Public Complaints Ottawa Police Services Board September 24, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT SECTION 59 GRIEVANCE PROCESSES Terry Lisson Director Promotion Appeals & Grievance Reviews 22 April 2010.
1 Opening the Door: Access to Government Information A primer for Media Students Mohawk College Sept. 18, 2002 Bob Spence Communications Co-ordinator Office.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Independent Police Review Act, 2007— Legislative Process and Implementation CACOLE Conference 2009 Ottawa, Ontario June 8 – 10, 2009.
Supporting and Protecting Adults From Harm Community Planning Board 10 th November 2011 Wendy Hinnie.
PUBLIC RECORDS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE SCOTT R. SWIER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ORILLIA POLICE SERVICES BOARD Role and Responsibilities.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
The Corruption and Crime Commission: Threat to organised crime, or to our concept of justice? Malcolm McCusker AO QC The John Curtin Institute of Public.
Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement June 6 - 9, 2010 Fredericton, New Brunswick.
Strategic Plan 2012/17 and Annual Performance Plan 2012/13 INDEPENDENT POLICE INVESTIGATIVE DIRECTORATE (IPID) 19 NOVEMBER 2014 BRIEFING TO THE PORTFOLIO.
Ottawa Police Service Chief’s Complaint Investigations Insp. T. Youngson-Larochelle and S/Sgt. M. Marin.
DISCIPLINE & DUE PROCESS 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Laws and Regulations.
1 Mr. Tony McCourt Ombudsman for the Defence Forces Presentation to Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions 5 th November, 2014.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
DEALING WITH HARASSMENT AND ABUSE COMPLAINTS Lt (NL) James Smith VANCOUVER ISLAND DIVISION.
An Overview of the Hearing Process Before the Environmental Review Tribunal April
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. PPDA Act and Administrative review  The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act, 2003, sections 89 and 90, provide.
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
Foundations of Effective Board Operation Nicole L. Mace Vermont School Boards Association.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Outreach and Education Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
New rights for people complaining about adult social care providers – an introduction.
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Health and Safety Representative (HSR) Contribute to the implementation of the OH&S consultation.
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
1 Complaint Process Process of Seeking Information Day 7.
1 GAEP Study Tour An Overview of the Ombudsman for Workplace Safety May 16, 2007.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
 M315, 3 rd Floor Marks Building, Parliament Wednesday, 20 June 2012, 11:00 – 13:00 BRIEFING TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON WOMAN, CHILDREN AND PERSONS WITH.
DVA REPORTS ICD JANUARY 2009 – DECEMBER 2010 PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE PROGRAMME 3 Presented by Mr. M Dlamini & Me. N Mbuli Tuesday, 23 August.
 Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 20 (Part XX) was proclaimed dealing with Violence Prevention in the Work Place.  Work Place Violence.
October 6, 2015San Antonio, Texas 2015 Attorneys Section Meeting IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS Lonette L. Turner, CEO IFTA, Inc.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION An Important Piece of IFTA. THE NEW PROCESS Streamlined Dispute Resolution Committee Appeal to IFTA, Inc. Board of Trustees.
Sexual Misconduct Information Presented by Office of Equity & Inclusion Sue Groff, Ed. D. September 8, 2015.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
January 2009: PRS Template Presentation PRS for Music Code of Conduct.
What Is Police Misconduct? Any action performed by a law enforcement officer that is criminal, unconstitutional, or against established rules, regulations,
I.C. § LIBRARY EXPANSION September Two Options (I.C. § ) Expansion of Library District May Occur by: Legislative Body Passing Resolution.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Mandatory notification Who? What? When? How? Kieran Pehm Commissioner Health Care Complaints Commission.
Sexual Harassment Seminar
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID)
Training Appendix Revised January 2018.
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Administering Human Rights Legislation
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Presentation transcript:

Public Complaints Ottawa Police Services Board September 24, 2012

2  Background  Overview of Complaints Process  Police Services Boards  Communications and Outreach  Questions Agenda

3  Arms length body within the Ministry of the Attorney General  The Director is independent of the government, the police and the public  Director is accountable for an annual report to the Minister  Director has autonomous authority on operations of the OIPRD and administration of Part V complaints  The Independent Police Review Act, 2007 was passed in May 2007, which establishes the Independent Police Review Director  The Director, Gerry McNeilly, was appointed in June of 2008  The legislation was proclaimed on October 19, 2009 and the OIPRD officially opened its doors to the public on that day. Office of the Independent Police Review Director

4  The Director is appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council on the recommendation of the Attorney General  He or she cannot be a police officer or former police officer  The Chief of Police or Commissioner of the OPP retains the responsibility for disciplinary hearings and the imposition of discipline  Complaints must be filed within six months of the incident the complaint is about Office of the Independent Police Review Director

 ‘Police officers’ as defined in the Police Services Act, this excludes: special constables, First Nations Constables, or civilian members etc.  A police force [the policies of, or services provided by the police force]  A chief of police or deputy chief of police  OPP Commissioner or deputy Commissioner Who can you complain about?

Any member of the public can make a complaint and you do not have to be a resident of Ontario Who can make a complaint?

o Directly affected person o A witness o A person in a personal relationship with the directly affected person AND you suffered loss, damage, distress, danger, or inconvenience o A person who has knowledge of the conduct, or has possession or control of anything, that the Director feels constitutes compelling evidence establishing misconduct or unsatisfactory work performance Criteria for making a public complaint:

 A complaint may be dismissed by the OIPRD under section (60) if it is determined: To be frivolous, vexatious or made in bad faith The complaint could be dealt with more appropriately under a different act or law It is not in the public interest to deal with the complaint - The Director can accept or deny a complaint at his/her discretion Screening Process

9 There are three ways public complaints can be dealt with: Conversation Local Complaint/ Formal Complaint Resolution Three Doors

10 Local Resolution

Local Complaint Local Resolution In Person Reported to OIPRD Fill Out and Sign: Local Resolution Agreement Form Part V Public Complaints

Formal Part V Public Complaint Office of the Independent Police Review Director Reviews, Screens, and Delegates ALL Complaints Investigation by Same Service (Or by Other Service) Investigation by OIPRD Dismissed – No Further Action Chief for Disposition Substantiated Or Not Substantiated Informal Resolution Discipline Request OIPRD Review ConfirmDirect Chief Hearing Appeal to OCPC Director for Disposition

 The Chief of Police or the OPP Commissioner retains the responsibility for disciplinary hearings and imposition of discipline  Investigations take approximately 120 days to complete, however more complex cases can take longer  Where a chief believes on reasonable grounds that serious misconduct or unsatisfactory work performance occurred, he or she must order a disciplinary hearing.  If the Director substantiates serious misconduct he or she will direct the Chief to order a hearing Results of an Investigation

14  A complainant may request a review: Within 30 days of a Chief’s decision that a complaint is unsubstantiated or “not of a serious nature”  Upon review, the Director may: Confirm the decision Direct the Chief to deal with a complaint as he/she specifies or take action independently Assign the investigation to another service Take over the investigation  The Director will notify all parties of the decision OIPRD Reviews

15  A complainant may appeal: The result of a disciplinary hearing by the police service to the OCPC To the police services board if they do not agree with a Chief’s decision about a policy or service complaint  There are no appeal provisions in the PSA to classifications or investigations conducted by the OIPRD  In addition there are no appeals of any of the Director’s decisions Appeals

16  New offences have been created to prevent: Harassment, coercion, or intimidation in relation to a complaint Intentionally hindering or obstructing or providing false information to the Director or an investigator Attempts to do any of the above  Prosecutions of these offences can be commenced with the consent of the Attorney General New Penalty/Offence Provisions

 Complaints must be filed within six months of the incident the complaint is about  You can file a complaint directly with the OIPRD: At By fax By mail, or In person at the Office of the Independent Police Review Director  You can also file a complaint at any municipal, regional or provincial police service in Ontario  The police will then forward the complaint form to the OIPRD within three business days Filing a Complaint

18 Police Services Boards

19  All complaints sent to a board directly, must be forwarded to the OIPRD within three business days  Complaints must be submitted on the OIPRD complaint form  The board should not take any other steps to address the complaint Complaints Sent Directly to Boards

20  Conduct complaints about municipal Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs are sent to the respective police services board after initial screening by the OIPRD  The board must review all complaints referred by the OIPRD. If, after review, the board: Is of the opinion that no misconduct occurred, no action will be taken If the police services board is of the opinion that the allegation could constitute misconduct then it must be returned to the OIPRD for an investigation Conduct Complaints about Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs

21  Where the OIPRD conducts an investigation, the OIPRD must provide a written report to the board  The report will indicate whether: The complaint is unsubstantiated The complaint is substantiated Conduct Complaints about Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs

22  If the complaint is unsubstantiated, the board shall: Take no action in response to the complaint Notify the complainant and the Chief or Deputy Chief in writing of the decision, with a copy of the written report  If, on reasonable grounds, the complaint is substantiated, the Director will: Refer the matter to the board Indicate if the misconduct or unsatisfactory work performance was serious or less serious Conduct Complaints about Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs

23  If the complaint is substantiated, and the conduct or unsatisfactory work performance is serious, the board must either: Hold a hearing into a matter, or Refer the matter to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission to hold the hearing Notify the OIPRD that a hearing is to be held Conduct Complaints about Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs

24  If the complaint was not of a serious nature, it may be resolved informally without holding a hearing  The Chief/Deputy Chief and the complainant must agree  To do Informal Resolution the board must: Complete an “Informal Resolution Agreement” form, signed by the Chief/Deputy Chief and the complainant Wait 12 business days for the cooling-off period to expire Conduct Complaints about Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs

25  Where the Chief/Deputy Chief and complainant consent to an Informal Resolution and do not revoke, the board must: Send the OIPRD the completed Informal Resolution agreement Send any other information requested by the OIPRD  Once this is completed, the complaint is considered resolved  If consent to Informal Resolution is revoked or not given, the board must: Provide the Chief/Deputy Chief with reasonable information about the finding of misconduct or unsatisfactory work performance Give the Chief/Deputy Chief an opportunity to respond in writing or orally Conduct Complaints about Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs

26  The board may then resolve the complaint by: Imposing on the Chief or Deputy Chief one or more penalties as specified in the Police Services Act Making entries in the employment record unless the Chief/Deputy Chief refuses to accept the disposition  If the Chief/Deputy Chief accepts the disposition, the board must provide notice of the penalties or action taken to the OIPRD Conduct Complaints about Chiefs and Deputy Chiefs

27  If the Chief/Deputy Chief refuses to accept penalties or action taken, the board must: Hold a hearing, or Refer the matter to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission to hold a hearing Notify the OIPRD that a hearing is to be held Chief/Deputy Chief’s Refusal to Accept the Disposition

28 Policy and Service Complaints

29  The OIPRD must refer policy and service complaints to the Chief of the concerned police service  Within 60 days of receiving a policy or service complaint, the Chief must: Review the complaint Determine what action to take, if any, and take that action Notify the complainant, the OIPRD and the board in writing of what was done, with reasons Inform the complainant that they may request a review by the relevant police services board  The Chief may request a 60-day extension before the initial period has expired Policy and Service Complaints about Municipal Police Services

30  A complainant may request a review in writing to the board within 30 days of receiving the report from the Chief  The board must verify the complainant submitted the request within 30 days  If the request is not received in 30 days, the board should notify the complainant the deadline has passed and no review will take place  If it was submitted on time, the board must advise the Chief of the request Reviews of Policy and Service Complaints

31  If the police services board has more than three members there are two options to follow: OPTION #1 Review the complaint Take any action, or no action, in response to the complaint, as considered appropriate Notify the complainant, the Chief and the OIPRD in writing of the response to the complaint, with reasons Procedures for Reviews

32  OPTION #2 Appoint a committee of at least three members (two of whom constitute a quorum) to review the complaint and make recommendations to the board after the review is complete After considering the recommendations of the committee, take any action, or no action, in response to the complaint, as considered appropriate Notify the complainant, the Chief and the OIPRD in writing of the response to the complaint, with reasons o While conducting a review, the board or committee of the board may choose to hold a public meeting with respect to the complaint Procedures for Reviews

 To ensure that police policies and services are meeting the needs of the public they serve, the OIPRD may require a police services board to submit a performance audit (PSA section 91).  A performance audit is an audit of how a police service is dealing with public complaints and is conducted, at the board’s expense, by an independent auditor and may be under the direction of the OIPRD. The OIPRD will make the results of all audits available to the public.  Under section 57 of the PSA, the OIPRD has the authority to conduct investigations into systemic issues related to complaints from the public. Audits and Systemic Reviews

34  Can direct the Chief or board to deal with complaint as specified, or to take other actions as he/she deems necessary or take the action independently  Order a hearing into a complaint  Assign the conduct of a hearing about a Chief or Deputy Chief to Ontario Civilian Police Commission  Conduct investigations into systemic issues related to complaints from the public  Conduct audits on how services are dealing with complaints OIPRD Powers

35  Search and Seizure powers: Search police premises and vehicles with or without a warrant Search other places with a warrant Summons persons or things under the Public Inquiries Act OIPRD Powers

36 Upcoming Projects

37  OIPRD is currently establishing a mediation program to assist in less serious complaints  Less formal structure for matters in the process of local resolution  More formal structure for informal resolution  Community-based form of mediation, with its facilitative and transformative style of mediation answers the requirements for the dual structure that the OIPRD has envisioned Mediation

 Outreach and education sessions are presented to all stakeholders across the province including both community groups and police groups  In , Regional Outreach and Education Advisors (ROEAs) made 275 presentations to stakeholder groups  ROEAs also participated in a number of conferences, workshops, and visited over 60 community organizations, libraries, MPP and MP offices to provide information and communications material about the OIPRD Outreach and Education

39 Contact Details

40 Contact details Office of the Independent Police Review Director 655 Bay Street, 10th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2T4 Tel: / Fax: /