Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness Tulsa Public Schools Jana Burk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth Using meaningful evaluation to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders.
Advertisements

Alaska Staff Development Network – 2013 Spring Leadership Retreat Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska Deep Dive Break-Out.
The Dynamic Trio of Effective Teaching Measures: Classroom observations, student surveys and achievement gains Thomas Kane Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
WHY USE A STUDENT SURVEY? The survey is a unique form of actionable feedback that districts, schools and teachers can use to inform practice. Students.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
Enquiring mines wanna no.... Who is it? Coleman Report “[S]chools bring little influence to bear upon a child’s achievement that is independent of.
Spring 2011 Strategic Data Project Convening Dr. Rorie Harris and Jessica Lotz, Memphis City Schools The Teacher Effectiveness Measure (TEM): An Overview.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Why Student Perceptions Matter Rob Ramsdell, Co-founder April 2015.
Types of Evaluation.
Introduction to NYC Teacher Data Initiative Training for Schools Fall 2008.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
Student Perception Survey Toolkit Colorado’s Student Perception Survey Planning Webinar for Districts.
March, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
This document is an editable template. Please make sure to customize it for your district before distributing. Copyright 2014 by The Colorado Education.
Seattle’s Teacher Evaluation Reform in Context. Two questions How does PG&E’s design compare to evaluation systems nationwide? What can SPS learn about.
Product Evaluation the outcome phase. Do the magic bullets work? How do you know when an innovative educational program has “worked”? How do you know.
Recognizing Effective Teaching Thomas J. Kane Professor of Education and Economics Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Classroom Assessment and Grading
Colorado’s Student Perception Survey. Agenda Why use a Student Perception Survey? What the Research Says Survey Overview Survey Administration Use of.
CHEA GENERAL MEETING August 31, 2011 STATE SALARY SCALE Professional Learning Community (PLC) NEGOTIATIONS DPAS II CHANGES STATE SALARY SCALE Professional.
Evaluating Teacher Performance Daniel Muijs, University of Southampton.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
What Students Can Tell Us about the Quality of Teaching: Evidence from MET and Implications for Teacher Preparation Ronald F. Ferguson, PhD Harvard University.
Scoring and Reporting of Results Teachers and School Leaders access reports online within 6 weeks of administration. Scoring based on % positive (Most.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 6 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 © 2011, Tulsa Public Schools.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.
Final Reports from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project Tom Kane Harvard University Steve Cantrell, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
© 2011, Tulsa Public Schools Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 © 2011, Tulsa Public Schools Jana Burk, Tulsa Public Schools Fellow Office of Teacher.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Judy Rink University of South Carolina.  …..a change from highly qualified teachers (meaning their preparation, courses they attend and degrees that.
Governor Christie’s Educator Effectiveness Task Force Report March 1, 2011.
Learning about Teaching. The Measures of Effective Teaching Project Participating Teachers.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 5 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
Council of Great City Schools, October 28, 2011 Dr. David Lussier Austin Independent School District 1 Redesigning the Teacher Appraisal System in Austin.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Post SIP, Post SEF, a new landscape Julie Westrop Mike Simm 11 June 2011.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Holland Central School District Opening Day September 3, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
RAPPS – Rural Alaska Principal Preparation and Support Program Ensuring Fidelity In the Evaluation System May 28 – 30, 2014 Learning Groups 1, 2, and 3.
Weighting components of teacher evaluation models Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Principal Investigator for Research and Dissemination, The National.
Using Student Perception Survey Results A Training for Principals This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation: Writing SLOs August 2014 Presented by Aimee Kirsch.
Gathering Feedback for Teaching Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains.
Session Objectives Decode the Teacher Summative Evaluation form, including the Student Achievement Measures, so it can be used to give teachers feedback.
Understanding Growth Targets and Target Adjustment Guidance for Student Learning Objectives Cleveland Metropolitan School District Copyright © 2014 American.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 4: Scoring an Individual SLO 1.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Teacher Growth and Portfolios “How do Portfolios benefit teacher growth?”
The Big Interview Vickie Carter Edu 650 Dr. Wendy Ricci July 6, 2015.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
What is Value Added?.
Module 9: Category III: Monitoring Student Progress
Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Presentation transcript:

Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness Tulsa Public Schools Jana Burk

Why Multiple Measure Reporting? When done properly, multi-measures provide a more reliable, actionable and valid teacher performance picture. TPS’ multi-measure reporting reveals how well the teacher is: o Teaching students o Reaching students o Impacting students Critical information for professional reflection and growth

Observation Alone: Provides the foundation for effective feedback and coaching Student Perception Survey Alone: Confirms whether teachers’ practices are reaching students All Three Metrics Together Value Added Alone: Communicates teachers’ impact on achievement gains after controlling for factors beyond their control Reliability Least Most Predictive Power (re teacher’s impact on student growth) Least Most National Research Findings Kane, Thomas J., and Douglas O. Staiger. "Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Research Paper. MET Project." Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (2012).

TPS’ Multi-Measure System Report includes observation data plus As available… Value Added Current Year Student Surveys

Important Notes Negotiated with teachers’ union Report scores separately—no composite score Student Surveys and VA are supplemental signals, not drivers Important state and local context

Teachers’ MM Documents Report Observation data: numerical score And…as available: o Value Added: not scores, but categorical descriptions of relative performance o Student Survey: not scores, but categorical descriptions of relative performance

Range Categories Below AverageAverageAbove Average 1 std. dev.

Student Surveys in Tulsa Tripod Piloted in spring 2013, controlled rollout in : district-wide, K-12, all subjects Paper-pencil Fall and spring administration

Lessons Learned Communication and buy-in – Inside – Outside Timing and context Continuous improvement – Solicit and use feedback Using the survey data

Questions?

More Information? Jana Burk