Helio – Geomagnetic Activity Influence on Cardiological Cases Ch. Katsavrias 1, P. Preka-Papadema 1, X. Moussas 1, Th. Apostolou 2, A. Theodoropoulou 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmic Rays and Space Weather
Advertisements

On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
Investigation of daily variations of cosmic ray fluxes in the beginning of 24 th solar activity cycle Ashot Chilingarian, Bagrat Mailyan IHY-ISWI Regional.
Study of Pi2 pulsations observed from MAGDAS chain in Egypt E. Ghamry 1, 2, A. Mahrous 2, M.N. Yasin 3, A. Fathy 3 and K. Yumoto 4 1- National Research.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
The possible solar and geomagnetic activity effects on the neurological disease of Multiple Sclerosis A. Gkotsinas 1, P. Preka-Papadema 1, N. Dimisianos.
Magnetometer ASCII Data for Kiana, Alaska Sara Anderson, Alyssa Fajayan, Bob Otsuka, and Andrew Palmer Carson High School Carson City, NV.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
An analysis of the 23 rd Solar Cycle’s High Speed Solar Wind Streams activity: sources of radiation hazards in Geospace Space Weather Effects on Humans:
The Solar and Space Weather Reseach Group in Lund Space weather Solar activity - the driver Modelling and forecasting space weather and effects using KBN.
Solar Activities and Halloween Storms Ahmed Hady Astronomy Department Cairo University, Egypt.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
Space Weather Major sources of space weather ● Solar wind – a stream of plasma consisting of high energy charged particles released from the upper atmosphere.
Efficacy of Muon Detection for Solar Flare Early Warning Canadian Muon Workshop St-Émile-de-Suffolk, Québec, Canada October 17-19, 2011 NRCan DND Carleton.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
Statistical Analysis of Solar Geomagnetic Storm Occurrences By: Seth Sivak.
Magnetic Storm Generation by Various Types of Solar Wind: Event Catalog, Modeling and Prediction N. S. Nikolaeva, Yu.I. Yermolaev, and I. G. Lodkina Space.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
K9LA Vancouver 2003 Disturbances to Propagation Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA CQ DX?Where’d everybody go?
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
The Sun- Solar Activity. Damage to communications & power systems.
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
Ground level enhancement of the solar cosmic rays on January 20, A.V. Belov (a), E.A. Eroshenko (a), H. Mavromichalaki (b), C. Plainaki(b), V.G.
1 The Geo-Response to Extreme Solar Events: How Bad Can it Get? Leif Svalgaard Stanford University, California, USA AOGS,
Solar and STP science with AstroGrid Silvia Dalla School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Manchester A PPARC funded project.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
Identifying the Role of Solar-Wind Number Density in Ring Current Evolution Paul O’Brien and Robert McPherron UCLA/IGPP.
DELAY TIMES BETWEEN GEOEFFECTIVE SOLAR DISTURBANCES AND GEOMAGNETIC INDICES Y. D. PARK 1, Y. -J. MOON 1, I. S. KIM 2, H. S. YUN 3 1.Korea Astronomy Observatory,
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,,
20th ESA Symposium Lev Dorman (1, 2) for the Team (A. Belov, I. Ben Israel, U. Dai, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, N. Iucci, Z. Kaplan, O. Kryakunova, A. Levitin,
The Geoeffectiveness of Solar Cycle 23 as inferred from a Physics-Based Storm Model LWS Grant NAG Principal Investigator: Vania K. Jordanova Institute.
Athens University – Faculty of Physics Section of Nuclear and Particle Physics Athens Neutron Monitor Station Study of the ground level enhancement of.
ENERGY ESTIMATION OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA DURING STRONGEST GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF THE CURRENT 24 SOLAR CYCLE ON MARCH 2015 The geomagnetic storms.
Solar weather consists of the Sun’s effects upon its planetary system and the solar activities it causes. Solar activities, such as flares and CMEs, form.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Yu.G. Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy of SB RAS Transparency of a magnetic cloud boundary for cosmic rays I.S. Petukhov, S.I. Petukhov.
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas S OLAR E VENTS TOWARDS THE E ARTH IN 2002 B.Schmieder (1), N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin (1), K. Bocchialini (2), M. Menvielle.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Ahmed A. HADY Astronomy Department Cairo University Egypt Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle23 and its Impact and its Impact.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
Extreme Event Symposium 2004 MAGNETOSPHERIC EFFECT in COSMIC RAYS DURING UNIQUE MAGNETIC STORM IN NOVEMBER Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Bringing 93,000,000 Miles to 40,000 Feet: Space Weather & Aviation An introduction to Space Weather What is it? Where does it come from? What does it do?
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients.
A joint study of the University of Göttingen (1) and Astrium (2)
Drivers and Solar Cycles Trends of Extreme Space Weather Disturbances
Investigations of CME in muon flux detected in hodoscopic mode
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
The Sun: Portrait of a G2V star
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Quantification of solar wind parameters from measurments by SOHO and DSCOVR spacecrafts during series of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the.
. Multipoint, galactic cosmic ray observations associated with a series of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the case study of June 2015 A. Papaioannou1,
The properties of CMEs embedded in extreme solar wind
P. Stauning: The Polar Cap (PC) Index for Space Weather Forecasts
Altai State University, RUSSIA
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Helio – Geomagnetic Activity Influence on Cardiological Cases Ch. Katsavrias 1, P. Preka-Papadema 1, X. Moussas 1, Th. Apostolou 2, A. Theodoropoulou 1, A. Hilaris 1 and Th. Papadima 3 1 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Physics, Department of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics 2 St. Panteleimon General Hospital of Nicaea, Piraeus 3 Evagelismos' General Hospital of Athens

Space Weather "The conditions and processes occurring in space which have the potential to affect the near Earth environment. Space Weather processes can include changes in the interplanetary magnetic field, coronal mass ejections from the Sun and disturbances in Earth's magnetic field. The effects of space weather can range from damage to satellites to disruption of power grids on Earth".

Heliobiology The effect of solar activity in human health 1.Photic solar effects 2.Non-photic solar effects

Previous Works 604 heart attack incidents from the cardiological department of KAT hospital in Athens (18/5/1992 until 1/6/1995) Patients with cardiological problems from the emergency department of two general hospitals: Lamia and Veria for selected months of the solar cycle 23 (1997 – 2007).

Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) The pathophysiological mechanism is formed by the under perfusion of myocardial, due to important minimization of the blood flow in the coronary arteries, resulting in the partial or fully necrosis of myocardium. The classification of patients is based on the morphology of the electrocardiogram in two categories: 1.Patients with acute chest pain and persistent (> 20 min) ST--segment elevation. This is termed ST elevation ACS (STE--ACS) and generally reflects an acute total coronary occlusion which, mostly, develop a ST elevation MI (STEMI). 2.Patients with acute chest pain but without persistent ST-segment elevation. This is dubbed non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE--ACS) and the diagnosis is based on the measurement of troponine enzyme. Also, a NSTEMI event can be caused by dynamic obstruction (eg.Vasospasm) and extrinsic factors leading to poor coronary perfusion (eg.hypotension, hypervolaemia or hypoxia). NSTEMI represents the majority of ACS.

Data Selection OMNIWEB: For the number of sunspots (Rz), the solar wind speed (V SW ) and the geomagnetic index DST, AE and Kp. NGDC GOES: For the daily number of solar flares by intensity class (intense solar flares of X and M class, hence forward X - M and weak flares of B and C class, henceforward B - C). SOHO/LASCO: For the daily number of CMEs (including the highly geoeffective Full and Partial Halo (width >200 degrees) hence P-H CMEs). There are two data gaps in this database in 25/6/ /10/1998 and 1/1/1999-4/2/1999. The patient records of the 2nd Cardiologic Department of the General Hospital of (Piraeus) 'St. Panteleimon', Greece: For the daily number of ACS cases, STE - ACS and NSTE - ACS (hence ST and NST respectively)

Analysis Method Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient Morlet Wavelet Analysis

Figure 1. Monthly number of ACS{NST (a) and ST (b), sunspots (c), flares (d), X – M flares (e), B flares (f), CMEs (g), P-H CMEs (h) and B - C flares (j). The grey curves represent Savitzky - Golay smoothing with a window of 12 points. Katsavrias et al, 2012 Flares (185) August 2001 and (217) January 2005 X-M flares (37) July 2000, September 2001 and (36) August 2002 CMEs (177) August 2002 (161) April 2007 P-H CMEs (89) September 2002, (91) June 2000 and (92) March 2001 NST (72) October 2002

Figure 2. Correlation coefficients with 12 months' time lag between smoothed monthly values of: NST cases and CMEs (a), NST cases and X- M flares (b), ST cases and B flares (c). Correlation coefficients with 18 months' time lag between smoothed monthly values of: NST cases and CMEs (d), NST cases and X- M flares (e), ST cases and B flares (f). The dash ellipse represents the confidence level which is above 99%. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Based on the discussion of the previous section, we focus on characteristics periods of the solar cycle 23 as marked by peaks in active phenomena. We proceed therefore to analyze in more detail three intervals of interest as follows: 1.The August--September 2002 peak: In this period appear the number of CMEs maximum, the number of P-H CMEs and the number of X-M flare peaks. Shortly after, in October 2002 the global maximum of NST cases (72) is recorded; a little later in November 2002 an ST monthly peak (32) is recorded. This was deemed significant as only 6 times after 2002 ST exceeds The Active Period October--December 2003: The most intense GMS of cycle 23 (- 220~nT) was recorded in October 30, 2003, within a period of extremely high helio- geomagnetic activity (there were Solar Energetic Particle events and three Ground Level Enhancements of Cosmic Rays in October 28 and 29 and in November 2, 2003) at the beginning of the descending phase of the solar cycle. 3.The year 2005: Although it was near the solar minimum, the quiet interval was interrupted by a period of extreme helio-geomagnetic activity in January 2005 with the maximum GLEs (Ground Level Enhancements of Cosmic Rays) of the past decades and a period of increased geomagnetic activity in April--September. This succession of intense, medium and small activity presents a unique opportunity of comparative study of the impact of this activity on ACS.

Figure 3. Daily number of DST index, solar wind speed (VSW) and ACS (NST and ST) cases during the period August 2002-February The grey curve represents the smoothed values (Savitzky- Golay smoothing with a window of 7 days). The ACS cases come from the database of General Hospital of the town of Nicaea (Piraeus) 'St. Panteleimon'. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 4. Daily distribution of DST and date labels of increased of NST ( 5) and ST (4) cases in 1/8/ /2/2003. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 5. Daily number of DST index, solar wind speed (VSW) and ACS (NST and ST) cases during the period October-December The grey curve represents the smoothed values (Savitzky- Golay smoothing with a window of 7 days). The ACS cases come from the database of General Hospital of the town of Nicaea (Piraeus) 'St. Panteleimon'. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 6. Daily distribution of DST and date labels of increased of NST ( 5) and ST (4) cases in 1/10/ /12/2003. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 7. Daily number of DST index, solar wind speed (VSW) and ACS (NST and ST) cases during the year The grey curve represents the smoothed values (Savitzky-Golay smoothing with a window of 7 days). The ACS cases come from the database of General Hospital of the town of Nicaea (Piraeus) 'St. Panteleimon'. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 8. Daily distribution of DST and date labels of increased of NST ( 5) and ST (4) cases in 1/1/ /3/2005. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 9. Daily distribution of DST and date labels of increased of NST ( 5) and ST (4) cases in 1/4/ /7/2005. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 10. Daily distribution of DST and date labels of increased of NST ( 5) and ST (4) cases in 1/8/ /12/2005. Katsavrias et al, 2012

Figure 11. Daily distribution, wavelet power spectrum and global wavelet spectrum of smoothed ACS (upper panel), NST (middle panel) and ST cases (bottom panel).

Figure 12. Daily distribution, wavelet power spectrum and global wavelet spectrum of CMEs (upper panel) and P-H CMEs (bottom panel).

Figure 13. Daily distribution, wavelet power spectrum and global wavelet spectrum of Flares (upper panel), X-M Flares (middle panel) and B Flares (bottom panel).

Figure 14. Daily distribution, wavelet power spectrum and global wavelet spectrum of DST Index (upper panel), Kp Index (middle panel) and AE Index (bottom panel).

Table 1. Correlation coefficients between global wavelet spectrum of Helio-geomagnetic parameters and ASC cases.NSTSTVsw0.39 ± ± Kp0.63 ± ± AE0.74 ± ± DST0.76 ± ± CME 0.93 ± ± P-H CME 0.93 ± ± Flares0.60 ± ± B Flares 0.83 ± ± 0.00 C Flares 0.58 ± ± BC Flares 0.64 ± ± X-M Flares 0.51 ± ±

Conclusions The calculated correlation coefficient using smoothed monthly values when the ACS time - series was lagging by 12 months behind the Helio - geomagnetic activity are: ± 0.00 between CME and NST, ± between NST - intense flares (X and M) and ± between ST--faint flares (B type). For the three periods of interest examined, we have studied the phase (pre - phase, main, recovery) of the storm that coincides with increased ACS cases.: 1.60% of increased ACS cases coincide with the storm recovery phase; the probability rises to 75% for the NST cases. 2.Only 3 dates (4.5%) with increased ACS cases took place at the main phase 3.6 dates (9% of the increased cases) took place at the pre-phase of the storms 4.We note a significant number of increased ACS cases (15%) in periods of high solar wind speed (>600Km/s) without geomagnetic storms.

Thank you for your attention