BELMONT FORUM E-INFRASTRUCTURES AND DATA MANAGEMENT PROJECT Updates and Next Steps to Deliver the final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan Lee Allison and Robert Gurney, Co-Chairs November 2014

Agenda 1.Interim Report 1.Process – how did we get here? 2.Conclusions and Recommendations 2.Belmont Forum feedback 3.Addressing the deliverables and timeline 4.Discussion and Questions

E-Infrastructures and Data Management Project: Address Belmont Challenge priorities Leverage’ existing investments through international added value Bring together new partnerships of natural scientists, social scientists, and users Improve how funding agencies collaborate with each other and develop new opportunities for research

Interim Report September 2014  Progress Report  Preview of emerging findings, conclusions, recommendations  Short-term recommendations that the Belmont Forum should consider implementing in 2015  All WP contributions were included; mature recommendations were synthesized in report body  Assessment of what needs to be done to deliver the final Community Strategy and Implementation Plan

Road to the Interim Report (1) WP Activities February 2014 – August 2014 WP Themes Data stewardship, including data management plans (1, 4, 6), Legal (4, 6), funding scientific research (4), Open Data (5), Exemplars/case studies (2, 3), Governance (6), Security (6), Education (6) August 2014

Road to the Interim Report (2) Steering Committee Mtg Cross-Cutting Recommendation Themes 1. Communication, collaboration, and coordination 2. Mapping the cyberinfrastructure “landscape” in the short and long-term 3. Active data management and stewardship principles or requirements 4. Funding of research infrastructure 5. Funding of scientific research, including proposal requirements and evaluation 6. Security issues 7. Knowledge transfer and development schema 8. Legal issues Paris, August 2014

Road to the Interim Report (3) Secretariat Writing Session Outcomes >> 4 cross- cutting near-term recommendations NSF Headquarters, Washington DC, September 2014 Steering Committee & WP Review September 2014 Delivered to the BF; BF Annual Meeting September 22; October

Interim Report: Findings & Emerging Conclusions (1)  Role and need for the Belmont Forum to:  Foster good practice on sharing data in global change research  Solicit, prioritize and develop use cases/exemplars to bring together environmental and computer scientists, data centers  Design and implement short courses to start to bridge skills gaps  Support and fund activities that increase awareness of data security and legal issues

Interim Report: Findings and Emerging Conclusions (2)  Coordination of data and information universally recognized as essential for global environmental research  Agreement, consistency, commonality, convergence across the WPs  Funding e-Infrastructure is very different from funding research  Address cultural, organizational, and social obstacles in tandem with technical challenges  Collaboration, Coordination, and Communication is critical  Training, Knowledge Transfer and co-Development between computer science and environmental science is needed

Interim Report: Near-Term Recommendations 1.Establish e-Infrastructure Community Social Elements and Coordination 2.Create Working Groups and Promote Training Activities 3.Foster Active Data Management and Stewardship Principles 4.Provide Support for the Development of Case Studies and Exemplars

Belmont Forum Feedback on Interim Report 2014 Annual Meeting, Beijing, China  Report accepted and strongly endorsed by the BF  Go-ahead to continue refining our findings and recommendations  BF will decide on taking actions based on the final Community Strategy & Implementation Plan (CSIP)  Final CSIP may be the first official Belmont Forum deliverable  May result in greater global recognition of our work  Our work may influence future BF funding calls  More collaborative than competitive funding calls  Impressed by level of international collaboration

Belmont Forum Feedback Guidance for the final CSIP  Focus around how findings promote reproducible science  Make explicit the goals, deliverables and participants in proposed legal, security and training working groups  Outline broader impacts for each recommendation  What difference can the BF can make by acting on recommendations?  How will scientists and the BF be able to do things that they couldn’t do before?  What are the consequences of not carrying out a recommendation?

Belmont Forum Feedback Guidance for the final CSIP (cont.)  Focus on recommendations that best leverage the BF process  Recommendations that are unique or best carried out by the BF that might be difficult or impossible to carry out any other way  Make sure WPs contribute to a single final report (CSIP), with agreed and evidenced recommendations supported by each of the WP deliverables  Recommend increased cross-WP participation

Revised Timeline  November 2014: WPs re-start work  December 13-14: Steering Committee (SC) Meeting at AGU Fall Meeting  January – March 2015: WPs continue work  March 2015: Draft WP reports due  April 9-16, 2015: SC Meeting, Secretariat writing session  April – May 2015: Assembly and BF review of draft CSIP  June 30, 2015: Final CSIP due

Proposed WP Changes In response to BF feedback  WP1: Model data management plans; model ways of publishing models as well as data. Work closely with WP4.  WP2 & WP3: Work together to select/develop exemplars  WP4: Best practices for determining/establishing trusted data repositories, implementation of data quality indicators publishing data journals, Digital Object Identifiers. Work closely with WP1.  Legal task group  WP5: Open Data Survey – results can inform all WPs  WP6: Training and security work groups, governance, best practices for funding research vs. funding research infrastructure  Work with the funding agency representatives and with all WPs

New Knowledge Hub Interim Report is available online

Questions and Discussion

Additional Reference Information

Interim Report: Contents  Actions that produce quick wins leading to recognizable results  Strategic leverage points that make a large impact with little funding or policy changes  Analysis of funding mechanisms that best sustain e- infrastructures  Strategic community-building initiatives around data infrastructures  Process to engage the Belmont Forum in the co-design of future CRAs to keep pace with changing global e-infrastructure landscape

Findings and Emerging Conclusions  There is a role and need for the Belmont Forum to:  Foster good practice on sharing data in global change research  Solicit, prioritize and develop use cases/exemplars that employ user-driven approaches that bring together environmental scientists, computer scientists, and data centers  Design and implement short courses to start to bridge skills gaps and promote best practices between HPCI and DIAI communities, and environmental sciences more generally  Support and fund activities that increase awareness of data security and legal issues  High Performance Computing Infrastructure (HPCI) and Data Intensive Analysis Infrastructure (DIAI) need to be considered together for both to be effective and create usable and actionable information for science and society

1. Establish E-infrastructure Community Social Elements and Coordination  Build a coordinated network of contributors that will:  Continue to map the dynamic landscape of interoperability, architecture, organizational efforts and expertise  Increase communication across global e-infrastructure efforts  Identify people, projects, programs, organizations working toward interoperability in science informatics, and the specific roles they play  Establish (or support existing) capabilities to:  Develop reference frameworks for legal and security issues around data  Formulate specific plans for training  Coordinate both between these efforts and with worldwide efforts in e-infrastructure  Support legal, security and training working groups (proposed)

2. Create Working Groups and Promote Training Activities  Establish Legal, Security and Training working groups  Coordinate national activities by Belmont Forum members  Deliverables:  Legal and Security  Legal Guide and Compendium Draft  Data Security Guide and Compendium Draft  Training  Mechanisms for recognition of training agreed with relevant professional bodies  Exemplar summer schools and online courses  Criteria for programs or short courses to be adopted by the Belmont Forum

3. Foster Active Data Management and Stewardship Principles  BF-funded research projects are required to:  Create and implement Data Management Plans (DMPs)  BF monitors and evaluates DMP implementation; factor in future BF funding  Identify additional DMP costs  Funders could provide infrastructure including data repositories to reduce overall data management costs  Make datasets publicly available by default  Restricting access requires appropriate justifications  Place datasets into trusted data repositories with appropriate metadata  Datasets are given data quality indicators  Make data interoperable and accessible  Comply with minimum standards for international programs, such as Future Earth, to ensure usability and compliance across disciplines and activities internationally  Individual BF members should adopt, monitor, and evaluate the implementation of a harmonized DMP template

4. Provide Support for the Development of Case Studies and Exemplars  Invite proposals for Case Studies or Exemplars that demonstrate to researchers and infrastructure experts best practices:  Research projects under Future Earth to test data management policy recommendations  Research projects as a tool for determining benefits of cross- disciplinary approaches by the users of harmonized e-infrastructure  Where appropriate, these funding calls could focus on HPCI and infrastructure, ensuring they are harmonized and enable stakeholders to work through end-to-end cooperation