IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Imperviousness values were assigned to each land use based on the literature. An average was calculated from a range of values for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
Advertisements

Storm Drain Medallion Mini-Grant Program. Storm Drains Storm drains are the entrance to the drain system that transports excess water from streets, parking.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Urban Rivers and Upper Bay Presented by: Jennifer Cragan Environmental Scientist.
The Effects of Different Resolution DEMs in Determining Overland Flow Regimes Stacy L. Hutchinson 1, J.M. Shawn Hutchinson 2, Ik-Jae Kim 1, and Philip.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.
Investigation of Seasonal Hydrology and Variable Source Areas within Regions of Ontario Ramesh Rudra (R.P. Rudra, B. Gharabaghi, S, Gregori, W.T. Dickinson)
1 Storm Water Management: Using GIS to Direct Non-Point Source Pollution Mitigation Efforts in the Eagleville Brook Watershed Jason Parent
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
Leila Talebi, Anika Kuczynski, Andrew Graettinger, and Robert Pitt
Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Modeling Water Quality. Special reference of this work to….
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
N ON- P OINT S OURCE P OLLUTION Analysis and Prediction in ArcView David Munn Texas A&M University/Dept. of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of.
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3
1 Quantitative Assessment of the Accuracy of Spatial Estimation of Impervious Cover Anna Chabaeva Daniel Civco James Hurd Jason Parent Department of Natural.
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling Analysis and Prediction David Munn.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
A Water Quality Loading Model for Tillamook Bay Patrice A. Melancon Thanks to: Dr. David Maidment Dr. Michael Barrett Dr. Francisco Olivera Dr. Maidment’s.
Why calculate slope and Aspect? Study the flow of water Identify the habitats of plants Identify potential sites for urban growth Drainage patterns on.
Community-wide urban stormwater planning utilizing LiDAR, the WinSLAMM model and GIS Dan Murphy Rebecca Gronewold UNI GeoTREE Center April 4, 2013.
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
Bernie Engel Purdue University. Low-Impact Development (LID) An approach to land development to mimic the pre-development site hydrology to: 1)Reduce.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
*Demonstration of pollutant composition of ‘average’ stormwater PollutantAcute CriteriaStormwater* Copper (ppb)3.6 to 125 to 150 Lead (ppb)14 to 6520 to.
Katie Teague County Extension Agent- Agriculture/Water Quality.
STREAM STEWARDS. CONTINUATION OF HIJACKED POWERPOINT.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
Nonpoint Source Pollution u Some basic principles u Example study of total pollution loads in the Corpus Christi Bay System –rainfall-runoff relationship.
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Bay Area Hydrology Model Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Urban Storm Drain Design: Rainfall-Runoff relations.
How Does Sprawl Affect Water Quality Eric Hammerling, Executive Director Farmington River Watershed Association.
Presented by George Doubleday 1. What is The Woodlands Purpose of this Research Build and Calibrate Vflo TM model for The Woodlands Compare storms with.
al-weather-gang/wp/2014/10/28/hawaii- lava-flow-advances-now-less-than-100- yards-from-nearest-home-in- pahoa/?hpid=z3http://
Watershed delineation and data preparation for groundwater modeling using GIS in the Savannah River Site GIS term project presentation November 25, 2003.
Created by The North Carolina School of Science and Math.The North Carolina School of Science and Math Copyright North Carolina Department of Public.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Stormwater/ NPDES Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Stormwater Water that runs off impervious surfaces into a surface water. And now...a message from your goldfish!And.
Institute of Water Research L-THIA LID Overview July 10, L-THIA LID Component Bernie Engel, Larry Theller Y.S. Park, T. Wright.
Flash Flood A rapid and extreme flow of high water into a normally dry area, or a rapid water level rise in a stream or creek above a predetermined flood.
State Board Modeling Needs and Interests Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Total Loads and Water Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay System Presented by: Ann Quenzer and Dr. David Maidment Special Thanks: Corpus Christi Bay National.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Stormwater and Low-Impact Development in San Diego, CA Mitchel J. Bartolo November 24, 2015 Source: City of San Diego.
Prepared By: Amaliyar Kamleshkumar ( ) Rathod Nikunj ( ) Parmar mukesh ( ) Patel Raj ( ) Ode Kiran ( )
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
The Town of Fort Myers Beach Stormwater Utility: Frequently Asked Questions Prepared by Tetra Tech September 2015.
Viewshed Analysis A viewshed refers to the portion of the land surface that is visible from one or more viewpoints. The process for deriving viewsheds.
Stormwater and our Local Watersheds Green Night in Roselle May 7, 2009.
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
Methods for Mapping Impervious Surfaces
Raster/Map Algebra/Hydrology
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Nonpoint Source Pollution
Thornton Creek Begins at North Seattle: Managing Stormwater Runoff
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

IMPERVIOUS SURFACES Imperviousness values were assigned to each land use based on the literature. An average was calculated from a range of values for each land use classification. Imperviousness ranged from 0.1 to 0.85 (low to high imperviousness, respectively). UC BERKELEY NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION STUDY INTRODUCTION Strawberry Creek is composed of two major branches, the North and South Forks, which flow through the UC Berkeley campus and on to San Francisco Bay. Stormwater runoff (the major contributor to non-point source [NPS] pollution) from the entire watershed is routed directly into Strawberry Creek, causing significant degradation of water quality. Common constituents in urban runoff include suspended solids, bacteria, heavy metals, oxygen-demanding substances, nutrients, oil and grease. These constituents increase chemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, turbidity, organic nitrogen, phosphorus, total and fecal coliform bacteria, as well as trace metals, in Strawberry Creek. Land use has an important influence on the amount and quality of runoff. The upper Strawberry Creek watershed is approximately 25% impervious. Impervious surfaces associated with urban environments prevent water from infiltrating into the soil; rainfall events quickly generate runoff frequently containing pollutants that wash directly into creeks. UC Berkeley seeks to more accurately model the flow of water and pollutants in the upper Strawberry Creek watershed above the Oxford Street culvert. This model satisfies this need and serves as a tool for campus planning and stormwater mitigation efforts. MODEL DEVELOPMENT We chose to model NPS pollution entirely within a GIS for added flexibility, efficiency, and useful visualization capabilities. Our basic approach involved the characterization of: HYDROLOGY USGS digital line graph hypsography data Digitally-generated stream network Hydrology was modeled solely as a function of hypsography, since available storm drain data were incomplete. USGS digital line graph hypsography data were converted into a line coverage and then into a point coverage. This point coverage was used to create a TIN, which was then converted into a grid with 30-foot cells. Arc/Info-Grid flow direction and flow accumulation commands were used on the resulting grid. The Arc/Info-Grid flow direction function creates a grid of values that represent the direction water would flow from each cell to its steepest downslope neighbor, with eight possible directions. Output cells from the flow accumulation function represent accumulation of all upslope cells and may be used to identify stream channels. USING GIS TO RELATE LAND USE TO STORMWATER RUNOFF IN THE CAMPUS PLANNING PROCESS GROUP: GEOFF BURCH ABBY HOATS JEFFREY KING MAUREEN MASONCLIENT: KATHERINE MORTIMER, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE CENTER, UC BERKELEY LA221: QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING | SPRING 2002 DEPARTMENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING | COLLEGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN | UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY LAND USE Land-use shapefiles were obtained from our client. The major shapefiles displayed roads, vegetated areas, buildings, and parking lots. All shapefiles were projected into Stateplane NAD 1983 California Zone III (feet), then clipped in ArcMap’s Geoprocessing Wizard based on the watershed boundary. Strawberry Creek Watershed – Strawberry Creek:blue City streets: cyan. The central campus is located at the east end of the watershed. N Pollutant Flow Loading [classified manually to display percentiles of the maximum: % (blue), % % (light blue), 0.03% - 0.1% (green), 0.1% - 0.2% (yellow), 0.2% - 3% (orange), 3% - 100% (red)]. This view displays areas where both flow and pollutant loading are high. The thresholding is an ordinal ranking, in which the variability is illustrated most clearly. Phosphorus loading concentrations from each grid cell range from 0.15 mg/L for roofs to 2.67 mg/L for lawns. Zinc loading concentrations range from 59 mg/L for lawns to mg/L for streets. Cadmium loading concentrations range from 0 mg/L for roofs and lawns to 1.1 mg/L for streets. Copper concentrations range from 13 mg/L for lawns to 51 mg/L for streets. The maximum annual pollutant loading values obtained in the watershed follow: phosphorus, 68 g/yr; zinc, 15,000 g/yr; cadmium, 57 g/yr; copper, 2,700 g/yr. Each pollutant loading grid was multiplied by the flow accumulation grid in order to determine areas where there is both high pollutant loading and high stream flow. These pollutant flow loading maps can be used to determine the relative contributions of existing land uses to NPS pollution and to evaluate where NPS pollution “hotspots” exist. The results from this model may be used to determine the location of water sampling stations for effective monitoring of NPS pollution. By repeatedly executing the model with modified input, the relationship between developed land and polluted runoff becomes clear. Though many areas of the campus have a permanent land use (i.e., buildings), other areas can be built in ways that will influence stormwater runoff quality. This model allows a campus planner to investigate different options and mitigation efforts such as aquatic buffers, filters, open channels and swales so that educated decisions about future land use can be made. If further refinement of our model is desired, several issues should be addressed. Storm drains and other non-natural routing of runoff should be included in the digital flow network. A more sophisticated algorithm for predicting the direction and accumulation of flow may be necessary. Future studies should seek greater resolution in several model components, including variability of rainfall over the watershed, characterization of land use, and hypsography. Weighted averaging of imperviousness and pollutant loading values within the grid cells should be performed. Finally, the model should be made more interactive to facilitate its use in campus planning applications. RESULTS The Simple Method calculates L, pollutant loading (g/yr) where  1 and  2 are conversion factors, P is average annual precipitation (in/yr), C is imperviousness, K is pollutant loading (mg/L), and A is grid cell area (ft 2 ). All land use shapefiles were unioned so that C and K values were retained for each polygon. The Arc/Info-Grid shapegrid function was implemented to generate five 30-foot cell grids (one for C value and one for each of the K values). The GRID module was again used to perform the algebraic calculations of the Simple Method for determining annual pollutant loading for each grid cell and for each pollutant. CALCULATIONS L =  1.  2. P. C. K. A POLLUTANT LOADING VALUES Four pollutants were modeled in this study: cadmium, copper, phosphorus, and zinc. These pollutants were chosen based on their prevalence in urban runoff and the information available in the literature about their loading levels from different land uses. Phosphorus Flow Loading Copper Flow Loading Zinc Flow Loading Cadmium Flow Loading