1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
NSR Regulations Update November 14, 2012 Atlanta, GA Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority EPA – Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Jan. EPA Final GHG Reporting Guidance (actually Dec ) Mar. 31stAnnual GHG Reporting AprilProposed HAPs or Mercury MACT July 1st Annual Toxic Release.
1 Year in Review: Climate Change Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 EPA Heats Things Up.
GHG Applicability Criteria. Introduction to PSD GHG Applicability As stated earlier, Tailoring Rule does not change basic applicability process Incorporation.
Update on CAAAC Workgroup, EPA Guidance, and Possible Future EPA GHG Regulations.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
1 The US EPA GHG Tailoring Rule – The Actual Regulatory Language.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Response to Comments on HAR Amendments Clean Air Branch Greenhouse Gas Rules Stakeholders Meeting 10/18/2013.
Federal Greenhouse Gas Regulations
EPA Climate Change Regulation Joseph A. Siegel US EPA Region 2 Conference on Carbon Politics and Finance October 29, 2010 Fordham Graduate School of Business.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
NACAA Permitting Workshop, Chicago June 14, 2011 Raj Rao, NSR Group Leader OAQPS, EPA GHG Permitting – Regulatory Update.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
1 PSD - Case #1 Case #1: –A simple cycle natural gas power plant with PTE NOx of 300 tpy and GHGs of 150,000 tpy CO2e receives a PSD permit addressing.
Transitional PSD Applicability Scenarios July 20, 2010 Jay Hofmann President trinityconsultants.com Troutman Sanders/Trinity Consultants PSD and Title.
GHG Regulations Update AWMA Southern Section September 12, 2012 Biloxi, MS Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority EPA – Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
Environmental Reform Climate Change Update VCEDA Annual Business Outlook Conference October 15, 2010 Sharon Rubalcava Alston + Bird.
UTILITY NSR REFORM TIMEFRAMES EARLY 90’SBEGIN CAAA IMPLEMENTATION MID 90’SNSR REFORM DEVELOPMENT - S/A Principles - EPA Proposals.
Change picture on Slide Master EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases Industrial Energy Consumers of America November 16, 2009 PRESENTED BY Peter Glaserargaret.
August 4, 2011 Heather Ceron US EPA Region 4 1. Greenhouse Gases 2.
Voluntary Programs and Mandated Actions Susan Wickwire Energy Supply & Industry Branch Office of Atmospheric Programs March 23, 2010.
Air Quality Regulations – What’s New? (for Ethanol Plants) Shelley Schneider Air Quality Division Administrator.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Region 4 – Atlanta, GA Dec , 2010.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
John A. Paul RAPCA. Background  Supreme Court Decision  Endangerment Finding  Johnson Memorandum  Light Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions Rule  Tailoring.
Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) and You 1. The Regulated GHGs CO 2 (Carbon Dioxide) CH 4 (Methane) N 2 O (Nitrous Oxide) SF 6 (Sulfur Hexafluoride) HFCs (Hydrofluorocarbons)
GHG Mandatory Reporting Rule: Proposal Overview Presented to Philadelphia Diesel Difference Working Group By Jim Smith, EPA Region 3 November 9, 2009.
1 Climate Change Regulatory Initiatives M-AGG Workshop (Market Mechanisms for Agricultural Greenhouse Gases) Davis, California June 10, 2010 Nico van Aelstyn.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
Massachusetts Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation 310 CMR 7.71 Stacy DeGabriele & Will Space MassDEP Climate Strategies December 10 th and 11 th, 2009.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Update on Climate Change and Clean Air Actions Janet McCabe Office of Air and Radiation September 29, 2010.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training PSD Applicability Example Landfill Applicability Examples John Calcagni, EPA Region 4.
Integrating GHG Programs in an ISO EMS 33rd National Energy & Environmental Conference Loews Ventana Canyon Resort Tucson, Arizona Presented by:
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
REGULATIONS & LEGISLATION BIG TEN ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP GROUP STEVE MARUSZEWSKI – PENN STATE Greenhouse Gases.
1 Greenhouse Gas Inventories for Tribes Melinda Ronca Battista, ITEP.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
Discussion of Clean Air Act Authorities and GHGs Bill Harnett WESTAR April 3,2008.
Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule aka GHG Permitting Rule.
MassDEP Response to EPA GHG Initiatives SIP Steering Committee January 13, 2011 Marc Wolman.
Update on EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Rulemakings Norman W. Fichthorn Hunton & Williams LLP 2010 American Public Power Association Energy and Air Quality Task.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
1 Anna Marie Wood Acting Director, Air Quality Policy Division Office of Air and Radiation Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards May 2010 Prevention.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Intersection of Climate Law, Policy & Science Margaret Claiborne Campbell Troutman Sanders LLP November 16, 2015.
Tailoring Rule - Title V Scenarios July 20, 2010 Katherine N. Blue Principal Consultant, Climate Change Services trinityconsultants.com Troutman Sanders/Trinity.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
PSD Background Presentation
Clean Air Act Glossary.
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases: The View from Washington Troutman Sanders LLP/Trinity Consultants July 20, 2010 PRESENTED BY Peter Glaser Troutman.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Greenhouse Gas Permitting: One Year After the Tailoring Rule
GHG Permitting: Regulatory Update
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Best Available Control Technology for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources
Navajo Nation Minor Source Regulations
Presentation transcript:

1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation Conference July 29, 2010

2 Overview of Presentation  The Final Tailoring Rule  Covered Pollutants  Phase-In Steps to Include GHG in PSD/Title V  State/Local Implementation Considerations  GHG Technical Information  PSD Implementation Guidance

3 The Final Tailoring Rule  Issued on May 13,  Published in the Federal Register on June 3, 2010  “Tailors” the existing requirements of PSD and title V permitting programs to focus requirements on the largest emitting facilities  Subjects facilities responsible for nearly 70 percent of the national GHG emissions from stationary sources to CAA permitting requirements  This includes the nation’s largest GHG emitters—power plants, refineries, and cement production facilities  Small farms, restaurants, and commercial facilities are likely not subject to this rule

4 Pollutants Covered  Sets thresholds for GHG emissions, addressing emissions from six well-mixed GHGs:  Carbon dioxide (CO 2 )  Methane (CH 4 )  Nitrous oxide (N 2 O)  Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)  Perfluorocarbons (PFCs)  Sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6 )

5 Pollutants Covered (cont.)  The aggregate sum of these six GHGs is the identified air pollutant in EPA’s Light-Duty Vehicle Rule, and the associated Endangerment Finding and Cause or Contribute Finding  To determine applicability, a source's GHG emissions are calculated as the sum of the six gases on a CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e) basis and compared against the relevant threshold

6 Phase-In Steps: Step 1  January 2, 2011 to June 30, 2011  No new permitting actions due solely to GHG emissions during this time period; only sources undertaking permitting actions “anyway” for other regulated pollutants will need to address GHG emissions  Covers sources responsible for 65% of total national stationary source GHG emissions

7 Phase-In Steps: Step 1 (cont.)  PSD Permitting Applicability:  “Anyway” sources will be subject to the PSD requirements only if they increase GHG emissions by 75,000 tpy CO 2 e or more  Title V Permitting Applicability:  Only those sources currently with title V permits will address GHGs, and only when applying for, renewing or revising their permits

8 Phase-In Steps: Step 2  July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2013  Sources subject to GHG permitting requirements under step 1 will continue to be subject to GHG permitting requirements  In addition, sources that emit or have the potential to emit GHGs at or above 100,000 tpy CO 2 e will also be subject to GHG permitting requirements in title V and possibly in PSD programs.

9 Phase-In Steps: Step 2  PSD Permitting Applicability:  Triggered with construction that increases emissions above certain thresholds  A newly constructed source (which is not major for another pollutant) will not be subject to PSD unless it emits 100,000 tpy or more on a CO 2 e basis  A modification project at a major stationary source will not be subject to PSD unless it results in a net GHG emissions increase of 75,000 tpy or more on a CO 2 e basis

10 Phase-In Steps: Step 2 (cont’d.)  Title V Permitting Applicability:  A GHG emission source (which is not already subject to title V) will not be subject to title V unless it emits 100,000 tpy or more on a CO 2 e basis.  Newly subject sources must apply for a title V permit on or before July 1, 2012 (which is one year from July 1, 2011), unless the permitting authority sets an earlier deadline.  Covers sources responsible for nearly 70% of total national stationary source GHG emissions

11 Phase-In Steps: Step 3  The rule establishes an enforceable commitment to complete another rulemaking no later than July 1,  We will propose or solicit comment on a possible step 3 of the phase-in plan  EPA will consider, during the implementation of step 2, whether it will be possible to administer GHG permitting programs for additional sources.  EPA will establish that step 3 would take effect on July 1, 2013, so that permitting authorities and sources can prepare for any additional GHG permitting actions.

12 Phase-In Steps: Step 3  Step 3, if different from step 2, will not require permitting of sources with GHG emissions below 50,000 tpy CO 2 e  We also commit to explore a wide range of streamlining options on which we plan to take comment in the step 3 proposal  In addition, we plan to solicit comment on a permanent exclusion of certain sources from PSD, title V or both

13 Phase-in Steps: Further Action  EPA will not require permits for smaller sources until April 30, 2016 or later  The rule establishes an enforceable commitment for EPA to complete a study within 5 years projecting the administrative burdens that remain for small sources after EPA has had time to develop (and states have had time to adopt) streamlining measures to reduce the permitting burden for such sources

14 Phase-in Steps: Further Action  We will use this study to serve as the basis for an additional rulemaking that would take further action to address small sources, as appropriate.  We are making an enforceable commitment to complete this rulemaking by April 30, 2016  We plan to solicit comment on a permanent exclusion of certain sources from PSD, title V or both.

15 Permitting Steps under the Tailoring Rule Step 1: Source already subject to PSD “anyway” (tpy CO 2 e) New source: N/A Modification: 75,000 Step 2: All Stationary Sources (tpy CO 2 e) New source: 100,000 Modification: 75,000 Step 3: Implementation of potential additional phase- in and streamlining options 5-year study: To examine GHG permitting for smaller sources Implementation of rule based on 5-year study Study Complete 2016

16 Newly-Subject Sources  The newly-subject sources in Step 2 are expected to include:  Large industrial sources from energy-intensive source categories that have not triggered permitting programs for their non-GHG emissions  The largest landfills  The largest coal mines or oil and gas production installations  Without the Tailoring Rule, there would have been millions of newly-subject sources and the costs would have been in the tens of billions of dollars

17 Newly-Subject Sources (cont.)  Title V does not trigger any new control requirements  These sources will not trigger PSD unless they construct or modify in a way that significantly increases emissions  If they do trigger PSD, BACT decisions made by permitting authorities (usually state/local agencies) must take costs into account

18 State Implementation  Definition of “subject to regulation” so that the GHGs emitted by sources that fall below the tailoring thresholds are not treated as “subject to regulation”.  “Subject to regulation” approach facilitates more rapid adoption and implementation of the tailoring rule thresholds by states before January 2, 2011  60 Day Letters: EPA requests states to submit information to appropriate EPA Regional Administrator within 60 days after the date of publication of the Tailoring Rule in Federal Register  If state must revise its statutes or regulations to implement Tailoring Rule, provide an estimate to time needed to do so

19 Other Actions and Issues  Streamlining options are being pursued as expeditiously as possible, and we encourage permitting authorities to do the same.  We are not providing exemptions from applicability determinations (major source and major modification) under title V and PSD for certain GHG emission sources, emission activities, or types of emissions at this time  This rule does not contain any additional exemptions or grandfathering provisions addressing the transition to PSD and title V permitting for GHGs

20 PSD GHG Technical Information  Late Summer 2010:  Initial technical data and information concerning available and emerging GHG control measures  GHG Mitigation Strategies Database  RACT/BACT/LAER Clearinghouse enhancements  GHG technical white papers that will provide information on control techniques and measures for the largest GHG emitting industrial sectors (e.g., power plants, industrial boilers, cement plants, refineries, iron and steel, pulp and paper and nitric acid plants)

21 GHG Implementation Guidance  Before end of 2010:  GHG Implementation Guidance  General PSD guidance, including BACT  Short Examples  Training for EPA Regions and Permitting Authorities  Traditional Classroom Workshops  Webinars  Extensive Example-Based Training

22 Additional Questions?  EPA Region 4 points of contact on the Tailoring Rule, its implementation and development of GHG guidance  Katy Forney,  Heather Abrams,  EPA’s website -