May 2001Venice Workshop1 The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle and Adaptive Optics Time Constant derived from DIMM data Marc Sarazin (1) and Andrei Tokovinine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Advertisements

Turbulence and Seeing AS4100 Astrofisika Pengamatan Prodi Astronomi 2007/2008 B. Dermawan.
Light and Telescopes Please pick up your assigned transmitter
Atmospheric Effects and Other Observational Issues AS3100 Lab. Astronomi Dasar 1 Prodi Astronomi 2007/2008 B. Dermawan.
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, November 2007, Tokyo, Japan OPTIMUM ARRAY DESIGN FOR THE DETECTION OF DISTANT.
Super Seeing from the AAT Peter Gillingham 26 th March 2003.
Site testing at Dome C: recent results CONCORDIASTRO Project E. Aristidi, A. Agabi, E. Fossat, T. Travouillon, M. Azouit, J. Vernin, A. Ziad, F. Martin,
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Atmospheric Turbulence
Overview of Astronomical Seeing Refraction in the atmosphere produces: Image motion Turbulence-induced astronomical “seeing” Image motion is the large-scale,
W AVEFRONT C HARACTERIZATION C AMPAIGN AT P ARANAL D ECEMBER 2007 Using DIMM-MASS-GSM-MOSP-LuSci & SCIDAR ESO/LUAN/IAC/CTIO Joint effort 1 FOROT-Sardenia.
Turbulence and Seeing measurements at Dome C A collaboration UNSW, CTIO and the University of Nice.
PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.
The Origin of Modern Astronomy Chapter 4:. Isaac Newton 1689.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
TMT.AOS.PRE DRF011 Turbulence and wind speed profiles for simulating TMT AO performance Tony Travouillon M. Schoeck, S. Els, R. Riddle, W. Skidmore,
NGAO Photometric Accuracy Budget Strategy Richard Dekany.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 6 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Telescopes and Astronomical Instruments The 2 main points of telescopes are 1)To make images with as much angular information as possible 2)To gather as.
Measuring Seeing, The Differential Image Motion Monitor (DIMM)
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
An Astronomer’s View of Optical Turbulence The characterization, understanding and use of an astronomical site of an astronomical site is a challenging.
July 2001Zanjan, Iran1 Atmospheric Profilers Marc Sarazin (European Southern Observatory)
4. Telescopes Light gathering power and resolution Optical and radio telescopes Limitations of Earth’s atmosphere and satellite missions. Instruments (prism.
Optics and Telescopes Lecture 11. Why do we use telescopes? Human eyes are lenses! Human eyes are lenses! Using larger lenses… Using larger lenses… 
Page 1 Introduction to Adaptive Optics Antonin Bouchez (with lots of help from Claire Max) 2004 Observatory Short Course.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
The LSST Exposure Time Calculator was developed to model the effects of LSST design changes on signal-to-noise ratio and survey depth. The ETC utilizes.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
Lidar Working Group on Space-Based Winds, Snowmass, Colorado, July 17-21, 2007 A study of range resolution effects on accuracy and precision of velocity.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
Chile Sky Background at ESO/la Silla in the Visible and Near IR Leonardo Vanzi -Olivier R. Hainaut European Southern Observatory La Silla - Chile.
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
Gary Chanan Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Irvine 4 February 2000.
Chapter 3 Telescopes. Gemini North Telescope, Mauna Kea, Hawaii.
ASTROCLIMATOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF GROUND-BASED OBSERVATORIES GIANLUCA LOMBARDI Dept. of Astronomy Univ. of Bologna INAF  OABo Dept. of Astronomy Univ. of.
Vancouver, June Models of the ground layer and free atmosphere at some sites A. Tokovinin, CTIO Need for OTP “models”: Adaptive Optics!
Astronomical Seeing. The Project Students will be introduced to the concept of astronomical seeing and how it affects the quality of astronomical images.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Meteorological Site Evaluation and Forecasting needs for the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) D. A. Erasmus Certified Consulting Meteorologist and.
Behind the Buzzwords The basic physics of adaptive optics Keck Observatory OA Meeting 29 January 2004 James W. Beletic.
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Atmospheric Turbulence
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
A monitor of the vertical turbulence distribution MASS: Victor Kornilov a, Andrei Tokovinin b, Olga Vozyakova a, Andrei Zaitsev a, Nicolai Shatsky a, Serguei.
Why Mauna Kea?. Mauna Kea, Hawaii Mauna Kea 13,824 ft.
Surface Layer SLODAR J. Osborn, R. Wilson and T. Butterley A prototype of a new SLODAR instrument has been developed at Durham CfAI and tested at the Paranal.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
Part 2: Phase structure function, spatial coherence and r 0.
Turbulence profiler MASS: First tests and plans A. Tokovinin CTIO edu/edu/~atokovin/profiler.
ISP Astronomy Gary D. Westfall1Lecture 7 Telescopes Galileo first used a telescope to observe the sky in 1610 The main function of a telescope is.
C n 2 profile reconstruction with Shack-Hartmann slope and scintillation data: first on-sky results J. Voyez (1), C. Robert (1), J.-M. Conan (1), V. Michau.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Innovations Foresight Astronomical Seeing The Astro-Imaging Channel Dr. Gaston Baudat Innovations Foresight, LLC 1(c) Innovations Foresight Dr.
Light, Optics and Telescopes The Electromagnetic Spectrum.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Atmospheric Turbulence François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa.
Page 1 Propagation of Light Through Atmospheric Turbulence Lecture 5, ASTR 289 Claire Max UC Santa Cruz January 26, 2016.
SLODAR Turbulence Profilers Richard Wilson, Tim Butterley, James Osborn Durham University, UK.
Telescopes and Astronomical Instruments
Interplanetary scintillation of strong sources during the descending phase near the minimum of 23 solar activity cycle Chashei I1., Glubokova1,2 S., Glyantsev1,2.
MASS-DIMM and SODAR at Cerro Pachon
MASS-DIMM – a turbulence monitor for Adaptive Optics
Astronomical Seeing B. Waddington 6/15/10.
4. Telescopes Light gathering power and resolution
Statistics of turbulence profiles at Cerro Tololo
Makmal Fizik Angkasa Research Activities and Projects in Space Physics Lab Prof. Dr. Mohd. Zambri Zainuddin Makmal Fizik Angkasa Jabatan Fizik.
NPOESS P3I & Follow-on Threshold Operational Mission
Presentation transcript:

May 2001Venice Workshop1 The Statistics of Isoplanatic Angle and Adaptive Optics Time Constant derived from DIMM data Marc Sarazin (1) and Andrei Tokovinine (2) (1) European Southern Observatory (2) Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory

May 2001Venice Workshop2 List of Themes How to find the ideal site...and keep it good? Optical Propagation through Turbulence –Mechanical and Thermal –Index of Refraction –Signature on ground based observations –Correction methods Integral Monitoring Techniques –Seeing Monitoring –Scintillation Monitoring Profiling Techniques –Microthermal Sensors –Scintillation Ranging Modelling Techniques

May 2001Venice Workshop3 Automated DIMM Operation 35cm Telescope for the automated DIMM at the VLT Observatory Pixel size=0.7”Pixel size=0.7” Pupil Diameter=11cmPupil Diameter=11cm Pupil Separation=20cmPupil Separation=20cm Exposure Time=5msExposure Time=5ms 600 frames/mn600 frames/mn

May 2001Venice Workshop4 Fried parameter: ( meter,  ^6/5) Seeing: (arcsec,  ^-0.2) Optical Propagation The Signature of Atmospheric Turbulence

May 2001Venice Workshop5 Correlation time: Isoplanatic angle: High Resolution Imaging

May 2001Venice Workshop6 Statistics of Tau0 Comparison of wavefront velocity V0 and 200mb wind speed during Paranal and Gemini balloon campaigns V0 = 0.4 V 200mb

May 2001Venice Workshop7 Statistics of Tau0 Estimate of the coherence time from 200mb wind velocity during Paranal and Gemini balloon campaigns V0 fit = Max(V ground, 0.4 V 200mb ) Tau0 fit =0.31 r0/ V0 fit

May 2001Venice Workshop8 Statistics of Tau0 The error on the estimate of the coherence time from 200mb wind velocity increases when low level turbulence dominates (Paranal and Gemini balloon campaigns) H bar =0.314 r0 / Theta0

Venice Workshop9 Statistics of Tau0 Geographical Location and 200mb wind velocity 16 years statistics ( line:0, dash:180, tr:La Silla, dia:Paranal, sq:Mauna Kea)

May 2001Venice Workshop10 Statistics of tau0 16-year average 200mb wind velocity at known observatories (Latitude and Longitude +/- 2.5 degree) ObservatoryJuneDecembermean Jun+Dec Chirripo (Costa Rica) Mauna Kea Gamsberg (Nam) Paranal La Silla La Palma Maidanak (Uz) San Pedro Martir

May 2001Venice Workshop11 Isoplanatic angle at zenith: Measuring teta0 with a DIMM Scintillation index at zenith:

May 2001Venice Workshop12 Measuring teta0 with a DIMM Choose an aperture such as: and

May 2001Venice Workshop13 Statistics of Theta0 Chromatic effects Comparison of scintillation index and isoplanatic angle for Paranal Cn2 profiles at various wavelengths (0,4, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 micron, top to bottom) The dispersion from the linear relation is about 5%. The chromatic error at 0.5 micron is [+2%,-5%] from 0.4 to 0.9 micron.

May 2001Venice Workshop14 Statistics of Theta0 Time Averaging Effects True bias from 200mb wind speed for Paranal Cn2 profiles compared to bias calculated from a single- layer model The best agreement is obtained using half the wind velocity at 200mb. The mean correction due to time averaging was 12% in 2000 with the 5ms Paranal DIMM

May 2001Venice Workshop15 Statistics of Tau0 and Theta0 Statistical Distribution of the seeing at Paranal in 2000 mean r0=11.6cm for photometric sky observations at 0.5 micron and at zenith, averaged over 10mn

May 2001Venice Workshop16 Statistics of Tau0 Statistical Distribution of the coherence time at Paranal in 2000 mean tau0=3.9ms for photometric sky observations at 0.5 micron and at zenith, averaged over 10mn

May 2001Venice Workshop17 Statistics of Theta0 Statistical Distribution of the isoplanatic angle at Paranal in 2000 mean Theta0=2.6” for photometric sky observations at 0.5 micron and at zenith, averaged over 10mn

May 2001Venice Workshop18 Statistics of Tau0 and Teta0 Statistical Distribution of the isoplanatic angle at Paranal in 2000 for high and low wind speed at the tropopause The mean Theta0 increases by 10% for each 10m/s speed decrease The mean Tau0 is 30% larger for the best 50% values of Theta0

May 2001Venice Workshop19 Statistics of tau0 and theta0 Paranal 2000 measurements at zenith, 0.5 micron, 10mn average Parameterbest 5%best 20%50%mean Seeing, arcsec mb wind, m/s Tau0, ms Theta0, arcsec