New Extraction Methods for Urine and Fecal Samples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ra in Water using MnO2 Resin: New Developments
Advertisements

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Using Eichrom Resins to Simplify the Analyses for Gallium Content and Atom Percent Fission.
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Environmental Samples
Anomalous Behavior of TEVA Resin Prepacked Columns: A Technical Update Anil Thakkar November 1st 2004 Cincinnati, OH.
A NALYTICAL S EPARATIONS G ROUP Megan Bennett, Ashlee Crable, Sherry Faye, Narek Gharibyan, Julie Gostic, and Chris Klug Subgroup Leader: Ralf Sudowe.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS I. Solid Phase Extraction sorbent configurations – layered phases.
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples
New Applications of Rapid Column Extraction for Methods at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III Savannah River Site.
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
D. P. DiPrete, C. C. DiPrete, and R. A. Sigg
Technical Updates on UTEVA, TEVA and TRU Resins
Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS
© Copyright, West Valley Nuclear Services Company, LLC (2004) The views expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views.
Experiment 4 Observing Chemical Reactions Chemistry Department UCC1 st Year Practicals.
Rapid Separation Methods for Bioassay Samples S. L. Maxwell, III and D. J. Fauth Westinghouse Savannah River Site.
Acid – Base Review Problems
The Determination of 226 Ra in Water Samples Anil H. Thakkar Eichrom Technologies, Inc. eichrom TECHNOLOGIES INC.
The Determination Of 226 Ra In Soil Samples Lawrence D. Morris General Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Anil H. Thakkar Eichrom Technologies, Inc.
Chapters 4, and 5.  Solution:  Electrolyte:  Nonelectrolyte:
Determination of Sr-89/Sr-90 in primary cooling water
Chemical Calculations for Solutions (Ch 12) Dr. Harris Lecture 12 Suggested HW: Ch 12: 1, 10, 15, 21, 53, 67, 81.
Analysis of Actinide Elements from Large Samples Henrieta Dulaiova Guebuem Kim Bill Burnett Florida State University and E. Philip Horwitz PG Research.
Radioactive Materials Analytical Laboratory Eichrom Technologies Inc. User Group Meeting May 2001 J.M. Giaquinto, L.D. Bible, D.C. Glasgow, J.M. Keller.
Actinide Analysis from Large- Volume Seawater Samples Bill Burnett & Guebuem Kim Department of Oceanography Florida State University and Phil Horwitz PG.
Page A European Perspective on the Use of Eichrom Resins Dr Jon Martin BNFL.
Rapid Actinide Analysis for Large Soil Samples-Update Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
Lecture 7: Digestion of Samples Digestion of water samples with Kjeldhl method for determination of N Destruction and extraction of soil and sludge for.
00J ppt Rapid Extraction Methods for the Process Laboratory S. L. Maxwell, III V. D. Jones S. T. Nichols J. Satkowski M. A. Bernard Westinghouse.
Elution and Mounting Techniques for Americium using Eichrom TRU Resin Mitch Abbate Radiochemistry Technical Director Severn Trent Services St. Louis May.
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002 Determination of actinides in emergency preparedness using Diphonix or Actinide resin in combination with gamma spectrometry Ulrika.
General Engineering Laboratories Use of Eichrom Resins for Bioassay Pa-231 Bob Timm - GEL Tim Chandler - GEL Bill Burnett - FSU Mike Schultz - PerkinElmer.
Developments in Environmental Radiochemistry* Environmental Radioactivity Measurement Facility Department of Oceanography Florida State University Tallahassee,
Distribution of radionuclides in soils in surroundings of Bratislava, capital of the Slovak Republic. II. Man-made radionuclides Mátel Ľ., Rosskopfová.
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
Working Through Mistakes, Miscues, and Mishaps in Actinide Separations Shane Knockemus US EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL May 4, 2004.
Research performed at UNLV on the chemistry of Technetium in the nuclear fuel cycle 1. Separation U/Tc and synthesis of solids form 2. Synthesis and characterization.
Updates from Eichrom’s Tech Support Lab Anil Thakkar May 4 th 2004 Charleston, SC.
New Extraction Methods for Actinides in Urine at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS S. L. Maxwell, III, D. J. Fauth, R. C. Henderson, J. J. Smiley, S. R. Johnson Westinghouse.
Th, Pu & U Separation Using TEVA and UTEVA Resin
Recent Improvements in Rapid Column Separation Methods at SRS
Lab Session 9 This is a two-week experiment in which they will explore how to use chemical reactions to identify substances. How can we use chemical reactions.
EIChroM I N D U S T R I E S, I N C. Introduction of Eichrom TEVA Disc: Tc-99 Analysis Anil H. Thakkar, Lawrence Jassin, Michael Fern Eichrom Industries,
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
 Extraction of OM  Rock-Eval (Pyrolysis)  Elemental analysis  GC, HPLC & MS  SIRMS.
Welcome to the Presentation of Plasma Based HNO3 Manufacturing Plant.
Rapid actinide measurements in environmental samples Dr Phil Warwick Geosciences Advisory Unit Southampton Oceanography Centre.
Determination of 210 Pb in mineral waters using Eichrom Resin Alžbeta Ďurecová, Dagmar Bursová, František Ďurec, Daniela Borošová State Institute of Public.
New Fecal Method for Plutonium and Americium at SRS Sherrod L. Maxwell III and David Fauth Savannah River Site.
Optimizing Radiochemical Methods at SRS (Ni-63, I-129, Actinides) Sherrod L. Maxwell, III Westinghouse Savannah River Company.
One-Column Separation and Analysis of Isotopic Am and Pu in Soil Samples Nidal M. Jadalla, Eberline Services, Albuquerque, NM Anil Thakkar, Eichrom Technologies,
Pyrosulfate fusion vs. TEVA / TRU forcing the issue Shane Knockemus U.S. EPA / NAREL Montgomery, AL November 11, 2002.
Winter conference on plasma spectrochemistry Sarah BAGHDADI Ph. advisor: Pr. Gérard COTE UMR 7575 CNRS-ENSCP, Paris Scientific advisor:
An Improved Method for Determination of Ra-228 * Jamie Christoff & Bill Burnett Department of Oceanography Florida State University “The Double-Pass Approach”
Dr. Carola A Laue Heavy Element Nuclear and Radiochemistry Group,
Anil H.Thakkar Eichrom Industries, Inc.. Darien, IL
The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples
Strontium Extraction from Urine Samples
Molarity and Dilutions
Dnyanasadhana College, Thane. Department of Chemistry M. Sc
Ra in Water using MnO2 Resin: Update
Equations Review!.
Technical Updates on TRU and TEVA Resins
Technetium-99 in Urine Tabitha Liebrecht & Buzz Vickery
Rapid Emergency Methods for Actinides and Sr-89/90
Aqueous Solutions Pt. 2.
Particulate and Dissolved 210Po and 210Pb in Water Columns from the
Eichrom Resin Columns: A New breakthrough
remove 167 mL aliquot for Sr-90 spike with 1 mg stable Sr carrier
National Air and Radiation Environmental Lab
Presentation transcript:

New Extraction Methods for Urine and Fecal Samples Sherrod L. Maxwell David J. Fauth Savannah River Site

Bioassay Urine Methods Improve chemical recoveries, improve Th-228 removal reduce acid waste and labor costs/rework Replace anion exchange methods and use vacuum-enhanced extraction chromatography Pu (Np when Pu-236 tracer used) on TEVA resin Pu, Np, U, Am, Sr Single two cartridge TEVA/TRU column plus SR resin No iron in urine allows single stacked TEVA+TRU column Pu, Np on TEVA; U, Am on TRU cartridge in stacked column Sr collected, evaporated, redissolved, separated on SR resin column

Pu, Np/Am, U, Sr on TEVA/TRU Resin (Urine) 1) Adjust to 2.5MHN03 - 1M Al(NO3)3 2) 0.05M sulfamic acid + 0.2M ascorbic acid 3) 0.4 to 0.5M sodium nitrite Th Removal 3mL 9MHCI/30mL 8MHCI Rinse 15mL 3MHN03 Pu Elution 30mL 0.10MHC1 - 0.05MHF - 0.1M NH4l 4mls 0.02M H2SO4 + 3mls 16M HN03 2mL TEVA Resin (50-100 um) Evaporate 2nd TEVA Column Remove TRU cartridge: 1) Elute Am with 12mL 4M HCI 2) Elute U with 20mL 0.1M ammonium bioxalate 2.0mL TRU-Resin (50-100 um) Collect, evaporate, dissolve in 8M HNO3 SRS Resin

Pu on TEVA Resin (Urine or Fecal) (2nd Column to Remove all Th-228) Redissolve in 7.5mL 3M HN03 + 1mL 2.5M Al(NO3)3 Add 0.5mL 1.5M ferrous sulfate + 1mL 1.5M ascorbic acid Add 1mL 3.M sodium nitrite Add 1mL 16M nitric acid Th Removal 2mL 9MHCI/8mL 8MHCI Rinse 10mL 3MHN03 Pu Elution 15mL 0.10MHC1 - 0.05MHF - 0.1M NH4l 1mL TEVA Resin

TEVA Pu Tracer Recoveries 500 mL urine sample/ Pu-242 tracer = 1.25 dpm/One TEVA Column Fe+AA/+NO2 %Recovery % Recovery (CeF3 microprecipitation) (Electroplating*) 1) 110 1) 84.4 2) 93.3 2) 72.4 3) 92.6 3) 69.3 4) 95.2 4) 69.6 5) 101.5 5) 79.8 6) 99.3 6) 84.5 7) 97.7 7) 79.1 8) 115.4 8) 85.5 9) 107.9 9) 84.8 10) 106.8 10) 77.0 11) 101.6 11) 82.5 12) 102.6 Avg. = 102.0% Avg. = 79.0 *Add 4 mL 0.02M H2SO4 to enhance F removal during solution cleanup for plating

TEVA- Np-237, Pu-236 Recoveries 500 mL urine sample/Np-237 spike = 1.40 dpm/Pu-236 = 0.425 dpm SA+AA/+NO2/Single TEVA column (CeF3 microprecipitation) % Pu-236 % Np-237 Recovery Recovery 1) 94.0 *** 2) 92.5 *** 3) 101 *** 4) 100 *** 5) 111 *** 6) 91.0 88.1 7) 91.9 86.7 8) 105 102.9 9) 109 102 10) 88.9 94.2 Avg. = 98.4% Avg. = 94.8%

TRU Resin-Am Tracer Recoveries 500 mL urine sample/Am-243 tracer = 1.55 dpm/TRU cartridge after TEVA SA+AA/+NO2 /load TEVA and TRU at same time/remove TRU cart./elute Am % Am-243 Recovery (Electroplating*) 1) 93.2 2) 92.1 3) 107.4 4) 70.3 5) 102.4 6) 103.0 7) 100.2 8) 103.3 9) 102.6 10) 94.7 Avg. = 96.9%

TRU Resin-U Tracer Recoveries 500 mL urine sample/U-232 tracer = 0.554 dpm/TRU cartridge after TEVA SA+AA/+NO2 /load TEVA and TRU at same time/remove TRU cart./elute U % U-232 Recovery (Electroplating*) 1) 97.9 2) 74.1 3) 85.6 4) 102.9 5) 90.6 6) 83.1 7) 57.7 8) 81.0 9) 80.4 10) 93.3 Avg. = 84.7%

Accuracy on Spiked Urine Samples Pu-238 Pu-239 Am-241 Sr-90 Levels 0.145-4.95 0.022-3.62 0.55-3.5 dpm/L 5.4-188 dpm/L dpm/L dpm/L picoCi/L Number Samples N=12 N=12 N=7 N=6 Bias -14.7% +12.4% -3.4% -4.8% Blanks 0.016 (N=8) 0.012 (N=8) 0.007 (N=23) -0.05 (N=4) DOELAP criteria (Bias: -25% to +50%)

Accuracy on Spiked Urine Samples U-234 U-238 U-235 Levels 0.197-2.04 0.147-3.02 dpm/L dpm/L Number Samples N=4 N=4 Average Bias +7.8% +1.5% Blanks 0.008 (N=12) 0.012 (N=10) -0.001 (N=12) DOELAP criteria (Bias: -25% to +50%)

Need for Improved Fecal Analysis for Pu and Am at SRS Background SRS incident in FB-Line Need for improved fecal analysis Complete dissolution of any plutonium oxide present Effective Th-228 removal Problems with microwave vessels Corrected pressure release valve problems Completed FB-Line incident samples

New Approach Old method: New approach: Residual undissolved solids in final nitric acid solution Solids contained some activity New approach: Continue to use HNO3-HF dissolution/multiple digestion Apply diphonix resin technology Used successfully for large soil samples Allows loading from HCl-HF solutions Digest Diphonix using SRS microwave method Apply Eichrom sequential column method

Method Details Microwave digestion of Diphonix resin Microwave to 190C for 15 minutes in 10 mL 16M HNO3 Change disk & microwave to 200C for 20 minutes in 10 mL 16M HNO3 Change disk & microwave to 215C for 25 minutes in 10 mL 16M HNO3 Add 3.5 mL 30wt% H2O2 and microwave to 21OC for 10 minutes in 10 ml 16M HNO3 Final wet ashing of resin Ash with 30wt% H2O2 four times Ash with HNO3 + H2O2 one time, or until does not get any whiter

Method Details Preparation for Pu, Am column separation Dissolve in 6 mLs of 5M to 6M HNO3 Add 6 mLs 2 to 2.5M aluminum nitrate Solution ready for TEVA + TRU resin column extraction Valence adjustment for Pu 1) Add 1 mL 1.5M ferrous sulfate + 1 mL 1.5M ascorbic acid, wait 3 min. 2) Add 1 mL 3.5M sodium nitrite

Method Details Separate Pu using TEVA column Th removal 9M HCl+8M HCl Use 2nd 1 mL TEVA column to remove all Th-228 High retention/good clean-up Separate Am using TRU column Collect load plus rinse from 1st TEVA column Evaporate to dryness Redissolve in 15 mls 3 M HNO3 Add 2 mLs 1.5M sulfamic acid + 5 mls 1.5M ascorbic acid Load to TRU resin

Pu, Am on TEVA + TRU Resin (Fecal Method) Adjust to 2.5MHN03 -1M Al(NO3)3 1) 0.1M ferrous sulfate 2) 0.25M sodium nitrite Th Removal 3mL 9MHCI/30mL 8MHCI Rinse 15 to 20mL 3MHNO3 Pu Elution 30mL 0.10MHC1 - 0.05MHF - 0.1M NH4l 2mL TEVA Resin (50-100 um) 4mls 0.02 H2S04/3mLs 16MHN03 evaporate ash H2O2 1mL TEVA column to ensure complete Th-288 removal - evaporate - redissolve in 3M HNO3 - add sulfamic acid + ascorbic acid Am Elution 3mL 9MHCI/15mL -4M HCI Rinse 1) 5mL 2.5M HNO3-0.1M ascorbic acid 2) 5mL 3M HNO3 0.1M NaNO2 3) 10mL 3M HNO3 2ml TRU resin (50-100 um)

Pu on TEVA Resin (Urine or Fecal) (2nd Column to Remove all Th-228) Redissolve in 7.5mL 3M HN03 + 1mL 2.5M Al(NO3)3 Add 0.5mL 1.5M ferrous sulfate + 1mL 1.5M ascorbic acid Add 1mL 3.M sodium nitrite Add 1mL 16M nitric acid Th Removal 2mL 9MHCI/8mL 8MHCI Rinse 10mL 3MHN03 Pu Elution 15mL 0.10MHC1 - 0.05MHF - 0.1M NH4l 1mL TEVA Resin

TEVA+TRU Pu/Am Tracer Recoveries Fecal samples: 1.5-4 grams ash/Pu-242 spike = 1.26 dpm TEVA column+ 2nd 1 mL TEVA column %Pu-242 Recovery %Am-243 Recovery Fecal blank 1A 75.3 91.5 Fecal blank 1B 68.5 103.1 Fecal blank 2 72.1 81.5 Fecal blank 3 A 75.6 89.2 Fecal blank 3 B 79.3 95.8 Fecal blank 4 78.4 100.8 Avg. 74.9 93.7 Column Reagent blank 74.4 90.8 blank 82.8 89.8 Avg. 78.6 90.3

Method Validation Analysis of multiple sample blanks Complete dissolution High tracer recovery Good Th-228 removal Analysis of artificial fecal sample spiked with Pu oxide from RESL-Idaho Test plan to validate versus known Pu levels

Assay of of DOE-RESL Fecal Standards Pu-239 Am-241 (picocuries) % Bias (picocuries) %Bias DOE-RESL values 2.18 2.76 SR-194 #1 1.860 2.405 SR-194 #2 1.841 2.608 Avg. 1.850 -15.1% 2.507 -9.2% SR-234 #1 2.062 2.488 SR-234 #2 2.139 2.335 Avg. 2.101 -1.4% 2.411 -10.7%

Plutonium Results on Leached EML QAP Soil Samples Smp. Wt. Pu-242 Tracer Pu-238 Pu-239 Recovery (dpm/g) (dpm/g) 9403 EML Value -------- 0.672 0.216 9.957g 90% 0.664 0.200 10.100g 80% 0.663 0.223 14.980g 97% 0.632 0.211 Avg. 89% 0.653 (-2.8%) 0.211 (-2.4%)

Pu Results on Fused EML QAP Soil Samples Smp. Wt. Pu-242 Tracer Pu-238 Pu-239 Recovery (dpm/g) (dpm/g) 9609 EML Value -------- 0.068 1.31 10.00g 73% 0.080 1.47 10.00g 82% 0.047 1.43 10.00g 85% 0.053 1.41 10.00g 80% 0.063 1.39 Avg. 80% 0.061 (-10%) 1.42 (+11%)

Am Results on Fused EML QAP Soil Samples Smp. Wt. Am-243 Tracer Am-241 Recovery (dpm/g) 9609 EML Value -------- 0.81 10.00g 84% 0.94 10.00g 87% 0.83 10.00g 73% 0.95 Avg. 80% 0.90 (+11%)

Summary Urine Pu, Np and Am, U on two cartridge TEVA-TRU column with Sr-90 on SR resin after evaporation High recovery/good Th-228 removal Rapid column methods for urine will result in significant time/cost savings/waste reduction Fecal New fecal method dissolves Pu oxide using HNO3 -HF Diphonix method has improved fecal analysis at SRS total dissolution remove Pu, Am from HCl-HF sample solutions excellent Th-228 removal/good results on DOE-RESL samples