1 Paris, May 5th 2008 Exospheric Sodium Observation of Mercury at TNG V. Mangano, C. Barbieri, F. Leblanc, G. Cremonese, C. Grava (1) INAF-Interplanetary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Johan Warell*, A. Sprague, R. Kozlowski, A. Önehag*, G. Trout, B. Davidsson*, J. Helbert, D. Rothery *Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University,
Advertisements

1 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW Meeting PARIS THEMIS Observations (2007) F. Leblanc (Service d'Aéronomie), A. Doressoundiram (Observatoire de Paris),V. Mangano (IFSI),
Echelle Spectroscopy Dr Ray Stathakis, AAO. What is it? n Echelle spectroscopy is used to observe single objects at high spectral detail. n The spectrum.
1 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Observations (new) and Comparison with one (ours) Exospheric Model F. Leblanc Service d'Aéronomie du CNRS/IPSL.
MSASI Mercury Sodium Atmospheric Spectral Imager PI: Ichiro Yoshikawa (Univ. of Tokyo) Co-PI: Oleg Korablev (IKI) Co-I: Shoichi Okano (Tohoku University)
PHEBUS Probing of Hermean Exosphere By Ultraviolet Spectroscopy PHEBUS Science Performance International Mercury Watch GroupObservatoire de Paris 5-6 April.
Echelle spectra reduction with IRAF*
Composite colliding winds (CWo - orbiting; CWc - concentric; CWb - binary) and Seaquist, Taylor and Button (STB) model of HM Sge (open circle - hot component;
AEOS Telescope + Image-Slicer/ Spectrograph Data Reduction and Results for June 8, 2006.
ASIC3 WorkshopLandsdowne, VA May 16-18, 2006 J. Harder Page 1 Calibration Status of the Solar Irradiance Monitor (SIM) : The Present and the Future Jerald.
Ingolf E. Dammasch ROB/SIDC Brussels, Belgium Solar UV Spectroscopy with SUMER on SOHO (extended version for 11 Oct 2007)
20 November 2006Boston Mercury Observation Workshop Observational Quests for Mercury’s Exosphere Ann L. Sprague Lunar and Planetary Laboratory University.
MERCURY OBSERVATIONS -- JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING November 2006 Center for Space Physics, Boston University, College of Arts and Sciences.
Nov Boston Meeting1 Mercury at the TNG Cesare Barbieri Dept. of Astronomy University of Padova With the collaboration.
June 2006 data review meeting, Boston, Nov 2006 Alain Doressoundiram1 MERCURY ’ S EXOSPHERE OBSERVATION USING EsPadOnS/CFHT Alain Doressoundiram(LESIA.
Observational Astrophysics II: May-June, Observational Astrophysics II (L2) Getting our NIRF What do want to do? 1.Image a selected.
November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Review of Physical Processes and Modeling Approaches "A summary of uncertain/debated.
Mercury’s Sodium Exosphere from Maui AEOS & Tohoku Observatory June 2006.
Spectrographs. Spectral Resolution d 1 2 Consider two monochromatic beams They will just be resolved when they have a wavelength separation of d Resolving.
THE SODIUM EXOSPHERE OF MERCURY: COMPARISON BETWEEN OBSERVATIONS AND MODEL A.Mura, P. Wurz, H. Lichtenegger, H. Lammer, A. Milillo, S. Orsini, S. Massetti,
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer for the normal-incidence region L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia.
Astronomical Instrumentation Often, astronomers use additional optics between the telescope optics and their detectors. This is called the instrumentation.
Science Specification of SOLAR-C payload SOLAR-C Working Group 2012 July 23.
EUV Spectroscopy. High-resolution solar EUV spectroscopy.
AAO Fibre Instrument Data Simulator 10 October 2011 ROE Workshop 2011 Michael Goodwin Tony Farrell Gayandhi De Silva Scott Smedley Australian Astronomical.
Spectroscopy Spectral analysis is probably the most important method for learning about the physics of the astronomical sources Simplest method to get.
3rd Integral Bart Work Shop Chocerady - November 1-3, Patrizia Ferrero GRB Too observations in Loiano Patrizia Ferrero (IASF-BO, OACT & Universita’
Phd Università degli studi di Napoli “Federico II”
Spectrographs. Literature: Astronomical Optics, Daniel Schneider Astronomical Observations, Gordon Walker Stellar Photospheres, David Gray.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
2005/11/086th Solar-B Science Supersonic downflows in the photosphere discovered in sunspot moat regions T. Shimizu (ISAS/JAXA, Japan),
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
A spectroscopic survey of the 3CR sample of radio galaxies Authors: Sara Buttiglione (SISSA - Trieste), Alessandro Capetti (INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico.
Chile Sky Background at ESO/la Silla in the Visible and Near IR Leonardo Vanzi -Olivier R. Hainaut European Southern Observatory La Silla - Chile.
18 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Astronomical Spectroscopy Notes from Richard Gray, Appalachian State, and D. J. Schroeder 1974 in “Methods of Experimental Physics, Vol. 12-Part A Optical.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Stefano Orsini 1, Valeria Mangano 1, Alessandro Mura 1, Francois Leblanc 2, Anna Milillo 1 1 IFSI-INAF Roma, Italy 2 CNRS/IPSL Paris, France Stefano Orsini.
Observations of Moreton waves with Solar-B NARUKAGE Noriyuki Department of Astronomy, Kyoto Univ / Kwasan and Hida Observatories M2 The 4 th Solar-B Science.
The Study of IFU for the Li Jiang 2.4m Telescope ZHANG Jujia 张居甲 Yun Nan Astronomical Observatory. CAS Sino-French IFU Workshop Nov Li Jiang.
The Wavelet Packets Equalization Technique: Applications on LASCO Images M.Mierla, R. Schwenn, G. Stenborg.
SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August 28, 2008, Ghent SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August.
IMF Prediction with Cosmic Rays THE BASIC IDEA: Find signatures in the cosmic ray flux that are predictive of the future behavior of the interplanetary.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Spatial Distribution of Atom Velocities in the Mercury Sodium Tail - Observation at Haleakala in June H. Fukazawa, M. Kagitani, S. Okano H. Fukazawa,
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
Graduate student presentation: Subtracting the sky light International Mercury Watch Meeting Student: Cesare Grava Supervisor: Cesare Barbieri (Università.
Aerosol distribution and physical properties in the Titan atmosphere D. E. Shemansky 1, X. Zhang 2, M-C. Liang 3, and Y. L. Yung 2 1 SET/PSSD, California,
Flare Prediction and the Background Corona Coronal Diagnostic Spectrometer Wolter-Schwarzschild Type 2 telescope Two separate spectrometers- the Normal.
THE EXOSPHERE OF MERCURY: SODIUM OBSERVATIONS AND MAGNETOSPHERIC MODELLING Mikonos 2009 Valeria Mangano & Stefano Massetti Interplanetary Space Physics.
Lecture 13 Light: the Cosmic Messenger Telescopes and Observational Astronomy.
Microwave emission from the trapped and precipitated electrons in solar bursts J. E. R. Costa and A. C. Rosal1 2005, A&A, 436, 347.
Atmospheric extinction Suppose that Earth’s atmosphere has mass absorption coefficient  at wavelength. If f 0 is flux of incoming beam above atmosphere,
Markarian 421 with MAGIC telescope Daniel Mazin for the MAGIC Collaboration Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München
Transit of Venus Observations From National Solar Observatory.
Rotation of Jets from Young Stars: New Clues from the Hubble Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph D. Coffey, F. Bacciotti, J. Woitas, T. P. Ray & J. Eisloffel.
Mercury Disk Observations by Japanese team 1. Observation of Mercury transit on the solar disk on November 9, 2007 [Dawn-Dusk Asymmetry] by Junya Ono and.
F. Pepe Observatoire de Genève Optical astronomical spectroscopy at the VLT (Part 2)
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Saturn’s Auroras from the Cassini Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Wayne Pryor Robert West Ian Stewart Don Shemansky Joseph Ajello Larry Esposito Joshua.
Adrian Martindale (on behalf of MIXS team) University of Leicester
SOLIS-VSM Magnetic Synoptic Maps
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
1 Rikkyo University, 2 Tohoku University
Progress Toward Measurements of Suprathermal Proton Seed Particle Populations J. Raymond, J. Kohl, A. Panasyuk, L. Gardner, and S. Cranmer Harvard-Smithsonian.
Yoji Hayashi, Ryoichi Imasu Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute,
Saturn’s Auroras from the Cassini Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph
RHESSI Spectral Analysis of the 1N/M1.9 flare of 20 October 2003
Spectroscopy Workshop
Presentation transcript:

1 Paris, May 5th 2008 Exospheric Sodium Observation of Mercury at TNG V. Mangano, C. Barbieri, F. Leblanc, G. Cremonese, C. Grava (1) INAF-Interplanetary Space Physics Institute, Roma (2) University of Padova, Astronomy Department (3) Service d'Aéronomie du CNRS, Verrières-Le-Buisson, France (4) INAF- Astronomical Observatory of Padova (5) CISAS- University of Padova

2 TNG site and description The TNG (Telescopio Nazionale Galileo) is the 3.58 m Italian Alt-Az telescope located in the island of La Palma, Canaries. It is equipped with an active optics system and its 2 Nasmyth foci host 5 instruments permanently mounted. Among these instruments, there is SARG, an high efficiency spectrograph with an echelle grating designed for the spectral range from 370 up to 900 nm, for a resolution from R=29000 to R= Altitude 2387 m a.s.l. Lat. 28º 45’ 28” N Long. 17º 53’ 38” W Paris, May 5th 2008

3 Mercury Observations at TNG 2002 (August 23rd-24th)  published on PSS 52 (2004) Barbieri C., Verani S., Cremonese G., Sprague A., Mendillo M., Cosentino R., Hunten D., First observations of the Na exosphere of Mercury with the high-resolution spectrograph of the 3.5 M Telescopio Nazionale Galileo 2003 (August 8,9 and 10th)  published on ICARUS 185 (2006) Leblanc F., Barbieri C., Cremonese G., Verani S., Cosentino R., Mendillo M., Sprague A., Hunten, D., Observation of Mercury’s exosphere: spatial distributions and variations of its Na component during August 8,9 and 10, (June 29,30th, July 1th)  paper in preparation (Mangano V. et al.) 2006 (June 16th to 18th)  first of the IMW coordinated campaign work still in progress first results showed by Barbieri in Boston, 2006 Paris, May 5th 2008

4 Results for the June 16, 2006 evening - 2 Log 10 scale D2 For better visual clarity, I show only the D2 intensities in ADUs. Each slit is 27 arcsec long. 46,55 44,48

5 TNG 2005 data set June 29th June 30th July 1st During the 2005 campaign 3 nights of observation were performed (at sunset at about 19:00 UT, for 1 hour). Main Mercury Parameters: Angular diameter: arcsec Elongation: º E Heliocentric distance: AU Sun-Mercury-Earth angle: º True Anomaly Angle º Paris, May 5th 2008

6 Long slit (26.7” x 0.4”) Resolution: Na filter (no order overlapping) 60 Å wide Scan in the north-south direction: equator ± 4” Exposure time: 120”

77 Paris, May 5th 2008 SARG CCD is a mosaic of two thinned back illuminated detectors dimensions: 2048x4096 pixels pixel size: 13.5 µm Phase 1: pre-analysis D2 D1 D 2 D 1

8 Paris, May 5th Correcting spectra for sky and diffuse light 2.Matching theorical dopplershifted D1 and D2 lines (red dotted line) with observed ones Phase 2: Analysis

9 Paris, May 5th Reproducing the Fraunhofer absorption bands throught three different profiles : a)Voigt, b) Solar spectrum, and c) straight line; comparison and extraction of the emission line

10 NB: In some cases the differences are negligible, but not in other slits. Hence, we choose the straight line profile as the best for all cases.

11 Paris, May 5th Creation of a reflectance model of the illuminated disk by following the Hapke theory

12 Paris, May 5th Comparison of this model with the continuum as a method to derive the calibration factor for the conversion ADU  Rayleigh 6. The output provides the D2 and D1 sodium profiles along the slit

13 Paris, May 5th st night: June 29th 2005 Slit Number Obs.Time (UT) Theoretical Position Final Position Seeing Sigma Calibration Factor HYLN004520: HYLN004620: HYLN004720: D composition /1:

14 Paris, May 5th nd night: June 30th D composition /2: Slit Number Obs.Time (UT) Theoretical Position Final Position Seeing Sigma Calibration Factor HYNB005320: HYNB005420: HYNB005520: HYNB005620: HYNB005720: HYNB005820: HYNB005920: HYNB006020:

15 Paris, May 5th rd night: July 1st D composition /3: Slit Number Obs.Time (UT) Theoretical Position Final Position Seeing Sigma Calibration Factor HYQB004420: HYQB004520: HYQB004620: HYQB004720: HYQB004820:

16 Paris, May 5th 2008 Two features are clearly visible: 1.An emission peak in the southern hemisphere at mid latitude: Related surface feature? Opening of the magnetic field southern cusp? 2.A global enhancement of sodium emission during the second night (50%) Related solar events? Phase 3: Interpretation

17 Paris, May 5th The peak appear to be at about: º E, 10-40º S Radar bright spots: (A. Sprague) A (15° E, 25° S), B(15° E, 55° N),C(120° E,15°N) (J. Harmon) A (12° E, 34° S), B(17° E, 58° N),C(114° E, 11°N), (18° E, 27° S), Bartok crater Location of the peak

18 Paris, May 5th No match with the radar bright spots. Maybe with the faint feature associated to the Bartok crater?

19 Paris, May 5th Opening of the magnetic cusps The mid-latitude position of the peak suggests a relation with the opening of the magnetic cusps: IMF Bx > 0  injection in southern hemisphere IMF Bx < 0  injection in the northern hemisphere (-) → IMF Bx > 0 (+) → IMF Bx < 0 IMF Bx (flipped) time Coronal Field ‘Wrong’ direction of the IMF Bx component!

20 Paris, May 5th Solar conditions – impulsive events Paris, May 5th 2008 Wilcox Solar Obs. photospheric field CR#2031SoHO/EIT (Fe XV 284 Å) image 29-June :00 UT Coronal Hole Fast Stream Active Region AR0781 (CMEs) 20

21 Paris, May 5th June 29th CME :30 UT, v 0 = 350 km/s Estimated arrival time: July 1st, 17:00 UT June 28th CME :05 UT, v 0 = 600/400 km/s Estimated arrival time: June 30th, 03:00 UT June 30th, 15:00 UT CME #2 CME #3 CME #1 June 28th HALO CME :30 UT, v 0 = 1750 km/s Estimated arrival time: June 30th, 05:00 UT

22 Paris, May 5th 2008 To summarise: 29-Jun (180) 30-Jun (181) 01-Jul (182) 20:00 UT20:00 UT 20:00 UT IMF Bx < 0 CME#1 CME#2 CME#3 time is Na intensification correlated to CME? N-S asymmetry? related to IMF Bx? Coronal hole