1 Comments On The Proposed CARB Alternative Fuel Specifications Steven Sokolsky Bevilacqua-Knight, Inc. * * BKI’s participation is funded by Occidental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utility and the NGV Market Phil Baker Director, Commercial & Industrial Markets Southern California Gas Company October 9, 2006.
Advertisements

Alternative Fuels and Systems for Refuse Trucks Richard Parish National Renewable Energy Laboratory Municipal Waste Management Association March 23, 2005.
Propane Diesel Injection  An introduction overview of the Powershot Propane Diesel Injection system (PDI) for use in medium and heavy duty vehicles.
: Conventional natural gas is clean, low carbon, affordable, and available 2050: Renewable biogas from landfills, animal waste and wastewater.
Building lifetime relationships with our clients and employees. Organic Waste Fuels Vehicle Fleet in Sacramento Omni Resort June
Public Interest Natural Gas Air Quality Research Program Marla Mueller Technical Lead May 12, 2005.
Alternative Fuels for Transit Buses Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis Marshall Miller UC Davis June 3, 2008.
Beyond Power Generation Transportation Fuel 1 Copyright TBD America, Inc. All rights reserved Barry Stevens, Ph.D. President TBD America, a Technology.
DEP Mobile Source Control Section Martin Costello.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Retrofit Emission Controls for On-Road Diesel Engines OCA Air Quality Summit Fresno, CA October 27, 2005 Manufacturers of Emission Controls Association.
Thursday 14th February 2013 Eduardo González, Head of Maintenance Department Public Bus Company of San Sebastián DBUS FLEET RUNNING ON BIODIESEL.
1 CARB Public Consultation Meeting Compressed Natural Gas Specifications August 3, 2005 WSPA/CIPA Presentation Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA)
Current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Renewable Fuels Activities September 2006.
1 The Impact of Using LNG-Derived Natural Gas in the South Coast Air Basin January 2006.
Natural Gas Vehicles (NGVs) in Thailand By Paweenuch Chainuwat
Nathan Sacks Georgia Institute of Technology July 31, 2013 Biodiesel School Buses How biodiesel can help local school districts save money, improve health,
Cleanenergyfuels.com 1 Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport Natural Gas Vehicles “America’s Best Kept Secret” AGTA Denver, Colorado James N. Harger September 26,
Natural Gas Vehicles in Southern California Southern California Gas Company Urban Water Institute Spring Water Conference February 21, 2013.
Sohail Ghanchi Energy Technology and Policy The University of Texas at Austin.
Creating an Environmentally Friendly Bus Service Steve Newsome EMTA General Meeting, Oslo.
> Natural Gas Composition for NGVs William E. Liss Gas Technology Institute.
Public Transit Department Bus and Fuel Procurement Strategy AzTA/ADOT Transit Conference April 2013.
Green Fleet Workshop Responsible Purchasing Guide for Light-Duty Fleet Vehicles Presented by the Responsible Purchasing Network March 29, 2007.
Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #4 July 30, 2008 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.
Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts of Ethanol in Thailand
TECHNICAL ISSUES OF INCREASED ETHANOL BLENDS Dr. Bruce Jones Director Minnesota Center for Automotive Research (MnCAR) Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Fuel Your Natural Gas Vehicle in the Los Angeles Basin Jenneille Hsu March 14, 2011.
1 Alternative Fuel School Buses: A View for Local Governments.
Workshop to Discuss Proposed Amendments to Motor Vehicle CNG Fuel Specifications February 2002 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
1 UTA & Alternative Fuel Vehicles GOVERNOR’S ENERGY DEVELOPMENT SUMMIT JUNE 2014.
California Experience in Converting Vehicles to Alternative Fuels New Delhi, India May 2001 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Air Resources Board.
11/08/01 1 SunLine’s Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Program Presented to the California Transportation Commission June 03.
Economic Analysis Framework Test Application Draft Results Economic Analysis Forum BBC Research & Consulting December 16, 2004.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Impacts.
Public Workshop to Discuss the Need for Amendments to the Alternative Fuels Regulations Regarding Motor Vehicle LPG & CNG June 21, 2000 California Environmental.
1 CARB Fuel Spec June 21, 2000 Michael Eaves NGV Program Manager Southern California Gas Company.
Shades of Green Update J.P. Blackford The George Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science DEED Intern.
1 Comments on the CARB Draft Proposed Concept to Revise Motor Vehicle CNG Specifications August 3, 2005 Edwin Harte LEV Program Manager SDG&E/SoCalGas.
Diesel Risk Reduction Plan California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
1 Potential User Benefits and Costs of Rising Fuel Prices in the Puget Sound Region TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 By Maren Outwater.
SCAQMD Air Quality Permitting for Emerging Technologies Jay Chen, P.E. South Coast Air Quality Management District November 4, 2009 Southern California.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Public Transit Bus Fleet Rule and Emission Standards for New Urban Buses California Air.
25/04/2007INGAS Air Quality Improvement and Natural Gas Use in Istanbul Omar ALAGHA,PhD Fatih University, Department of Environmental Engineering,
FINAL1 Inventory, Emissions, and Population July 2, 2003 AIR, Inc.
1 Scripps Inst. of Oceanography University of California at San Diego Oakland, California, October 18, 2013 V. Ramanathan, University of California, San.
© Copyright 2003, California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition0 1 NGV Commercial Fuel Spec CARB Workshop August 3, 2005 Mike Eaves, President.
Public Workshop to Discuss Proposed Amendments to Motor Vehicle LPG Fuel Specifications February 2002 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
Union Pacific Railroad Comments February 23, 2005.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
Proposed Amendments to Heavy-Duty On-Board Diagnostic Requirements August 23, 2012 Heavy-Duty OBD.
Transforming Transit in California October 22, 2015 CalACT Fall Conference and Bus Show Rohnert Park, CA Tony Brasil, Chief Heavy Duty Diesel Implementation.
July 21, Today’s Proposed Action Approve ozone SIP revisions for South Coast and San Joaquin Valley Reasonable Further Progress Transportation.
1 South Coast AQMD Staff Comments on Proposed Regulation for In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicles South Coast Air Quality Management District Agenda Item No.
Fuel Cell and Hybrid Transit Buses Marshall Miller Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Davis.
30th Space Wing Team Vandenberg - HAWKS 1 California Airborne Toxic Control Measures for Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines John Gilliland.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Impacts of Natural Gas Fuel Composition on Tailpipe Emissions and Fuel Economy PGOB /15/00 June 2000.
1 Compressed Natural Gas Specifications for Motor Vehicles August 3, 2005 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board.
Retrofitting Transit Buses to Reduce Air Emissions Kim Perrotta, Air Quality Coordinator, Ontario Public Health Association CUTA Conference 2003.
1 Alternative Fuel School Buses: View for Fleet Managers.
California Air Resources Board Industrial Strategies Division Oil and Gas and GHG Mitigation Branch Proposed Regulation on the Commercialization of Alternative.
A Theoretical Gas Quality Analysis of Natural Gas for Vehicles (NGV) in Thailand Yossapong Laoonual 1,2, Sumrerng Jugjai 2, Somchai Chanchaona 2 1 College.
GERG Gas Sensor Workshop GERG PC Utilisation (GERG PCU) Brussels,
San Joaquin valley clean transportation summit
A Test Application of the WRAP Economic Analysis Framework
May 25, 2018 Sacramento, California
Presentation transcript:

1 Comments On The Proposed CARB Alternative Fuel Specifications Steven Sokolsky Bevilacqua-Knight, Inc. * * BKI’s participation is funded by Occidental of Elk Hills, Inc.

2 Major Points NGV population remains miniscule in terms of total California vehicle inventory - number of “legacy” vehicles < 3,500 statewide, < 2 dozen in SCC & SSJVNGV population remains miniscule in terms of total California vehicle inventory - number of “legacy” vehicles < 3,500 statewide, < 2 dozen in SCC & SSJV Experiences with existing MN-73 & MN-80 exemptions prove compositional specs are no longer necessaryExperiences with existing MN-73 & MN-80 exemptions prove compositional specs are no longer necessary Only vehicles affected by change to MN-spec would be HD transit & school buses, refuse haulers – LD & MD vehicle capable using low MN fuelsOnly vehicles affected by change to MN-spec would be HD transit & school buses, refuse haulers – LD & MD vehicle capable using low MN fuels HD vehicles rarely fuel at more than one station – situation is localizedHD vehicles rarely fuel at more than one station – situation is localized New HD engine technologies allow lower MN fuels, even as low as MN-65New HD engine technologies allow lower MN fuels, even as low as MN-65 Emissions testing indicates air quality is not significantly impacted by higher BTU gasesEmissions testing indicates air quality is not significantly impacted by higher BTU gases

3 California Vehicle Populations Total California vehicle population: Total number of NGVs: Total number of “legacy” vehicles in SCAQMD territory: Total number of “legacy” vehicles in SJV and Coast regions: Legacy vehicles: pre-2002 vehicles needing up to MN-80 fuel due to potential knocking problems 25 million ~25,000 (0.1%) ~3,300 (0.01%) ~35 (0.0001%)

4 Ongoing Experience with Methane Number Exemptions Currently 28 stations receive exemptions from CARB to use MN-based specificationCurrently 28 stations receive exemptions from CARB to use MN-based specification 7 MN-80 with blending (~22 vehicles), 9 MN-80 w/o blending (~950 vehicles – mostly LA MTA buses), 12 MN- 73 w/o blending (~105 vehicles)7 MN-80 with blending (~22 vehicles), 9 MN-80 w/o blending (~950 vehicles – mostly LA MTA buses), 12 MN- 73 w/o blending (~105 vehicles) No major performance problems can be attributed to gas qualityNo major performance problems can be attributed to gas quality

5 CAVTC Test Results: General Observations Fuel economy and PM emissions improve with lower MN fuelsFuel economy and PM emissions improve with lower MN fuels Ranges of NOx & THC, CO and NMHC emissions are mixed and did not correlate strongly to MN numberRanges of NOx & THC, CO and NMHC emissions are mixed and did not correlate strongly to MN number Average CO 2 emissions trended slightly lower with higher MN numberAverage CO 2 emissions trended slightly lower with higher MN number Note: Vehicles were not optimized for performance or emissions on each fuelNote: Vehicles were not optimized for performance or emissions on each fuel

6 Test Fuel Composition METHANE NO. METHANEETHANEPROPANEISO-BUTANEN-BUTANEISO-PENTANEN-PENTANE C 6 + C0 2 N 2 OXYGENTOTAL NET HEAT VALUE (BTU/CF) #2 High C 3 + CARB SPEC NG FUEL COMPOSITION Highlighted areas do not comply with CARB spec #1 High Inerts/C 3 + #3 High Ethane #4 Comm. Grade Min = Min = Max = 6.00 Max = 6.00 C 3 + Max = 3.00 Range = Max = 1.00

7 Comparable Emissions Avg 0.03 Avg 2.0 Avg 1.8 Avg 1.7 Avg 1.4 Avg 0.05 Avg 0.03 Avg 0.03 Avg 6.1 Avg 5.6 Avg 6.5 Avg 5.7

8 Comparable Emissions Avg 7.0 Avg 9.1 Avg 9.2 Avg 7.0 Avg 945 Avg 931 Avg 919 Avg 890 Avg 9.1 Avg 8.6 Avg 8.5 Avg 7.8 Avg 2.3 Avg 2.4 Avg 2.3 Avg 2.1

9 Case Study Kings Canyon USD CNG Station Meets CNG fueling needs of 3 school districts, 3 rural transits & UPS – 30 fleet vehicles totalMeets CNG fueling needs of 3 school districts, 3 rural transits & UPS – 30 fleet vehicles total Currently receives CARB exemption – ethane level regularly over CARB spec of 6% - ranges as high as 8%Currently receives CARB exemption – ethane level regularly over CARB spec of 6% - ranges as high as 8% Vehicles consistently running on higher BTU gas: ~1075 BTU/cfVehicles consistently running on higher BTU gas: ~1075 BTU/cf Kings Canyon buses (16 John Deere 8.1L – 1996 to 2002 MY) have run >500K miles with no major performance or maintenance problemsKings Canyon buses (16 John Deere 8.1L – 1996 to 2002 MY) have run >500K miles with no major performance or maintenance problems

10 Conclusions Number of vehicles affected by draft spec is smallNumber of vehicles affected by draft spec is small Previous experiences using MN-specs are positivePrevious experiences using MN-specs are positive HD vehicles belong to fleets and fuel at same location every day – any problems can be easily addressedHD vehicles belong to fleets and fuel at same location every day – any problems can be easily addressed Emissions tests demonstrate negligible changes in air quality with “richer” fuelsEmissions tests demonstrate negligible changes in air quality with “richer” fuels All new HD NGVs are capable of running on MN-73 or lower: LD & MD vehicle performance unaffectedAll new HD NGVs are capable of running on MN-73 or lower: LD & MD vehicle performance unaffected Move to MN-spec benefits NGV industry, end-users & producersMove to MN-spec benefits NGV industry, end-users & producers ARB should consider moving to statewide MN-73 spec as older engines are retiredARB should consider moving to statewide MN-73 spec as older engines are retired