Figure 6.4 Total and marginal damage and benefit functions, and the efficient level of flow pollution emissions. D(M) B(M) D(M) B(M) Maximised net benefits.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fossil fuel stock Fossil fuel extraction Production Utility Welfare Pollution flows Consumption Pollution stocks Clean-up or defensive expenditure Environmental.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Stationary-Source Local Air Pollution.
Pollution Policy with Imperfect Information (Ch. 8)
Pollution Control: Instruments
MICROECONOMICS: Theory & Applications Chapter 20 Public Goods and Externalities By Edgar K. Browning & Mark A. Zupan John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 9 th Edition,
CHAPTER 18 OUTLINE Externalities Ways of Correcting Market Failure Stock Externalities Externalities and Property Rights Common.
A stocks and flows approach An Integrated Assessment Framework for Considering Climate Change: 1. the principal domains Society and Economy Greenhouse.
ERE10: Instruments of Environmental Policy Criteria, incl. cost-effectiveness Instruments –Institutional –Command and control –Market based A comparison.
5. Economics of “Quality” Pollution control – Damage function Pollution categories – source, dispersion Ambient, emissions – Abatement cost function “Socially.
Benefits, costs WTP – demand Benefit – area under the curve Opportunity Cost Marginal Cost Equimarginal cost.
19 Externalities The market tends to overproduce. Spillover CostsSpillover Benefits The market tends to underproduce.
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
ERE9: Targets of Environmental Policy Optimal targets –Flow pollution –Stock pollution When location matters Steady state –Stock-flow pollutant Steady.
Spatial Dimensions of Environmental Regulations How can economics help us better regulate when the damages occur over space?
Lecture 22: The Environment and Development
Economics 214 Lecture 8 Introduction to Functions Cont.
DEMAND Substitute slices of pizza for bottles. MARKET DEMAND Substitute slices of pizza for bottles.
Chapter 4 Conventional Solutions to Environmental Problems: The Command-and-Control Approach © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Pollution policy with imperfect information
The Objectives of Firms A2 Economics. What are the Objectives of Firms?  What do you feel are the main objectives of firms? Minimising Costs + Maximising.
CHAPTER 5: Pollution control: targets
Chapter 4 Pollution Problems: Must We Foul Our Own Nests?
Efficiency and Exchange
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
Notes for Chapter 6 ECON Benefit cost analysis Many definitions and perspectives  Determines optimal policy from the perspective of either government.
Modeling Costs and Benefits of Biodegradable Mulches SCRI BDM Economics Working Group Srinivasa Ponnaluru June 1, 2011.
Exam 3 review. optimal pollution what is appropriate level of waste? how to achieve that level (who has to reduce how much?) identify efficient levels.
Option Values and Accounting Prices Karl-Göran Mäler Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics.
Stock pollution 1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 9: Stock pollution Perman et al. Chapter 16 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Pollution control: instruments
Environmental Economics Week 2 MARKET FAILURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS READING: Common: Chapter 4 Perman et al: Chapter 5 and 6.
ECONOMICS 415 CLICKER QUESTIONS Chapter 2 – Question Set #1.
Emissions trading end of the world Greg Barrett Economics Lecturer University of Canberra Carbon cycle ecology Objectives Theory Practice.
Modeling Market Failure Chapter 3 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Defining Air Quality: The Standard-Setting Process
Class 7 Environmental Policy Tools
Some additional notes on transfer coefficients and spatial considerations Because almost everyone was confused last time!
Notes for Chapter 5 ECON Economics of Environmental Quality The exchange of private goods and services will generally result in socially efficient.
Air pollution. Command and control 27,000 major sources of pollutants in US are subject to control Clean Air Act 1970; EPA created to oversee Describe.
MED-CSP Concentrating Solar Power for the Mediterranean Region WP0: Introduction WP1: Sustainability Goals WP2: Renewable Energy Technologies WP3: Renewable.
Economic valuations and benefit transfer in ARIES Joshua Farley Community Development and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics University.
Modeling the Market Process: A Review of the Basics Chapter 2 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Command-and-Control Strategies: The Case of Standards Chapter 11.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview.
By: Serenity Hughes ECONOMICS 101.  The markets for many important products are dominated by a small number of very large firms. IMPERFECT COMPETITION.
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS – 2e Charles D. Kolstad Copyright © 2011 by Oxford University Press, Inc. C H A P T E R 16 AUDITS, ENFORCEMENT, AND MORAL HAZARD.
Externalities and Public Goods
Trading and Efficiency © 1998, 2006 Peter Berck. Topics Marginal Cost of abatement and Bid for Permits Efficient Allocation of Emissions among firms Cap.
Systems and Feedback Loops. Questions for Today: What is a system and it’s parts? What are the different types of system response? What is a time delay?
Lecture: 5 Development and Environmental Economics By Miss Pratiti Singha, Assistant Professor(Part Time), Department of Economics, Radhamadhab College,
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS – 2e Charles D. Kolstad Copyright © 2011 by Oxford University Press, Inc. C H A P T E R 13 PROPERTY RIGHTS.
MICROECONOMICS: Theory & Applications By Edgar K. Browning & Mark A. Zupan John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 11 th Edition, Copyright 2012 PowerPoint prepared by.
Environmental policy with uncertainty/imperfect information Price or quantity? M Weitzman, 1974, Prices vs quantities, RevEconstudies.
A General Model of Pollution Control
Topic 5: Public Policy Instruments
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
A General Model of Pollution Control
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics
“Too Many MERV’s” ?? According to ASHRAE and IEST – 20 Possible Assignable MERV’s Three “Markets” E3 Arrestance MERV 1-4 General.
ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 3, Chapter 7 -9
NORMATIVE AND POSITIVE
Trading and Efficiency
Economics of Pollution Control: An Overview
Systems and Feedback Loops
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics 3rd ed. Jonathan M
Taxes, Standards and Tradable Permits
Chapter 14 Environmental Economics: An Overview
The Economics of Environmental Quality
Session 7: Public Policy Instruments
Presentation transcript:

Figure 6.4 Total and marginal damage and benefit functions, and the efficient level of flow pollution emissions. D(M) B(M) D(M) B(M) Maximised net benefits M * M* M

£ C3 C1 C2 * MA M* Marginal damage Marginal abatement cost M Figure 6.5 The economically efficient level of pollution minimises the sum of abatement and damage costs. £ Marginal damage * C3 C1 Marginal abatement cost C2 M Quantity of pollution emission per period MA M*

Figure 6.6 Setting targets according to an absolute health criterion. Marginal health damage t* MC MH Emissions, M

Figure 6.7 A ‘modified efficiency’ based health standard. Marginal health damage tH* MC MH* Emissions, M

Figure 6.8 A spatially differentiated air shed.

Figure 6.9 Efficient steady-state emission level for an imperfectly persistent stock pollutant. Two cases: {r = 0 and  > 0} and {r > 0 and  > 0}. ** * M* M** M

Figure 6.10 Threshold effects and irreversibilities. Figure 6.10a A threshold effect in the decay rate/pollution stock relationship.  A

Figure 6.10(b) An irreversibility combined with a threshold effect.  A

f(x) a b • • x Figure 6.11 A strictly convex function

D D MS M MD = dD/dM MD MS M Figure 6.12 A non-convex damage function arising from pollution reaching a saturation point.

£ a b C M1 M2 M3 M4 Marginal benefit Marginal damage M M Quantity of pollution emission per period M2 M1 b C a Figure 6.14 A non-convex damage function arising from pollutants harmful at low concentrations but beneficial at higher concentrations. M3 M4