 The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices was adopted by the government in 1969 and the MRTP Commission was set up in 1970.  The act came into.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. S Chakravarthy1 GREETINGS TO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FOR ICAIS POST QUALIFICATION COURSE VIDEO CONFERENCE FROM HYDERABAD 25 AUGUST
Advertisements

Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Tariffs Gender Module #5 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social Equality.
GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION Levelling the Field for Development BY : EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 5 TH JUNE 2013.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law Rijit Sengupta Role of Trade Unions in Promoting Competition in Zambia 13 th February 2012, Kitwe, Zambia.
Why competition law? Economic performance Social welfare Well being of consumers.
IDRC Forum in KyotoApril 13, Challenges in Enforcing Chinese Antimonopoly Law Prof. Dr. Wang Xiaoye Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
3.06 Develop A Foundational Knowledge Of Pricing To Understand Its Role In Marketing.
COMPETITION ACT,  The Finance Minister in his Budget Speech on 27 th February, 1999 stated “The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Chapter 46 Antitrust Law.
 Section 1 of Sherman Act regulates “horizontal” and “vertical” restraints.  Per Se vs. Rule of Reason.  Per Se violations are blatant and substantially.
GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION Levelling the Field for Development SIXTH ANNUAL AFRICAN CONSUMER PROTECTION DIALOQUE CONFERENCE.
1 Competition Policy and Issues of Sustainable Economic Growth in African Context: A Framework.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class I, 6th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
Indian Competition Regime and Experiences with Cartels Pradeep S Mehta CUTS International.
Welcome to Mergers and Acquisitions uk. Plan of Topic Definitions Importance Patterns in Mergers and Acquisitions –Merger and Acquisition Activity in.
CHAPTER 8: SECTION 1 A Perfectly Competitive Market
Introduction : Before 1991, economic development of the country was due to the public sector. But it is realized that public sector was insufficient due.
C OMPETITION LAW IN NIGERIA Daniel Bwala. Background There is no specific Competition law in Nigeria at the moment. However there are laws or rules in.
Citizen consumer and civic Action Group Chennai, India
Competition Policy in India: an Overview TCA Anant Department of Economics Delhi School of Economics.
What the government does A2 Economics and Business Unit 4B By Mrs Hilton for revisionstation.
“Equal and open access to the market in terms of economic integration and increased competition ” Astana Forum, 24 May 2013 Presented by Hassan Qaqaya,
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF COMPETITION AGENCIES. GENERAL STRUCTURE OF CA CAs differ in size, structure and complexity The structure depicts power distribution.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
1 EVOLUTION OF COMPETITION LAW IN INDIA Pradeep S Mehta CUTS International.
EVOLUTION OF COMPETITION LAW IN INDIA
Competition Law Definition and Scope Dr. A.K. Enamul Haque Professor of Economics United International University.
COMPETITION & REGULATORY AGENCIES Types of Competition Mergers Government Regulation Anti-Trust Legislation Federal Regulatory Agencies.
16 August Capacity Building on Competition Policy in Namibia Rehabeam Shilimela NEPRU.
 “Market power” is the power of company to control the market for its product.  The law does allow for market monopolies when a patent is issued. During.
1 ABA Spring 2009 Meeting- Section of International Law Panel on Antitrust in the East Presentation on Indian Competition Act— Abuse of Dominance Vinod.
Consumer Protection and Competition Highlights Livingstone, Zambia September 2013 The Fifth Annual African Dialogue Consumer Protection Conference.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE By: Group C Aneesh Srivastava (B12008) Ankan J Bhattacharyya (B12010) Mandeep Singh (B12022) Priti (B12030) Trisha Chakrabarty (B12053)
Industrial Policy Faculty – Lovely School Of Business LPU.
1 Introduction to Competition Policy and Law National Training Workshop on Competition Policy and Law Gaborone, Botswana: 25 – 27 July 2007 Presenter:
Competition Law and Policy for Development: Insights from Nepal Dhrubesh Chandra Regmi South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics & Environment (SAWTEE)
UNCTAD Competition Law and Policy for Practitioners The Rationale For Introducing Competition Law and Policy By Michael Adam, Competition law and Consumer.
1 Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy Chapter 15 © 2006 Thomson/South-Western.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPT Slides t/a Economics for Business 3e by Fraser, Gionea and Fraser 7-1 Chapter 7 Government market intervention.
1 Pre-Independence Laws: PRIVATE CAPITAL Constitution (1950); IDR Act (1951); IPR (1956); MRTP Act, 1969; State Ownership Reserved Lists & Licensing Post.
Monopoly and Antitrust Policy. Imperfect Competition and Market Power An imperfectly competitive industry is an industry in which single firms have some.
Standards Anti-Trust Compliance Briefing August 31, 2004.
EU Competition Law. Introduction Competition law protects competition in a free market economy, that is, an economic system in which the allocation of.
2 Consumer Unity & Trust Society International The Relationship of Competition and Regulation Policy and Administration Professor Allan Fels, AO Dean.
CHAPTER 8: SECTION 2 A Perfectly Competitive Market Characteristics of a Monopoly A monopolistic market has the following three characteristics: It has.
COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW 1 2 EXTANT COMPETITION LAW OF INDIA MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, 1969 BROUGHT INTO FORCE IN 1970.
(new)The Competition Act. The Competition Act 2003 & 2007 The Competition bill was passed by both the houses of Parliament in December 2002, and The President.
Competition Policy in India: an Overview Pankaj Jain Faculty : Lovely Professional University.
Amity School of Business Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act,
Prof. Frederick Abbott UNDP Consultant
PRESENTATION AT THE OECD NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FIGHTING BID-RIGGING IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PRESENTATION BY DUNCAN T. MOROTSI DIRECTOR LEGAL AND ENFORCEMENT.
European Union Law Week 10.
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
This is the prescribed textbook for your course.
Subject : law aspects of corporate business
THE COMPETITION ACT Presented by : Ripal Makwana Roll no : 27
Competition and Consumer Act issues affecting franchises
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
Name: Jani Radhika A. Roll no: 19 M
THE GOVERNMENT AND THE ECONOMY
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
LEGAL ASPECTS OF CORPORATE BUSINESS
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Presentation transcript:

 The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices was adopted by the government in 1969 and the MRTP Commission was set up in  The act came into force from 1st June 1970 and has been amended in 1974,1980,1982,1984 and 1991  The Act extended to the whole of India excepting Jammu and Kashmir.

 In the pre-1991 period the declared policy of the government was to  curb and restrict the growth of monopoly power in the country.  for this purpose, the government imposed restrictions on the entry of large business houses in a number of industries,  set up a large number of industries in the public sector,  and undertook various measures to encourage small and medium industries. MRTP ACT 1969 :

 The most important in this phase was passing of the MRTP Act (Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act) in 1969 and the setting up of the MRTP Commission in  Since 1991, the focus has shifted from controlling monopolies to promoting competition.

Control of monopolies, Prohibition of monopolistic and restrictive and unfair trade practices.

 Monopolistic Trade Practice Sections 31 and 32 of the MRTP Act relate to monopolistic trade practices. ‘monopolistic trade practice’ means a trade practice which has, or is likely to have, the effect of- 1. Maintaining the price of goods or charges for the services at an unreasonable level by limiting, reducing or otherwise controlling, production, supply or distribution of goods (or services) 2. Unreasonably preventing or lessening competition in the production, supply or distribution of any of goods produced, supplied or distributed or any services rendered in India,;

3. Increasing unreasonably- (a) the cost of production of any goods; or (b) charges for the provision, or maintenance, of any services; 4. Increasing unreasonably- (a) the prices at which goods are or may be, sold or resold (b) the profits which are, or maybe derived by the production, supply or distribution of any goods 5. Preventing or lessening competition in the production, supply, or distribution of any goods(or services)by the adoption of unfair methods or unfair or deceptive practices.

 Restrictive Trade Practice According to the MRTP Act, A trade practice which has, or may have the effect of preventing, distorting or restricting competition in any manner  Which tends to obstruct the flow of capital or resources into the stream of production, or  Which tends to bring about manipulation of prices or conditions of delivery or to affect the flow of supplies in the market relating to goods or services in such manner as to impose on the consumers unjustified costs or restrictions.  A trade practice which has or may have the effect of preventing, distorting or restricting competition in any manner, is a restrictive trade practice.

 A trade practice which, for the purpose of promoting any sale, use or supply of any goods or services, adopts unfair method  These are categorized as:  False Representation  False Offer or Bargain Price  Free gifts offer and Prize Schemes  Non-compliance of Prescribed Standards  Hoarding, Destruction etc

 The Industrial policy statement of 1991 bring drastic changes in MRTP Act. These provisions were criticized very much because of their negative impact on growth and competition.  This act is not applicable to : This act is not applicable to (i) Any undertaking owned or controlled by a government (central or state) (ii) Any undertaking the management of which has been taken over by the government. (iii) Any undertaking owned by a cooperative society

(i) The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice Commission. (ii) The Central Government and Supreme court.

ACTION CAN BE INITIATED BY:  AN INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER  A REGISTERED ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMERS  A TRADE ASSOCIATION  GOVERNMENT( Central and State Government)  MRTP COMMISSION SUO MOTU

 Competition Act, 2002 With the economic reforms program in 1991, MRTP Act lost its relevance in the new liberalized and global competitive scenario. There was a shift of focus from curbing monopolies to promoting competition.  Competition bill, 2001 was introduced in Parliament and passed in December This Act is called Competition Act, 2002.

It is a tool to implement and enforce competition policy and to prevent and punish anti-competitive business practices by firms and unnecessary Government interference in the market.

 To prevent practices having adverse effect on competition,  To promote and sustain competition in markets,  To protect the interests of consumers.

 Overall Scheme Competition Act, 2002, is designed for the following purposes:  Prohibition of anti-competitive agreements;  Horizontal Agreement  Vertical Agreement  Prohibition of abuse of dominant position

MRTP A CT, 1969C OMPETITION A CT, 2002 Based on the pre-reforms scenario Based on the post-reforms scenario Complex in arrangement and language Simple in arrangement and language and easily comprehensible Frowns upon dominanceFrowns upon abuse of dominance Registration of agreements compulsory No requirement of registration of agreements No penalties for offencesPenalties for offences Reactive and rigidProactive and flexible Unfair trade practices coveredUnfair trade practices omitted