© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT COSIMA-ROAD - Modelling Decision Support and Uncertainty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Stuart Baker, Deputy Director of National Rail Projects Department for Transport, UK Zagreb, November 10,
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO APPLIED WELFARE ECONOMICS AND BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS.
Transport City Logistics Technical workshop "Urban Mobility Package" Brussels, 13 th June 2013 Mark MAJOR DG MOVE Unit C1 : Clean Transport and Sustainable.
Module 4 Understanding and planning under uncertainty Country-led environmental and climate change mainstreaming (specialist course) Training materials.
Briefing on a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for Transit Investments in the Washington Region David Lewis Ph.D. Chief Economist HDR|Decision Economics.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Unit 3 (cont.): Economic Analysis— Cost-Benefit Analysis 2.
I Model of impact on society II Results, 4 sectors of society III 8 Case studies I Model of impact on society II Results, 4 sectors of society III 8 Case.
Decision Making: An Introduction 1. 2 Decision Making Decision Making is a process of choosing among two or more alternative courses of action for the.
Clean Energy Project Analysis Course Financial and Risk Analysis with RETScreen ® Software © Minister of Natural Resources Canada 2001 – Photo Credit:

Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Simulation.
03 July 2015Course Overview1 Energy Project Evaluation RES Course ESP606 Goal: To build up knowledge to so that participants will be able to assess if.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D, P.E. CE 7640: Fall 2002.
HDM-4 Applications. 2 Project Appraisal Project Formulation Maintenance Policy Optimization Road Works Programming Network Strategic Analysis Standards.
1 Engineering Economic Decisions Lecture No.1 Professor C. S. Park Fundamentals of Engineering Economics Copyright © 2005.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Estimating Risks Associated with Travel Demand Forecasts 14 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 2013 Thomas Adler, RSG Michael Doherty,
Cost Analysis of Military Training Marcel C. Smit SAS-095 workshop on Cost-Benefit Analysis of Military Training Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5-6 June 2012.
Public Policy Analysis MPA 404 Lecture 21. Previous Lecture Distribution of resources as a rationale for policy interventions The Social Welfare Function.
Regulatory Impact Analysis: Experience in Norway Presentation at Third Regional Meeting of the Working Group IV on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private.
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL.
Role and Components of Project Evaluation
Robustness in assessment of strategic transport projects The 21st International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making Jyväskylä June
Project Planning and Capital Budgeting
Dr. István Fekete: The Role of Integrated Risk Management in Organizations April11th, Budapest.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
Knowing what you get for what you pay An introduction to cost effectiveness FETP India.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia Prioritization Methods For Multimodal Investments, Including Return on Investment.
1 ECGD3110 Systems Engineering & Economy. 2 Lecture 1 Introduction to Engineering Economics.
Accessibility project in Denmark Phase 1 - Collect data, define congestion, establish methods to estimate congestion and the marginal congestion costs.
1 ECGD4214 Systems Engineering & Economy. 2 Lecture 1 Part 1 Introduction to Engineering Economics.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
The TIDE impact assessment methodology TIDE Final Conference Barcelona, September 2015 Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy Oliver.
Business Process Change and Discrete-Event Simulation: Bridging the Gap Vlatka Hlupic Brunel University Centre for Re-engineering Business Processes (REBUS)
Chapter McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Risk and Capital Budgeting 13.
An overview of multi-criteria analysis techniques The main role of the techniques is to deal with the difficulties that human decision-makers have been.
SE 361 Lecture-03. Science is defined as: a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study; knowledge or a system of knowledge covering.
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
June 14th, 2006 Henk Taale Regional Traffic Management Method and Tool.
1 Analyse the Report “Towards a European Main Road Network” Meeting in London, 08/09th November 2006 Presented by Brit Colditz, German Federal Ministry.
Feasibility Study.
Measuring IT Innovation Benefits. Evaluation of IT innovation Why measure IT benefits? A new IS/IT system is an investment; it must be strategically/financially.
PRE-ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ESTABLISHING A METHODOLOGY FOR PERFORMING COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF ITS INVESTMENTS Finn Krenk Danish Road.
PLANNING OF TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS DURING WIDENING OF THE RING ROAD AROUND COPENHAGEN Charlotte Vithen Coordinator of Traffic Management Danish Road.
1 of 31 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 60 minutes (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
SBSTA’s five-year Work Program on the scientific, technical and socio-economic aspects of impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change Presentation.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ITS- INVESTMENTS How to make cost-benefit analyses to a better tool for analysing the socio-economic profitability of ITS-investments.
Workshop on Disproportionate Costs, 10./ Copenhagen Summary and draft conclusions 11 April 2008.
© EIPA – Robin Smail / Ex-ante Project Appraisal & project selection 1 Robin Smail Senior Lecturer CoR / DG Regio Open Days 28 September 2004 Steps for.
Asset accounting-29.pptx This course will give an overview of the following Workbreakdown Structure Network Project Builder Project Planning.
Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Richard de Neufville  Massachusetts Institute of Technology Review for Mid-termSlide 1 of 14 Review of 1st half.
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND THE EU COHESION FUND: LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE Massimo Florio and Silvia Vignetti University of Milan and.
P4 Advanced Investment Appraisal. 2 2 Section C: Advanced Investment Appraisal C1. Discounted cash flow techniques and the use of free cash flows. C2.
P5 : Advanced Performance Management. B1: External Influences on Organisational Performance B1. Changing business environment B2. Impact of external factors.
R EHABILITATION OF R AILWAY T RANSPORT IN C ENTRAL AND E ASTERN E UROPE I NTRODUCTION
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
HS2 - What tests should be applied in evaluating the final business case ? Chris Nash.
EWG Study Tour, Galway, 18/09/2006
Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS) Laboratory
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Module 3b Cost-Benefit-Analysis (CBA)
Cost Benefit Analysis.
Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view
Evaluation from a Corridor perspective: methods and results Merja Penttinen, VTT
Cost Benefit Analysis in the Transport Sector… …and Evaluations
Presentation transcript:

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT COSIMA-ROAD - Modelling Decision Support and Uncertainty

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 2 About me  Ph.d. Student, M.Sc. from the Technical University of Denmark – finishes in 2008  Half way through my Ph.d. study entitled:  Optimization of Decision Support concerning Large Scale Infrastructure Projects  2nd phase concerns risk analysis and sensitivity analysis upon uncertain variables and parameters  as part of an overall software package for appraisal in the Danish Road Sector  Partly financed by a Danish Centre for Logistics and Freight Transport – CLG StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 3 Outline of Presentation  Why do we need a model for appraising road infrastructure projects? – A Danish Manual for Appraisal Studies  Brief overview of the modelling structure of COSIMA-ROAD  Presentation of Case Example  The Deterministic Calculation  Cost-Benefit Analysis  Single value point of return  The Stochastic Calculation  Risk Analysis  Interval point of return in terms of probability distributions  Conclusion & Perspective StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 4 The Socio-Economic Analysis  Prioritising between the different project proposals is necessary  Decision-makers has to choose the optimal combination of investments in a long-term planning perspective  Decision between several project alternatives  Decision of the actual design of the given/chosen projects  Assessment of each projects socio-economic rentability  ….it is of course easier to achive political accept of a project if the socio- economic rate of return is high – but it may not lead to implementation. (The Danish Ministry of Transport, 2003) StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 5 The Danish Manual  The Danish Ministry of Transport and Energy has conduc- ted CBA for a long time, however, it has been unsystematic  A tool for socio-economic analysis  Acceptance of methodology by transparency  Systematic method of determining various impact  Narrowing possible solution to a few alternatives  A practical toolbox for the analysts performing the socio- economic analysis  Identical measures and procedures for evaluating transport projects StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 6 Danish Manual (1) StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 7 Danish Manual (2) StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 8 Evaluation Criteria  B/C-rate  Net Present Value The ratio indicates the present value of the benefits that will result per present value invested. StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 9 Case example – The Alleroed Case Alleroed Inhabitants StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 10 The Case  The main goal is to find a Ring Road that can connect the New Residential Area to the main Road Network  The second goal is to relieve the town centre of Alleroed for through traffic and congestion StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 11 Basic & Alternative Scenarios  To perform any sort of appraisal study you need a basic scenario BUT  Do-Nothing Scenario BUT with the new generated traffic etc.  In the Alleroed Case - 4 different Alternative Scenarios are suggested COSIMA-ROAD  Comparison of these scenarios are the main objective for implementing COSIMA-ROAD  It is, however, important to remember that a good socio- economic performance does not necessarily lead to implementation DSS  Decision Support System - DSS StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 12 Basic Scenario  The Do-Nothing Scenario  Traffic is supposed to arrive at the new residential area as always  Problems in the future with congestions  Capacity  Pollution  Noise  ….  COST = 0 Billion DKK StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 13 Alternative 1  An upgrade of the existing road network and a 1 km extension  The cheapest sollution  Problems in the future with congestion  Noise, emission etc. is still influencing the residential areas around the existing road  COST = 19.2 Billion DKK StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 14 Alternative 2 & 3  Both alternatives are bypass- and new constructed roads  Externalities are moved away from residential areas  COST Alternative 2 = 54.9 Bill. DKK  COST Alternative 3 = 48.6 Bill. DKK StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 15 Alternative 4  A large scale upgrade of the entire road network in the Alleroed Region  The most expensive  Creates a substantial time benefit for travellers in the region  Removes externalities from all of the residential areas  Adapted for future requirements  COST = Billion DKK StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 16 Implementation in COSIMA-ROAD StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 17 COSIMA-ROAD  COSIMA - COmpoSIte Model for Assessment StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 18 Entry Data Sheet – COSIMA-ROAD StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 19 Main Data Input StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 20 Forecast sheet - Impacts StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 21 Key Figures StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 22 Trip Purposes StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 23 Results - Overview StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 24 Results of all 4 alternatives StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 25 Results of all 4 alternatives StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 26 Risk Analysis  COSIMA-ROAD is designed to give a deterministic single value result, in this case as a benefit/cost ratio  However, several uncertainties are involved when interpreting models  The basis of Risk Analysis is then to give the decision- makers the ability to consider a ”complete set of possible future outcomes”  Assigning probability distributions on the uncertain first year effects – NOT Unit prices  Outcome is Interval results in terms of probability distributions StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 27 Stochastic calculation – Risk Analysis module  as add-on to Excel  The different levels of knowledge is divided into 3 groups where the actual distribution parameters are assessed: StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 28 Risk Analysis Sheet in COSIMA-ROAD StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 29 Distribution of the Construction Cost  It has been found suitable to use an Erlang Distribution with a Scale parameter k = 5.  The Shape parameter is found by the following relationship:  The mean is calculated by the so- called Lichtenberg’s Principle:  This type of distributions is reasonable as the Construction Cost most often is exceed StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 30 Distribution of the Travel Time Savings  Recent Master Thesis from DTU has shown that a std. deviation between 10% - 20% is a reasonable error corresponding to the Traffic Models StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 31 Distribution of Maintenance Cost  It has been found that a 10% lower bound and 50% higher bound is reasonable StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 32 Distribution of The Safety Effect (number of Accidents)  This impact is found by impact models. These models, like the traffic models have embedded errors – a study has shown that these vary quiet extensively (+/- 10% in our case) StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 33 Risk Analysis Sheet with applied distributions StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 34 Results of the Risk Analysis StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 35 Results of the Risk Analysis StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 36 Results all four alternatives StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 37 Conclusion & Perspective  The COSIMA-ROAD Evaluation System has been used in real case studies in the Danish Road Directorate  The model has proven highly applicable within transport infrastructure planning – at the moment it is used in a large-scale study in Greenland  To address some of the uncertainties embedded in the model result a Monte-Carlo simulation is conducted making use of various probability distributions  The various probability distributions applied within the COSIMA- ROAD model is to be revised and further investigated  Especially, the two main impacts; Construction Costs and Travel Time Savings are to be further investigated StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 38 PhD Student, M.Sc. in Engineering Kim Bang Salling Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport Decision Modelling Group Phone:

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 39 ”The Monster Sheet” – Basic calculations StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 40 ”The Monster Sheet” – Basic calculations StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 41 ”The Monster Sheet” – Basic calculations StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 42 ”The Monster Sheet” – Basic calculations StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 43 ”The Monster Sheet” – Basic calculations StartEnd

© Copyright DTU-CTT 2006 Technical University of Denmark Centre for Traffic and Transport - CTT 44 ”The Monster Sheet” – Basic calculations StartEnd