L AFAYETTE R EGIONAL S CHOOL New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) 2011-2012 Test Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Accountability Reports. Where Do I Find These Reports? Counselor Principal School Improvement Specialist System Testing Coordinator State.
Advertisements

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Assessing Math Concepts AMC Orange County Schools.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Building Level Benchmark Data This represents the percent of students who demonstrated the following proficiency levels on benchmark assessments. AP-Advanced.
Department of Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Kahle Charles, Director of Curriculum.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Brock’s Gap Intermediate School Hoover City Schools Testing- Spring 2014 Results / Analysis- Fall 2014.
M ANDARIN O AKS E LEMENTARY S CHOOL Florida Standards Assessments.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
St. Charles School District What is Title I? United States Federal Government’s largest education assistance program for schools. Title I,
Pam Stewart, Commissioner SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN [ DRAFT ] Memorial Elementary School 851 E HICKORY ST Arcadia, FL
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Teacher Evaluation Training June 30, 2014
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Setting Performance Standards for the Hawaii State Alternate Assessments: Reading, Mathematics, and Science Presentation for the Hawaii State Board of.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
Scenic Hills Elementary School 2014 Annual Title I Parent Meeting Presented by: Herronda Harley, Professional Learning Coach September 25, 2014.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
Freshman Parent Night Math & ELA September 17, 2015.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
What is a Title I? Title I is Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of This program provides financial assistance to states.
District/School Alignment Plan Proposal. Academic Goal 1: Plaucheville Elementary School will meet the Fundamental Practice Level or above in the.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
RI High School Diploma Requirements. Coursework Performance- Based Assessments State Assessment Performance assessments are real- life experiences that.
1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
Pike County Middle GA Milestones 2015
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Berry Middle School/Spain Park High School Hoover City Schools Testing- Spring 2014 Results / Analysis- Fall 2014.
NECAP Presentation Dunn’s Corners School Westerly, RI February 24, 2010.
How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.
Legislative Education Study Committee Dec. 17, 2015 K-3 P LUS E XTENDED S CHOOL Y EAR P ROGRAM The contents of this presentation were developed under a.
Curriculum Night Elementary. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Birmingham Falls Georgia Milestones
Augusta School Department School Board Presentation
What is MAP? There by, bringing about differentiated testing.
What is MAP? You may be familiar with paper and pencil assessments where all your child is asked the same questions and spend a fixed amount of time taking.
Joseph Brown Elementary
Understanding Results
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Standards-aligned IEPs
Anderson Elementary School
A Parent Information Presentation
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

L AFAYETTE R EGIONAL S CHOOL New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Test Results

NECAP SUMMARY Tests are designed to measure student performance on grade level expectations (GLE’s) as adopted by the four states, (NH, VT, RI, & ME) Tests are designed to measure the content and skills that students are expected to have as they begin the current enrolled grade

S UBJECT A REAS NECAP assesses the following elementary areas: Mathematics – grades 3,4,5,6 Reading – grades 3,4,5,6 Writing – grade 5 Science – grade 4

P ROFICIENCY L EVELS There are four proficiency levels: Proficient with Distinction Proficient Partially Proficient Substantially Below Proficient

P ROFICIENCY L EVELS First digit is the grade level Second and third digits are the numerical mean scaled score “40” is the “cut point” or lowest score for proficiency on all tests (340 would be the cut point for 3 rd grade proficiency, for ex.) Other “cut points” vary from grade to grade and level to level

3 RD G RADE S CORES ( MEAN SCALED SCORES ) Reading Lafayette-358 State-349 Mathematics Lafayette-353 State-347

4 TH G RADE S CORES ( MEAN SCALED SCORES ) Reading Lafayette State Mathematics Lafayette State

5 TH G RADE S CORES ( MEAN SCALED SCORES ) Reading Lafayette * State Mathematics Lafayette * State Writing Lafayette-553 State-541 * Indicates mean score equals “Proficient w/ Distinction” rating

6 TH G RADE S CORES ( MEAN SCALED SCORES ) Reading Lafayette State Math Lafayette State Writing Lafayette-543 State-543

7 TH G RADE S CORES ( MEAN SCALED SCORES ) Reading Lafayette State Mathematics Lafayette * 745 State Writing Lafayette- standardization year- no scores State- standardization year- no scores

E SSENTIAL Q UESTION …? What is the percentage of Lafayette students scoring at the “Proficient” or “Proficient w/ Distinction” levels?

S TUDENTS S CORING AT THE “P ROFICIENT ” OR “P ROFICIENT W / D ISTINCTION ” LEVELS Grade 3 Reading LRS avg. =9/9=100% State avg.== 81% Mathematics LRS avg. =8/9=89% State avg.= =76%

G RADE 3 – R EADING A CHIEVEMENT

G RADE 3 – M ATHEMATICS A CHIEVEMENT

S TUDENTS S CORING AT THE “P ROFICIENT ” OR “P ROFICIENT W / D ISTINCTION ” LEVELS Grade 4 Reading LRS avg. =13/14=93% State avg.==79% Mathematics LRS avg. = 12/14=86% State avg.==76%

G RADE 4 - R EADING A CHIEVEMENT

G RADE 4 – M ATHEMATICS A CHIEVEMENT

S TUDENTS S CORING AT THE “P ROFICIENT ” OR “P ROFICIENT W / D ISTINCTION ” LEVELS Grade 5 Reading LRS avg. = 22/22=100% State avg.=77% Mathematics LRS avg. = 19/22= 86% State avg. = 76% Writing LRS avg. = 19/22=86% State avg. ==55%

G RADE 5 – R EADING A CHIEVEMENT

G RADE 5 – M ATHEMATICS A CHIEVEMENT

G RADE 5 – W RITING A CHIEVEMENT

S TUDENTS S CORING AT THE “P ROFICIENT ” OR “P ROFICIENT W / D ISTINCTION ” LEVELS Grade 6 Reading LRS avg. =13/14=93% State avg. ==80% Mathematics LRS avg. =13/14= 93% State avg. == 72%

G RADE 6 – R EADING A CHIEVEMENT

G RADE 6 – M ATHEMATICS A CHIEVEMENT

S TUDENTS S CORING AT THE “P ROFICIENT ” OR “P ROFICIENT W / D ISTINCTION ” LEVELS Grade 7 Reading LRS avg. =12/12=100% State avg. ==77% Mathematics LRS avg. = 9/12=75% State avg. ==68%

G RADE 7 – R EADING A CHIEVEMENT

G RADE 7 – M ATHEMATICS A CHIEVEMENT

A NY Q UESTIONS ? Clearly, Lafayette Regional School’s academic program is in the exemplary category. Those students who are not receiving a “Proficient” or “Proficient w/ Distinction” are being targeted for extra help in a variety of ways. Differentiated instruction, remedial math tutoring, small group work, and home/school communications are some of the strategies used to help these students. Title I and Special Education services are also in place for some of these students.

S O W HY A RE O UR NECAP T EST S CORES H IGHER T HAN M ANY (M OST ) O THER S CHOOLS ? 1. Our students come to school, eager and ready to learn. Unfortunately, that is not always the case in many schools… 2. Our teachers are very veteran educators that strive to continually improve their instructional strategies. 3. Our entire staff works hard to enrich our students’ educational experience. 4. Our parents support their children and our school as teammates to further enhance student achievement.

A ND, SAU #35 schools worked together to align our curricula to the state standards We spend a significant amount of time on preparing our students for taking standardized tests and tests in general. Teachers use the NECAP Released Items from past years in their daily instruction to better prepare our students for the upcoming tests. We also use the Terra Nova standardized tests to practice test taking skills, chart progress in national percentiles, and overcome test-taking anxieties.

D OES T HAT M EAN, W E T EACH T O T HE T EST ? Simply put, YES, We Do! (No apologies!) And, here’s why: NECAP tests are based on state standards, also called “grade level expectations” (GLE’s) Our curricula are based on those standards Therefore, this assessment matches our instruction of the curricula!

T HANK YOU ! For being a part of the community who supports education in general and our students in particular. Without the community’s continued support we could not attain such high levels of student success and achievement. We will continue to work diligently towards challenging our students in a developmentally appropriate manner in both academics and social development.