Our Road to National Recognition of Intervention Specialist Programs at Walsh University Gary D. Jacobs, Ph.D. Janet M. Devine, MAED Jean A. DeFazio, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Preparing IRA/CAEP Program Reports to Earn National Recognition Dr. Diane Kern, IRA SPA Coordinator CAEP Conference Fall,
February 2005Transition Services Preparation & Training Developing NCATE Assessment Rubrics: Modeling Best Practice For Our Students Pamela Luft Kent State.
“Sticking Points” Conceptual framework has five structural elements Conceptual framework has five structural elements Standard 1 requires data, not information.
Kindergarten Assessment August  All kindergarten teachers complete summative first quarter evaluations on all kindergarten students (electronic.
LSP Nov 2 Agenda Announcements Reading Follow-up TERI –Update and overview –Partnerships –Task Groups.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Brian Yusko Associate Dean of Academic Programs Subject and grade-level specific.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Project SEARCH Mercy Regional Medical Center Lorain, Ohio Varnum Award Video.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
Managing Data Collection: Where we were, where we are, and where we want to be! Gwen Brockman California State University, Dominguez Hills.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Culturally Competent Practice in School Psychology Department of Education Personnel Preparation Training Grant Marilyn S. Wilson, PI.
TPA OVERVIEW AND EXPANSION What is TPA? TEACHER PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SCALE teaching performance assessments (TPAs) have several features.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
State of the Profession: PreK-12 Ohio TESOL Conference November 1, 2013.
Academic Parent Teacher Teams APTT – Palm Beach County Building Capacity for Effective Family Engagement in Palm Beach County.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Linking the DRDP to Instruction: Using the DRDP (2015) Reports
Update on Program Review Margie Crutchfield AACTE February, 2009.
Deciphering SPA Requirements Kathy Hildebrand, Ph.D., Assistant Dean of Assessment & Continuous Improvement, College of Education Cynthia Conn, Ph.D.,
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification Now go to the top of your profession.
CAA Options: Collection of Evidence CTE Connection December 8, 2006 Rod Duckworth, Director of Career and Technical Education OSPI.
Performance-Based Accreditation
Keys to Preparing ILA/CAEP Program Reports for Writers Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers Myrtle Beach, SC | November 5, 2016.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Eastern’s Assessment System
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE April 2008
EDCI Retreat; Aug TJ Oakes Phillip VanFossen
North Carolina Read to Achieve
Ohio Deans Compact Brenda Haas
ENDS Report Priority #3 Create Spaces of Optimism
Writing the Institutional Report
Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

Our Road to National Recognition of Intervention Specialist Programs at Walsh University Gary D. Jacobs, Ph.D. Janet M. Devine, MAED Jean A. DeFazio, Ph.D.

Walsh University’s Programs Intervention Specialist, K-12, Mild/Moderate Intervention Specialist, K-12, Moderate/Intensive Early Childhood Intervention Specialist, PreK-3, Moderate/Intensive

Use the Red Book See pages in the What Every Special Educator Must Know for key phrases, incorporate into your report Menu/ProfessionalDevelopment/ProfessionalS tandards/Red_book_5th_edition.pdfhttp:// Menu/ProfessionalDevelopment/ProfessionalS tandards/Red_book_5th_edition.pdf 14 designations of special education programs Learn the language of your standard, e.g, Clinical vs. Student Teaching

Know Your Acronyms SPA = Specialized Professional Association ELS = English as a second language ELN = Exceptional Learning Needs EC = Exceptional Conditions CF = Conceptual Framework IR = Institutional Report

Administrative Support Full support of Dean and Chair NCATE Coordinator Stipends for summer work Consultant hired

Assemble Your Team Writers should have special education background Recruit other experts in your division or college Find an outside reader Balance skills of team

Preliminary Ground Work Know your SPA standards Know 10 CEC Standard Domain Areas align with Ohio Educator Standards Link alignment chart website here Know your program requirements Undergraduate or Graduate level Programs Allow time to write, analyze data, define assessments, create rubrics

Choose friends wisely Confer with your ODE consultant Consider a paid consultant Ask questions Use your connections Ask for feedback from others Utilize the NCATE and CEC resources

Submission Deadlines Electronic submission of reports Submit six months prior to on-site visit Encouraged to submit one year prior to visit September 15 th & February 1 st Solicit help from your IS department Check NCATE website or with NCATE consultant

NCATE website Become familiar with NCATE website Helpful hints Model programs on website BOE guidelines

Conceptual Framework Thread the conceptual framework throughout your report What makes your institution unique? Include in report Assessment data from the SPA reports becomes a part of your assessment plan

Rubrics Study assessment plan Link assessments to the CEC standards Determine scale (5, 4, 3) Label and define each scale rating, e.g., 3 = Target; 2 = Acceptable; 1 = Unacceptable We followed NCATE 3 point scale

Data Collection Choose 6-8 key assessments based on candidate proficiencies found in your institution’s conceptual framework Align those key assessment with the CEC standards Solicit input from school partnerships

Use of Data Design data collection to help you improve your program Make program changes based on data Objectively review data Be honest about results of data Review for validity and reliability Be receptive of feedback from outside consultants, cooperating teachers and supervisors

Amount of Data Required Program Reports Submitted Amount of Data Required Through February semester September 15, year February 1, year September 15, years February 2, years September 15, 2009 & after 3 years

Assessment #1 Praxis II content test data is required Check out Praxis website Align test to CEC standards Discovered we didn’t have subcategory information

Assessment #2 Another content assessment is required We chose an assessments for each of the three different programs ISE M/M = case study ISE M/I = unit of study with learning centers ECIS = field-based case study

Assessment #3 Assessment of Candidate’s Ability to Plan Instruction DAPP = Developmental Assessment Plan Project Students write an Individual Assessment Plan (IAP), then assess a student, write a Diagnostic Prescriptive (DP), an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and then implement goals and objectives with a real child

Assessment #4 Assessment of Clinical Practice required Two types of rubrics used to gather data One is aligned with Praxis/Pathwise Second is CEC specific rubric CEC specific rubric is changing due to feedback from users

Assessment #5 Assessment of Candidate Effect on Student Learning Portfolio Assessment Freshmen begin a developmental portfolio Transitions into professional portfolio during pre-clinical practice Updated in clinical practice Evolving into an electronic teacher work sample In future will use impact on student learning

Assessment #6 Additional Assessment to address CEC Standards Family Interview Project Candidates interview parents of child with disabilities, provide a written and oral report as an in-class project Reflect on the experience

Assessment #7 Additional Assessment to address CEC Standards (optional, but use) 3-D Classroom Model Develop rules and consequences Group behavior change Parent letter and newsletter written Classroom management plan

Assessment #8 Additional Assessment to address CEC Standards (optional but use) Impact on Student Learning Modeled after the Ohio value added project Based on the assess, teach, assess model We put this here, but will have to be used in Assessment #5 at next submission

Assessments for our Three Programs ECISISE M/MISE M/I Assess. #1Praxis II Assess. #2Case StudyUnit StudyCase Study Assess. #3DAPP Assess. #4 Clinical Prac. Clinical Prac Assess. #5Portfolio Assess. #6Interview Assess. #73-D Model Assess. #8Impact

Assessment Chart CEC Report Standards/CEC/CECWebReport- July1.dochttp:// Standards/CEC/CECWebReport- July1.doc

Meetings Don’t miss one Get summaries if you can’t attend Attend with writing partners or other faculty Cover all breakout sessions Attend SPA training sessions offered by ODE Attend NCATE, AACTE and SPA national conferences

Lessons Learned Keep current – moving target Attend all meetings Learn from the work Balance teaching and writing tasks Take time from work to celebrate

QUESTIONS?

Contact Information Gary Jacobs Janet Devine Jean DeFazio