Dr. Alex Anemone, Superintendent November 17, 2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP NJASK 3-8 RESULTS How are we doing compared to the standard? % Partially Proficient % Proficient % Advanced Proficient.

Advertisements

Review – April 29, * New way of reporting data about schools * Errors * DFG (District Factor Group) * Peer Grouping * Data Review.

Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.

Washington Township 2007 Test Scores Washington Township Administrative Team October 23, 2007.

Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.

Oak Park District Summer Programs November 13, 2012.

North Arlington Public Schools NJASK Data Presented by: Dennis Kenny, Nicole C. Russo, Elaine Jaume, Marie Griggs & Jennifer Rodriguez.

PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.

L AFAYETTE R EGIONAL S CHOOL New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Test Results.

CPW #27 Learning Intentions - Today, I am going to: 1. review my Winter 2014 MAP results. 2. identify my areas of strength and weakness in both Reading.

Fall 2014 MAP NWEA Score Comparison Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High School October 22, 2014.

Measures of Academic Progress An Introduction to the MAP® K – 12 Computer Adaptive Interim Assessment.

JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

Espanola Public School Back to School Administrative Meeting July 28, 2015, 8:00-5:00 PM Presented by: Myra L. Martinez Associate Superintendent The mission.

Academic State of the District A Presentation to the Board of Education October 21, 2010 Mr. Joseph C. Bond Superintendent of Schools Dr. Joan K. Lange.

A Primer on Growth Percentiles Elementary/Middle School Progress Reports January 29, 2010.

ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.

Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.

1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)

Benchmark Data. World History Average Score: 56% Alliance: 96%

CINNAMINSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011 TEST SCORE PRESENTATION.

LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 2006 SCORE REPORT: ITBS AND BENCHMARK NRT: National Reference Test given to grades K-9 = MC only = ITBS (Iowa Test of Basic.

Investing in Quality Dr. Jim Gamble Ms. Karin Laraway 2013/14 Budget Overview.

Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.

District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.

District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District October 18, 2012.

HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL Alex Anemone, Ed.D. October 6, 2014 NJ Testing Report Spring 2014.

 1. What is MAP?  2. Share how PCPS uses data from MAP to plan for instruction, track student progress, and provide formative feedback  3. Dr. David.

Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.

Star Rating Part 2 Growth, Graduation Rates and College and Career Readiness.

1 Performance Trend Data ELA and MATH Grades 3-8 Aggregate Results August 2012.

Clinton County Middle School Winter 2013 MAP Results.

Welcome to MMS MAP DATA INFO NIGHT 2015.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.

NJASK Comparison Scores to Essex Fells, J Districts, & Statewide (Slides 2-9) Tracking NJASK Scores for 3 rd, 4 th,& 5 th Grades (Slides ) Tracking.

2015 PSSA/Keystone Data and Information Monday, October 12, 2015 Presented by Dr. Tammy Stern.

Presented by: Andy McDermott Principal-Willow Elementary School Title I Annual Meeting.

Review of Special Education in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Findings and Recommendations Dr. Thomas Hehir Silvana and Christopher Pascucci Professor.

Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.

Special Education Plan Feedback Sessions. Agenda Welcome and Introductions Department of Student Services Purpose Why are we updating the Special Education.

Tanaina Elementary SBA Data Look May rd Grade SBA Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Far Below 91.9%

MAP TESTING MEASURES OF ACADEMIC PROGRESS DECEMBER 9, 2014.

1 Changes to NYS Grades 3 – 8 Assessments. In 2010, NYS Raised the Bar for Proficiency ELA Level 2Level 3 Grade

A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.

MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.

Chronic Absence in Oregon Attendance Works The Children’s Institute The Chalkboard Project ECONorthwest.

MAP and Common Assessment Results January 22, 2015.

Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.

Mount Olive Township Public Schools PARCC Results.

Montgomery Township School District Student Achievement Review Damian Pappa Director of Data, Assessment & Accountability October 13, 2015.

Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Measures of Academic Progress

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools

Hartford Jt. 1 School District

PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.

Measuring College and Career Readiness

ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Data Overview Sandtown Middle School

Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October 2014.

Glen Ridge District Testing Report

Assessment Report Board of Education 2014

Reeds Road School Performance Report

Donovan Elementary MCAS

Smithville School Performance Report

Measuring College and Career Readiness

District Assessment Report

Presentation transcript:

Dr. Alex Anemone, Superintendent November 17, 2014

 Testing dates: October 6-24, 2014  Grade 2: Math and Reading  Grades 3-8: Math, Reading, and Language Usage  MAP is completed online and has predictive value.  Approximately questions per subject.  RIT is the equal interval score unit.

Part. Prof. Predicted Part. Prof. Actual Proficient Predicted Proficient Actual Adv. Prof. Predicted Adv. Prof. Actual Math18.7%11.2%50.2%35.4%31.0%53.4% ELA18.0%13.6%64.4%68.0%17.6%18.4%

MAP for Prim. Grades Low 1- 20%ile LoAvg %ile Avg %ile HiAvg %ile High %ile HTS Mean RIT National Mean RIT Math0 (0%)2 (6%)4 (12%)6 (18%)21(64%) Reading0 (0%)2 (6%)5 (15%)7 (21%)19 (58%)

MAPLow 1- 20%ile LoAvg %ile Avg %ile HiAvg %ile High %ile HTS Mean RIT National Mean RIT Math0 (0%)2 (8%)3 (12%)11 (42%)10 (38%) Reading0 (0%) 3 (12%)4 (15%)19 (73%) Lang. Usage 0 (0%) 3 (12%)7 (27%)16 (62%)

MAPLow 1- 20%ile LoAvg %ile Avg %ile HiAvg %ile High %ile HTS Mean RIT National Mean RIT Math3 (7%)4 (10%)11 (27%)10 (24%)13 (32%) Reading2 (5%)1 (2%)9 (22%)15 (37%)14 (34%) Lang. Usage 3 (8%)1 (3%)6 (15%)14 (35%)16 (40%)

MAPLow 1- 20%ile LoAvg %ile Avg %ile HiAvg %ile High %ile HTS Mean RIT National Mean RIT Math1 (3%)3 (8%)5 (13%)10 (26%)20 (51%) Reading2 (5%)1 (3%)5 (13%)13 (33%)18 (46%) Lang. Usage 1 (3%)2 (5%)4 (10%)13 (33%)19 (49%)

MAPLow 1- 20%ile LoAvg %ile Avg %ile HiAvg %ile High %ile HTS Mean RIT National Mean RIT Math3 (9%)5 (15%)3 (9%)16 (47%)7 (21%) Reading1 (3%)5 (15%)3 (9%)11 (32%)14 (41%) Lang. Usage 2 (6%)3 (9%)5 (15%)7 (21%)17 (50%)

MAPLow 1- 20%ile LoAvg %ile Avg %ile HiAvg %ile High %ile HTS Mean RIT National Mean RIT Math4 (19%)3 (14%)5 (24%) 4 (19%) Reading3 (14%)4 (19%) 5 (24%) Lang. Usage 3 (14%)2 (10%)4(19%)5 (24%)7 (33%)

MAPLow 1- 20%ile LoAvg %ile Avg %ile HiAvg %ile High %ile HTS Mean RIT National Mean RIT Math6 (19%)1 (3%)10 (31%)5 (16%)10 (31%) Reading6 (19%)0 (0%)7 (22%)9 (28%)10 (31%) Lang. Usage 2 (6%)4 (13%)5 (16%)10 (31%)11 (34%)

HTS Math RITNational Math RIT Difference RIT Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade

HTS Reading RITNational Reading RIT Difference RIT Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade

HTS Language Usage RIT National Lang. Usage RIT Difference RIT Grade 2N/A Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade

 Share data with staff.  Differentiate – enrichment and remediation.  Continue to track growth and examine gaps that may exist.  Align professional development activities as appropriate.

 HTS Class of 2014: 6 transfers ( grade 8)  HTS Class of 2015: 8 transfers ( grade 7)  HTS Class of 2016: 3 transfers ( grade 6)  HTS Class of 2017: 6 transfers ( grade 5)

ELAMath Advanced Proficient2 students (8.7%)11 students (47.8%) Proficient19 students (82.6%)11 students (47.8%) Partially Proficient2 students (8.7%)1 student (4.3%)

 District Factor Groupings measure and compare entire communities, not schools.  With inclusion of the transfer students and assuming their scores remained constant, 2014 NJASK Grades 5-8 passing rate (advanced proficient + proficient) in ELA would have increased by 1.0% and the passing rate in math would have increased by 1.3%

 “Aid in Lieu” payments ($884 per child/per school year) are made to families that send their children to private schools and do not get bussed to that particular school.  The AIL data does not include students who are bussed to private schools school year – 70 students are bussed to private schools  The data does seem to indicate that Harding serves a significantly lower percentage of the total student population than our peer districts. Again, DFGs represent communities, not schools.

DistrictTotalPublic SchoolsAid in Lieu Harding (DFG J) (74.2%)137 (25.8%) Millburn (J)5,1624,881 (94.6%)281 (5.4%) Chatham (J)4,3834,206 (96.0%)177 (4.0%) Mt. Lakes (J)1,5981,560 (97.6%)38 (2.4%) Ridgewood (J)~5,8255,725 (98.3%)<100 (1.7%) Mendham T. (J)~1054~1039 (98.6%)15 (1.4%) Mendham B. (J)~866~842 (97.2%)24 (2.8%) Up. Saddle R. (J)~1,901~1,839 (96.7)62 (3.3%) Hanover Twp. (I)~2,100~2,044 (97.3%)56 (2.7%) Madison (I)2,7022,574 (95.3%)128 (4.7%)