*Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. DOE by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

17. April 2015 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Application of a multiscale transport model for magnetized plasmas in cylindrical configuration Workshop.
ASIPP HT-7 belt limiter Houyang Guo, Sizhen Zhu and Jiangang Li Investigation of EAST Divertor Asymmetry in Plasma Detachment & Target Power Loading Using.
Barbora Gulejová 1 of 12 Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas SPS Annual Meeting in Lausanne, 14/2/2006 SOLPS5 modelling of ELMing H-mode on TCV.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
Conference on Computational Physics 30 August 2006 Transport Simulation for the Scrape-Off Layer and Divertor Plasmas in KSTAR Tokamak S. S. Kim and S.
SUGGESTED DIII-D RESEARCH FOCUS ON PEDESTAL/BOUNDARY PHYSICS Bill Stacey Georgia Tech Presented at DIII-D Planning Meeting
Exploring Capability to Calculate Heat Loads on Divertors and Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting September 6-7, 2007 Idaho Falls,
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
X.Q. Xu 1, R.H. Cohen 1, W.M. Nevins 1, T.D. Rognlien 1, D.D. Ryutov 1, M.V. Umansky 1, L.D. Pearlstein 1, R.H. Bulmer 1, D.A. Russell 2, J.R. Myra 2,
Integrated Effects of Disruptions and ELMs on Divertor and Nearby Components Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering Center for Materials.
Progress on Determining Heat Loads on Divertors and First Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting December 12-13, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia.
Progress Report on Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Farrokh Najmabadi, Rene Raffray, Mark S. Tillack, John Pulsifer, Zoran Dragovlovic (UCSD) Ahmed Hassanein.
GTC Status: Physics Capabilities & Recent Applications Y. Xiao for GTC team UC Irvine.
European Joint PhD Programme, Lisboa, Diagnostics of Fusion Plasmas Spectroscopy Ralph Dux.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
N EOCLASSICAL T OROIDAL A NGULAR M OMENTUM T RANSPORT IN A R OTATING I MPURE P LASMA S. Newton & P. Helander This work was funded jointly by EURATOM and.
A.Yu. Pigarov, S.I. Krasheninnikov, J.A. Boedo
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
pkm- NCSX CDR, 5/21-23/ Power and Particle Handling in NCSX Peter Mioduszewski 1 for the NCSX Boundary Group: for the NCSX Boundary Group: M. Fenstermacher.
ITPA, DivSOL, May 2007: Coster et al Coster, Bonnin, Corrigan, Wiesen, Chankin, Zagorski, Owen, Rognlien, Kukushkin, Fundamenski, … With contributions.
6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation of Magnetic Fusion Plasmas Hyunsun Han, G. Park, Sumin Yi, and J.Y. Kim 3D MHD SIMULATIONS.
Joaquim Loizu P. Ricci, F. Halpern, S. Jolliet, A. Mosetto
Divertor/SOL contribution IEA/ITPA meeting Naka Nov. 23, 2003 Status and proposals of IEA-LT/ITPA collaboration Multi-machine Experiments Presented by.
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
PIC simulations of the propagation of type-1 ELM-produced energetic particles on the SOL of JET D. Tskhakaya 1, *, A. Loarte 2, S. Kuhn 1, and W. Fundamenski.
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
Overview of MHD and extended MHD simulations of fusion plasmas Guo-Yong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, New Jersey, USA Workshop on ITER.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Challenging problems in kinetic simulation of turbulence and transport in tokamaks Yang Chen Center for Integrated Plasma Studies University of Colorado.
1 Development of integrated SOL/Divertor code and simulation study in JT-60U/JT-60SA tokamaks H. Kawashima, K. Shimizu, T. Takizuka Japan Atomic Energy.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
Rotation effects in MGI rapid shutdown simulations V.A. Izzo, P.B. Parks, D. Shiraki, N. Eidietis, E. Hollmann, N. Commaux TSD Workshop 2015 Princeton,
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
FLCC March 28, 2005 FLCC - Plasma 1 Fluid Modeling of Capacitive Plasma Tools FLCC Presentation March 28, 2005 Berkeley, CA David B. Graves, Mark Nierode,
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
Edge characterization experiments in the National Spherical Torus Experiment V. A. Soukhanovskii and NSTX Research Team Session CO1 - NSTX ORAL session,
Radial Electric Field Formation by Charge Exchange Reaction at Boundary of Fusion Device* K.C. Lee U.C. Davis *submitted to Physics of Plasmas.
Erosion/redeposition analysis of CMOD Molybdenum divertor and NSTX Liquid Lithium Divertor J.N. Brooks, J.P. Allain Purdue University PFC Meeting MIT,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
EXTENSIONS OF NEOCLASSICAL ROTATION THEORY & COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENT W.M. Stacey 1 & C. Bae, Georgia Tech Wayne Solomon, Princeton TTF2013, Santa Rosa,
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
1 SIMULATION OF ANOMALOUS PINCH EFFECT ON IMPURITY ACCUMULATION IN ITER.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
1Field-Aligned SOL Losses of HHFW Power and RF Rectification in the Divertor of NSTX, R. Perkins, 11/05/2015 R. J. Perkins 1, J. C. Hosea 1, M. A. Jaworski.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
LI et al. 1 G.Q. Li 1, X.Z. Gong 1, A.M. Garofalo 2, L.L. Lao 2, O. Meneghini 2, P.B. Snyder 2, Q.L. Ren 1, S.Y. Ding 1, W.F. Guo 1, J.P. Qian 1, B.N.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
Integrated Plasma Simulations C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop Toward an Integrated Plasma Simulation Oak Ridge, TN November 7-9,
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
NSTX APS-DPP: SD/SMKNov Abstract The transport properties of NSTX plasmas obtained during the 2008 experimental campaign have been studied and.
56 th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics. October 27-31, New Orleans, LA Using the single reservoir model [3], shown on right, to:
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Engineering models in the ARIES system code, Part II M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, et al. ARIES Project Meeting January 2011.
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
Major aims of IPP-NIFS collaboration on divertor physics
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
Presentation transcript:

*Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. DOE by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA LLNL-PRES Modeling Boundary Plasma/Neutral Characteristics for ARIES* T.D. Rognlien, G.D. Porter, & M.E. Rensink LLNL ARIES-Pathways Project Meeting Bethesda, MD Oct , 2010

2 ARIES October 2010 – 2 Outline 1.Outline of important edge plasma input available for ARIES (1 slide) 2.Our tools and examples of past work (12 slides) 3.Return to discuss the “plans” slide (at any time)

3 ARIES October 2010 – 3 Discussion of plans for edge modeling of ARIES 4 point-designs (similar to ITER concerns) 1.Baseline analysis using documented “best assumptions” –ideally use same divertor geometry and impurity seeding –however, each point design may have different optimal choices, e.g., pedestal density, temperature, and power flux may dictate different geometry and impurity levels 2.Sensitivity studies –turbulent radial transport is largest unknown, but better empirical scaling and turbulence modeling developing (e.g., D, V conv, and  –wall conditions, i.e., sputtering and recycling, especially if mixed material walls/divertor 3.Transient heat and particle fluxes –(small) ELMs are present baseline; impact material fatigue and heat removal & impurity control 4.Ash removal and DT fueling –adequate He pumping is key to divertor geometry choice (#1) –separate D & T recycling/transport; how does T get back in core

4 ARIES October 2010 – 4 Background Mark Tillack & I have been discussing strategies to utilize existing modeling codes In addition to some involvement from me, Gary Porter & Marv Rensink are retired edge physicists interested in part-time involvement Presentation sketches some history/capability and possible contributions to ARIES goals 100 MW/m 150 MW/m 50 MW/m 200 MW/m Near-term facilities ITER NHTX (Princeton) FDF (GA) CTF (Princeton) ARIES-ST 0 Exhaust Power (MW) Major radius (m) Heat flux is a growing issue Interactive questions/discussion encouraged

5 ARIES October 2010 – 5 UEDGE is a 2D plasma/neutral fluid transport code covering closed & open field-line regions Features of UEDGE Physics: –Multispecies plasma; var. n i,e, u ||i,e, T i,e,  –Flux-limited kinetic corrections –Fit radial plasma transport coefficients or coupling to BOUT turbulent fluxes –Reduced Navier-Stokes or Monte Carlo for wall-recycled/sputtered neutrals –Multi-step ionization and recombination Numerics: –Finite Vol.; Newton-Krylov implicit solver –Non-orthogonal mesh for fitting divertor –Steady-state or time dependent –Parallel version with 2D decomposition –PYTHON or BASIS scripting control DIII-D UEDGE mesh

6 ARIES October 2010 – 6 UEDGE is built in a modular fashion UEDGE source code; 98% FORTRAN, 2% C; revision control - CVS/SVN Turbulent fluxes - 3D Fluid BOUT Precond.; NK-solvers Transport equations; multi-species Common utilities & variables Atomic physics tables; ioniz., recomb., rad. or Monte Carlo Neutrals: fluid or Monte Carlo Flux-surface mesh generator BASIS or PYTHON provides scripting control MHD equilibrium Core/wall bdry. conds. External to UEDGE

7 ARIES October 2010 – 7 Some history of UEDGE development & use Marv & I continue to develop UEDGE capabilities & applications −Divertor geometry, cross-field drifts, convective blobs −Double null, fluid or DEGAS-2 neutrals −PFC modeling including APEX, ALPS, ITER −DIII-D, C-Mod, NSTX, & ITER modeling Gary has developed diagnostics/applic. −H-alpha, impurity radiation −Extensive DIII-D, C-Mod, ASDEX-U, JET modeling Also, all 3 of us performed detailed comparative study of FIRE, IGNITOR, & ITER for Snow Mass 2002

8 ARIES October 2010 – 8 ARIES-specific history In 2001, Marv & I performed some simulations for ARIES AT & RS for the APEX project −both solid and liquid wall options were considered −the solid wall option work published as part of Fusion Eng. Design review of edge modeling in 2002 About 2005, T.K. Mau from ARIES visited us a couple of times to learn UEDGE −we started him with our 2002 ARIES-AT example −I believe T.K.’s extensions were part of the published 2006 (Jardin et al.) ARIES paper, but we didn’t participate directly in that extended work 3-weeks ago, A. Mahdavi queried me about our ARIES models & results, & I now understand from Mark that there is some question about the impurity radiation – but Ali & I didn’t discuss any discrepancy; we are interested if there is an issue here

9 ARIES October 2010 – 9 In 2001, we used ARIES AT and FIRE to illustrate options to reduce for divertor heat-flux Rognlien, Rensink, Fusion Eng. Design, 60 (2002) 497. Mantle radiation loss 77% assumed for comparison tilted-plate case - next 47 MW/m 2 ARIES-AT double null, orthogonal plates

10 ARIES October 2010 – 10 Now tilt the divertor plate to reduce the heat-flux – no explicit impurities considered here Rognlien, Rensink, Fusion Eng. Design, 60 (2002) 497. Large mantle radiation loss 77% assumed here

11 ARIES October 2010 – 11 Impact of seeding with neon illustrated by FIRE example – full multi-charge-state simulation; transport each Ne ion Rognlien, Rensink, Fusion Eng. Design, 60 (2002) 497. FIRE heat-flux to outer divertor with neon FIRE geometry/mesh with tilted plates

12 ARIES October 2010 – 12 Radiation power to main-chamber wall computed by mapping local power at each cell as isotropic radiator Rognlien, Rensink, Fusion Eng. Design, 60 (2002) 497. Radiated power computed by method similar to RADLOAD diagnostic in ARIES ‘06 FIRE geometry/mesh with tilted plates (Here neon level slightly increased gives a slowly-evolving detached plasma)

13 ARIES October 2010 – 13 UEDGE simulations for ARIES-AT reported in FED ‘06 used orthogonal plates and a simpler impurity model S. Jardin et al., Fusion Eng. Design, 80 (2005) 25. ARIES-AT double null, orthogonal plates Relation between ‘02 and ‘06 ARIES-AT simulation –’02 consider tilted plates to reduce power, ‘06 did not –‘02 left impurity effect to the FIRE example, ‘06 includes impurities –‘02 FIRE example used non- coronal, multspecies model for Ne, ‘06 used fixed concentration coronal model for Ar –we did the ‘02 modeling, Mau did the ‘06 modeling Any mix can be done in the future

14 ARIES October 2010 – 14 Neutrals can be important; we usually use fluid model for efficiency; can use Monte Carlo, which is similar Radial neutral fueling-flux across separatrix in DIII-D Gap region is beyond normal UEDGE mesh Neutral flux High-energy CX- neutrals can sputter the first wall

15 ARIES October 2010 – 15 Classical ExB and grad_B drifts are important for argon transport into the core plasma of DIII-D (Porter)

16 ARIES October 2010 – 16 Connection to OFES FY10 Joint Research Target on scaling of heat-flux width Primary experimental scaling of heat width narrowing with plasma current, I p ; => heat flux increases –Both DIII-D and NSTX observe strong I p scaling in H-mode –C-Mod may see strong peak heat- flux scaling in EDA-mode (see LaBombard, APS-DPP) – Kinetic ion modeling may help explain the I p scaling a transport model giving 1/I p width can be used in UEDGE DIII-D - Lasnier et al. NSTX - Maingi et al.

17 ARIES October 2010 – 17 Discussion of plans for edge modeling of ARIES 4 point-designs (similar to ITER concerns) 1.Baseline analysis using documented “best assumptions” –ideally use same divertor geometry and impurity seeding –however, each point design may have different optimal choices, e.g., pedestal density, temperature, and power flux may dictate different geometry and impurity levels 2.Sensitivity studies –turbulent radial transport is largest unknown, but better empirical scaling and turbulence modeling developing (e.g., D, V conv, and  –wall conditions, i.e., sputtering and recycling, especially if mixed material walls/divertor 3.Transient heat and particle fluxes –(small) ELMs are present baseline; impact material fatigue and heat removal & impurity control 4.Ash removal and DT fueling –adequate He pumping is key to divertor geometry choice (#1) –separate D & T recycling/transport; how does T get back in core

18 ARIES October 2010 – 18 Summary A width range of edge model experience/tools available Previous ARIES modeling has made various assumptions, but we understand the basic consequences We should continue discussion of priorities for ARIES edge modeling

19 ARIES October 2010 – 19 Backup slides

20 ARIES October 2010 – 20 Some of what you should know above edge/PMI modeling - an outline Impressive features of fluid transport modeling (UEDGE, …) –complex magnetic geometry –multispecies impurity transport/radiation –neutral transport/sources –wall sputtering/recycling/re-deposition –partial fitting of experimental data Limitations and emerging improvements –physics-based turbulent radial transport (D, V,  blobs; ELMs) –kinetic plasma effects – parallel perpendicular to B-field –integrated/self-consistent edge/wall and edge/core coupling –toroidal (3D) asymmetries, peaking factors

21 ARIES October 2010 – 21 Edge transport modeling has primarily used fluid equations obtained by moments of kinetic eqn. Continuity and momentum equations are solved for plasma & neutrals ∂n k  ∂t + div(n k V k ) = S pk ∂(n k m k V ||k )  ∂t + div(n k m k V ||k V k ) = -grad || P k + qn k E || - F ||k - R ||k + S mk Similar energy equations solved for T e and T i Radial velocities are convective-diffusive (fit) + classical drifts V r = V conv - D(dn k /dr)/n k + ExB/B 2 + V grad B Turbulence fit or from simulation; parallel transport classical Parallel electron thermal conduc. timescale (≤ s); implicit solver Electrostatic potential from  J = 0 Turbulence Classical