Chapter 15 Counter-terrorism. Introduction  United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key New Surveillance Provisions Professor Peter P. Swire Ohio State University Privacy 2001 Conference October 4, 2001.
Advertisements

SEARCH AND SEIZURE: COMPLICATED BY TECHNOLOGY
Homeland Security and the Future of Criminal Justice.
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Module 2 Kentucky Victim Assistance Academy Lessons 2.0 – 2.3 1DRAFT KVAA.
A writ of habeas corpus is a legal request directed to a detaining authority It demands that a prisoner be taken before a court, and that the detaining.
Passed by the Senate 98-1 Passed by the House October 26, 2001 – Signed into law by President Bush 130 pages in length Divided into 10 titles.
USA PATRIOT Act and Libraries Eric Johnson & Rodney Clare Jackman Sims Memorial Library.
The Patriot Act And computing. /criminal/cybercrime/PatriotAct.htm US Department of Justice.
Patriot Act October 26, United (and) Strengthening America (by) Providing appropriate tools required (to) intercept (and) obstruct Terrorism Act.
Chapter 17 Law and Terrorism.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9a– Homeland Security and Civil Liberties: USA Patriot Act.
Works Citied. How Has the War on Terrorism Affected Civil Liberties? Opposing Viewpoints Civil Liberties Cole, David. The War on Terrorism.
Constitutional Law Part 3: The Federal Executive Power Lectures 4-5: Separation of Powers and Foreign Policy & Presidential War Powers and Terrorism.
1 INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST GROUPS & ARMED CONFLICT.
USA PATRIOT ACT USA PATRIOT ACT
Responding to Cybercrime in the Post-9/11 World Scott Eltringham Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section U.S. Department of Justice (202)
13.1 Chapter 13 Privacy © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
Policing the Internet: Higher Education Law and Policy Rodney Petersen, Policy Analyst Wendy Wigen, Policy Analyst EDUCAUSE.
The Criminal Amendments: Rights of the Accused Trends Over Time
Brad Butt MP February 10, – criminalize the advocacy or promotion of terrorism offences in general; – counter terrorist recruitment by giving our.
ISSUES IN FBI LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO COUNTER-TERRORISM INVESTIGATIONS Ranjana Natarajan National Security Clinic University of Texas School of Law.
Law and Terrorism “The laws will thus not be silent in time of war, but they will speak with a somewhat different voice.” Chief Justice Rehnquist.
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process. In this chapter, you will look at the role of police and the courts in the criminal investigation process.
1 Copyright © 2011 M. E. Kabay, J. Tower-Pierce & P. R. Stephenson. All rights reserved. The U.S.A.P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act CJ341 – Cyberlaw & Cybercrime Lecture.
The Patriot Act Protecting the US or Violating People’s Freedoms.
“To those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists—for they erode our national.
1 Chapter 15 Search Warrants Search Warrants. 2 Search Warrants Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment Search warrants fall under the 4 th Amendment.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 18. THE SPECIAL COURTS Section 4.
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 4. Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 2 Chapter 18, Section 4 Objectives 1.Contrast the jurisdiction.
Two competing options: (1) Military tribunals / commissions Most recently, created by Executive Order in Nov 2001 Secretary of Defense ordered to establish.
Constitutional Law Spring 2008 Professor Fischer War Powers I February 22, 2008.
Section 411 ‘Patriot Act’ violates 1st Amendment Permits guilt to be imposed solely on the basis of political associations protected by 1st Amendment.
Agencies and Surveillance Authority SNFI Agencies and Surveillance Authority 1.Civics 101, Courts, and the Constitution 2.Executive Agencies 3.PATRIOT.
JUSTICE  The principle of fairness: the idea of moral equality. Criminal Justice Today  The proper ordering of things and persons within a society.
5. Law Enforcement. Pre-2001 Terrorists as Criminals 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty.
Anti-Terrorism in the Time of Hope and Change. Charges in Federal Court  Offenses described by statute, typically defined in Title 18, U.S. Code.  Includes.
American Government and Organization PS1301 Wednesday, 3 December.
STANDARD(S): 12.1 Students explain the fundamental principles and moral values of American democracy. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT 1.Contrast the.
1 The Broader Picture Laws Governing Hacking and Other Computer Crimes Consumer Privacy Employee Workplace Monitoring Government Surveillance Cyberwar.
Chapter 10 The Criminal Process. A.k.a. Procedural criminal law Two most essential elements of Canadian Criminal Process are: - Truth - Justice.
Chapter 14 USA Patriot Act, Foreign Intelligence and Other Types of Electronic Surveillance Covered by Federal Law "Big Brother in the form of an increasingly.
Chapter 19 - Congressional Authority for National Security Surveillance Part I.
Chapter 20 Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights.
Chapter 26 - Military Detention Part II. 2 Padilla v. Hanft, 423 F.3d 386 (2005) Subsequent cases to the publication of the book have made most of the.
Due Process Amendments What is due process? Due process, for the people of the United States, refers to how laws are enforced why laws are.
Patriot Act (2002)Patriot Act (2002) Dylan Plassmeyer-Pd:8.
Bell Ringer At last year’s Super Bowl, the government secretly used face recognition software on people attending the event by using surveillance cameras.
How have the courts expanded due process rights?.
STUDENT RIGHTS MINI-WRITE On a half sheet of paper write at least two paragraphs on the following questions: What rights do you have when you come to school?
Unit 2: Chapter 17.  Attacks on September 11, 2001 shook America to its core  Largest on U.S. soil since World War II  Feeling of vulnerability  Congress.
Dr. Marie-Helen Maras Preventive Detention Week 10.
Ruqayya Y Khan, Trinity University
Law and Terrorism Chapter 17.
Understanding the Constitution
U.S. and Texas Politics and Constitution Civil Liberties I February 3, 2015 J. Bryan Cole POLS 1336.
VI. CRIMINAL PROCESS FROM ARREST TO CONCLUSION
Team SCLA Constitutional Law: Oral Arguments
Legal Implications.
Protection Or Violation ?
Lesson # 7 A Practical Guide to Computer Forensics Investigations
How Does Electronic Surveillance Work Legally?
Due Process of The Law Group 3 Brad Jackson Jessica Garcia
DO NOW.
Laws Governing Police Surveillance
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 4
Electronic Surveillance, Post 9/11
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 2
Bell Ringer Name as many things as you can think of that DO NOT make you "Proud to be an American". Think about decisions our country has made in history.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 15 Counter-terrorism

Introduction  United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 defines new federal criminal offenses relating to terrorism introduces reforms to criminal procedure to make it easier to investigate and detect acts of terrorism  many definitions of terrorism  the Constitution is not a “suicide pact” and that the first priority of government must be to protect the American people

Electronic Surveillance  Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act provided procedures for electronic surveillance of threats to national security extended in 1994 to cover physical searches of dwellings and other structures  the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Conditions to Obtain a FISA Warrant  probable cause that the target is the agent of a foreign power or a member of an international terrorist organization  based on the “probability of a possibility” that the target of the order “may engage” in activities threatening the national security or “may engage” in terrorism (less than probable cause)  the primary purpose must be to investigate a threat to national security or threat of terrorism  the place or communication device targeted for surveillance must be being used or is about to be used by a foreign power or terrorist organization to carry out activities that threaten the national security

FISA  an American citizen or resident of the United States may not be singled out for surveillance under FISA based on the First Amendment  FISA warrants generally are easier to obtain than warrants for ordinary criminal investigations  “the wall”  section 218 of the PATRIOT Act

FISA (cont.)  FISA warrants authorize government investigations for 120 days and may be renewed for up to a year  FISA authorizes the U.S. attorney general to conduct the emergency surveillance of U.S. citizens and residents for seven days (or longer for a non-citizen) before obtaining a warrant  pen registers are employed to record telephone numbers dialed from a phone  trap-and-trace devices record the numbers of incoming calls  and voice mail  roving wiretaps  emergency electronic surveillance

Sneak and Peek Warrants  anticipatory searches  authorizes law enforcement to delay notifying an individual that they have conducted a search  Section 213  30 day delay, 90 day extension  tangible/intangible evidence

Information and Records  United States v. Miller  national security letters  seizure of business records

Detention of Noncitizens  Section 412: a noncitizen may be detained for seven days without being charged with a criminal or immigration violation  the attorney general of the United States must certify that there are “reasonable grounds to believe” that an immigrant is a terrorist or has engaged in terrorist activities

Material Witness Warrants  the government is able to arrest a witness whose testimony is material to a grand jury investigation or to a criminal prosecution and who may be unavailable at a later date to testify or who may flee in order to avoid testifying  such individuals are to be released following their testimony  Department of Justice: every individual detained under a material witness warrant has been found to have relevant information  proposed reforms limits on the length of detention very high burden of proof of flight risk detained persons should be informed as to why

Monitoring of Lawyer-Client Communications  available where “reasonable suspicion exits to believe that a pre-trial detainee or an inmate may use communications with attorneys... to further or facilitate acts of terrorism”  attorney-client privilege to keep communications confidential does not apply where communications are intended to “facilitate criminal acts or a conspiracy to commit criminal acts” and are not related to “seeking or providing legal advice”  may be undertaken without a warrant  required notification of attorneys

Interrogations  enhanced interrogation techniques used on high- value detainees  Article III of the Geneva Conventions  enemy combatants  Detainee Treatment Act of 2005  changes from Bush to Obama policy

Military Commissions and Combat Status Review Tribunals  military commissions  Authorization for Use of Military Force  provide most of the basic rights that are considered important to a fair trial  possess the flexibility to limit these rights in the interest of protecting national security  Department of Defense, Military Commission Order No. 1  Rasul v. Bush

Military Commissions (cont.)  Hamdi v. Rumsfeld  combatant status review tribunals  administrative review boards  Hamdan v. Rumsfeld  flaws of the military commissions exclusion from trial failure to follow rules of evidence jury verdicts limited appeals

Military Commissions (cont.)  Military Commissions Act of 2006  Boumediene v. Bush  announced closure of Guantanamo  Guantanamo prosecutions  debate whether terrorism should be treated as an act of war and prosecuted before a military commission or as a common crime and prosecuted before civilian criminal courts