Paying for TMDL Compliance – Different Approaches From Around Southern California Southern California Water Dialogue Group February 28, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Paul Cook Irvine Ranch Water District General Manager February 21, 2013 Shared Services: Baker Water Treatment Plant.
Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on Budget-based Water Rate Structures 1 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern.
Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Management of New York City’s Watershed Michael A. Principe, Ph.D. Deputy Commissioner New York City Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water.
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
District of Columbia Stormwater Fees October 27, 2008 Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington Brendan Shane DDOE Office of.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Water Conservation in the San Diego Region Bill Jacoby San Diego County Water Authority North Bay Water Association April 2, 2004.
Lee County Government Division of Natural Resources TMDL/BMAP Update TMDL/BMAP Update November 30, 2010 Roland Ottolini, Director Lee County Division of.
Legal Aspects/Prop 218 Joan Arneson August 13, 2008.
1 BILLING ADJUSTMENTS Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2012.
Expedited Projects + Innovative Teamwork = Measurable Improvements to the Health of Lake Okeechobee and the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee Estuaries.
Introduction to TMDLs for Nutrients Presented by: Dr. Scott Emery January 15, 2009.
Center for Watershed Protection Illicit Sewage Discharges in the Chesapeake Bay 2012 Chesapeake Bay Stormwater Retreat Lori Lilly Watershed Ecologist/Planner.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
Catherine Elvert City of Palo Alto Utilities Communications Manager.
Tom Singleton Associate VP, Director, Integrated Water Resources an Atkins company Linking TMDLs & Environmental Restoration.
CONSERVATION Three Retail Views Southern California Water Dialog July 23, 2008 Peer Swan.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee
Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection Mary Ann Dickinson Executive Director California Urban Water Conservation Council.
Los Angeles County Flood Control District Water Quality Funding Initiative Southern California Water Dialogue June 22, 2011.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Cypress Restoration of the Bayou Bienvenue Central Wetland Unit Sarah K. Mack Environmental Scientist.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Governor’s Strategic Growth Plan Flood Protection and Clean, Safe, Reliable Water Supply Bond and Financing Acts of 2006 and 2010 Southern California Water.
Making the Connection Between Water and Land Use Judy Corbett, Executive Director Local Government Commission Smart Growth gets Water-wise.
Santa Margarita Region MS4 Permit – Pyrethroids Evaluation Jason E. Uhley, P.E. Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District.
Workshop on the draft General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water from Small MS4s Fresno August 6, 2002 Redding August 8, 2002 San Luis Obispo August.
Rich Haller, P.E. Program Manager, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) April 2, 2004 Brine Disposal Strategies in Inland Southern California.
IMLA New England Regional Land Use Seminar June 21, 2012 Work Session 2. Storm Water Management James N. Katsiaficas, Esq. P.O. BOX 426 PORTLAND, MAINE.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Orange County Landscaping and Water Conservation Ordinance Presented to: Orange County Board of County Commissioners June 23, 2009.
N.P.D.E.S. PHASE II Virginia Beach. Local Condition AREA 312 SQUARE MILES CHESAPEAKE BAY 98 SQUARE MILES WATERSHED SOUTHERN 209 SQUARE MILES WATERSHED.
Irvine Ranch Water District Special District Consolidations Presentation to CALAFCo Conference September 6, 2006.
Lake Independence Phosphorus TMDL Critique Stephanie Koerner & Zach Tauer BBE 4535 Fall 2011.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Proposed MMWD Rate Restructure MCOE District Business Officials November 4, 2015.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed The City of Tallahassee’s Efforts to Reduce Stormwater Pollution Hydrogeology Workshop May 12-13,
Bald Eagle Lake Watershed Stormwater Reuse/Phosphorus Reduction Project February 3, 2016 Kyle Axtell Water Resource Specialist & Project Manager Rice Creek.
Available Funding North/South Lahontan Colorado River Basin Sacramento River Mountain Counties Tulare/Kern San Diego Santa Ana Los Angeles Central Coast.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
By Will Holoman. University of North Carolina – Wilmington - B.A. in Environmental Science – Marine Science Emphasis University of Utah - B.S. in Civil.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
© Amec Foster Wheeler Business Analysis for Canal Management Principles, Experience and Key Decision Points.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
The road ahead... Maximizing the benefits of maintenance efforts from a regulatory and fiscal perspective.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Water Use Efficiency Master Plan Elizabeth Lovsted, PE Senior Civil Engineer January 16, 2016.
Water Conservation in the San Joaquin Valley Mary Lou Cotton, C.C.P.
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
STATEWIDE DROUGHT RESPONSE: IMPACT TO SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY
City of Forest Lake MS4 Program
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Drought Planning Through Integrated Rate Design
Director Jerry Werner March 26, 2010
IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 9
Paul D. Jones II, P.E., General Manager August 25, 2016
Mutually Beneficial Partnerships in Groundwater Banking Paul Weghorst Irvine Ranch Water District August 15, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Paying for TMDL Compliance – Different Approaches From Around Southern California Southern California Water Dialogue Group February 28, 2007

Irvine Ranch Water District 1 Outline of Today’s Discussion IRWD’s Approach to Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management at the Watershed Level Unique TMDL Compliance Funding Mechanisms and Strategies Future Opportunities for Water Supply Entities and Cities

Irvine Ranch Water District 2 About Irvine Ranch Water District Formed in 1961 by landowners to supply water for extensive irrigation - population 300 California Water District providing: - Water - Hydroelectric -Wastewater - Recycled water -Resource management -Urban runoff management / control (Modified enabling act in 2000) Current Customer Base - Residential Population 325,000 - Daytime Population estimated 500,000 - Service Connections 93,000 Size of District -179 square miles/114,500 acres -118 square miles in San Diego Creek watershed

Irvine Ranch Water District 3 Approximately coincident with IRWD service area (80% of watershed in IRWD) Primary freshwater source for Newport Bay—EPA “impaired water body” 118 square miles City of Irvine and portions of: –City of Lake Forest –City of Newport Beach –City of Orange –City of Tustin –Unincorporated County 4 primary types of TMDL’s: –Nutrients (nitrogen/phosphorous) –Sediment –Pathogens –Toxics (pesticides, selenium, etc.) TMDL Compliance - San Diego Creek Watershed

Irvine Ranch Water District 4 Relationship Between Water Consumption and Dry Weather Flow Generation Discharge into sensitive receiving waters Dry weather runoff that carries pollutants = Over-irrigation = Example: Urban Runoff in San Diego Creek Implementing a “Cradle to Grave” philosophy Both multiple and single entity approaches

Irvine Ranch Water District 5 *Source: Northwood (Irvine) Residential Runoff Reduction Study, 2003 Urban Runoff Generation – Residential* SFD 5,000 FT Lot 62% 8,000 AF Runoff 10% 1,290 AF ET & I 28% 3,610 AF 1,150,000 Gallons Per Day 12,900 AF/YR Average O.C. Water Agency/Dept 30 agencies/depts.

Irvine Ranch Water District 6 Urban Runoff and TMDL Compliance Partnerships – Where Does IRWD Fit? Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Region 8) County of Orange Principal Permitee Lake Forest City Co-Permitee Newport Beach City Co-Permitee Orange City Co-Permitee Tustin City Co-Permitee Irvine City Co-Permitee Permittee Compliance Mechanisms Education/Training/ Inspections Development/Construction Standards Water Quality Monitoring Local structural BMP’s Runoff management and Source Control (Conservation and demand management) Watershed-wide Treatment BMP’s IRWD’s TMDL Management Strategies

Irvine Ranch Water District 7 Urban Runoff Management and Source Control Strategy #1: Water Conservation and Demand Management TMDL Compliance Strategies

Irvine Ranch Water District 8 Allocation-Based “Conservation” Rate Structure Basic Premise: Allocate water to customers based upon land use- specific indoor uses and landscaping needs Encourage use within allocation through a significantly tiered commodity pricing system Over-use generates “penalty” revenue to fund TMDL Compliance Activities: – Source Control (water conservation programs, incentives and education) – Urban runoff treatment

Irvine Ranch Water District 9 TIER BREAK POINT RATE (% of Allocation) ($/ccf) Low Volume % $0.75 Base % Base rate$0.91 Inefficient % 2x base$1.82 Excessive % 4x base$3.64 Wasteful 201+% 8x base$ % of water needed for indoor/ outdoor uses Typical Residential Fixed Charge = $6.75/month (3/4” meter) Allocation-Based Rate Structure

Irvine Ranch Water District 10 Sample Residential Water Billing - Overuse 8/10/06 9/09/ CCF USAGE - LOW VOLUME DISCOUNT $12.00 USAGE - CONSERVATION BASE RATE $20.93 USAGE - INEFFICIENT $36.40 USAGE - EXCESSIVE $69.18 USAGE - WASTEFUL $29.12 WATER SERVICE CHARGE $6.75 YOUR ALLOCATION FOR THIS BILL 39 CCF BILL CALCULATION BASED ON 0.12 ac. / SFD TO AVOID LATE CHARGE PAY BEFORE 10/07/06 $ Over allocation use pays penalty rates, discourages overuse Commodity Within Allocation$ % Commodity Above Allocation$ %

Irvine Ranch Water District 11 Determining Appropriate Allocations Single Family Detached House (4 occupants) Outdoor Allocations Irrigated area seasonal needs (Eto) Variances Pool Additional occupants Medical needs Others (equestrian, etc.) + +

Irvine Ranch Water District 12 Landscape Allocation Allocation based on landscaped area and real time evapotranspiration –Cool season turf –Irrigation system efficiency - 80% IRWD has three weather stations Central Coastal Foothill

Irvine Ranch Water District 13 Results: Rate Structure Reduces Water Use Since Rates Adopted in 1991: –Average water use dropped from 3.5 ft./acre To 1.9 ft./acre –Stabilization of dry weather runoff –Changes in plant material selection - more “California Friendly” landscaping From 1992 to 2000: –Irrigated area doubled –Water use increased by 3%

Irvine Ranch Water District 14 Water Conservation – Landscape Programs Landscape Water Management Report Card “Fall Campaign” (Postcard reminders) Residential Education / Workshops Protector del Agua Landscape Certification Program New Programs Artificial Turf Replacement Weather Based Irrigation Controllers “California Friendly” landscaping

Irvine Ranch Water District 15 IRWD Residential and Landscape Water Usage Water Conservation Programs

Irvine Ranch Water District 16 Per Capita Water Consumption Comparison Source: California Urban Water Conservation Council, 2002

Irvine Ranch Water District 17 Urban Runoff Management and Source Control Strategy #2 Watershed-wide Structural BMP’s – the Natural Treatment System TMDL Compliance Strategies

Irvine Ranch Water District 18 San Joaquin Marsh 320 ac. owned and managed by IRWD 68 ac. of treatment ponds 3.5 million gallons per day Removes about 70% of nitrogen from San Diego Creek (75,000 pounds per year) Removal of 50,000 tons of sediment and 10,000 pounds of phosphorus per year from desilting basins Newport Harbor Upper Newport Bay IRWD Plant (MWRP) San Diego Creek UC Natural Reserve Restored wetlands/ uplands San Joaquin Marsh N Pacific Ocean Carlson Marsh Natural Treatment System Ponds Urban Runoff Treatment Systems – Treatment Wetlands

Irvine Ranch Water District 19 Natural Treatment System (NTS) Expands wetlands treatment watershed-wide 71 sites considered; 31 selected Completed 4 sites, designed 10 sites, 3 sites construction award 1/2006 State/federal grant funds authorized (25%) Integral with city runoff management programs Multiple governmental, private, regulatory and community/envirnomental entity effort Urban Runoff Treatment Systems

Irvine Ranch Water District 20 Complex Multiple Entity Effort - NTS Inter-agency Agreements for Operating, Maintenance, Facility Use Watershed Cities -- Irvine, Lake Forest, Newport Beach, Orange, Tustin County of Orange Regulation, Permitting, MS4 Permit Authorization Regional Water Quality Control Board CDFG, USFWS, Corps, Supplemental Funding EPA, USBR, State Water Resources, Coastal Conservancy Critical Reviewers and Stakeholders Residents Environmental Community Representatives Development Standards, R/W, Construction Landowners and developers

Irvine Ranch Water District 21 Future Opportunities for Water Supply Entities and Cities Water Purveyor recognition of the water supply and environmental management interrelationship –Embrace a “Cradle to Grave” management and problem solving philosophy Clarification of ability to participate in TMDL compliance activities through legislation: –Add to list of services –Incentive based participation (i.e. adopt conservation rate structure, can use revenue for stormwater compliance programs)

Irvine Ranch Water District 22 Questions? Paul D. Jones II General Manager Irvine Ranch Water District