The World of GIS Hydro ‘98 David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin Presented by:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of DRAIN-WARMF Model to Simulate Water Flow & Nitrogen Transport From an Agricultural Watershed: “ Subsurface Flow Component” Shadi Dayyani.
Advertisements

Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Perform raster based network delineation from digital elevation models Perform raster based.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Floodplain Mapping Using AV-RAS Esteban Azagra and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources David R
Hydrologic Analysis Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
By Jennifer VerWest. Differences between Flat and Average/Steep Terrain Flat Terrain Steep/Average Terrain.
DEM-Based Stream and Watershed Delineation
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
GIS Modeling Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin Interdisciplinary aquatic modeling workshop, July 21, 2005.
CRWR-PrePro: A System of GIS Tools for HEC-HMS Modeling Support
Geographic Information Systems : Data Types, Sources and the ArcView Program.
Flood Analysis of Scioto River Using HEC-RAS/GIS Converting HEC-2 Data for HEC-RAS /ArcView GIS Analysis and Inundation Mapping (A pilot using Big Darby.
1 CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Session #1 (some material from Dr. David Maidment, University of Texas) January 18, 2006 Learning Objectives:
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
Opportunities for Development of a Global Water Information System David R. Maidment, University of Texas at Austin Definition of an information system.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Interface data models Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 GIS Geo Database Arc Hydro data model Geographically Integrated Hydrologic Modeling Systems.
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
DEM’s, Watershed and Stream Network Delineation DEM Data Sources Study Area in West Austin with a USGS 30m DEM from a 1:24,000 scale map Eight direction.
Nonpoint Source Pollution u Some basic principles u Example study of total pollution loads in the Corpus Christi Bay System –rainfall-runoff relationship.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
by David M. Beekman and Vito A. Cimino
CRWR-FloodMap ArcView Digital Elevation Model HEC-HMS Flood discharge HEC-RAS Water surface profiles ArcView Flood plain maps CRWR-PreProAvRAS Digital.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
Arc Hydro and Modeling Intrinsic Modeling – within a particular application eg Excel, ArcGIS Dynamic Linked Library – tightly coupled package of functions.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
Stream and Watershed Delineation from DEM’s David Maidment, Ph.D. and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas.
Introduction to GIS. What is GIS? Geographic Information System Geographic implies of or pertaining to the surface of the earth Information implies knowledge.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
The World of GIS Hydro ‘98 David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin Presented by:
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
Land and Water Resource Information Systems By David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Presented at UN.
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
LIDAR Flood mapping for Brownsville and Matamoros Gueudet Pierre GIS in Water Resources University of Texas Austin Fall 2002.
CRWR-PrePro Stream and Watershed Delineation Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Introduction to GIS David R. Maidment
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics
National Hydro Data Programs
Arc Hydro for EPA Basins
Approaches to Continental Scale River Flow Routing
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Nonpoint Source Pollution
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

The World of GIS Hydro ‘98 David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin Presented by:

GISHydrologic Modeling Environmental descriptionProcess representation Data Input Model Results Synthesis of GIS and Modeling

Linking Data and Models Integrated Spatial Database GIS Hydro ‘98 Models Watershed Characterization Runoff & Routing Hydraulics Water Quality Atmosphere & Soil Water

Traditional approach Spatial Hydrology Process Representation Environmental Description Process-based Modeling Map-based Modeling Hydrologic Modeling

Users Hydrologic simulation Time series data Spatial hydrologic model Spatial data Real World Spatial Hydrologic Modeling Concept

t t t I Q t  Continuous time hourly, daily  Steady state mean annual  Seasonal monthly  Single event Dealing with Time Variation

Two tasks: I. Environmental description using a map II. Process representation using equations Modeling Procedure

Environmental description Process representation  1. Study design  2. Terrain analysis  3. Land surface description  4. Subsurface description  5. Hydrologic data representation  6. Soil water balance  7. Water flow  8. Constituent transport  9. Impact of water utilization  10. Presentation of results Ten Step Procedure for Modeling

 Objectives of the study?  Range and subdivision of the spatial domain?  Duration and subdivision of the time horizon?  Variables to be computed? Step 1. Study Design

Computational effort ~ LMN LMN < 10,000,000 for execution within ArcView Number of: Spatial units = L Variables computed = M Time intervals = N Time Variables Space N M L Space, Time, and Process Variables

Mean annual flow and transport on a raster grid Time Variables Space N=1 M L Time-Averaged Modeling

Land Characterization (Land use, Soils, Climate, Terrain) Water Characterization (water yield, flooding, groundwater, pollution, sediment) Relationships between land type and water characteristics Land and Water Interaction

Land Characterization (Land use, Soils, Climate, Terrain) Non Point Source Pollution (mean annual flows and pollutant loads) Adapt Water to the Land System Water Characterization (water yield, flooding, pollution, sediment)

Land Characterization (Land use, Soils, Climate, Terrain) Water Characterization (water yield, flooding, pollution, sediment) CRWR-PrePro (GIS Preprocessor for HEC-HMS flood hydrograph simulation) Adapt Land to the Water System

CRWR-PrePro: HMS Preprocessor Geographic DataSchematic Diagram Increasing Scale  Increasing Complexity

Digital Elevation Model (DEM)

 Vector representation as points, lines and areas  Raster representation on a grid of DEM cells Vector Raster OutletStreamWatershed Raster-Vector Equivalence

+ =  Take a mapped stream network and a DEM  Make a grid of the streams  Raise the off-stream DEM cells by an arbitrary elevation increment  Produces "burned in" DEM streams = mapped streams “Burning In” the Streams

 Begin with an elevation grid  Flow in direction of steepest descent Eight-Direction Pour Point Model

ElevationFlow direction grid Flow Direction Grid

Flow Direction u Water flows to one of its neighbor cells according to the direction of the steepest descent. u Flow direction takes one out of eight possible values.

Flow direction grid Implied network between cell centers Grid Network

Number of upstream cells Classification of flow accumulation Number of cells > 6 = stream 0 cells = watershed boundary Flow Accumulation Grid

Flow Accumulation u Flow accumulation is an indirect way of measuring drainage areas (in units of grid cells).

Types of Outlets and Nodes Stream junction node Stream headwater node System outlet node User-defined node Sub-basin Stream

Stream Segmentation u Stream segments (links) are the sections of a stream channel connecting two successive junctions, a junction and an outlet, or a junction and the drainage divide.

Watershed Delineation u The drainage area of each stream segment is delineated.

 What DEM cell size to use?  Cell size = Region area / 1,000,000  What size watershed to delineate?  Watershed > 1000 cells Thousand-Million Rule

Cell Size Watershed Area (km 2 ) Typical Application 1” (~ 30 m) 3” (~ 100 m) 15” (~ 500 m) 30” (~ 1 km) 3’ (~ 5 km) 5’ (~ 10km) , ,000 Urban watersheds Rural watersheds River basins, States Nations Continental Global Application of Digital Elevation Models

Raster to Vector Conversion u Streams and watersheds are converted from raster to vector format.

Dissolving Spurious Polygons u Cells connected to the main watershed polygon through a corner are defined as a separate polygon (spurious polygon). u These polygons are dissolved into the main polygon.

Watershed Parameters Flow length upstream and downstream Average Curve Number Slope and length of the longest flow-path Identification of the longest flow-path Lag-time SCS Unit Hydrograph

 distance downstream to outlet Flow-Length Function in ArcView  distance to upstream divide

Flow Length Downstream to the Watershed Outlet

Flow Length Upstream to the Watershed Divide

Longest Flow-Path Total flow length = upstream length + downstream length

V 21 V 11 V 41 V 31 V 61 V 51 V 32 V 12 V 22 V 42 V 52 V 62 V 23 V 13 V 33 V 53 V 43 V 24 V 16 V 15 V 14 V 63 V 34 V 44 V 54 V 64 V 25 V 35 V 45 V 55 V 65 V 26 V 36 V 46 V 56 V 66 Velocity magnitudeVelocity direction V = aS b S = slope a,b = land cover coefficients Velocity Field

 time to outlet (weighted flow length) Time = Distance x 1 Velocity Flow Time Computation

Isolation of a Sub-System

Connection to HEC-HMS HMS SchematicParameter Transfer HMS Basin File Ferdi’s code

Upper Mississippi Flood Study

Streams and Subwatersheds 162 subwatersheds each with a USGS gage at the outlet defined using 15” (500m) DEM Rivers defined by EPA River Reach File 1 (RF1)

CRWR-Prepro Schematic Network Inlets Mississippi River Missouri River Outlet (Mississippi R. at Thebes, Ill)

HEC-Hydrologic Modeling System HMS Basin file CRWR-PrePro HEC-HMS Model Schematic

Land Characterization (Land use, Soils, Climate, Terrain) Non Point Source Pollution (mean annual flows and pollutant loads) Adapt Water to the Land System Water Characterization (water yield, flooding, pollution, sediment)

Possible Land-Water Transform Coefficients Water Land

Map-Based Surface Water Runoff Runoff, Q (mm/yr) Precipitation, P (mm/yr) Accumulated Runoff (cfs) P Q Runoff Coefficient C = Q/P

Water Quality: Pollution Loading Module DEM Precip. Runoff LandUse EMC Table Concentration Load Accumulated Load Load [Mass/Time] = Runoff [Vol/Time] x Concentration [Mass/Vol]

Expected Mean Concentration Land Use EMC Table derived from USGS water quality monitoring sites

Total Constituent Loads Input for Water Quality Model Water Quality: Land Surface -Water Body Connection Bay Water Quality

Flood Hydraulics u Given the flood discharge (HEC-HMS), what is the water surface elevation (HEC- RAS, River Analysis System) u How to draw flood plain maps? HEC-RAS AVRAS Cross-section mapping

Flood Hydraulics: Stream Geometry Data l Determine cross-section elevations from TIN terrain data l HEC-RAS pre- and post-processing using avRAS (ArcView) or HEC AMLs (Arc/Info) l Visualize floodplain TINs with ArcView’s 3D Analyst extension as flood rises

Hydraulics: RAS Stream Geometry Data l Digital orthophoto serves as a base map upon which to digitize the stream l Avenue scripts create an ArcView cross-section table from the HEC-RAS output text file l Link cross-section table records to cross-section locations on the digitized stream

GIS - River Analysis System (AVRAS) Pre Processor (Avenue) GIS GIS RAS Import RAS 2.0 GIS RAS Export Post Processor (Avenue) GIS Hydraulic Input Dean Djokic & Zichuan Ye (ESRI)

Stream Bed Shape in ArcView Cross-sections

Flood Plain in HEC-RAS

Floodplain in ArcView

Floodplain in ArcView 3-D Analyst

Spatial Hydrology Virtual Campus Courses u ESRI Virtual Campus course on Spatial Hydrology ( u University of Texas GIS in Water Resources online course during Fall 1998 (limited enrollment) (

DHI: Hydraulic & Water Resources Engineering MIKE SHE MIKE BASIN MIKE 11 MOUSE DHI Models Pipe Networks River Basin Networks 1-D River Modeling Hydrologic Modeling Danish Hydraulic Institute

BYU: Surface and Groundwater Flow Integrates digital terrain models with standard runoff models such as HEC-1, TR-20, TR-55. Subsurface Representation and Model Interface for Groundwater Simulation: MODFLOW, MT3D, MODPATH, SEEP2D, and FEMWATER. Two-Dimensional Surface Water Model Interface for RMA2, RMA4, RMA10, HIVEL2D, FLO2DH (FESWMS), ADCIRC, CGWAVE, WSPRO, SED2D- WES, and DAMBRK. Brigham Young University

EPA: Water Quality TOXIROUTE NPSMQUAL2E US Environmental Protection Agency ArcView Preprocessor for Water Quality Models