Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
Supporting Continuous Improvement in Low Achieving Schools West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support August.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
6/2/20151 Making the Case for Online Professional Development Linda Pittenger Kentucky Department of Education Online Learning Institute 22 March 2006.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
MTIP: Michigan Technology Implementation Project: Western Michigan Technology Conference April 19, 2002.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Using Data to Improve Adult Ed Programs Administrators’ Workshop.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Summer Non-effective School Districts district staff issue a plethora of uncoordinated and often contradictory directives while presiding over resource.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
Coaching for Learning June Online Meeting Reminder: Use the Audio Wizard to ensure you can hear the presentation. 1.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools
School Improvement Planning Process OSPI PSESD
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
A joint presentation of the Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher Education Collaboration and the Stanford University School of Education.
Sandra Johnson, M.A. & M.S. Susie Ceppi- Bussmann, Ph.D. New Mexico State University.
Essential Conditions for Implementation of... Local Professional Development Programming.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
The Michigan Statewide System of Support for Title I Schools.
Medicine Hat School District 76 Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living and relationships Building Capacity Presentation to the.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Federal Programs Spring Directors’ Conference March 6-7, 2012 Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III & System Support Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
COACHING PLC Skill Up to Scale Up. Why?What? How?Who?
SECC/TXCC Regional Institute State Education Agency Strategies for Promoting Equity: Promoting Reward, Recognition, and Career Advancement through the.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
AdvancED Accreditation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Coaching for Math GAINS
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Russ Brock Coordinator of Programs
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support

Evidence-Based Approach to Effective Resource Allocation – consider how academic coaching might serve to support: a.The District’s Continuous Improvement Plan b.The District’s Professional Development Plan c.The District’s Highly-Qualified Plan 1.Retention 2.Retraining

Finance Choices that significantly impact learning but are within the Guidelines of Title Programs Must be based on needs of the school district listed within the 5 year plan for continuous improvement Must be targeted first at schools identified for improvement Must focus on increasing student achievement Must be supplemental positions and not supplant state or local funds

Title II Expenditures: FY 2011 $2,980,760 $4,771,486 $13,462,821 (Note: Estimate Excludes Administrative, Indirect, and Parental Involvement Expenditures)

Interpretation of the Data West Virginia spends an average of three (3) dollars on “workshop” professional development for every dollar spent on coaching or classroom size reduction. (Title II) The trend indicates that districts are reducing the practice of classroom size reduction in favor of hiring coaches

High Impact Areas to Consider in a District’s Plan for Continuous Improvement New Teacher Retention Building Capacity for Collaborative Teaming o Teams focused on the 4 critical questions of learning o Job-embedded Professional Learning (data- based & team-identified) Technical Assistance for Educators who need to improve performance (retraining) & for implementation of programs or strategies

Collaborate About What? Focus on Student Learning If we want our efforts to have a significant impact, we should focus on the factors that significantly impact learning—to do that we must look very intentionally at student learning.

Highly Effective Collaborative Teams Focus on 4 Critical Questions 1.What is it we expect students to learn? 2.How will we know when they have learned it? 3.How will we respond when they don’t? 4.How will we respond when students do learn it or already know it?

In what ways could coaches assist teachers or teacher teams with focusing on the Four Critical Questions? Let’s Ponder Would utilizing coaches as part of job-embedded PD be more effective for translating learning into practice than a workshop?

High Impact Areas to Address in a District’s Plan for Continuous Improvement New Teacher Retention Collaborative Teaming Processes o Focus on Student Learning o Professional Learning (data-based & team-identified) Technical Assistance for Educators who need to improve performance (retraining) & for implementation of programs or strategies

The Work of Coaches according to Task Force 1. Support the Continuous Improvement Process 2. Build Capacity for Site-based Collaborative Teaming and Peer Coaching 3. Support for Beginning Teachers (and Mentors) Professional Development Staff development is not just to implement isolated instructional innovations; its central purpose is to build strong collaborative work cultures that will develop the long- term capacity for change. Michael Fullan

“Embedded professional development is a continuous cycle of improvement that fosters collective responsibility; primarily occurs several times per week; and must be supported—by job-embedded coaching or external assistance.” Learning Forward (formerly NSDC)

Guiding Principles for Effective Job- Embedded Professional Development Establish teams Create an environment of shared responsibility for student learning; Provide opportunities for them to share Engage in active learning that is sustained over time through job-embedded action research; Encourage to become exemplars of change;

Guiding Principles for Effective Job- Embedded Professional Development Provide a risk-free setting for transparency of practice, collective work and reflection; Provide support (coaches) to serve as role models for effective leadership and professionalism; and Provide opportunities for contribution to meaningful work; Provide sufficient time for integration of learning into practice.

Professional Training and Translating the Learning into Practice

Effective Professional Development Why? How? What? Peer Support

Data / Evidence Collaborative Conversations Collective Commitment Collective Efficacy Instructional/Engagement Change Kids See Their Learning Is Different/Better “Student Sees Success” Student Self Efficacy IMPACTS STUDENT ACADEMIC SUCCESS TRUST Organizational Learning Instructional Best Practices (CAI) Psychology of Learning

Data / Evidence Collaborative Conversations Collective Commitment Collective Efficacy Instructional/Engagement Change Kids See Their Learning Is Different/Better “Student Sees Success” Student Self Efficacy IMPACTS STUDENT ACADEMIC SUCCESS TRUST Organizational Learning Instructional Best Practices (CAI) Psychology of Learning What happens when we go directly here?

Coaching can provide the support that teachers need to improve the quality of their instruction that results in increased student learning. Educational Leadership, Jan. 2012

Let’s Ponder As part of the District’s Professional Development Plan, would funding coaches to support job-embedded PD be more effective for translating learning into practice than “the same workshop everyone”?

High Impact Areas to Address in a District’s Plan for Continuous Improvement New Teacher Retention Collaborative Teaming Processes o Focus on Student Learning o Professional Learning (data-based & team-identified) Technical Assistance for Educators who need to improve performance (retraining) & for implementation of programs or strategies

Roles of WV Coaches

Coaching Roles that Could Support Collaborative Teaming Processes Resource Provider Data Coach Curriculum Specialist Instructional Specialist Support Mentors of Beginning Teachers (or mentor themselves) Supporter of Collaborative Teams Classroom Supporter Learning Facilitator Supporter of School Leadership Teams Implementation Coach Learner

Coach as a Supporter of Struggling Teachers Resource Provider Data Coach Curriculum Specialist Instructional Specialist Support Mentors of Beginning Teachers (or mentor themselves) Supporter of Collaborative Teams Classroom Supporter Learning Facilitator Supporter of School Leadership Teams Implementation Coach Learner

Beginning Teacher Mentor Learning Facilitator Continuous Improvement Curriculum and Instruction Data Coach Collaborative Teaming Coach Technology Integration

The Work of Coaches according to Task Force 1. Support the Continuous Improvement Process 2. Build Capacity for Site-based Collaborative Teaming and Peer Coaching 3. Support for Beginning Teachers (and Mentors) Funding Sources for Coaches Federal: Title I Title II, Parts A and D Title III Title VI IDEA State: Step 7 State Local: Levy

Is Professional Development in your district primarily based on…. Teacher preferences? Grant determinants? Various district offices’ control? OR Let’s Ponder

Is Professional Development in your District …. Aligned to performance goals & capacity- building? Accessible to integrated budgets? Based upon staff needs, determined by data? Connected to district policies for teacher recruitment, retention or support? Measured for effectiveness of the investment?

What Strategic Finance Choices Will your District Make for: Professional Learning? Continuous Improvement (Student Learning)? Building Capacity for Collaborative Teaming? The District’s Highly-Qualified Plan… Retention? Retraining?

Task Force Recommendations for supporting coaches and mentors Policy Support (teacher induction) Strategic Resource Allocation Professional Development

WVDE’s Professional Learning Structure of Support for West Virginia Coaches

Coaching for School Growth Supporting All Educators A. Coaching Team Processes (collaborative and leadership teams) B. Coaching for Professional Performance (individual educators) 1.Specific Technical Assistance for Individual Teachers 2. Induction: Mentorship and/or Coaching of Beginning Teachers The Work of Coaches—a Snapshot

Year-long blended delivery: Face-to-Face and Online Modules & Networking Based on the levers of the West Virginia Continuous Improvement Process & Learning-by-Doing Model Access to specialized training Graduate credit State level and regional support Possible future plans: WV coaching standards and evaluation that may eventually lead to an advanced credential or endorsement for academic coaches

Coaches support teachers and teacher teams as professionals and students benefit!

Contact Information Linda Bragg Phone: Coaching for Learning Web Site will be launched during the May training.