Native Aspirations Community Readiness Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Building.
Advertisements

Assessing Community Readiness and Implementing Culturally Appropriate Interventions within Aboriginal Communities Training of Trainers.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Reclaiming Futures as part of the OJJDP required Three-Year State Plan A Presentation to State SAGs Tom Begich.
1 DEVELOPING S.M.A.R.T. OBJECTIVES Judith Ellis, M.S. Lead Public Health Advisor Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration Center for Substance.
 1. Goals and Objectives  2. Appropriateness of Project Design  3. Coordination with Related Efforts  4. Consumer Involvement  5. Methodology 1.
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Community Readiness: A Handbook for Successful Change
Karen L. Mapp, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent, Boston Public Schools
Questionnaire Report for Grades 6 to12 Eanes Independent Schools.
Addressing Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) in New Brunswick Stacy Taylor Department of Health January 24, 2012.
Forming And Sustaining Successful Partnerships Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison/Educator with University of Zimbabwe and University of California.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
Native American, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiians: Using Community Readiness to Advance HIV/AIDS Prevention Advancing HIV/AIDS Prevention in Native Communities.
1 Ben George – Poet, Al Zantua & David Little Raven – Drummers.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
VOLUNTEERS The Heart of the Community Building Connections: Community Leadership Program.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
AN INTRODUCTION TO CAPITAL CAMPAIGNS Sarah Granger.
Partners Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice National Sheriffs’ Association.
Preliminary Assessment Tribal Emergency Response Preparedness Dean S. Seneca, MPH, MCURP Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Centers for Disease.
Early Childhood Programs Supported by ITCM Resources and support for tribal/American Indian communities in developing a comprehensive, integrated, high.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
 Planning provides the foundation for conservation district programs and operations.  The planning process broadly defines the vision of the future.
Participatory Evaluation Mary Phillips, BME Former Circles of Care Program Coordinator, Oakland and an Evaluator, Los Angeles, CA.
Community Readiness Model
that keep families strong
1 © 2011 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. 11 Community Readiness and Engagement Scott Chazdon, Ph.D. Extension Center for Community.
First, let’s make sure we understand what the SWAT Movement is all about.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Building Community Readiness – Strategies that Promote Change Holly Raffle Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Building a Toolkit of Skills and Resources Sarah Lampe, Rebecca Rapport & Mary Wold Paige Backlund Jarquín.
2012 Connecticut Community Readiness Assessment for Substance Use Prevention: ERASE Strategic Prevention Framework University of Connecticut Health Center.
Perspectives on Impact Evaluation Cairo, Egypt March 29 – April 2, 2009 Presented by: Wayne M. Harding. Ed.M., Ph.D., Director of Projects, Social Science.
Corinne Graffunder, DrPH, MPH National Center for Injury Prevention and Control October 2009 Laying the Foundation: The Strategic Vision for RPE.
MOVING FORWARD: STATEWIDE PROGRESS OF MOFAS GRANTEES.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
The JCI Impact Strategy
Building Partnerships: Empowerment & Change through Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Tracy Schroepfer, PhD, MSW, MA University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Chittenden County, Vermont 1. Formal partners Local Education - 8 School Districts (41 schools) + 1 Advisory School District (9 schools) Local Mental.
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
Ready or Not? assessing and implementing change Stephanie Jones Erica Ruck, Ovens and King Community Health Service.
Defending Childhood Protect Heal Thrive January 25-27, 2011 Sandra Spencer Executive Director National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
Georgetown TA Center1 NAMI Expanding Partnerships in Systems of Care: Families, Education and Mental Health Working Together Darcy E. Gruttadaro, J.D.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Collaboration and Coalition Building Presented by Prevention Services of ETP Inc. and DMHAS’ Prevention Unit.
COMMUNITY COALITION BUILDING. Workshop Objectives  Describe effective community coalition building  What?  Why?  How?  Key challenges and success.
@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Fire Prevention Education Team Organization 1A-01-P310-EP.
Community Readiness Assessment. Assessing Community Readiness Readiness is the degree to which a community is prepared to take action on an issue. It.
Session 4 Agenda 1. Strategic Prevention Framework Sustainability Step 4: Implementation Step 5: Evaluation 2. Bringing It All Together 2.
1 Assessing Community Needs and Community Readiness.
Chapter 3: Needs Assessment. Needs Assessment, defined: The measure against which program implementation and outcome will be compared. “A needs assessment.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Building Organizational Capacity to Create Community Change
Capacity Building.
Community Readiness.
Partnering with 12 community sectors:
Community Readiness.
Presentation transcript:

Native Aspirations Community Readiness Model U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Native Aspirations Our children are the songs of our future Community Readiness Model Tribal Justice and Safety – TT & TA Phoenix, AZ July 30, 2007 Presented by: Gary Neumann and Gloria Guillory, KAI Project Managers

Presentation Overview What is the Community Readiness Model (CRM)? Why use the CRM? Dimensions of Community Readiness Stages of Readiness Process for using the CRM Community Readiness Experiential Group Exercise

CRM Developers Originated out of the Tri-Ethnic Center for Prevention Research at Colorado State University, which is now the Center for Applied Studies in American Ethnicity (http://www.colostate.edu/Dept/CASAE/). PowerPoint Presentation utilizes excerpts from the “Community Readiness: A Handbook for Successful Change” (Plested, Edwards, Jumper-Thurman – April 2006)

Purpose of the Model The purpose of Community Readiness is to provide communities with the stages of readiness for development of appropriate strategies that are more successful and cost effective.

What Does The Model Do? Facilitates community-based change Uses a nine stage, multi-dimensional model Creates interventions that are community-specific and culturally-specific Provides a road map for the prevention journey Builds cooperation among systems and individuals

What The Model Can Do Helps identify resources Helps identify obstacles Provides an assessment of how ready the community is with respect to accepting an intervention as something that needs doing Identifies types of efforts that are appropriate to initiate, depending on stage of readiness

What The Model Can’t Do Make people do what they don’t believe in Tell you exactly what you should do to accomplish your objectives

Why Use Community Readiness? Initiates community action and instills community ownership Utilizes existing resources, de-emphasizing money Provides a tool for evaluation of efforts Requires no outside ‘experts’ Creates a community vision that translates into a more sustainable effort Develops culturally-appropriate strategies

Dimensions of Community Readiness Community Efforts (programs, activities, policies, etc.) Community Knowledge of the Efforts Leadership (formal or informal) Community Climate Community Knowledge About the Issue Resources Related to the Issue (people, time, money, space, etc.)

Stage of Readiness The CRM defines 9 stages of community readiness ranging from “no awareness” of the problem to “high level of community ownership” in response to the issue.

1 - No Awareness: Not generally recognized by the community as a concern “It’s just the way things are!” 2 - Denial/Resistance: Some community members recognize that it is a concern Feeling that nothing needs to be done locally 3 - Vague Awareness: General feeling by some that there is a local concern and that something should be done about it No immediate motivation/identifiable leadership

4 – Preplanning: Clear recognition by some that there is a local concern and prevention should be implemented Identifiable leadership, but efforts are not focused or detailed 5 – Preparation: Planning is going on and focuses on details Resources are actively being sought 6 – Initiation: Information is available to justify the efforts Activity and action is underway, but still viewed as a new effort

7 – Stabilization: One or two efforts are running, supported by administrators or community decision-makers Staff are trained and experienced 8 - Confirmation/Expansion: Standard efforts are now in place and leadership supports expanding and improving services Efforts are being evaluated and modified 9 - High Level Of Community Ownership: Diversify funding resources, identify new sources Continue to track data trend for grant writing

Process For Using the Community Readiness Model Identify the issue Define the community Conduct key respondent interviews Score to determine readiness level Develop strategies Create community change!

Identify Issue The Native Aspirations project utilizes the CRM to assess the issue of youth violence which is inclusive of violence, bullying and suicide. The CRM was originally developed to address community alcohol and drug abuse prevention efforts, but has also been used for other issues, such as: Intimate partner violence Child abuse Transportation issues HIV/AIDS Cultural competence Suicide Many more issues!

Define Community Most communities participating in Native Aspirations have elected to serve youth reservation-wide while some have chosen to concentrate efforts in one particular community and/or agency.

Conduct Stakeholder Interviews A minimum of 4-6 individuals in your community who are connected to the issue. In some cases it may be “politically advantageous” to interview more people. However, only 4-6 interviews are generally needed to accurately score the community. Try to find people who represent different segments of your community.

Who Is Interviewed? Depending on the issue: School personnel City/county/tribal/government and leaders Health/medical professionals Community members at large Social services Spiritual/religious leaders Mental health and treatment services

Conducting CR Interviews There are approximately 20 questions and interviews can last up to 30 minutes in general Use the telephone or conduct face-to-face interviews; avoid written format Ask questions exactly as they are written; avoid interjecting personal bias or opinions Record all responses as accurately as possible There is no right or wrong answers; no good or bad interview; all provide essential information!

Score Interviews Scoring is an easy step-by-step process that gives you the readiness stages for each of the six dimensions. Utilizes at least two independent scorers who score each of the dimensions based on statements and references in the interview (score from 1-9) and come up with independent scores.

Score Interviews The two scorers meet to reach a consensus in order to come up with a combined score for each of the six dimensions and to find the Overall Stage of Readiness!

Develop Appropriate Strategies for Readiness Level Once a community knows its level of readiness in dealing with a specific issue, it can then develop strategies for prevention/intervention. The model gives appropriate strategies for each stage of readiness. The Native Aspirations project utilizes the Community Readiness score to help communities develop strategies that are appropriate for their stage of readiness to address youth violence, bullying, and suicide.

Prioritize Dimensions Prioritize the lowest scoring dimensions and focus on strategies that will increase the community’s readiness on those dimensions. Bring all dimensions up to the highest scoring dimension before moving onto the next stage.

1 – No Awareness Goal: Raise awareness of the issue Strategies… One on one visit with others Visit existing and established small groups Phone call to friends and potential supporters – inform others, get them excited and solicit their support – be creative!

2- Denial/Resistance Goal: This issue exists in this community Strategies… Continue strategies from previous stage Put up flyers and brochures Put information in church bulletins, newsletters, etc. Low intensity but visible media

3 – Vague Awareness Goal: Community can make positive changes Strategies… Continue strategies from previous stage Hold special events, potlucks, dances, etc. Conduct informal surveys to see how people feel about the issue Publish newspaper editorials/articles and creative media consistent with community visibility

Community Readiness Assessment HOW READY ARE WE? Large group exercise: Move furniture to allow adequate room for everyone to line up against longest wall on one side of the room. Note posted numbers (corresponding to the stages of readiness) on one side of the room. Have the participants line up at the other end of the room (side to side), For each dimension: have participants “self assess” their communities readiness by moving towards a score (1-10) posted on the wall. Note largest group score on chart paper for each dimension. Then score each of the six dimensions in this manner! Once each dimension is scored have them return to their seats. Review the next slide – their community readiness report! Compare & discuss scores

Tribal or Alaska Native Community Community Readiness Scores Efforts: 3.81 Knowledge of the Efforts: 3.31 Leadership: 3.19 Community Climate: 3.56 Knowledge of the Issue: 3.06 Resources: 3.12 Overall Readiness Score: 3.34

Community Readiness Exercise Large group exercise For the following dimensions, score to the best of your knowledge, the readiness level you feel your community is at: 1. Community Efforts 2. Community Knowledge of the Efforts 3. Leadership 4. Community Climate 5. Community Knowledge About the Issue 6. Resources Related to the Issue Make up individual cards numbered 1-9 (for Community Readiness Dimensions) Line up on the ground and allow enough room for a group of people to convene around each number Go through each of the Community Readiness Dimensions and ask the participants to line up around the number where they feel their community is at in terms of readiness. One of the facilitators will go to each number and clarify the # of people who scored the dimension at that level (1-9). The other facilitator will make notes of each of the 6 dimensions (blank page with the 6 dimensions written on it and under each dimension numbers 1-9. Record the numbers for each of the dimensions and circle the highest number. If there is a tie we had those who tied to come to a group consensus if they feel they are more at one level than the other.

Community Readiness Score Comparisons Stakeholder Interviews: Efforts: 3.81 Knowledge: 3.31 Leadership: 3.19 Community Climate: 3.56 Knowledge of Issue: 3.06 Resources: 3.12 Overall Readiness Score: 3.34 Group Exercise: Efforts: Knowledge: Leadership: Community Climate: Knowledge of the Issue: Resources: Overall Readiness Score: Insert KAI’s community scores! Insert CMP participant’s scores

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed it’s the only thing that ever has.” ~ Margaret Mead ~

Our children are the songs of our future Native Aspirations Our children are the songs of our future Kauffman & Associates, Inc. South 165 Howard St., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99201 Phone: (509) 747-4994 Fax: (509) 747-5030 www.kauffmaninc.com