MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frequency Scanning Interferometry (FSI) measurements
Advertisements

S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November ATLAS Group, University of Oxford, UK S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, A. Mitra, D. F. Howell, R. B. Nickerson Geodetic Grids.
ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham*, Edward Botcherby*, Paul Coe*, Grzegorz Grzelak*, Ankush Mitra*, Johannes Prenting.
LiCAS Project: FSI Overview Richard Bingham, Edward Botcherby, Paul Coe, John Green, Grzegorz Grzelak, Ankush Mitra, John Nixon, Armin Reichold University.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
LumiCal Alignment System Status report Leszek Zawiejski, Tomasz Wojtoń, Arkadiusz Moszczyński Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Cracow 25th FCAL Collaboration.
MONALISA David Urner, Armin Reichold, Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner Monitoring Alignment and Stabilisation with high Accuracy (Previously known.
Benoit BOLZON Nanobeam 2005 – Kyoto Active mechanical stabilisation LAViSta Laboratories in Annecy working on Vibration Stabilisation Catherine ADLOFF.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
MONALISA LiCAS D.Urner +, A. Reichold +, G. Grzelak* P. Coe +, C. Uribe-Estrada +, Y. Han + M. Warden +, J. Dale +, G. Moss + P. Brockill +, S. Cohen +,
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
ATF2 ILC Final Focus Test Beam Line at KEK-ATF References : ATF2 Proposal, KEK Report ATF2 Proposal Vol.2, KEK Report ホームページ:
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
Tue 31 Mar :50 (CEST) 13:50 UTC CLIC stabilisation day 5 - LAPP OXFORD MONALISA 1 Options for interferometric monitoring of CLIC test magnet M.
MONALISA an Update David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
Active Vibration Stabilization for the NLC Final Focus Quads Josef Frisch, Linda Hendrickson, Thomas Himel, Andrei Seryi,
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
MONALISA David Urner Oxford University. Straightness Monitor Build from Distance Metres Decision taken this workshop to move from existing extraction.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
CARE / ELAN / EUROTeV Feedback Loop on a large scale quadrupole prototype Laurent Brunetti* Jacques Lottin**
1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010.
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
MONALISA: The precision of absolute distance interferometry measurements Matthew Warden, Paul Coe, David Urner, Armin Reichold Photon 08, Edinburgh.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Passive isolation: Pre-isolation for FF quads A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, A. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. Ramos.
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
Lecture 8 (10/28) METR 1111 Radars. Radar & its History RADAR is an acronym Stands for RAdio Detecting And Ranging In 1930’s, radar used to monitor shipping.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Beam Dynamics IR Stability Issues Glen White / SLAC September IRENG07 Vibration tolerances for final doublet cryomodules Settlement of detector.
Superconducting final doublet Support A.Jeremie. SC magnet steps Motivation: have an active stabilisation as planned in ILC and CLIC => need to evaluate.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
Vibration measurements with and without Monalisa 15/07/09 Benoît BOLZON (LAPP) David Urner (Oxford) Paul Coe (Oxford) 1 Benoît BOLZON.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
Piezo and retroflector calibration Understanding the details of interferometer performance.
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,
David Urner Oxford University/JAI
The Engineering Test Facility for nLC
Summary FD Support System
Vibration issues at Linear Colliders:
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Topics on Vibration Issues
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
IP configuration session
David Urner, Armin Reichold , Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner
Presentation transcript:

MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University

Why do we need nano-metre style position monitoring at ILC There are many places paricularly in the BDS where position monitors can be helpful. Technically the hardest problem is the final focus

Luminosity depends crucial on our ability to focus both beams onto the same spot Final focus quadrupole magnet Bunches focused to 5 nm in vertical …but ground motion creates 100nm displacements in 0.2s Want relative motion information … but there’s no direct line of sight! CSM Distance Meter

Interferometers Need 2 tools, both with nm type resolutions over order 10m. –Straightness Monitor measuring motion perpendicular to line of sight. Main tool to measure the relative motion of objects (magnets) –Distance metre: Easier to build Required to solve fundamental questions regarding laser quality. Can also provide perpendicular measurements if several measurements are combined to do triangulation. Hence we also need order 1  m absolute distance measurements to understand the geometry. Combine both measurements into one system! Interference pattern sensitive to perpendicular motion of retro-reflector

FSI (Frequency Scanning Interferometry) Temperature compensated Reference interferometer build by LiCAS, available in our laboratory.

 =750nm Prototype Interferometre: 400mm OPD: FSI – Mode  =750nm  =70nm Add box to reduce air turbulence

Prototype Interferometre: 400mm OPD: Fixed Freq. Mode  =4.5nm

5Hz Feed-Forward Final Focus Quadrupoles: –How to best use motion information between the two FF magnets? –Feedback/stabilization is difficult Little room to move large magnet Another feedback system that can interfere with existing feedback systems –Feed-Forward information to FONT Elegant Can help that FONT converges faster, particularly during commissioning, when beams are less well defined However need detailed simulation to study how much such a system can help. Study must include scenarios where things are not nice e.g: –Position monitor signal noisy –Bunch deformed –Large incoherent fluctuations between bunches.

Fast Feed-Forward Final Focus quadrupole cold mass is a fairly large object that is supported at only few places –Unclear how high we can push resonance frequencies. –Unclear how much ground motion is amplified at these resonance frequencies. Altough the frequencies are very slow compart with the train length, they can cause a substantionl motion of a FF-quad –MONALISA can, given the necessary effort, sample at very high rates and predict the motion of the FF-quads. –A vertical distance metre to ground is sufficient, since ground will not move at these short times –Simulation how much help this information can give to FONT are required.

Push-Pull If FF quadrupoles are monitored this information can also be usefull during Push-Pull operations –Relative measurement can monitor frequency behaviour of QD0s –Absolute measurement can measure if Quadrupole returned to same position (relative to detector and ground) to order 1  m –Y. Nosochkov: Large y-offsets at IP should be efficiently detected and prevented (keep below 200nm)

Critical magnets in BDS Quite a large number of magnets in BDS with position tolerances of order 100nm. Slow drifts will move them fairly quickly away from their position –Plan: regular beam based alignment to move them back to ideal position However there are several 5Hz based feedback systems that will influence this process –It is rather easy to imagine that the whole system can drift away A position measurement of some critical magnets would have clear benefits: –Produce independent check. –Less time required for beam based alignment. Would be nice if we could estimate how much beam time can be won. –Large potential time savings particular at commissioning. –After longish shutdowns (hours to weeks) MONALISA system can move monitored magnets immediately into optimal position. (FSI measures absolute distances!) –Simulation needed to understand if and how much MONALISA information can help 5Hz feedback systems in BDS

Conclusion Nice new results for MONALISA interferometer Studies needed to understand improvement if MONALISA data is included in feed-back systems Push-Pull might be a strong rational to find the energy to study the implications of a postion monitoring system for QD0s.