Oil Spill Response Research for Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Activities Alaska Oil Spill Technology Symposium March 6 - 7, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA)
Advertisements

EMS Checklist (ISO model)
DEQ Mission By the end of the decade, Virginians will enjoy cleaner water available for all uses, improved air quality that supports communities and ecosystems,
Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management System Overview.
. BSEE Arctic Oil ResponseResearch For the US/CA Northern Oil and Gas Research Forum November 2012, Anchorage, AK Matthew Quinney, Ohmsett COTR.
Facilitating a Dialog between the NSDI and Utility Companies J. Peter Gomez Manager, Information Requirements, Xcel Energy.
Community Committee Woodfibre Liquefied Natural Gas (WLNG) Project Interim Report September 16, 2014.
Advances in Treating Agents for Oil Spill Response with Applicability to the Arctic Amy Tidwell & Tim Nedwed, ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company Ian.
 Missions & Activities Regulatory & Permitting  Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) promotes energy independence, environmental protection and.
Presentation to RRT/NWAC Spills Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program Dale Jensen, Program Manager March 10, 2011.
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Federal Advisory Board DHS Challenges & Opportunities Captain Curtis Dubay, P.E. Department.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
August 14, 2001AOGCC / Jt. Committee on Natural Gas Pipelines 1 Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) Presentation August 14, 2001 to Joint.
ATC/EMSA/F2 Research&InnovationVertimar Vigo - Spain 1 EMSA: Its role in preventing accidental marine pollution and improving response systems Ana.
Welcome MACOORA Annual Meeting October 22-23, 2008 Fall River, Massachusetts Carolyn Thoroughgood.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Appendix 8.1 – Waste Management Plan Oil Spill Contingency Plan – Land Document Number: KOC.SA.020 Incident Name: Incident Date/Time: Incident Location:
Office of Renewable Energy Programs NAC-CESU Annual Meeting June 12, 2013 Mary C. Boatman, Ph.D. Environmental Studies Chief.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
CTTSO Overview John Morgan, Deputy Director for Science and Technology, CTTSO September 2010.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Staffing and Training.
Coastal Water Quality Remote Sensing Welcome Dr. Jeff Payne Deputy Director NOAA Coastal Services Center October 7, 2003.
The Multipurpose Marine Cadastre A Tool for Planning & Decision Making in the Marine Environment Christine Taylor Minerals Management Service (MMS) David.
Environmental Protection in the United States Christopher Green U.S. Embassy July 13, 2006.
1 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Assessing Historic Properties and Cultural Resources in the Main Hawaiian Islands Dave Ball, MA, RPA Pacific Region.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Commerce and Transportation.
Alternative Energy on the Outer Continental Shelf Robert P. LaBelle Deputy Associate Director Offshore Energy and Minerals Management Minerals Management.
MMS Alternative Energy Program November 28, 2007.
NWS Partners Meeting 2010 Dave Westerholm, Director National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Response and Restoration June 9, 2010.
Ifremer French Research Institute for the Exploitation of the Sea.
Building the Digital Coast. Priority Coastal Issues Land use planning (growth management) Coastal conservation Hazards (flooding/inundation/storm surge)
Title? 1. 2 National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling Report to the President
A Culture of Sustainability NDIA 30 th Environmental & Energy Symposium Hank Habicht Chief Executive Officer Global Environment & Technology Foundation.
THE ARCTIC OIL SPILL RESPONSE TECHNOLOGY JOINT INDUSTRY PROGRAM JENNIFER WYATT, ARCTIC JIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR June 17, 2014.
Scientific Research and Offshore Energy Development Walter Cruickshank, Deputy Director Minerals Management Service Energy Policy and Science Research.
Delivering Legal Services Executing the Mission Delivering Legal Services Executing the Mission Tulane Admiralty Law Institute March 11 – 13, 2015 New.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
BP Oil Spill Response US EPA Roles and Activities.
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
Department of Commerce Workshop San Juan, Puerto Rico 17 November 2009 Laura Furgione Assistant Administrator for Program Planning and Integration National.
SERDP Funding Opportunities Dr. Jeffrey Marqusee SERDP Executive Director.
California State Lands Commission Mineral Resources Management Division Long Beach Unit Safety & Environmental Audit Proposal June 23, 2011 Mineral Resources.
3/17/08Arctic Observation Integration Mtg1 Introduction & Workshop Goals Hajo Eicken Chair, SEARCH Observing Change Panel Geophysical Institute University.
Supporting Community Participation in U.S. Arctic Ocean Governance Strengthening Institutions Strategies for Cooperative Management in the Marine Environment.
North Slope Science Initiative Dr. John F. Payne, Executive Director Dr. Denny Lassuy, Acting Deputy Director North Slope Science Initiative
Progress Report of the Russian Federation Project 2013 “Development of Safety Systems in Implementation of Economic and Infrastructural Projects in the.
California Energy Commission 1 LNG Permitting and Environmental Review: the View from California DOE LNG Forum Los Angeles June 1, 2006 Kevin Kennedy,
Division of Environmental Sciences Environmental Studies Program Ronald Lai Program Coordinator of Physical Sciences.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
Future needs and plans for ocean observing in the Arctic AOOS Arctic Town Hall Futur Zdenka Willis Integrated Ocean Observing System National Program Office.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
The Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Right-of-Way Permitting for an Offshore Route John Goll Alaska Regional Director Department of the Interior U.S. Minerals.
Pipeline Safety in Michigan Jennifer McKay Policy Director Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council City of Boyne City Commission Meeting April 25, 2016.
The mission of the Oil Spill Task Force is to strengthen state and Provincial abilities to prevent, prepare for, and respond to oil spills.
1 Presentation to the Alaska Senate Resources Committee
Improving California’s Oil Spill Prevention & Response A Summary of Senate Bill 414 Amy Trainer, Executive Director Environmental Action Committee of West.
BSEE BAST Determination Process Joseph Levine National Ocean Industries Association 2016 Annual Meeting April 22, 2016 Washington, D.C “To promote safety,
Marine safety Unit Savannah
Federal On-Scene Coordinator Representative Training
President’s Report Robert B. Gagosian October 15, 2009
Offshore Oil and Gas Environmental Issues
Federal Acquisition Service
Joint Planning and Development Office “Where new ideas are welcome”
Small Business Innovation Research Program
Presentation transcript:

Oil Spill Response Research for Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Activities Alaska Oil Spill Technology Symposium March 6 - 7, 2014

Overview BSEE Mission and Responsibilities Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs Environmental Enforcement Division Oil Spill Response Division Oil Spill Response Research Website Current Research Projects

Mission BSEE works to promote safety, protect the environment, and conserve resources offshore through vigorous regulatory oversight and enforcement.

Exploration Areas

Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs Manages rules, standards, and compliance programs governing oil, gas, and mineral operations on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). ORP is responsible for: OCS regulations and the associated policy documents Safety management programs Safety and pollution prevention research Technology assessments Inspection and enforcement policies Accident investigation practices Development and execution of the agency's technical training program Coordinates BSEE operational and safety programs with the U.S. Coast Guard, other Federal and State agencies, industry groups, and international regulatory partners.

Environmental Enforcement Division Monitors the environmental compliance of permits that BSEE issues to energy developers. EED ensures that companies meet the requirements established in the following laws: National Environmental Policy Act Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act Clean Air Act Marine Mammal Protection Act Clean Water Act Oil Pollution Act Endangered Species Act National Historic Preservation Act

Oil Spill Response Division Responsible for carrying out BSEE authorities related to oil spill research, planning, preparedness, and response. Functions include: Reviewing and approving oil spill response plans in both Federal and State waters Funding and dissemination of oil spill response research Supporting the National Response Team, Regional Response Teams, Area Committees, and the Interagency Coordinating Committee on Oil Pollution Research (ICCOPR) Providing subject matter expertise to the Federal On-Scene Coordinator during oil spills from regulated offshore facilities Engaging with the international community to improve oil spill planning, preparedness, and response Conducting government initiated unannounced exercises Verifying spill response resources are at optimal performance levels Manages the Ohmsett facility where full scale oil spill response testing, training, and research can take place with oil in a realistic simulated marine environment

OHMSETT (The National Oil Spill Response Test Facility) 2.6 million gallon salt water tank Can be chilled to 28.5 F Ice can be added to the tank to simulate oil and ice interaction Researchers from 26 nations have used or visited Ohmsett for testing Full scale testing, training, research and development with oil

Call for Proposals BSEE has $7M for research in FY 2014 Annually issues at least one Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) to solicit project submissions BAA posted on Federal Business Opportunities website

BSEE Dispersant Research 2014 February 3-28 Cold Water Dispersant Effectiveness Comparison Testing at Ohmsett: OSRD research staff will utilize the Ohmsett facility to conduct independent comparative performance testing of various dispersants. Traditionally, Corexit has been the dispersant of choice in the U.S. Due to litigation as a result of the Deepwater Horizon Spill in 2010, Nalco, the manufacturer of the Corexit family, has implemented strict controls over the sales and use of their product. This has prompted many OSROs to look at alternatives to Corexit EC9500A to replenish inventory used during the Deepwater Horizon Spill of 2010.Test parameters have been established to simulate arctic conditions and Alaskan crude oil will be used. Dispersants to be tested are: Corexit 9500, Finasol OSR 52, Dispersit SPC 1000 and ZI-400.

Oil Spill Detection and Mapping Under Arctic Sea Ice Using Autonomous Underwater Vehicles OSRR#1000 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Objective: To evaluate and develop an AUV-based system for detection and mapping of oil in ice-infested waters from underneath the water and/or ice. Progress: Initial AUV testing occurred in conjunction with a Coast Guard Strike Force exercise in the Great Lakes in February, The final test, initially planned for Barrow, AK has been moved to Prudhoe Bay and is now scheduled for April, Estimated Completion Date: July 2014

Burning Behavior of Oil in Ice Channels OSRR#1007 Worcester Polytechnic Institute Objective: to enable assessment of the efficiency of in-situ burning of an oil spill in icy conditions and set a new experimental and modeling framework to explore burning of oil spills on ice, which will allow quantifying the efficiency of combustion as well as point of extinction for liquid fuel spills in icy conditions. Complete.

Enhanced Oil Spill Detection Sensors in Low- light Environments – OSRR# 1013 US Army Research Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM) Objective: to enhance the methods currently in place to detect oil in a marine environment. The methods currently in place are not conducive to oil spill recovery operations during periods of low light and rely heavily on time- delayed aerial remote sensing technologies, or visual observation. This project will leverage the knowledge and expertise of RDECOM’s Night Vision and Electronic Sensors Directorate (NVESD) personnel to assist BSEE in the identification and documentation of existing capability gaps; identification and assessment of technology gaps; test and evaluate potential new or alternative hardware; and if necessary, support the design, development and demonstration of new technologies to meet identified needs. Estimated Completion Date: June 2016

North Slope Coastal Imagery Initiative – OSRR # 1015 Moran Environmental Recovery, LLC Objective: to develop a coastal imagery-based response tool that can be implemented on the North Slope of Alaska. The North Slope is a region of both onshore and offshore oil development and stretches 6,000 km (4,000 mi) from Cape Lisburne to the Canadian border. The provision of georeferenced, high resolution imagery will provide the Federal On scene Coordinator and Incident Command with the highest resolution imagery via an online delivery system. They will consolidate existing georeferenced video and photographic imagery of the North Slope shoreline and geotag the oblique imagery to high resolution satellite and orthrophoto imagery. The imagery will be accessible online through a web portal or through other platforms (e.g., Environmental Response Management Application or ERMA). The contractor will to use open-source, high- resolution delivery systems for HD video (e.g., You Tube) and high-resolution photography (e.g., Flickr) linked to an open-source GIS (e.g., ArcGIS on-line). Estimated Completion Date: January 2014

Technological Assessment of Alaskan Arctic Oil Spill Response Temporary Oil Storage Options – OSRR # 1019 PCCI, Inc. Objective: To assess Alaskan arctic oil spill response temporary storage options. Development of a set of Top Level Requirements (TLR) for temporary oil storage of recovered oil in the Alaskan Arctic. Review of the current state of the art of technologies available for temporary storage. Review of current oil storage capability in Arctic as required by regulation. Estimated Completion Date: July 2014

Estimating an Oil Spill Response Gap for the U.S. Arctic Ocean – OSRR # 1022 Nuka Research & Planning Group, LLC Objective: Conduct an oil spill response gap analysis for three areas in the U.S. Arctic Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. This analysis will quantify the frequency that oil spill response may not be feasible due to weather or environmental conditions. Conditions including wind, sea state, temperature, ice coverage, and visibility will be considered in the analysis. Response options including mechanical recovery, in situ burn, and use of dispersants will be included in the analysis. Limits of air reconnaissance will also be considered due to its importance in oil tracking. Estimated Completion Date: September 2014

Development of Surrogate Ice Modules for Simulated Arctic Environment Testing at Ohmsett – OSRR #1023 PCCI, Inc. Objective: To explore the feasibility of developing surrogate ice modules that could be used at Ohmsett to test oil spill response equipment in various, repeatable, simulated arctic conditions. Estimated Completion Date: September 2014

Testing of Skimmer Hoses and Hose Couplings Under Simulated Arctic Conditions – OSRR # 1026 Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) Objective: to assess performance of standard skimmer hoses and hose couplings used during oil recovery operations when subjected to low temperatures found in the Arctic. Performance and life cycle testing will be conducted under two tasks.. - Task 1: Moving recovered oil/water/ice "product" through a hose using a diaphragm pump. - Task 2: Evaluation of hose/hose coupling performance in a low temperature environment. Estimated Completion Date: October 2014

Environmentally Benign Oil Simulants to Mimic the Behavior of Oil Droplets in the Ocean – OSRR # 1029 Environmental Protection Agency Objective: to advance the understanding of spill responders and the scientific community on how submerged oil plumes and floating slicks are transported in aquatic environments. Task 1: Fabricating environmentally benign, optically active particles that simulate oil droplets in the water column using synthesis techniques that are readily scalable from bench to industrial production, Task 2: “Tuning” the oil simulant using innovative synthesis technique to allow flexibility in creating behaviors ranging from floating to sinking in the water column Task 3: Detecting the oil simulant under dilute concentrations due to the high fluorescent signature of the oil simulant Task 4: Verifying the oil simulant behavior using commercial off- the-shelf (COTS) response tools, such as fluorometers and particle size analyzers. Estimated Completion Date: September 2014

Research to Support the Prediction of Effectiveness of Dispersant Use in the U.S. Beaufort and Chukchi Seas – OSRR# 1030 SL Ross Objective: to provide information to support dispersant use decision making with respect to dispersant effectiveness under conditions likely to be encountered in the U.S. Beaufort and Chukchi Seas Task 1.Identification of Typical Environmental Conditions in the U.S. Beaufort and Chukchi Seas that Affect Dispersant Effectiveness. Task 2. Summarize Historical Dispersant Effectiveness Testing on Alaskan Oils and Identify Knowledge Gaps. Task 3. Conduct Dispersant Effectiveness Tests to address Knowledge Gaps.. Task 4. Conduct Large Scale Ohmsett Dispersant Effectiveness Tests to Address Knowledge Gaps. Estimated Completion Date: September 2014

Spill-Response-Research-(OSRR).aspx Questions? –