Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation 2014-2015 Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Open Library June 4, 2004 Informed Consent Process and Federal Regulations That Must Be Met to Waive Informed Consent Tracey Craddock Regulatory Compliance.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
University of Indianapolis Institutional Review Board Protecting Study Volunteers in Research.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
Research Involving Human Subjects Review of Risk and Protection from Harm.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
UCR IRB–SB Reviewer Placemat
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Conducting Human Subjects Research
UCR IRB–SB Reviewer Placemat
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Common Rule Changes to Consent and Template
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Conducting Human Subjects Research
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator

Evaluating Risk 2 Federal and state laws require review of all research involving human subjects. College policy ensures that the rights and welfare of human participants are adequately protected in research conducted under its auspices: The IRB will review all research involving human participants. The IRB has the responsibility and authority to review, approve, disapprove or require changes in and monitor research activities involving human participants. The IRB focuses on whether participants are found to be at risk, at which time the risk/benefit ratio of the project will be evaluated.

Evaluating Risk 3 The review of human participants research is confined solely to procedures affecting the rights and welfare of human participants. Review of protocol focuses on issues of: Risk/Benefit Ratio Recruitment and Equitable Selection of Participants Informed Consent Process Privacy and Confidentiality

Evaluating Risk 4 Risk Benefit Ratio The IRB will examine study design or scientific merit only within the context of its risk/benefit analysis. Risks to participants are minimized by using procedures which are consistent with sound research design and do not unnecessarily expose participants to risk. Risks to participants are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to participants, and the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result from the research.

Evaluating Risk 5 Recruitment and Equitable Selection of Participants The IRB ensures that the recruitment of participants is equitable and free of coercion. Selection criteria should consider all populations that might potentially benefit from the research, not just those readily available.

Evaluating Risk 6 Informed Consent Informed consent will be sought from each prospective participant or the participant’s legally authorized representative and will be appropriately documented in accordance with 45 CFR and (Code of Federal Regulations). The reviewers will look for the process used to obtain informed consent, not just the informed consent document.

Evaluating Risk 7 Informed Consent Reviewers must be convinced that all information regarding the study that would be relevant to participants’ ability to make an informed decision to participate has been provided. A written signature is documentation of consent and is required for all Category 3 proposals Proposals that fall into an exempt (Category 1) or expedited (Category 2) category do not require signed informed consent

Evaluating Risk 8 Basic Elements of Informed Consent Researcher and institutional affiliation Description/purpose of the project Expectations for participants Length of time required for participation Location of study Indicates that participation is voluntary and subject can withdraw at any time without penalty

Evaluating Risk 9 Basic Elements of Informed Consent: Indicates confidentiality will be protected and explains how data will be disseminated Risks/benefits statement Disclosure about video- and/or audiotaping (if applicable), including storage and disposal Information about paying participants (if applicable) Participant or person giving consent is over 18 Contact information for investigator and/or faculty advisor, including phone number and .

Evaluating Risk 10 Privacy and Confidentiality The IRB will determine that adequate provisions have been taken to protect the privacy of participants and for ensuring confidentiality of participants and of study data as appropriate.

Evaluating Risk 11 Compliant Proposals Include: Clear and concise objectives, methods and procedures Recruitment procedures and recruitment script, letter or Copies of all questionnaires, testing instruments or interview questions Specific steps to safeguard privacy & confidentiality Informed consent document(s) Letter from participating institution or organization

Evaluating Risk 12 Resources Contact information: Colleen Donaldson or Julie Wilkens or Kim Remley or Protecting Human Subjects – three instructional films IRB Website: References: