SLD Eligibility Peer Review April 2011 Dr. Evelyn S. Johnson Associate Professor, BSU uL.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RtI Response to Intervention

Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.

Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.

Using RTI Data to Inform Eligibility

SCHOOLS K - 12 Dr. Susan W. Floyd Education Associate Speech-Language Disabilities, Assistive Technology Office of Exceptional Children South Carolina.

Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.

Goose Creek CISD Response to Intervention Training Part I.

Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.

Office of Dispute Resolution Melanie J. Reese, Ph.D. Dispute Resolution Coordinator

RTI and Special Education: Making sense of it all!

Office of Dispute Resolution Melanie J. Reese, Ph.D. Dispute Resolution Coordinator

Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson STATE OF THE STATE Richard Henderson Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education Idaho Association.

Specific Learning Disability Criteria and Resources Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Special Education Division of Student.

Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.

Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.

Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.

Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.

SLD Eligibility Review Teresa Fritsch, Psy.S., NCSP School Psychologist

1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,

Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-

Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions

Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007

The Power Of Partnership: Maryland’s Historic Memorandum of Understanding on the Use of Student Learning Objectives Webinar with David Volrath,

ICSD District RtI Committee Agenda 3/13/12 3:45- Review of Our Norms and today’s agenda 4:00- Defining RtI and screening tool criteria 4:30- Begin review.

Specific Learning Disability Criteria for School Administrators Richard Henderson Regional Special Education Consultant Idaho State University.

Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential

Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.

KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S

“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”

MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.

Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.

Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013 Lee Pesky Center Dr. Evelyn Johnson SESTA Gina Hopper

National Center on Response to Intervention NCRTI TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Tessie Rose, PhD NCRTI Co-coordinator of TA and.

Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.

Jackson Elementary School Title I Information

EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.

Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings

Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.

RtI and PBS Dr. Patricia Drake Wayne RESA September 17, 2010.

Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.

Assessment in Special Education, SPED 4131 Professor Dr. Regina Blair

Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Eligibility Guidelines

Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson Shannon Dunston Division of Special Education Division of Student Achievement and School Improvement Idaho State Department.

GETTING TO KNOW YOUR PARAPROFESSIONAL Frank Howe, Southeast Regional Coordinator Beth Eloe-Reep, Southeast Regional Coordinator Gina Hopper, Associate.

Extraordinary and Medically Complex Exemptions for Testing.

Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.

Guidance to Support SLD Listening Comprehension and Oral Expression

The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.

 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.

RtI Eligibility Exclusionary Factors. Why Consider Exclusionary Factors? When We Think About Entitlement…It: Is a high stakes, high consequence, decision.

Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.

Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships

SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.

Response to Intervention New roles for Reading Teachers in the newly authorized IDEA.

We will start shortly. Feel free to relax and chat while you wait for class to begin. Our agenda for tonight’s seminar is to discuss Response to Intervention,

Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.

 Developing a State Model for Student Support Services Personnel Evaluations Bureau of Exceptional Education & Student Services & Division of Educator.

Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.

Specific Learning Disability Criteria Implementation Update Richard Henderson Idaho State Department of Education Division of Federal Programs Division.

The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.

February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.

SLD: The Big Picture- Exemplary Eligibility Reports Training November 30, 2010 Gina Hopper Carrie Semmelroth Rich Henderson Nancy Thomas Price Teresa Fritsch.

School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.

Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017

Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities

Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2012

Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H

Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support

A3 – Improving State Level Supports and Stakeholder Engagement through Effective Evaluation Kim Gulbrandson, Justyn Poulos – Wisconsin RtI Center Key.

Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy

Presentation transcript:

SLD Eligibility Peer Review April 2011 Dr. Evelyn S. Johnson Associate Professor, BSU uL

Introduction Quick Review of the Policy & Form Process for Peer Review Case File Examples & Rubric Training Agenda

Purpose & Objectives Train the trainers on the SLD eligibility policy Explain process for peer review Practice eligibility form evaluations Complete SLD file review

Connect the functional & operational definition Rule Out Impacts learning Process disorder Your Text SLD RTI / Achievement RTI / Screen Process Eval Rule Out

Assumptions Core is effective Fidelity Appropriate comparison Confirmed Imperfect Ability to Learn Progress Class Performance Benchmarks ✔ Standard Ach.

Assumptions Core is effective Fidelity Appropriate Confirmed Not primarily due to… EEC/CLD Poor Instruction Medical ✔

Ensuring CLD not the primary cause Bias Evidence base? Norms Language Acquisition

Assumptions Connect to Academic Area Standard Assessment Process Disorder Ipsative AND Normative Obstruct learning Narrow, specific capacities ✔

Have we met the criteria to establish SLD? Rule Out Impacts learning Process disorder ✓ SLD RTI / Achievement RTI / Screen Process Eval Rule Out ✓ ✓ ✓

Review Feedback Process Review Check/in Check/out Review Table Documents Team Assignments Process for Peer Review

Rubric & Form Review Case Study 1 (whole group) Case Study 2 (on your own) Compare/Review Case Study Case Study Training

Training and Technology for Today’s Tomorrow Website to link school professionals and parents with special education training opportunities and resources across the state Supported By: –Idaho State Department of Education (ISDE), Special Education Project Team: –Cari Murphy –Shawn Wright

Statewide Special Education Technical Assistance (SESTA ) (New Service Offered through the SDE) Center for School Improvement & Policy Studies, BSU Gina Hopper, Carol Carnahan, Associate Director Statewide Consultant

Contact Information: Richard Henderson, Director of Special Education, Idaho Department of Education Dr. Evelyn Johnson, Boise State University