A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute American Institutes for Research PACER Center University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Disabilities Presentation.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. University of Connecticut A.J. Pappanikou Center For Developmental Disabilities 263 Farmington Avenue, MC6222 Farmington, CT
The Core Competencies for Youth Development Professionals were developed with leadership from the OPEN Initiative, Missouri Afterschool Network (MASN),
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Creating an Early Childhood System Karen Ponder February 9, 2010 Arizona Early Childhood Task Force.
State Implementation Grants for Improving Services for Children with ASD and other Developmental Disabilities and the State Public Health Coordinating.
Caregiver Support. Child Intervention Intake Statistics  Calgary and Area 2013:  The Region received 14,100 reports about a child or youth who may be.
Project Aim To provide training for Early Childhood Care Providers (ECCPs) on Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) principles within the EIBI autism classroom,
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Healthy Inclusion: Caring for Children with Special Needs in Child Care © The National Training Institute for Child Care Health Consultants,
FOUNDATION UNIT Teaching Research Assistance to Childcare Providers.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
Early Childhood Special Education RESOURCES.  Early Childhood Special Education Early Childhood Special Education Wisconsin Early Childhood Indicators.
The Iowa Pediatric Integrated Health Home Program (PIHH) is for children and youth, 0 to 18 years old, who are Medicaid eligible and have a Severe Emotional.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
Objectives 1. Children will be supported in an integrated way through the establishment of a Start Right Community Wrap- Around Programme in the target.
School-Family-Community Partnerships Increasing Volunteerism
National MEDICAL HOME Autism Initiative Poster Presentation for DEC Conference 2005 Linda Tuchman Ginsberg, PhD
The mission of TnT is threefold: (1) to study prevalence, policy and resources, individualized decision making, training and support and other factors.
Building Outcome Data into a State On-Line Data System A birth through five project in Kansas Margy Hornback, Ed.D., Kansas Part B 619 Coordinator Kansas.
ROUTES TO SUCCESSFUL INCLUSION for Children of All Abilities Ages Birth to Five A web toolkit for child care providers and other caregivers Presented by:
Michigan Partnering with Parents to Help Measure Outcomes for Young Children and Families Chandra Jones Vanessa Winborne MICC Parent Michigan Part C Coordinator.
Service Coordination: Are We There Yet? Gloria Harbin, Ph.D. Kathleen Whitbread, Ph.D. University of Connecticut A.J. Pappanikou Center For Developmental.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
December 20, A Brief Overview: Real Choice and Independence Plus Systems Change Grants Connect the Dots Meeting December 20, 2004.
State Advisory Council Birth to Age 8 Alignment through the Rural Opportunities Initiative Summary Presentation for the Board of Early Education and Care.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
Parents as Teachers © (PAT)  Vision All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.  Mission To provide the information,
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
EI/ECSE 101: Understanding the Basics of Early Intervention Under IDEA Part C Kathleen Mankinen, M. Ed. FSDB Outreach Department Parent Infant Program.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Striving Towards Excellence in Comprehensive Care: What do Children Need? July 10, 2007 Christopher A. Kus, M.D., M.P.H.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Documenting Family Outcomes: Decisions, Alternatives, Next Steps Don Bailey, Ph.D. Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. Contact information: Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Recommendation 1: Public Awareness and Patient Education (Updated 2008)
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Training Personnel Using Autism online ebp Modules
Early Childhood Personnel Center
FPG Child Development Institute
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Presentation transcript:

A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia Rusert, University of Connecticut Research and Training Center on Service Coordination University of Connecticut Health Center

Agenda Brief Overview and History Activities of Service Coordination Outcomes of Service Coordination Practices of Service Coordination Tool Kits: Intersection of Activities, Outcomes, and Practices

Center Principles Collaborative model of integrated activities Families are an integral component Stakeholders contribute to all phases Use of a Participatory Research Model

Center Framework Family Status Outcomes Recommended Practices Measurement Training Model Dissemination Surveys Focus Groups Delphi Technique Outcome Measurement Validation Studies I. II. V. Service Provision System Administration III. IV. VI.

Research Survey Studies Part C Survey Service Coordination Curriculum Survey Parent Leader Survey Parent ICC Survey

Focus Groups and Delphi Studies Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, Massachusetts, North Carolina Two rounds of Focus Groups and Delphis Parents Service Providers Service Coordinators Program Administrators Physicians Childcare Providers Identify Outcomes and Practices of Effective Service Coordination

National Surveys Parent/Practitioner Design Identified Outcomes of: Natural Environment Service Coordination Early Intervention Family Survey Design Identified Experiences with: Early Intervention Natural Environment Service Coordination

Interviews Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, Massachusetts, North Carolina Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington Family Members in Early Intervention Family Members’ Service Coordinator Identify Outcomes and Practices

Outcome Comparison

Center Logic Model

Child Eligible for Part C Child’s Family Child and Family Characteristics - ethnicity, culture and primary language of family - age of child and others in family -developmental needs of child -support needs of family -SES of family -family/child enrollment in programs -location Input State Policies and Infrastructure -context -values -lead agency -funding -training -case loads -service delivery options Service Coordinator -values - background - training -years experience -skills Community Resources, Services and Supports -rural, suburban, urban -early childhood programs -early childhood learning opportunities -family support mechanisms -family /child services - financial infrastructure Output Service Coordination Model -type -finance -case loads -personnel standards Local Collaborative Practices -collaborative structures -personnel standards -team model relationships Service Coordinator Tasks - coordinate evaluations and assessments - IFSP -assist family with service providers -coordinate and monitor services -inform families on advocacy -coordinate medical and health -transitions Children and families receive quality service Transitions are successful Families have the support, knowledge and tools to address their individual needs Families make informed decisions about services, resources and opportunities for their child Children and families receive appropriate supports and services that are coordinated, effective and individualized to their needs Agencies and professionals are coordinated Families are knowledgeable about the needs of their child Long-term Outcomes Families acquire and/or maintain a quality of life to enhance their well being Families are able to meet the special needs of their child Children’s health and development is enhanced Immediate OutcomesIntermediate Outcome

Service Coordination Activities 1. Coordinating the Performance of Evaluations and Assessments 2. Facilitating and Participating in the Development, Review, & Evaluation of the IFSP 3. Assisting the Family in Identifying Available Service Providers 4. Coordinating and Monitoring the Delivery of Available Services 5. Informing Families of Available Advocacy Services 6. Coordinating with Medical & Health Providers 7. Facilitating the Development of a Transition Plan

Service Coordination Outcomes 1. Children and families receive quality service 2. Families are knowledgeable about the needs of their child 3. Families make informed decisions about services, resources, and opportunities for their child 4. Families have the support, knowledge, and tools to address their individual needs 5. Agencies and professionals are coordinated 6. Transitions are successful

Service Coordination Practices Help Giving Provide info/Access supports (Participatory) Provide support/encouragement (Relational) Collaboration Communication among team members Collaboration with community organizations Administration Administrative duties (paperwork) Professional development

How do we package and present this data on Activities, Outcomes, & Practices...

... so that Service Coordinators actually use this information to enhance their practices?

Service Coordinator Toolkits Checklists of Practices Printed and Web-Based Resources Helpful Tips Video Demonstrations Sample Forms and Informational Materials

For more information University of Connecticut A.J. Pappanikou Center For Developmental Disabilities 263 Farmington Avenue, MC6222 Farmington, CT USA Julia Rusert: Phone: (860) Fax: (860) Website: