 22 Combination of highly precise K-Band observations with comparably low accurate GPS relative velocity

Residual quantities Orbit fitting using the homogeneous solution of the variational equation with a known a priori gravity field Avoiding the estimation of empirical parameters by using short arcs 23 true orbit GPS-observations estimated orbit

Residual quantities 24 ratio ≈ 1:2 ratio ≈ 25:1

Approximated solution 25

Next generation GRACE

27 New type of intersatellite distance measurement based on laser interferometry Noise reduction by a factor 10 expected M. Dehne, Quest

Solution for next generation GRACE 28

Variational equations for velocity term Reduction to residual quantity insufficient Modeling the velocity term by variational equations: Application of the method of the variations of the constants 29

Results 30 Only minor improvements by incorporating the estimation of corrections to the spherical harmonic coefficients due to the velocity term Limiting factor is the orbit fit to the GPS positions  additional estimation of corrections to the initial conditions necessary

Summary The primary observables of the GRACE system (range & range rate) are connected to gravity field quantities through variational equations (numerical integration) or through in-situ observations (analytical integration). Variational equations pose a high computational effort. In-situ observations demand the combination of K-band and GPS information. Next generation GRACE instruments pose a challenge to existing solution strategies. 31