10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 1 Hyperon polarization in a quark-quark scattering model Eduard De La Cruz Burelo Homer A. Neal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics Results of the NA49 exp. on Nucleus – Nucleus Collisions at SPS Energies P. Christakoglou, A. Petridis, M. Vassiliou Athens University HEP2006,
Advertisements

Pawan Kumar NetrakantiPANIC-2005, Santa Fe1 Pion, proton and anti-proton transverse momentum spectra in p+p and d+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Outline:
ICPAQGP, Kolkata, February 2-6, 2015 Itzhak Tserruya PHENIX highlights.
03/14/2006WWND2006 at La Jolla1 Identified baryon and meson spectra at intermediate and high p T in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Outline: Motivation Intermediate.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
First Observation of the Baryon; Properties of,,, and Baryons Andreas Warburton Cornell University CLEO Collaboration XXX th International Conference on.
 Transverse Polarization in STAR Au-Au Collisions Polarization definition and models E896 results STAR analysis STAR results Significance of results Future.
Helen Caines Yale University SQM – L.A.– March 2006 Using strange hadron yields as probes of dense matter. Outline Can we use thermal models to describe.
1 Statistical Models and STAR’s Strange Data Sevil Salur Yale University for the STAR Collaboration.
Particle rapidity distribution in proton-nucleus collisions using the proton-contributor reference frame arXiv: [hep-ph] arXiv: [hep-ph]
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
M. Djordjevic 1 Effect of dynamical QCD medium on radiative heavy quark energy loss Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University.
M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy quark energy loss in a dynamical QCD medium Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University M. Djordjevic and U. Heinz, arXiv:
1 Updates on Transversity Experiments and Interpretations Jen-Chieh Peng Transversity Collaboration Meeting, JLab, March 4, 2005 University of Illinois.
Glauber shadowing at particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions within the framework of pQCD. Alexey Svyatkovskiy scientific advisor: M.A.Braun.
Forward - Backward Multiplicity in High Energy Collisions Speaker: Lai Weichang National University of Singapore.
Lecture 11: Quarks inside the proton 9/10/ Idea: try to identify a kinematic regime in which the electrons scatter from pointlike constituents.
QM2006 Shanghai, China 1 High-p T Identified Hadron Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Masahiro Konno (Univ. of Tsukuba) for the PHENIX.
From Luigi DiLella, Summer Student Program
Experimental Approach to Nuclear Quark Distributions (Rolf Ent – EIC /15/04) One of two tag-team presentations to show why an EIC is optimal to access.
Introduction 2. 2.Limitations involved in West and Yennie approach 3. 3.West and Yennie approach and experimental data 4. 4.Approaches based on.
P Spring 2003 L9Richard Kass Inelastic ep Scattering and Quarks Elastic vs Inelastic electron-proton scattering: In the previous lecture we saw that.
QM 年 11 月 日 Shanghai, China 梁作堂 (Liang Zuo-tang) 山东大学 1 For The 19th International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions.
Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USA N. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo,
Determining Strangeness Quark Spin in Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering at J-PARC T.-A. Shibata (Tokyo Tech) in collaboration with N. Saito (Kyoto Univ) and.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Víctor M. Castillo-Vallejo 1,2, Virendra Gupta 1, Julián Félix 2 1 Cinvestav-IPN, Unidad Mérida 2 Instituto de Física, Universidad de Guanajuato 2 Instituto.
Jet Physics in ALICE Mercedes López Noriega - CERN for the ALICE Collaboration Hot Quarks 2006 Villasimius, Sardinia - Italy.
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
J/  production in p+p collisions at PHENIX and gluon distribution QWG meeting at FNAL September Hiroki Sato (Kyoto University) for the PHENIX collaboration.
Λ and Σ photoproduction on the neutron Pawel Nadel-Turonski The George Washington University for the CLAS Collaboration.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
1 Probing Spin and Flavor Structures of the Nucleon with Hadron Beams Flavor and spin structures of the nucleons –Overview and recent results Future prospects.
Seminários GFPAE – 02/ Diffractive heavy quark production at the LHC Mairon Melo Machado
Francesco Noferini Bologna University Erice, Italy 31 st August 2006 Two-particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC.
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
The completion of single-spin asymmetry measurements at the PROZA setup V. Mochalov (IHEP, Protvino) On behalf of the PROZA-SPASCHARM collaboration.
Lara De Nardo DIS 2007 Measurement of the spin structure functions g 1 and g 1 at HERMES Lara De Nardo TRIUMF/DESY pd.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
Recent multiplicity studies at ZEUS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinHadron Structure 2004, Sept. 1st University of Wisconsin, Madison on behalf of the.
1 Charged hadron production at large transverse momentum in d+Au and Au+Au collisions at  s=200 GeV Abstract. The suppression of hadron yields with high.
1 Madrid, April 27, 2009 Aram Kotzinian Longitudinal target polarization dependence of Λ polarization and polarized strangeness PDF Λ polarization Unpolarized.
Hyperon Polarization in Heavy ion Collisions C. C. Barros Jr. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brasil Strangeness in Quark Matter 2013 University.
Extension to the transverse degrees of freedom of the statistical parton distributions C. Bourrely, F. Buccella and J. Soffer Frascati, 8 June 2005 The.
Squaw Valley, Feb. 2013, Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University Take home message  The scaling (p T, ε, R, ∆L, etc) properties of azimuthal anisotropy.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Collaboration Meeting, Oct. 21st Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Intermediate pT results in STAR Camelia Mironov Kent State University 2004 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop on Strangeness and Exotica at RHIC.
10/29/2007Julia VelkovskaPHY 340a Lecture 4: Last time we talked about deep- inelastic scattering and the evidence of quarks Next time we will talk about.
Helen Caines Yale University Strasbourg - May 2006 Strangeness and entropy.
M. Djordjevic 1 Heavy quark energy loss in a dynamical QCD medium Magdalena Djordjevic The Ohio State University M. Djordjevic and U. Heinz, arXiv:
The First Transverse Single Spin Measurement in High Energy Polarized Proton-Nucleus Collision at the PHENIX experiment at RHIC RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
Anisotropic flow of charged and strange particles in PbAu collisions at 158 AGeV measured in CERES experiment J. Milošević 1),2) 1)University of Belgrade.
Lecture 8: Understanding the form factor 30/9/ Why is this a function of q 2 and not just q ? Famous and important result: the “Form Factor.
Chiral Magnet Effect, where are we?
Flavor decomposition at LO
Hyperon studies in the atlas experiment
(Anti)Lambda polarization in SIDIS
High-pT Identified Hadron Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions
THE SIMULATION OF POLARIZED BARYONS
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Strangeness Production in Heavy-Ion Collisions at STAR
ALICE and the Little Bang
STAR Spin alignment of vector mesons (K*0, φ) in Au+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC Jin Hui Chen Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics and UCLA For the STAR.
Measurement of the spin structure functions g1 and g1 at HERMES
Polarized Structure Function of Nucleon and Orbital Angular Momentum
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Measurement of the spin structure functions g1 and g1 at HERMES
Presentation transcript:

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 1 Hyperon polarization in a quark-quark scattering model Eduard De La Cruz Burelo Homer A. Neal

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 2 Outline  Hyperon polarization remains a major open question even at energies of hundreds of GeV  Extraordinary behavior of hyperon polarization has no simple explanation  Polarization in pp  pp and pp  H + X : could both be the result of simple quark- quark scattering?  A proposed model based on quark-quark scattering.  The qualitative explanation of the hyperon polarization for a variety of processes

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 3 Hyperon polarization  An unresolved question:  What causes the large polarization in inclusive hyperon production in p-p collisions?  Vanishingly small polarizations are predicted in QCD.  No model is now able to explain all features of Hyperon polarization at the same time.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 4 Particle Quark content*Polarization pN  H+X Λ0Λ0Λ0Λ0 (ud) 0 sNegative Σ0Σ0Σ0Σ0 (ud) 1 sPositive Σ+Σ+Σ+Σ+ (uu) 1 sPositive Σ-Σ-Σ-Σ- (dd) 1 sPositive Ξ-Ξ-Ξ-Ξ- (ss) 1 dNegative Ξ0Ξ0Ξ0Ξ0 (ss) 1 uNegative Ω-Ω-Ω-Ω- s s s~Zero Λ0Λ0Λ0Λ0 (u d) 0 s Zero Ξ+Ξ+Ξ+Ξ+ (s s) 1 dNegative Σ-Σ-Σ-Σ- (ūū) 1 s Positive ΛbΛbΛbΛb (ud) 0 b ? Hyperon polarization characteristics Particle Quark content*Polarization pN  H+X Λ0Λ0Λ0Λ0 (ud) 0 sNegative Σ0Σ0Σ0Σ0 (ud) 1 sPositive Σ+Σ+Σ+Σ+ (uu) 1 sPositive Σ-Σ-Σ-Σ- (dd) 1 sPositive Ξ-Ξ-Ξ-Ξ- (ss) 1 dNegative Ξ0Ξ0Ξ0Ξ0 (ss) 1 uNegative Ω-Ω-Ω-Ω- s s s~Zero Λ0Λ0Λ0Λ0 (u d) 0 s Zero Ξ+Ξ+Ξ+Ξ+ (s s) 1 dNegative Σ-Σ-Σ-Σ- (ūū) 1 s Positive * (Diquark) J state J=0 : Negative J = 1 + s quark: Positive 2 s-quarks: Negative Plans to measure it (LHC)

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 5 Λ 0 : Lowest mass hyperon … more intriguing  Very little dependence on the initial proton energy and in the target material.  Grows negative linearly with p T until a plateau is reached around 1 GeV/c.  For constant x F (=p L /p max ) value, the plateau extends from 1 GeV/c to the highest measured p T.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 6 Intriguing questions: Why do the Λ 0 and Ξ polarizations look similar? Why is the Σ polarization positive? Why is the Ω polarization almost ~zero? Why is there a plateau in the Λ 0 polarization?

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 7 Features we would like to explain:  The shape and magnitude of the Λ 0 polarization  The different signs in the Λ 0 and Σ polarization  The similarity of the polarization for the Λ 0 and Ξ  The small value of the Ω polarization

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 8 q-q scattering: relating pp  pp to pp  Λ + X process  Is there any connection between the observed polarization in these two processes? –They could come from the same source: quark-quark scattering. u d u u d s Λ0Λ0 proton u d u u d u u d u u d s u d u u d u u Λ0Λ0

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 9 pp  pp in a quark-quark scattering model   Neal et al. proposed a q-q scattering model to explain the polarization in elastic p-p scattering:   First region is due to q-q scattering   Second region is due to 2q-2q or q-2q   Subsequent data is consistent with 3q-3q scattering*.  Can we apply the same idea to pp  Λ + X process? H.A. Neal et al. Phys. Lett. B 51 (1974) 79 *) H.A. Neal et al. Phys. Lett. B 439 (1998) 407

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 10 pp  Λ + X in a quark-quark scattering model  From a preexisting pair in the incoming proton, the s quark scatters, get highly polarized, and end up in the hyperon.  Hyperon polarization: P H =P q (x,p T ). P q (x F,p T ) : quark polarization effect due to a q-q scattering process.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 11 Λ 0 polarization from polarization in pp  pp (1)  Model: P H =P q (x,p T ) –In a multiple quark scattering* P –In a multiple quark scattering* P ~ m q P q (p T ) *) J. Szwed, Phys. Lett. B 105 (1981) 403. Assuming m s ~2m u

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 12 Λ 0 polarization from polarization in pp  pp (2)  What p T (Λ 0 ) vs. p T (p) should we compare? – –For a elastic p-p scattering in a q-q region (Neal et al.): – –For pp  Λ + X in q-q region:  We should compare at: Assuming s-quark account for half of the Λ 0 mass.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 13 Comparison of proton and Λ 0 polarization Proton polarization multiplied by 2 Proton p T multiplied by 2/3 If we let proton data to tell us what values prefer to match Λ 0 data, selected values are around to 2 and 2/3.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 14 What about the plateau?   The plateau in the Λ 0 polarization can be understood as the saturation of the s quark polarization (P=100%). Polarization

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 15 Explaining the other features  Why the similar polarization for the Λ 0 and Ξ? If the polarization of both hyperons is due to one s quark becoming highly polarized from the scattering process, then we expect the polarization of both hyperons to be similar.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 16 Why the different sign in the Λ 0 and Σ polarization? u d s u d s  Beam quarks does not contributed to the Λ 0 polarization  s quark is responsible for the large polarization of the Λ 0.  s quark polarization is negative.  s quark polarization is negative which force the polarization of the u and d quarks to be positive, so overall polarization is positive.  If we assume the s quark being responsible of the polarization, it can be showed that the sign of the Σ polarization is opposite to that of the Λ polarization.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 17 Why Ω polarization is ~0?  One of 3 s quarks get polarized in the scattering, setting a maximum of 33% to the polarization of the Ω.  Should be similar to the Λ 0 polarization in the one quark scattering region. Λ 0 polarization compared to the Ω polarization. Statistics too low to make strong conclusions.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 18 Future tests/Implications  Λ b polarization is planned to be measured in LHC (ATLAS & LHCb)  Polarization could be huge if the q-q contribution to production is important and the Szwed mass scaling holds.  Simple relation should exist between Λ and Λ b polarization is our q-q idea is correct.

10/6/2006 E. De La Cruz Burelo, SPIN 2006, Kyoto Japan 19 Conclusions:  A model based in a simple q-q scattering process is proposed:  Polarization due the scattering process P q (p T ) is the same for all quark species.  s quark scatters from the incoming proton is the responsible for the large hyperon polarization.  Λ and proton polarization seems to have a common source.  The model is able to qualitatively address all of the main observed features of hyperon polarization.